Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study
•Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options in the early stage after lung transplantation.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage.•There w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation proceedings 2022-05, Vol.54 (4), p.1104-1108 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1108 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1104 |
container_title | Transplantation proceedings |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Pióro, Anna Latos, Magdalena Urlik, Maciej Stącel, Tomasz Gawęda, Martyna Pandel, Anastazja Przybyłowski, Piotr Knapik, Piotr Ochman, Marek |
description | •Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options in the early stage after lung transplantation.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year.•Further research on this issue is required.
Lung transplantation remains the only feasible option for certain patients with end-stage lung disease. Lifelong immunosuppression increases the risk of infection, including fungal infections. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of antifungal prophylaxis and treatment among lung transplant recipients in the early postoperative stage.
This retrospective analysis included 127 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2014 and 2021 in the lung transplant ward, 65.35% of whom were males. The most common indication for lung transplantation was cystic fibrosis (n = 59; 46.46%). All of the patients were receiving inhaled amphotericin B. Within this group there were patients who also were treated with intravenous caspofungin, intravenous/oral voriconazole, or both.
The difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between caspofungin and voriconazole in the early post-transplant period was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.5, P = .477). Moreover, the difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between itraconazole and voriconazole during the first post-transplant year was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.46, P = .496).
Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options after lung transplantation. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year. Further research on this issue is required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652583398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041134522001749</els_id><sourcerecordid>2652583398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4fdb51589386a8bdd9acdcb320ee82bd96411c6b9d97da78eb9925ff91dc28003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFtrGzEQhUVpaZy0f6GIPPVlHV1WaylvxnGTgKGhSZ-FVpp1ZPZWSRu6_74yTqCPgQGhM2fmMB9Cl5QsKaHV1WGZgunjGAYL4JaMMLYkuaj4gBZUrnjBKsY_ogUhJS0oL8UZOo_xQPKflfwzOuOi5Csq6ALN6z75Zur3psUPYRif59b89RGb3uGnACZ10Ce87oZ-j3fZlsVjdGuy-gusH33uR-x7vDWhnfHDENMwQjDJvwB-TGYP13iNH32_b6HYZDOELE9u_oI-NaaN8PX1vUC_f2yfNnfF7uft_Wa9KyyvWCrKxtWCCqm4rIysnVPGOltzRgAkq52qSkptVSunVs6sJNRKMdE0ijrLJCH8An0_7c28_kwQk-58tNDmE2CYomaVYEJyrmS2Xp-sNgwxBmj0GHxnwqwp0Uf0-qD_R6-P6DXJRUUe_vaaM9Vd7r2NvrHOhpuTAfK1Lx6CjjbTs-B8AJu0G_x7cv4BnUuecA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652583398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Pióro, Anna ; Latos, Magdalena ; Urlik, Maciej ; Stącel, Tomasz ; Gawęda, Martyna ; Pandel, Anastazja ; Przybyłowski, Piotr ; Knapik, Piotr ; Ochman, Marek</creator><creatorcontrib>Pióro, Anna ; Latos, Magdalena ; Urlik, Maciej ; Stącel, Tomasz ; Gawęda, Martyna ; Pandel, Anastazja ; Przybyłowski, Piotr ; Knapik, Piotr ; Ochman, Marek</creatorcontrib><description>•Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options in the early stage after lung transplantation.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year.•Further research on this issue is required.
Lung transplantation remains the only feasible option for certain patients with end-stage lung disease. Lifelong immunosuppression increases the risk of infection, including fungal infections. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of antifungal prophylaxis and treatment among lung transplant recipients in the early postoperative stage.
This retrospective analysis included 127 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2014 and 2021 in the lung transplant ward, 65.35% of whom were males. The most common indication for lung transplantation was cystic fibrosis (n = 59; 46.46%). All of the patients were receiving inhaled amphotericin B. Within this group there were patients who also were treated with intravenous caspofungin, intravenous/oral voriconazole, or both.
The difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between caspofungin and voriconazole in the early post-transplant period was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.5, P = .477). Moreover, the difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between itraconazole and voriconazole during the first post-transplant year was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.46, P = .496).
Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options after lung transplantation. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year. Further research on this issue is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35437151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2022-05, Vol.54 (4), p.1104-1108</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4fdb51589386a8bdd9acdcb320ee82bd96411c6b9d97da78eb9925ff91dc28003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4fdb51589386a8bdd9acdcb320ee82bd96411c6b9d97da78eb9925ff91dc28003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6429-7638</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35437151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pióro, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latos, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urlik, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stącel, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawęda, Martyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandel, Anastazja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przybyłowski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapik, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochman, Marek</creatorcontrib><title>Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>•Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options in the early stage after lung transplantation.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year.•Further research on this issue is required.
Lung transplantation remains the only feasible option for certain patients with end-stage lung disease. Lifelong immunosuppression increases the risk of infection, including fungal infections. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of antifungal prophylaxis and treatment among lung transplant recipients in the early postoperative stage.
This retrospective analysis included 127 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2014 and 2021 in the lung transplant ward, 65.35% of whom were males. The most common indication for lung transplantation was cystic fibrosis (n = 59; 46.46%). All of the patients were receiving inhaled amphotericin B. Within this group there were patients who also were treated with intravenous caspofungin, intravenous/oral voriconazole, or both.
The difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between caspofungin and voriconazole in the early post-transplant period was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.5, P = .477). Moreover, the difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between itraconazole and voriconazole during the first post-transplant year was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.46, P = .496).
Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options after lung transplantation. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year. Further research on this issue is required.</description><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFtrGzEQhUVpaZy0f6GIPPVlHV1WaylvxnGTgKGhSZ-FVpp1ZPZWSRu6_74yTqCPgQGhM2fmMB9Cl5QsKaHV1WGZgunjGAYL4JaMMLYkuaj4gBZUrnjBKsY_ogUhJS0oL8UZOo_xQPKflfwzOuOi5Csq6ALN6z75Zur3psUPYRif59b89RGb3uGnACZ10Ce87oZ-j3fZlsVjdGuy-gusH33uR-x7vDWhnfHDENMwQjDJvwB-TGYP13iNH32_b6HYZDOELE9u_oI-NaaN8PX1vUC_f2yfNnfF7uft_Wa9KyyvWCrKxtWCCqm4rIysnVPGOltzRgAkq52qSkptVSunVs6sJNRKMdE0ijrLJCH8An0_7c28_kwQk-58tNDmE2CYomaVYEJyrmS2Xp-sNgwxBmj0GHxnwqwp0Uf0-qD_R6-P6DXJRUUe_vaaM9Vd7r2NvrHOhpuTAfK1Lx6CjjbTs-B8AJu0G_x7cv4BnUuecA</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Pióro, Anna</creator><creator>Latos, Magdalena</creator><creator>Urlik, Maciej</creator><creator>Stącel, Tomasz</creator><creator>Gawęda, Martyna</creator><creator>Pandel, Anastazja</creator><creator>Przybyłowski, Piotr</creator><creator>Knapik, Piotr</creator><creator>Ochman, Marek</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-7638</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study</title><author>Pióro, Anna ; Latos, Magdalena ; Urlik, Maciej ; Stącel, Tomasz ; Gawęda, Martyna ; Pandel, Anastazja ; Przybyłowski, Piotr ; Knapik, Piotr ; Ochman, Marek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4fdb51589386a8bdd9acdcb320ee82bd96411c6b9d97da78eb9925ff91dc28003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pióro, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latos, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urlik, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stącel, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawęda, Martyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandel, Anastazja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przybyłowski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapik, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochman, Marek</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pióro, Anna</au><au>Latos, Magdalena</au><au>Urlik, Maciej</au><au>Stącel, Tomasz</au><au>Gawęda, Martyna</au><au>Pandel, Anastazja</au><au>Przybyłowski, Piotr</au><au>Knapik, Piotr</au><au>Ochman, Marek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1104</spage><epage>1108</epage><pages>1104-1108</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>•Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options in the early stage after lung transplantation.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage.•There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year.•Further research on this issue is required.
Lung transplantation remains the only feasible option for certain patients with end-stage lung disease. Lifelong immunosuppression increases the risk of infection, including fungal infections. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of antifungal prophylaxis and treatment among lung transplant recipients in the early postoperative stage.
This retrospective analysis included 127 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2014 and 2021 in the lung transplant ward, 65.35% of whom were males. The most common indication for lung transplantation was cystic fibrosis (n = 59; 46.46%). All of the patients were receiving inhaled amphotericin B. Within this group there were patients who also were treated with intravenous caspofungin, intravenous/oral voriconazole, or both.
The difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between caspofungin and voriconazole in the early post-transplant period was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.5, P = .477). Moreover, the difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between itraconazole and voriconazole during the first post-transplant year was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.46, P = .496).
Caspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options after lung transplantation. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year. Further research on this issue is required.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35437151</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.015</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-7638</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1345 |
ispartof | Transplantation proceedings, 2022-05, Vol.54 (4), p.1104-1108 |
issn | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652583398 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
title | Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A00%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antifungal%20Prophylaxis%20and%20Treatment%20Among%20Lung%20Transplant%20Recipients%20in%20Early%20Postoperative%20Stage:%20A%20Single-Center%20Study&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Pi%C3%B3ro,%20Anna&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1104&rft.epage=1108&rft.pages=1104-1108&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2652583398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652583398&rft_id=info:pmid/35437151&rft_els_id=S0041134522001749&rfr_iscdi=true |