Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study

•Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options in the early stage after lung transplantation.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage.•There w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2022-05, Vol.54 (4), p.1104-1108
Hauptverfasser: Pióro, Anna, Latos, Magdalena, Urlik, Maciej, Stącel, Tomasz, Gawęda, Martyna, Pandel, Anastazja, Przybyłowski, Piotr, Knapik, Piotr, Ochman, Marek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1108
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1104
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 54
creator Pióro, Anna
Latos, Magdalena
Urlik, Maciej
Stącel, Tomasz
Gawęda, Martyna
Pandel, Anastazja
Przybyłowski, Piotr
Knapik, Piotr
Ochman, Marek
description •Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options in the early stage after lung transplantation.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year.•Further research on this issue is required. Lung transplantation remains the only feasible option for certain patients with end-stage lung disease. Lifelong immunosuppression increases the risk of infection, including fungal infections. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of antifungal prophylaxis and treatment among lung transplant recipients in the early postoperative stage. This retrospective analysis included 127 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2014 and 2021 in the lung transplant ward, 65.35% of whom were males. The most common indication for lung transplantation was cystic fibrosis (n = 59; 46.46%). All of the patients were receiving inhaled amphotericin B. Within this group there were patients who also were treated with intravenous caspofungin, intravenous/oral voriconazole, or both. The difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between caspofungin and voriconazole in the early post-transplant period was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.5, P = .477). Moreover, the difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between itraconazole and voriconazole during the first post-transplant year was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.46, P = .496). Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options after lung transplantation. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year. Further research on this issue is required.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652583398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041134522001749</els_id><sourcerecordid>2652583398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4fdb51589386a8bdd9acdcb320ee82bd96411c6b9d97da78eb9925ff91dc28003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFtrGzEQhUVpaZy0f6GIPPVlHV1WaylvxnGTgKGhSZ-FVpp1ZPZWSRu6_74yTqCPgQGhM2fmMB9Cl5QsKaHV1WGZgunjGAYL4JaMMLYkuaj4gBZUrnjBKsY_ogUhJS0oL8UZOo_xQPKflfwzOuOi5Csq6ALN6z75Zur3psUPYRif59b89RGb3uGnACZ10Ce87oZ-j3fZlsVjdGuy-gusH33uR-x7vDWhnfHDENMwQjDJvwB-TGYP13iNH32_b6HYZDOELE9u_oI-NaaN8PX1vUC_f2yfNnfF7uft_Wa9KyyvWCrKxtWCCqm4rIysnVPGOltzRgAkq52qSkptVSunVs6sJNRKMdE0ijrLJCH8An0_7c28_kwQk-58tNDmE2CYomaVYEJyrmS2Xp-sNgwxBmj0GHxnwqwp0Uf0-qD_R6-P6DXJRUUe_vaaM9Vd7r2NvrHOhpuTAfK1Lx6CjjbTs-B8AJu0G_x7cv4BnUuecA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652583398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Pióro, Anna ; Latos, Magdalena ; Urlik, Maciej ; Stącel, Tomasz ; Gawęda, Martyna ; Pandel, Anastazja ; Przybyłowski, Piotr ; Knapik, Piotr ; Ochman, Marek</creator><creatorcontrib>Pióro, Anna ; Latos, Magdalena ; Urlik, Maciej ; Stącel, Tomasz ; Gawęda, Martyna ; Pandel, Anastazja ; Przybyłowski, Piotr ; Knapik, Piotr ; Ochman, Marek</creatorcontrib><description>•Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options in the early stage after lung transplantation.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year.•Further research on this issue is required. Lung transplantation remains the only feasible option for certain patients with end-stage lung disease. Lifelong immunosuppression increases the risk of infection, including fungal infections. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of antifungal prophylaxis and treatment among lung transplant recipients in the early postoperative stage. This retrospective analysis included 127 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2014 and 2021 in the lung transplant ward, 65.35% of whom were males. The most common indication for lung transplantation was cystic fibrosis (n = 59; 46.46%). All of the patients were receiving inhaled amphotericin B. Within this group there were patients who also were treated with intravenous caspofungin, intravenous/oral voriconazole, or both. The difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between caspofungin and voriconazole in the early post-transplant period was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.5, P = .477). Moreover, the difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between itraconazole and voriconazole during the first post-transplant year was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.46, P = .496). Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options after lung transplantation. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year. Further research on this issue is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35437151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2022-05, Vol.54 (4), p.1104-1108</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4fdb51589386a8bdd9acdcb320ee82bd96411c6b9d97da78eb9925ff91dc28003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4fdb51589386a8bdd9acdcb320ee82bd96411c6b9d97da78eb9925ff91dc28003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6429-7638</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pióro, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latos, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urlik, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stącel, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawęda, Martyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandel, Anastazja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przybyłowski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapik, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochman, Marek</creatorcontrib><title>Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>•Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options in the early stage after lung transplantation.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year.•Further research on this issue is required. Lung transplantation remains the only feasible option for certain patients with end-stage lung disease. Lifelong immunosuppression increases the risk of infection, including fungal infections. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of antifungal prophylaxis and treatment among lung transplant recipients in the early postoperative stage. This retrospective analysis included 127 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2014 and 2021 in the lung transplant ward, 65.35% of whom were males. The most common indication for lung transplantation was cystic fibrosis (n = 59; 46.46%). All of the patients were receiving inhaled amphotericin B. Within this group there were patients who also were treated with intravenous caspofungin, intravenous/oral voriconazole, or both. The difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between caspofungin and voriconazole in the early post-transplant period was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.5, P = .477). Moreover, the difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between itraconazole and voriconazole during the first post-transplant year was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.46, P = .496). Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options after lung transplantation. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year. Further research on this issue is required.</description><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFtrGzEQhUVpaZy0f6GIPPVlHV1WaylvxnGTgKGhSZ-FVpp1ZPZWSRu6_74yTqCPgQGhM2fmMB9Cl5QsKaHV1WGZgunjGAYL4JaMMLYkuaj4gBZUrnjBKsY_ogUhJS0oL8UZOo_xQPKflfwzOuOi5Csq6ALN6z75Zur3psUPYRif59b89RGb3uGnACZ10Ce87oZ-j3fZlsVjdGuy-gusH33uR-x7vDWhnfHDENMwQjDJvwB-TGYP13iNH32_b6HYZDOELE9u_oI-NaaN8PX1vUC_f2yfNnfF7uft_Wa9KyyvWCrKxtWCCqm4rIysnVPGOltzRgAkq52qSkptVSunVs6sJNRKMdE0ijrLJCH8An0_7c28_kwQk-58tNDmE2CYomaVYEJyrmS2Xp-sNgwxBmj0GHxnwqwp0Uf0-qD_R6-P6DXJRUUe_vaaM9Vd7r2NvrHOhpuTAfK1Lx6CjjbTs-B8AJu0G_x7cv4BnUuecA</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Pióro, Anna</creator><creator>Latos, Magdalena</creator><creator>Urlik, Maciej</creator><creator>Stącel, Tomasz</creator><creator>Gawęda, Martyna</creator><creator>Pandel, Anastazja</creator><creator>Przybyłowski, Piotr</creator><creator>Knapik, Piotr</creator><creator>Ochman, Marek</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-7638</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study</title><author>Pióro, Anna ; Latos, Magdalena ; Urlik, Maciej ; Stącel, Tomasz ; Gawęda, Martyna ; Pandel, Anastazja ; Przybyłowski, Piotr ; Knapik, Piotr ; Ochman, Marek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4fdb51589386a8bdd9acdcb320ee82bd96411c6b9d97da78eb9925ff91dc28003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pióro, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latos, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urlik, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stącel, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawęda, Martyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandel, Anastazja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przybyłowski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapik, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochman, Marek</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pióro, Anna</au><au>Latos, Magdalena</au><au>Urlik, Maciej</au><au>Stącel, Tomasz</au><au>Gawęda, Martyna</au><au>Pandel, Anastazja</au><au>Przybyłowski, Piotr</au><au>Knapik, Piotr</au><au>Ochman, Marek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1104</spage><epage>1108</epage><pages>1104-1108</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>•Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options in the early stage after lung transplantation.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year.•Further research on this issue is required. Lung transplantation remains the only feasible option for certain patients with end-stage lung disease. Lifelong immunosuppression increases the risk of infection, including fungal infections. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of antifungal prophylaxis and treatment among lung transplant recipients in the early postoperative stage. This retrospective analysis included 127 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2014 and 2021 in the lung transplant ward, 65.35% of whom were males. The most common indication for lung transplantation was cystic fibrosis (n = 59; 46.46%). All of the patients were receiving inhaled amphotericin B. Within this group there were patients who also were treated with intravenous caspofungin, intravenous/oral voriconazole, or both. The difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between caspofungin and voriconazole in the early post-transplant period was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.5, P = .477). Moreover, the difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between itraconazole and voriconazole during the first post-transplant year was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.46, P = .496). Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options after lung transplantation. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year. Further research on this issue is required.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35437151</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.015</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-7638</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2022-05, Vol.54 (4), p.1104-1108
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652583398
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
title Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A00%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antifungal%20Prophylaxis%20and%20Treatment%20Among%20Lung%20Transplant%20Recipients%20in%20Early%20Postoperative%20Stage:%20A%20Single-Center%20Study&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Pi%C3%B3ro,%20Anna&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1104&rft.epage=1108&rft.pages=1104-1108&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2652583398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652583398&rft_id=info:pmid/35437151&rft_els_id=S0041134522001749&rfr_iscdi=true