A T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) method in BALB/c mice based on a cytometric bead array
Most current methods to assess T-cell-dependent antibody responses (TDAR) are semi-quantitative and based on measures of antibody titer generated against a standard antigen like keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The precision, sensitivity, and convenience of TDAR assays might be improved by applying...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of immunotoxicology 2022-12, Vol.19 (1), p.34-40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 40 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 34 |
container_title | Journal of immunotoxicology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Zhong, Wenhua Chang, Penghuan Gan, Lianfang Zhong, Lifan Yang, Zhaoxin |
description | Most current methods to assess T-cell-dependent antibody responses (TDAR) are semi-quantitative and based on measures of antibody titer generated against a standard antigen like keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The precision, sensitivity, and convenience of TDAR assays might be improved by applying rapid, sensitive, specific cytometric bead assays (CBA). In the study here, KLH antigen was covalently coupled onto the surface of cytometric beads using immune microsphere technology, and IgM antibody capture spheres were prepared for use in pretreatment processing of samples. The working parameters associated with this novel TDAR-CBA system were optimized in orthogonal experiments. The optimal concentration of the KLH coating solution in this system was 160 μg/ml, that of the anti-KLH IgG capture spheres 6.0 × 10
5
/ml, and the optimal dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Affini-Pure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) was 60 μg/ml. Repeated tests indicated that this approach yielded good linearity (r
2
= 0.9937) method, with a within-run precision of 3.1-4.9%, and a between-run precision of 4.4-4.9%. This new approach had a limit of detection of 113.43 ng/ml (linear range = 390.63-50 000), and an interference rate of just 0.04-3.51%. Based on these findings, it seems that a new mouse TDAR assay based on CBA can be developed that would appear to be more sensitive, accurate, and precise than the current TDAR assay approaches based on traditional ELISA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/1547691X.2022.2067273 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2656742817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_99985032ec964490bb268ea4e73f896b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2742863011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-9ba2c90e1d9864f5a0b08409a43f43ebcf37ee4b20a7563eee36b52e106b68563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhSMEog_4CSBLbNpFWr9ixzum5VVpJCQ0SN1ZftyAR0k82Bmh_HscZjoLFmxs69zvHvv6VNUbgm8IbvEtabgUijzeUExpWYSkkj2rzhe9FgqT56czeTyrLnLeYkwVYfhldcZKQTLJzyu7QpvaQd_XHnYwehgnZMYp2OhnlCDv4pgBXW0-rL5dowGmn9GjMKK71fru1qEhOEDWZPAojsggN0-xQCk4ZMF4ZFIy86vqRWf6DK-P-2X1_dPHzf2Xev3188P9al07hjGrlTXUKQzEq1bwrjHY4pZjZTjrOAPrOiYBuKXYyEYwAGDCNhQIFla0RbmsHg6-Ppqt3qUwmDTraIL-K8T0Q5s0BdeDVkq1DWYUnBKcK2wtFS0YDpJ1rRK2eF0dvHYp_tpDnvQQ8vJNZoS4z5qKRkhOWyIL-u4fdBv3aSyTaroggmFCCtUcKJdizgm60wMJ1kug-ilQvQSqj4GWvrdH970dwJ-6nhIswPsDEMYupsH8jqn3ejJzH1OXzOhC1uz_d_wBNLCrzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2742863011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) method in BALB/c mice based on a cytometric bead array</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Zhong, Wenhua ; Chang, Penghuan ; Gan, Lianfang ; Zhong, Lifan ; Yang, Zhaoxin</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Wenhua ; Chang, Penghuan ; Gan, Lianfang ; Zhong, Lifan ; Yang, Zhaoxin</creatorcontrib><description>Most current methods to assess T-cell-dependent antibody responses (TDAR) are semi-quantitative and based on measures of antibody titer generated against a standard antigen like keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The precision, sensitivity, and convenience of TDAR assays might be improved by applying rapid, sensitive, specific cytometric bead assays (CBA). In the study here, KLH antigen was covalently coupled onto the surface of cytometric beads using immune microsphere technology, and IgM antibody capture spheres were prepared for use in pretreatment processing of samples. The working parameters associated with this novel TDAR-CBA system were optimized in orthogonal experiments. The optimal concentration of the KLH coating solution in this system was 160 μg/ml, that of the anti-KLH IgG capture spheres 6.0 × 10
5
/ml, and the optimal dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Affini-Pure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) was 60 μg/ml. Repeated tests indicated that this approach yielded good linearity (r
2
= 0.9937) method, with a within-run precision of 3.1-4.9%, and a between-run precision of 4.4-4.9%. This new approach had a limit of detection of 113.43 ng/ml (linear range = 390.63-50 000), and an interference rate of just 0.04-3.51%. Based on these findings, it seems that a new mouse TDAR assay based on CBA can be developed that would appear to be more sensitive, accurate, and precise than the current TDAR assay approaches based on traditional ELISA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-691X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-6901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/1547691X.2022.2067273</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35477374</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies ; Antibody Formation ; Antibody response ; Antigens ; bead array ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Fluorescein isothiocyanate ; Immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulin M ; Keyhole limpet hemocyanin ; Lymphocytes T ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; qualitative analysis ; T-cell-dependent antibody response ; T-Lymphocytes</subject><ispartof>Journal of immunotoxicology, 2022-12, Vol.19 (1), p.34-40</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-9ba2c90e1d9864f5a0b08409a43f43ebcf37ee4b20a7563eee36b52e106b68563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1547691X.2022.2067273$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1547691X.2022.2067273$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2095,27481,27903,27904,59119,59120</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35477374$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Wenhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Penghuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Lianfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Lifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhaoxin</creatorcontrib><title>A T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) method in BALB/c mice based on a cytometric bead array</title><title>Journal of immunotoxicology</title><addtitle>J Immunotoxicol</addtitle><description>Most current methods to assess T-cell-dependent antibody responses (TDAR) are semi-quantitative and based on measures of antibody titer generated against a standard antigen like keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The precision, sensitivity, and convenience of TDAR assays might be improved by applying rapid, sensitive, specific cytometric bead assays (CBA). In the study here, KLH antigen was covalently coupled onto the surface of cytometric beads using immune microsphere technology, and IgM antibody capture spheres were prepared for use in pretreatment processing of samples. The working parameters associated with this novel TDAR-CBA system were optimized in orthogonal experiments. The optimal concentration of the KLH coating solution in this system was 160 μg/ml, that of the anti-KLH IgG capture spheres 6.0 × 10
5
/ml, and the optimal dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Affini-Pure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) was 60 μg/ml. Repeated tests indicated that this approach yielded good linearity (r
2
= 0.9937) method, with a within-run precision of 3.1-4.9%, and a between-run precision of 4.4-4.9%. This new approach had a limit of detection of 113.43 ng/ml (linear range = 390.63-50 000), and an interference rate of just 0.04-3.51%. Based on these findings, it seems that a new mouse TDAR assay based on CBA can be developed that would appear to be more sensitive, accurate, and precise than the current TDAR assay approaches based on traditional ELISA.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibody Formation</subject><subject>Antibody response</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>bead array</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Fluorescein isothiocyanate</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M</subject><subject>Keyhole limpet hemocyanin</subject><subject>Lymphocytes T</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>qualitative analysis</subject><subject>T-cell-dependent antibody response</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes</subject><issn>1547-691X</issn><issn>1547-6901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhSMEog_4CSBLbNpFWr9ixzum5VVpJCQ0SN1ZftyAR0k82Bmh_HscZjoLFmxs69zvHvv6VNUbgm8IbvEtabgUijzeUExpWYSkkj2rzhe9FgqT56czeTyrLnLeYkwVYfhldcZKQTLJzyu7QpvaQd_XHnYwehgnZMYp2OhnlCDv4pgBXW0-rL5dowGmn9GjMKK71fru1qEhOEDWZPAojsggN0-xQCk4ZMF4ZFIy86vqRWf6DK-P-2X1_dPHzf2Xev3188P9al07hjGrlTXUKQzEq1bwrjHY4pZjZTjrOAPrOiYBuKXYyEYwAGDCNhQIFla0RbmsHg6-Ppqt3qUwmDTraIL-K8T0Q5s0BdeDVkq1DWYUnBKcK2wtFS0YDpJ1rRK2eF0dvHYp_tpDnvQQ8vJNZoS4z5qKRkhOWyIL-u4fdBv3aSyTaroggmFCCtUcKJdizgm60wMJ1kug-ilQvQSqj4GWvrdH970dwJ-6nhIswPsDEMYupsH8jqn3ejJzH1OXzOhC1uz_d_wBNLCrzA</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Zhong, Wenhua</creator><creator>Chang, Penghuan</creator><creator>Gan, Lianfang</creator><creator>Zhong, Lifan</creator><creator>Yang, Zhaoxin</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>A T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) method in BALB/c mice based on a cytometric bead array</title><author>Zhong, Wenhua ; Chang, Penghuan ; Gan, Lianfang ; Zhong, Lifan ; Yang, Zhaoxin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-9ba2c90e1d9864f5a0b08409a43f43ebcf37ee4b20a7563eee36b52e106b68563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibody Formation</topic><topic>Antibody response</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>bead array</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Fluorescein isothiocyanate</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M</topic><topic>Keyhole limpet hemocyanin</topic><topic>Lymphocytes T</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>qualitative analysis</topic><topic>T-cell-dependent antibody response</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Wenhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Penghuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Lianfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Lifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhaoxin</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of immunotoxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhong, Wenhua</au><au>Chang, Penghuan</au><au>Gan, Lianfang</au><au>Zhong, Lifan</au><au>Yang, Zhaoxin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) method in BALB/c mice based on a cytometric bead array</atitle><jtitle>Journal of immunotoxicology</jtitle><addtitle>J Immunotoxicol</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>34-40</pages><issn>1547-691X</issn><eissn>1547-6901</eissn><abstract>Most current methods to assess T-cell-dependent antibody responses (TDAR) are semi-quantitative and based on measures of antibody titer generated against a standard antigen like keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The precision, sensitivity, and convenience of TDAR assays might be improved by applying rapid, sensitive, specific cytometric bead assays (CBA). In the study here, KLH antigen was covalently coupled onto the surface of cytometric beads using immune microsphere technology, and IgM antibody capture spheres were prepared for use in pretreatment processing of samples. The working parameters associated with this novel TDAR-CBA system were optimized in orthogonal experiments. The optimal concentration of the KLH coating solution in this system was 160 μg/ml, that of the anti-KLH IgG capture spheres 6.0 × 10
5
/ml, and the optimal dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Affini-Pure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) was 60 μg/ml. Repeated tests indicated that this approach yielded good linearity (r
2
= 0.9937) method, with a within-run precision of 3.1-4.9%, and a between-run precision of 4.4-4.9%. This new approach had a limit of detection of 113.43 ng/ml (linear range = 390.63-50 000), and an interference rate of just 0.04-3.51%. Based on these findings, it seems that a new mouse TDAR assay based on CBA can be developed that would appear to be more sensitive, accurate, and precise than the current TDAR assay approaches based on traditional ELISA.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>35477374</pmid><doi>10.1080/1547691X.2022.2067273</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1547-691X |
ispartof | Journal of immunotoxicology, 2022-12, Vol.19 (1), p.34-40 |
issn | 1547-691X 1547-6901 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2656742817 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Animals Antibodies Antibody Formation Antibody response Antigens bead array Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Fluorescein isothiocyanate Immunoglobulin G Immunoglobulin M Keyhole limpet hemocyanin Lymphocytes T Mice Mice, Inbred BALB C qualitative analysis T-cell-dependent antibody response T-Lymphocytes |
title | A T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) method in BALB/c mice based on a cytometric bead array |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T18%3A03%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20T-cell-dependent%20antibody%20response%20(TDAR)%20method%20in%20BALB/c%20mice%20based%20on%20a%20cytometric%20bead%20array&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20immunotoxicology&rft.au=Zhong,%20Wenhua&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=34-40&rft.issn=1547-691X&rft.eissn=1547-6901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/1547691X.2022.2067273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2742863011%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2742863011&rft_id=info:pmid/35477374&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_99985032ec964490bb268ea4e73f896b&rfr_iscdi=true |