Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review
Context Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical education 2022-10, Vol.56 (10), p.972-982 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 982 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 972 |
container_title | Medical education |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Orlik, Witold Aleo, Giuseppe Kearns, Thomas Briody, Jonathan Wray, Jane Mahon, Paul Gazić, Mario Radoš, Normela García Vivar, Cristina Lillo Crespo, Manuel Fitzgerald, Catherine |
description | Context
Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD.
Methods
This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021.
Results
Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70); half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38) and healthcare professionals' knowledge gain (n = 19).
Conclusions
There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes.
In view of the rising costs of healthcare globally, Witold et al. demonstrate an urgent need for stronger economic evaluations of CPD programmes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/medu.14813 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2654296707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2654296707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-d360d65397e89da2394139265f0bcf40866e4dde93de0c0484109ddf0d0a622d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2qFYSPS38AstQLqrQw_ljvujcUQlsJ1B7gbBl7Fow2cWrvBuXf1yGBAwfmMtI7jx6NXkK-MjhjZc7n6MczJlsmPpEJE6quuObiM5mAgLYCxmCfHOT8BABNLds9si9qWZdYTcjtzMVFnAdHcWX70Q4hLmjs6PTvJbVuCKswBMy0i4k-ou2HR2cT0mWKHeZcWNvnH_SCZheXYfFAE64CPh-RL1054PFuH5K7q9nt9Fd1_efn7-nFdeWEFqLyQoFXtdANttpbLrRkQnNVd3DvOgmtUii9Ry08ggPZSgba-w48WMW5F4fkdOst__wbMQ9mHrLDvrcLjGM2RSW5Vg00Bf32Dn2KY9q8b3jDuJJtXbNCfd9SLsWcE3ZmmcLcprVhYDZdm03X5qXrAp_slON9id_Q13ILwLbAc-hx_YHK3Mwu77bS_8RniBU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2712648551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Orlik, Witold ; Aleo, Giuseppe ; Kearns, Thomas ; Briody, Jonathan ; Wray, Jane ; Mahon, Paul ; Gazić, Mario ; Radoš, Normela ; García Vivar, Cristina ; Lillo Crespo, Manuel ; Fitzgerald, Catherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Orlik, Witold ; Aleo, Giuseppe ; Kearns, Thomas ; Briody, Jonathan ; Wray, Jane ; Mahon, Paul ; Gazić, Mario ; Radoš, Normela ; García Vivar, Cristina ; Lillo Crespo, Manuel ; Fitzgerald, Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>Context
Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD.
Methods
This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021.
Results
Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70); half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38) and healthcare professionals' knowledge gain (n = 19).
Conclusions
There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes.
In view of the rising costs of healthcare globally, Witold et al. demonstrate an urgent need for stronger economic evaluations of CPD programmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/medu.14813</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35451106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cost benefit analysis ; Educational administration ; Medical education ; Patient-centered care ; Professional development</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2022-10, Vol.56 (10), p.972-982</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-d360d65397e89da2394139265f0bcf40866e4dde93de0c0484109ddf0d0a622d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-d360d65397e89da2394139265f0bcf40866e4dde93de0c0484109ddf0d0a622d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6022-559X ; 0000-0002-1306-3364 ; 0000-0002-9405-5357</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmedu.14813$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmedu.14813$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451106$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orlik, Witold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briody, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wray, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahon, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazić, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radoš, Normela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Vivar, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillo Crespo, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Context
Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD.
Methods
This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021.
Results
Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70); half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38) and healthcare professionals' knowledge gain (n = 19).
Conclusions
There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes.
In view of the rising costs of healthcare globally, Witold et al. demonstrate an urgent need for stronger economic evaluations of CPD programmes.</description><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Educational administration</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2qFYSPS38AstQLqrQw_ljvujcUQlsJ1B7gbBl7Fow2cWrvBuXf1yGBAwfmMtI7jx6NXkK-MjhjZc7n6MczJlsmPpEJE6quuObiM5mAgLYCxmCfHOT8BABNLds9si9qWZdYTcjtzMVFnAdHcWX70Q4hLmjs6PTvJbVuCKswBMy0i4k-ou2HR2cT0mWKHeZcWNvnH_SCZheXYfFAE64CPh-RL1054PFuH5K7q9nt9Fd1_efn7-nFdeWEFqLyQoFXtdANttpbLrRkQnNVd3DvOgmtUii9Ry08ggPZSgba-w48WMW5F4fkdOst__wbMQ9mHrLDvrcLjGM2RSW5Vg00Bf32Dn2KY9q8b3jDuJJtXbNCfd9SLsWcE3ZmmcLcprVhYDZdm03X5qXrAp_slON9id_Q13ILwLbAc-hx_YHK3Mwu77bS_8RniBU</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Orlik, Witold</creator><creator>Aleo, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Kearns, Thomas</creator><creator>Briody, Jonathan</creator><creator>Wray, Jane</creator><creator>Mahon, Paul</creator><creator>Gazić, Mario</creator><creator>Radoš, Normela</creator><creator>García Vivar, Cristina</creator><creator>Lillo Crespo, Manuel</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, Catherine</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-559X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-3364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-5357</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review</title><author>Orlik, Witold ; Aleo, Giuseppe ; Kearns, Thomas ; Briody, Jonathan ; Wray, Jane ; Mahon, Paul ; Gazić, Mario ; Radoš, Normela ; García Vivar, Cristina ; Lillo Crespo, Manuel ; Fitzgerald, Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-d360d65397e89da2394139265f0bcf40866e4dde93de0c0484109ddf0d0a622d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Educational administration</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orlik, Witold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briody, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wray, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahon, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazić, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radoš, Normela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Vivar, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillo Crespo, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orlik, Witold</au><au>Aleo, Giuseppe</au><au>Kearns, Thomas</au><au>Briody, Jonathan</au><au>Wray, Jane</au><au>Mahon, Paul</au><au>Gazić, Mario</au><au>Radoš, Normela</au><au>García Vivar, Cristina</au><au>Lillo Crespo, Manuel</au><au>Fitzgerald, Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>972</spage><epage>982</epage><pages>972-982</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Context
Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD.
Methods
This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021.
Results
Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70); half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38) and healthcare professionals' knowledge gain (n = 19).
Conclusions
There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes.
In view of the rising costs of healthcare globally, Witold et al. demonstrate an urgent need for stronger economic evaluations of CPD programmes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35451106</pmid><doi>10.1111/medu.14813</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-559X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-3364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-5357</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-0110 |
ispartof | Medical education, 2022-10, Vol.56 (10), p.972-982 |
issn | 0308-0110 1365-2923 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2654296707 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Cost benefit analysis Educational administration Medical education Patient-centered care Professional development |
title | Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A40%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20evaluation%20of%20CPD%20activities%20for%20healthcare%20professionals:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Orlik,%20Witold&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=972&rft.epage=982&rft.pages=972-982&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/medu.14813&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2654296707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2712648551&rft_id=info:pmid/35451106&rfr_iscdi=true |