What does gender has to do with math? Complex questions require complex answers
Whether mathematics is a gendered domain or not is a long‐lasting issue bringing along major social and educational implications. The females' underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has been considered one of the key signs of the math gender gap, althoug...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neuroscience research 2023-05, Vol.101 (5), p.679-688 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 688 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 679 |
container_title | Journal of neuroscience research |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Girelli, Luisa |
description | Whether mathematics is a gendered domain or not is a long‐lasting issue bringing along major social and educational implications. The females' underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has been considered one of the key signs of the math gender gap, although the current view largely attributes the origin of this phenomenon to sociocultural factors. Indeed, recent approaches to math gender differences reached the universal conclusion that nature and nurture exert reciprocal effects on each other, establishing the need for approaching the study of the math gender issue only once its intrinsic complexity has been accepted. Building upon a flourishing literature, this review provides an updated synthesis of the evidence for math gender equality at the start, and for math gender inequality on the go, challenging the role of biological factors. In particular, by combining recent findings from different research areas, the paper discusses the persistence of the “math male myth” and the associated “female are not good at math myth,” drawing attention to the complex interplay of social and cultural forces that support such stereotypes. The suggestion is made that longevity of these myths results from the additive effects of two independent cognitive biases associated with gender stereotypes and with math stereotypes, respectively. Scholars' responsibility in amplifying these myths by pursuing some catching lines of research is also discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jnr.25056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2653268857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2653268857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-9652106736f3498e97bdf082879d879373660de09f494396a1ac7ea14827b0603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kElLxEAQhRtRdFwO_gFp8KKHaKXX9ElkcEUURPHY9CQVJ0OWsTth9N_bOqMHwUNRUO_j1eMRsp_CSQrATmetP2ESpFojoxSMToQUep2MgCtIBKRsi2yHMAMAYyTfJFtcCsFBw4g8vExdT4sOA33FtkBPpy7Qvosnuqj6KW1cPz2j466Z1_hO3wYMfdW1gXp8GyqPNF8prg0L9GGXbJSuDri32jvk-fLiaXyd3D1c3YzP75KcZ5lKjJIsBaW5KrkwGRo9KUrIWKZNEYdHQUGBYEphBDfKpS7X6FKRMT0BBXyHHC195777DmWbKuRY167FbgiWKcmZyjKpI3r4B511g29jOsviKyYklyxSx0sq910IHks791Xj_IdNwX61bGPL9rvlyB6sHIdJg8Uv-VNrBE6XwKKq8eN_J3t7_7i0_AQ3iYO5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2793245352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What does gender has to do with math? Complex questions require complex answers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Girelli, Luisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Girelli, Luisa</creatorcontrib><description>Whether mathematics is a gendered domain or not is a long‐lasting issue bringing along major social and educational implications. The females' underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has been considered one of the key signs of the math gender gap, although the current view largely attributes the origin of this phenomenon to sociocultural factors. Indeed, recent approaches to math gender differences reached the universal conclusion that nature and nurture exert reciprocal effects on each other, establishing the need for approaching the study of the math gender issue only once its intrinsic complexity has been accepted. Building upon a flourishing literature, this review provides an updated synthesis of the evidence for math gender equality at the start, and for math gender inequality on the go, challenging the role of biological factors. In particular, by combining recent findings from different research areas, the paper discusses the persistence of the “math male myth” and the associated “female are not good at math myth,” drawing attention to the complex interplay of social and cultural forces that support such stereotypes. The suggestion is made that longevity of these myths results from the additive effects of two independent cognitive biases associated with gender stereotypes and with math stereotypes, respectively. Scholars' responsibility in amplifying these myths by pursuing some catching lines of research is also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-4012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4547</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jnr.25056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35443070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cognitive ability ; Complexity ; Educational Status ; Engineering ; Female ; Females ; Gender ; Gender aspects ; gender differences ; Gender equity ; gender stereotypes ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Male ; math anxiety ; math myths ; Mathematical analysis ; mathematical learning ; Mathematics ; Sex differences ; Social Behavior ; Stereotypes ; Stereotyping</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroscience research, 2023-05, Vol.101 (5), p.679-688</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022 The Author. Journal of Neuroscience Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-9652106736f3498e97bdf082879d879373660de09f494396a1ac7ea14827b0603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-9652106736f3498e97bdf082879d879373660de09f494396a1ac7ea14827b0603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjnr.25056$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjnr.25056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35443070$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Girelli, Luisa</creatorcontrib><title>What does gender has to do with math? Complex questions require complex answers</title><title>Journal of neuroscience research</title><addtitle>J Neurosci Res</addtitle><description>Whether mathematics is a gendered domain or not is a long‐lasting issue bringing along major social and educational implications. The females' underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has been considered one of the key signs of the math gender gap, although the current view largely attributes the origin of this phenomenon to sociocultural factors. Indeed, recent approaches to math gender differences reached the universal conclusion that nature and nurture exert reciprocal effects on each other, establishing the need for approaching the study of the math gender issue only once its intrinsic complexity has been accepted. Building upon a flourishing literature, this review provides an updated synthesis of the evidence for math gender equality at the start, and for math gender inequality on the go, challenging the role of biological factors. In particular, by combining recent findings from different research areas, the paper discusses the persistence of the “math male myth” and the associated “female are not good at math myth,” drawing attention to the complex interplay of social and cultural forces that support such stereotypes. The suggestion is made that longevity of these myths results from the additive effects of two independent cognitive biases associated with gender stereotypes and with math stereotypes, respectively. Scholars' responsibility in amplifying these myths by pursuing some catching lines of research is also discussed.</description><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>gender differences</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>gender stereotypes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>math anxiety</subject><subject>math myths</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>mathematical learning</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><issn>0360-4012</issn><issn>1097-4547</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kElLxEAQhRtRdFwO_gFp8KKHaKXX9ElkcEUURPHY9CQVJ0OWsTth9N_bOqMHwUNRUO_j1eMRsp_CSQrATmetP2ESpFojoxSMToQUep2MgCtIBKRsi2yHMAMAYyTfJFtcCsFBw4g8vExdT4sOA33FtkBPpy7Qvosnuqj6KW1cPz2j466Z1_hO3wYMfdW1gXp8GyqPNF8prg0L9GGXbJSuDri32jvk-fLiaXyd3D1c3YzP75KcZ5lKjJIsBaW5KrkwGRo9KUrIWKZNEYdHQUGBYEphBDfKpS7X6FKRMT0BBXyHHC195777DmWbKuRY167FbgiWKcmZyjKpI3r4B511g29jOsviKyYklyxSx0sq910IHks791Xj_IdNwX61bGPL9rvlyB6sHIdJg8Uv-VNrBE6XwKKq8eN_J3t7_7i0_AQ3iYO5</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Girelli, Luisa</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>What does gender has to do with math? Complex questions require complex answers</title><author>Girelli, Luisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-9652106736f3498e97bdf082879d879373660de09f494396a1ac7ea14827b0603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>gender differences</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>gender stereotypes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>math anxiety</topic><topic>math myths</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>mathematical learning</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Girelli, Luisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroscience research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Girelli, Luisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What does gender has to do with math? Complex questions require complex answers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroscience research</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci Res</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>679</spage><epage>688</epage><pages>679-688</pages><issn>0360-4012</issn><eissn>1097-4547</eissn><abstract>Whether mathematics is a gendered domain or not is a long‐lasting issue bringing along major social and educational implications. The females' underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has been considered one of the key signs of the math gender gap, although the current view largely attributes the origin of this phenomenon to sociocultural factors. Indeed, recent approaches to math gender differences reached the universal conclusion that nature and nurture exert reciprocal effects on each other, establishing the need for approaching the study of the math gender issue only once its intrinsic complexity has been accepted. Building upon a flourishing literature, this review provides an updated synthesis of the evidence for math gender equality at the start, and for math gender inequality on the go, challenging the role of biological factors. In particular, by combining recent findings from different research areas, the paper discusses the persistence of the “math male myth” and the associated “female are not good at math myth,” drawing attention to the complex interplay of social and cultural forces that support such stereotypes. The suggestion is made that longevity of these myths results from the additive effects of two independent cognitive biases associated with gender stereotypes and with math stereotypes, respectively. Scholars' responsibility in amplifying these myths by pursuing some catching lines of research is also discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35443070</pmid><doi>10.1002/jnr.25056</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-4012 |
ispartof | Journal of neuroscience research, 2023-05, Vol.101 (5), p.679-688 |
issn | 0360-4012 1097-4547 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2653268857 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals |
subjects | Cognitive ability Complexity Educational Status Engineering Female Females Gender Gender aspects gender differences Gender equity gender stereotypes Humans Literature reviews Male math anxiety math myths Mathematical analysis mathematical learning Mathematics Sex differences Social Behavior Stereotypes Stereotyping |
title | What does gender has to do with math? Complex questions require complex answers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T22%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20does%20gender%20has%20to%20do%20with%20math?%20Complex%20questions%20require%20complex%20answers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroscience%20research&rft.au=Girelli,%20Luisa&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=679&rft.epage=688&rft.pages=679-688&rft.issn=0360-4012&rft.eissn=1097-4547&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jnr.25056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2653268857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2793245352&rft_id=info:pmid/35443070&rfr_iscdi=true |