Assessment of brain tumors by magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging and computed tomography perfusion: a comparison study

Purpose To investigate the association and agreement between magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging (DSC-PWI) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) in determining vascularity and permeability of primary and secondary brain tumors. Material and methods DSC-PWI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiologia medica 2022-06, Vol.127 (6), p.664-672
Hauptverfasser: Scola, Elisa, Desideri, Ilaria, Bianchi, Andrea, Gadda, Davide, Busto, Giorgio, Fiorenza, Alessandro, Amadori, Tommaso, Mancini, Sara, Miele, Vittorio, Fainardi, Enrico
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 672
container_issue 6
container_start_page 664
container_title Radiologia medica
container_volume 127
creator Scola, Elisa
Desideri, Ilaria
Bianchi, Andrea
Gadda, Davide
Busto, Giorgio
Fiorenza, Alessandro
Amadori, Tommaso
Mancini, Sara
Miele, Vittorio
Fainardi, Enrico
description Purpose To investigate the association and agreement between magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging (DSC-PWI) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) in determining vascularity and permeability of primary and secondary brain tumors. Material and methods DSC-PWI and CTP studies from 97 patients with high-grade glioma, low-grade glioma and solitary brain metastasis were retrospectively reviewed. Normalized cerebral blood flow (nCBF), cerebral blood volume (nCBV), capillary transfer constant (nK2) and permeability surface area product (nPS) values were obtained. Variables among groups were compared, and correlation and agreement between DSC-PWI and CTP were tested. Results All DSC-PWI and CTP parameters were higher in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11547-022-01470-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652863352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2652863352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ff3870fd0bd75441078d4660987eb25faa77f469b32c2fe05a94e680192098b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERUvhBVggS2zYhI5_Esfsqqr8SJW6gXXkJHbq6sYOHkcofRveFN_eQhGLrmyNv3NmxoeQNww-MAB1hozVUlXAeQVMKqjunpET1vKmanQrnv9zPyYvEW8BJDDQL8ixqKVkWsEJ-XWOaBFnGzKNjvbJ-EDzOseEtN_obKZgsx9oshiDCYOl4xbMXCq44mCX7Hu_83mjQww5Gcx0scmt6GOoflo_3WQ7Ul9sfJioCWPh5mXdF3Oc45TMcrM9Sj5Scw-Y5Es7inkdt1fkyJkd2tcP5yn5_uny28WX6ur689eL86tqEKrOlXOiVeBG6Ee13w5UO8qmAd0q2_PaGaOUk43uBR-4s1AbLW3TAtO8ML0Up-T9wXdJ8cdqMXezLxvudibYuGLHm5q3jRA1L-i7_9DbuKZQpitUo0FIrnSh-IEaUkRM1nVLKj-Rto5Btw-wOwTYlQC7-wC7uyJ6-2C99rMd_0r-JFYAcQCwPIXJpsfeT9j-BtPpqss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2669034279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of brain tumors by magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging and computed tomography perfusion: a comparison study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Scola, Elisa ; Desideri, Ilaria ; Bianchi, Andrea ; Gadda, Davide ; Busto, Giorgio ; Fiorenza, Alessandro ; Amadori, Tommaso ; Mancini, Sara ; Miele, Vittorio ; Fainardi, Enrico</creator><creatorcontrib>Scola, Elisa ; Desideri, Ilaria ; Bianchi, Andrea ; Gadda, Davide ; Busto, Giorgio ; Fiorenza, Alessandro ; Amadori, Tommaso ; Mancini, Sara ; Miele, Vittorio ; Fainardi, Enrico</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Purpose To investigate the association and agreement between magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging (DSC-PWI) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) in determining vascularity and permeability of primary and secondary brain tumors. Material and methods DSC-PWI and CTP studies from 97 patients with high-grade glioma, low-grade glioma and solitary brain metastasis were retrospectively reviewed. Normalized cerebral blood flow (nCBF), cerebral blood volume (nCBV), capillary transfer constant (nK2) and permeability surface area product (nPS) values were obtained. Variables among groups were compared, and correlation and agreement between DSC-PWI and CTP were tested. Results All DSC-PWI and CTP parameters were higher in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas ( p  < 0.01 and p  < 0.001). Metastases had greater DSC-PWI nCBV ( p  < 0.05), nCTP-CBF ( p  < 0.05), nCTP-CBV ( p  < 0.01) and nCTP-PS ( p  < 0.0001) than low-grade gliomas and more elevated nCTP-PS ( p  < 0.01) than high-grade gliomas. The correlation was strong between DSC-PWI nCBF and CTP nCBF ( r  = 0.79; p  < 0.00001) and between DSC-PWI nCBV and CTP nCBV ( r  = 0.83; p  < 0.00001), weaker between DSC-PWI nK2 and CTP nPS ( r  = 0.29; p  < 0.01). Bland–Altman plots indicated that the agreement was strong between DSC-PWI nCBF and CTP nCBF, good between DSC-PWI nCBV and CTP nCBV and poorer between DSC-PWI nK2 and CTP nPS. Conclusion DSC-PWI and CTP CBF and CBV maps were comparable and interchangeable in the assessment of tumor vascularity, unlike DSC-PWI K2 and CTP PS maps that were more discordant in the analysis of tumor permeability. CTP could be an alternative method to quantify tumor neoangiogenesis when MRI is not available or when the patient does not tolerate it.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1826-6983</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1826-6983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01470-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35441970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Blood flow ; Blood volume ; Brain ; Brain cancer ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology ; Computed tomography ; Contrast Media ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Glioma - diagnostic imaging ; Glioma - pathology ; Humans ; Imaging ; Interventional Radiology ; Magnetic resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neuroradiology ; Perfusion ; Permeability ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography ; Tumors ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Radiologia medica, 2022-06, Vol.127 (6), p.664-672</ispartof><rights>Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2022</rights><rights>2022. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.</rights><rights>Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ff3870fd0bd75441078d4660987eb25faa77f469b32c2fe05a94e680192098b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ff3870fd0bd75441078d4660987eb25faa77f469b32c2fe05a94e680192098b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9056-4122</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11547-022-01470-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11547-022-01470-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35441970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scola, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desideri, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadda, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busto, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorenza, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amadori, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancini, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miele, Vittorio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fainardi, Enrico</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of brain tumors by magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging and computed tomography perfusion: a comparison study</title><title>Radiologia medica</title><addtitle>Radiol med</addtitle><addtitle>Radiol Med</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Purpose To investigate the association and agreement between magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging (DSC-PWI) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) in determining vascularity and permeability of primary and secondary brain tumors. Material and methods DSC-PWI and CTP studies from 97 patients with high-grade glioma, low-grade glioma and solitary brain metastasis were retrospectively reviewed. Normalized cerebral blood flow (nCBF), cerebral blood volume (nCBV), capillary transfer constant (nK2) and permeability surface area product (nPS) values were obtained. Variables among groups were compared, and correlation and agreement between DSC-PWI and CTP were tested. Results All DSC-PWI and CTP parameters were higher in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas ( p  < 0.01 and p  < 0.001). Metastases had greater DSC-PWI nCBV ( p  < 0.05), nCTP-CBF ( p  < 0.05), nCTP-CBV ( p  < 0.01) and nCTP-PS ( p  < 0.0001) than low-grade gliomas and more elevated nCTP-PS ( p  < 0.01) than high-grade gliomas. The correlation was strong between DSC-PWI nCBF and CTP nCBF ( r  = 0.79; p  < 0.00001) and between DSC-PWI nCBV and CTP nCBV ( r  = 0.83; p  < 0.00001), weaker between DSC-PWI nK2 and CTP nPS ( r  = 0.29; p  < 0.01). Bland–Altman plots indicated that the agreement was strong between DSC-PWI nCBF and CTP nCBF, good between DSC-PWI nCBV and CTP nCBV and poorer between DSC-PWI nK2 and CTP nPS. Conclusion DSC-PWI and CTP CBF and CBV maps were comparable and interchangeable in the assessment of tumor vascularity, unlike DSC-PWI K2 and CTP PS maps that were more discordant in the analysis of tumor permeability. CTP could be an alternative method to quantify tumor neoangiogenesis when MRI is not available or when the patient does not tolerate it.]]></description><subject>Blood flow</subject><subject>Blood volume</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Glioma - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1826-6983</issn><issn>0033-8362</issn><issn>1826-6983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERUvhBVggS2zYhI5_Esfsqqr8SJW6gXXkJHbq6sYOHkcofRveFN_eQhGLrmyNv3NmxoeQNww-MAB1hozVUlXAeQVMKqjunpET1vKmanQrnv9zPyYvEW8BJDDQL8ixqKVkWsEJ-XWOaBFnGzKNjvbJ-EDzOseEtN_obKZgsx9oshiDCYOl4xbMXCq44mCX7Hu_83mjQww5Gcx0scmt6GOoflo_3WQ7Ul9sfJioCWPh5mXdF3Oc45TMcrM9Sj5Scw-Y5Es7inkdt1fkyJkd2tcP5yn5_uny28WX6ur689eL86tqEKrOlXOiVeBG6Ee13w5UO8qmAd0q2_PaGaOUk43uBR-4s1AbLW3TAtO8ML0Up-T9wXdJ8cdqMXezLxvudibYuGLHm5q3jRA1L-i7_9DbuKZQpitUo0FIrnSh-IEaUkRM1nVLKj-Rto5Btw-wOwTYlQC7-wC7uyJ6-2C99rMd_0r-JFYAcQCwPIXJpsfeT9j-BtPpqss</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Scola, Elisa</creator><creator>Desideri, Ilaria</creator><creator>Bianchi, Andrea</creator><creator>Gadda, Davide</creator><creator>Busto, Giorgio</creator><creator>Fiorenza, Alessandro</creator><creator>Amadori, Tommaso</creator><creator>Mancini, Sara</creator><creator>Miele, Vittorio</creator><creator>Fainardi, Enrico</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9056-4122</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Assessment of brain tumors by magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging and computed tomography perfusion: a comparison study</title><author>Scola, Elisa ; Desideri, Ilaria ; Bianchi, Andrea ; Gadda, Davide ; Busto, Giorgio ; Fiorenza, Alessandro ; Amadori, Tommaso ; Mancini, Sara ; Miele, Vittorio ; Fainardi, Enrico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ff3870fd0bd75441078d4660987eb25faa77f469b32c2fe05a94e680192098b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Blood flow</topic><topic>Blood volume</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Glioma - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scola, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desideri, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadda, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busto, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorenza, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amadori, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancini, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miele, Vittorio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fainardi, Enrico</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiologia medica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scola, Elisa</au><au>Desideri, Ilaria</au><au>Bianchi, Andrea</au><au>Gadda, Davide</au><au>Busto, Giorgio</au><au>Fiorenza, Alessandro</au><au>Amadori, Tommaso</au><au>Mancini, Sara</au><au>Miele, Vittorio</au><au>Fainardi, Enrico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of brain tumors by magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging and computed tomography perfusion: a comparison study</atitle><jtitle>Radiologia medica</jtitle><stitle>Radiol med</stitle><addtitle>Radiol Med</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>664</spage><epage>672</epage><pages>664-672</pages><issn>1826-6983</issn><issn>0033-8362</issn><eissn>1826-6983</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Purpose To investigate the association and agreement between magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging (DSC-PWI) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) in determining vascularity and permeability of primary and secondary brain tumors. Material and methods DSC-PWI and CTP studies from 97 patients with high-grade glioma, low-grade glioma and solitary brain metastasis were retrospectively reviewed. Normalized cerebral blood flow (nCBF), cerebral blood volume (nCBV), capillary transfer constant (nK2) and permeability surface area product (nPS) values were obtained. Variables among groups were compared, and correlation and agreement between DSC-PWI and CTP were tested. Results All DSC-PWI and CTP parameters were higher in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas ( p  < 0.01 and p  < 0.001). Metastases had greater DSC-PWI nCBV ( p  < 0.05), nCTP-CBF ( p  < 0.05), nCTP-CBV ( p  < 0.01) and nCTP-PS ( p  < 0.0001) than low-grade gliomas and more elevated nCTP-PS ( p  < 0.01) than high-grade gliomas. The correlation was strong between DSC-PWI nCBF and CTP nCBF ( r  = 0.79; p  < 0.00001) and between DSC-PWI nCBV and CTP nCBV ( r  = 0.83; p  < 0.00001), weaker between DSC-PWI nK2 and CTP nPS ( r  = 0.29; p  < 0.01). Bland–Altman plots indicated that the agreement was strong between DSC-PWI nCBF and CTP nCBF, good between DSC-PWI nCBV and CTP nCBV and poorer between DSC-PWI nK2 and CTP nPS. Conclusion DSC-PWI and CTP CBF and CBV maps were comparable and interchangeable in the assessment of tumor vascularity, unlike DSC-PWI K2 and CTP PS maps that were more discordant in the analysis of tumor permeability. CTP could be an alternative method to quantify tumor neoangiogenesis when MRI is not available or when the patient does not tolerate it.]]></abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><pmid>35441970</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11547-022-01470-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9056-4122</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1826-6983
ispartof Radiologia medica, 2022-06, Vol.127 (6), p.664-672
issn 1826-6983
0033-8362
1826-6983
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652863352
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Blood flow
Blood volume
Brain
Brain cancer
Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Brain Neoplasms - pathology
Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology
Computed tomography
Contrast Media
Diagnostic Radiology
Glioma - diagnostic imaging
Glioma - pathology
Humans
Imaging
Interventional Radiology
Magnetic resonance
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neuroradiology
Perfusion
Permeability
Radiology
Retrospective Studies
Tomography
Tumors
Ultrasound
title Assessment of brain tumors by magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging and computed tomography perfusion: a comparison study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T01%3A57%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20brain%20tumors%20by%20magnetic%20resonance%20dynamic%20susceptibility%20contrast%20perfusion-weighted%20imaging%20and%20computed%20tomography%20perfusion:%20a%20comparison%20study&rft.jtitle=Radiologia%20medica&rft.au=Scola,%20Elisa&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=664&rft.epage=672&rft.pages=664-672&rft.issn=1826-6983&rft.eissn=1826-6983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11547-022-01470-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2652863352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2669034279&rft_id=info:pmid/35441970&rfr_iscdi=true