Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review

Context Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical education 2022-10, Vol.56 (10), p.972-982
Hauptverfasser: Orlik, Witold, Aleo, Giuseppe, Kearns, Thomas, Briody, Jonathan, Wray, Jane, Mahon, Paul, Gazić, Mario, Radoš, Normela, García Vivar, Cristina, Lillo Crespo, Manuel, Fitzgerald, Catherine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 982
container_issue 10
container_start_page 972
container_title Medical education
container_volume 56
creator Orlik, Witold
Aleo, Giuseppe
Kearns, Thomas
Briody, Jonathan
Wray, Jane
Mahon, Paul
Gazić, Mario
Radoš, Normela
García Vivar, Cristina
Lillo Crespo, Manuel
Fitzgerald, Catherine
description Context Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD. Methods This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021. Results Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70); half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38) and healthcare professionals' knowledge gain (n = 19). Conclusions There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes. In view of the rising costs of healthcare globally, Witold et al. demonstrate an urgent need for stronger economic evaluations of CPD programmes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/medu.14813
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2654296707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2654296707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-d360d65397e89da2394139265f0bcf40866e4dde93de0c0484109ddf0d0a622d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2qFYSPS38AstQLqrQw_ljvujcUQlsJ1B7gbBl7Fow2cWrvBuXf1yGBAwfmMtI7jx6NXkK-MjhjZc7n6MczJlsmPpEJE6quuObiM5mAgLYCxmCfHOT8BABNLds9si9qWZdYTcjtzMVFnAdHcWX70Q4hLmjs6PTvJbVuCKswBMy0i4k-ou2HR2cT0mWKHeZcWNvnH_SCZheXYfFAE64CPh-RL1054PFuH5K7q9nt9Fd1_efn7-nFdeWEFqLyQoFXtdANttpbLrRkQnNVd3DvOgmtUii9Ry08ggPZSgba-w48WMW5F4fkdOst__wbMQ9mHrLDvrcLjGM2RSW5Vg00Bf32Dn2KY9q8b3jDuJJtXbNCfd9SLsWcE3ZmmcLcprVhYDZdm03X5qXrAp_slON9id_Q13ILwLbAc-hx_YHK3Mwu77bS_8RniBU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2712648551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Orlik, Witold ; Aleo, Giuseppe ; Kearns, Thomas ; Briody, Jonathan ; Wray, Jane ; Mahon, Paul ; Gazić, Mario ; Radoš, Normela ; García Vivar, Cristina ; Lillo Crespo, Manuel ; Fitzgerald, Catherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Orlik, Witold ; Aleo, Giuseppe ; Kearns, Thomas ; Briody, Jonathan ; Wray, Jane ; Mahon, Paul ; Gazić, Mario ; Radoš, Normela ; García Vivar, Cristina ; Lillo Crespo, Manuel ; Fitzgerald, Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>Context Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD. Methods This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021. Results Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70); half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38) and healthcare professionals' knowledge gain (n = 19). Conclusions There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes. In view of the rising costs of healthcare globally, Witold et al. demonstrate an urgent need for stronger economic evaluations of CPD programmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/medu.14813</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35451106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cost benefit analysis ; Educational administration ; Medical education ; Patient-centered care ; Professional development</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2022-10, Vol.56 (10), p.972-982</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-d360d65397e89da2394139265f0bcf40866e4dde93de0c0484109ddf0d0a622d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-d360d65397e89da2394139265f0bcf40866e4dde93de0c0484109ddf0d0a622d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6022-559X ; 0000-0002-1306-3364 ; 0000-0002-9405-5357</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmedu.14813$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmedu.14813$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451106$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orlik, Witold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briody, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wray, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahon, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazić, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radoš, Normela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Vivar, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillo Crespo, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Context Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD. Methods This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021. Results Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70); half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38) and healthcare professionals' knowledge gain (n = 19). Conclusions There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes. In view of the rising costs of healthcare globally, Witold et al. demonstrate an urgent need for stronger economic evaluations of CPD programmes.</description><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Educational administration</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2qFYSPS38AstQLqrQw_ljvujcUQlsJ1B7gbBl7Fow2cWrvBuXf1yGBAwfmMtI7jx6NXkK-MjhjZc7n6MczJlsmPpEJE6quuObiM5mAgLYCxmCfHOT8BABNLds9si9qWZdYTcjtzMVFnAdHcWX70Q4hLmjs6PTvJbVuCKswBMy0i4k-ou2HR2cT0mWKHeZcWNvnH_SCZheXYfFAE64CPh-RL1054PFuH5K7q9nt9Fd1_efn7-nFdeWEFqLyQoFXtdANttpbLrRkQnNVd3DvOgmtUii9Ry08ggPZSgba-w48WMW5F4fkdOst__wbMQ9mHrLDvrcLjGM2RSW5Vg00Bf32Dn2KY9q8b3jDuJJtXbNCfd9SLsWcE3ZmmcLcprVhYDZdm03X5qXrAp_slON9id_Q13ILwLbAc-hx_YHK3Mwu77bS_8RniBU</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Orlik, Witold</creator><creator>Aleo, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Kearns, Thomas</creator><creator>Briody, Jonathan</creator><creator>Wray, Jane</creator><creator>Mahon, Paul</creator><creator>Gazić, Mario</creator><creator>Radoš, Normela</creator><creator>García Vivar, Cristina</creator><creator>Lillo Crespo, Manuel</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, Catherine</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-559X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-3364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-5357</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review</title><author>Orlik, Witold ; Aleo, Giuseppe ; Kearns, Thomas ; Briody, Jonathan ; Wray, Jane ; Mahon, Paul ; Gazić, Mario ; Radoš, Normela ; García Vivar, Cristina ; Lillo Crespo, Manuel ; Fitzgerald, Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-d360d65397e89da2394139265f0bcf40866e4dde93de0c0484109ddf0d0a622d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Educational administration</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orlik, Witold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briody, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wray, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahon, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazić, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radoš, Normela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Vivar, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillo Crespo, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orlik, Witold</au><au>Aleo, Giuseppe</au><au>Kearns, Thomas</au><au>Briody, Jonathan</au><au>Wray, Jane</au><au>Mahon, Paul</au><au>Gazić, Mario</au><au>Radoš, Normela</au><au>García Vivar, Cristina</au><au>Lillo Crespo, Manuel</au><au>Fitzgerald, Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>972</spage><epage>982</epage><pages>972-982</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Context Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD. Methods This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021. Results Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70); half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38) and healthcare professionals' knowledge gain (n = 19). Conclusions There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes. In view of the rising costs of healthcare globally, Witold et al. demonstrate an urgent need for stronger economic evaluations of CPD programmes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35451106</pmid><doi>10.1111/medu.14813</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-559X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-3364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-5357</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-0110
ispartof Medical education, 2022-10, Vol.56 (10), p.972-982
issn 0308-0110
1365-2923
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2654296707
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Cost benefit analysis
Educational administration
Medical education
Patient-centered care
Professional development
title Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A40%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20evaluation%20of%20CPD%20activities%20for%20healthcare%20professionals:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Orlik,%20Witold&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=972&rft.epage=982&rft.pages=972-982&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/medu.14813&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2654296707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2712648551&rft_id=info:pmid/35451106&rfr_iscdi=true