How to dose-stage large or high-risk brain metastases: an alternative two-fraction radiosurgical treatment approach

The authors sought to evaluate clinical outcome in patients with large, high-risk brain metastases (BMs) treated with different dose strategies by use of two-fraction dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). A retrospective analysis was performed with data from 142 patients from two centers who...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurosurgery 2022-12, Vol.137 (6), p.1-1675
Hauptverfasser: Cho, Anna, Medvedeva, Kira, Kranawetter, Beate, Untersteiner, Helena, Hirschmann, Dorian, Lepilina, Olga, Baulin, Anatoly, Buschmann, Martin, Ertl, Adolf, Marik, Wolfgang, Dorfer, Christian, Rössler, Karl, Gatterbauer, Brigitte, Ilyalov, Sergey, Frischer, Josa M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1675
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of neurosurgery
container_volume 137
creator Cho, Anna
Medvedeva, Kira
Kranawetter, Beate
Untersteiner, Helena
Hirschmann, Dorian
Lepilina, Olga
Baulin, Anatoly
Buschmann, Martin
Ertl, Adolf
Marik, Wolfgang
Dorfer, Christian
Rössler, Karl
Gatterbauer, Brigitte
Ilyalov, Sergey
Frischer, Josa M
description The authors sought to evaluate clinical outcome in patients with large, high-risk brain metastases (BMs) treated with different dose strategies by use of two-fraction dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). A retrospective analysis was performed with data from 142 patients from two centers who had been treated with two-fraction dose-staged GKRS between June 2015 and January 2020. Depending on the changes in marginal dose between the first (GKRS1) and second (GKRS2) GKRS treatments, the study population was divided into three treatment groups: dose escalation, dose maintenance, and dose de-escalation. The 142 study patients underwent two-fraction dose-staged GKRS treatments for 166 large, high-risk BMs. The median tumor volume of 7.4 cm3 decreased significantly from GKRS1 to GKRS2 (4.4 cm3; p < 0.001), and to the last follow-up (1.8 cm3; p < 0.001). These significant differences in BM volume reduction were achieved in all three treatment groups. However, differences according to the primary tumor histology were apparent: while dose maintenance seemed to be the most effective treatment strategy for BMs from lung cancer or melanoma, dose escalation was the most beneficial treatment option for BMs from breast, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary cancer. Of note, the vast majority of patients who underwent dose-staged BM treatment did not show any significant postradiosurgical complications. In patients with large, high-risk BMs, dose-staged GKRS treatment represents an effective local treatment method with acceptable complication risks. Different dose-strategy options are available that may be chosen according to the primary tumor histology and treatment volume but may also be tailored to the findings at GKRS2.
doi_str_mv 10.3171/2022.2.JNS212440
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651691502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2651691502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-1938d1c86ba270208ab8a4d37965ceb4f8681c493a75f33076dc0f91b36350183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMyGPLC7-SByHDVVAQRUMwBxdHKc1JHGxHSr-e1K1dLkb7r13ej-ELhmdCpaxG045n_Lp88sbZzxJ6BEas1wIQmUujtGYDmciqEpH6CyET0qZTCQ_RSORJlwqwcYozN0GR4crFwwJEZYGN-CH6Txe2eWKeBu-cOnBdrg1EQZJMOEWQ4ehicZ3EO2PwXHjSO1BR-s67KGyLvR-aTU0OHoDsTVdxLBeewd6dY5OamiCudjvCfp4uH-fzcni9fFpdrcgmvM8kqGJqphWsgSeUU4VlAqSSmS5TLUpk1pJxXSSC8jSWgiayUrTOmelkCKlTIkJut7lDm-_exNi0dqgTdNAZ1wfCi5TJnOWUj5I6U6qvQvBm7pYe9uC_y0YLbaoiy3qghcH1IPlap_el62pDoZ_tuIP7mV6Qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2651691502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to dose-stage large or high-risk brain metastases: an alternative two-fraction radiosurgical treatment approach</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Cho, Anna ; Medvedeva, Kira ; Kranawetter, Beate ; Untersteiner, Helena ; Hirschmann, Dorian ; Lepilina, Olga ; Baulin, Anatoly ; Buschmann, Martin ; Ertl, Adolf ; Marik, Wolfgang ; Dorfer, Christian ; Rössler, Karl ; Gatterbauer, Brigitte ; Ilyalov, Sergey ; Frischer, Josa M</creator><creatorcontrib>Cho, Anna ; Medvedeva, Kira ; Kranawetter, Beate ; Untersteiner, Helena ; Hirschmann, Dorian ; Lepilina, Olga ; Baulin, Anatoly ; Buschmann, Martin ; Ertl, Adolf ; Marik, Wolfgang ; Dorfer, Christian ; Rössler, Karl ; Gatterbauer, Brigitte ; Ilyalov, Sergey ; Frischer, Josa M</creatorcontrib><description>The authors sought to evaluate clinical outcome in patients with large, high-risk brain metastases (BMs) treated with different dose strategies by use of two-fraction dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). A retrospective analysis was performed with data from 142 patients from two centers who had been treated with two-fraction dose-staged GKRS between June 2015 and January 2020. Depending on the changes in marginal dose between the first (GKRS1) and second (GKRS2) GKRS treatments, the study population was divided into three treatment groups: dose escalation, dose maintenance, and dose de-escalation. The 142 study patients underwent two-fraction dose-staged GKRS treatments for 166 large, high-risk BMs. The median tumor volume of 7.4 cm3 decreased significantly from GKRS1 to GKRS2 (4.4 cm3; p &lt; 0.001), and to the last follow-up (1.8 cm3; p &lt; 0.001). These significant differences in BM volume reduction were achieved in all three treatment groups. However, differences according to the primary tumor histology were apparent: while dose maintenance seemed to be the most effective treatment strategy for BMs from lung cancer or melanoma, dose escalation was the most beneficial treatment option for BMs from breast, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary cancer. Of note, the vast majority of patients who underwent dose-staged BM treatment did not show any significant postradiosurgical complications. In patients with large, high-risk BMs, dose-staged GKRS treatment represents an effective local treatment method with acceptable complication risks. Different dose-strategy options are available that may be chosen according to the primary tumor histology and treatment volume but may also be tailored to the findings at GKRS2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1933-0693</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3171/2022.2.JNS212440</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35426831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of neurosurgery, 2022-12, Vol.137 (6), p.1-1675</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-1938d1c86ba270208ab8a4d37965ceb4f8681c493a75f33076dc0f91b36350183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-1938d1c86ba270208ab8a4d37965ceb4f8681c493a75f33076dc0f91b36350183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35426831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cho, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medvedeva, Kira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranawetter, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Untersteiner, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschmann, Dorian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepilina, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baulin, Anatoly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buschmann, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ertl, Adolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marik, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorfer, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rössler, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatterbauer, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilyalov, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frischer, Josa M</creatorcontrib><title>How to dose-stage large or high-risk brain metastases: an alternative two-fraction radiosurgical treatment approach</title><title>Journal of neurosurgery</title><addtitle>J Neurosurg</addtitle><description>The authors sought to evaluate clinical outcome in patients with large, high-risk brain metastases (BMs) treated with different dose strategies by use of two-fraction dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). A retrospective analysis was performed with data from 142 patients from two centers who had been treated with two-fraction dose-staged GKRS between June 2015 and January 2020. Depending on the changes in marginal dose between the first (GKRS1) and second (GKRS2) GKRS treatments, the study population was divided into three treatment groups: dose escalation, dose maintenance, and dose de-escalation. The 142 study patients underwent two-fraction dose-staged GKRS treatments for 166 large, high-risk BMs. The median tumor volume of 7.4 cm3 decreased significantly from GKRS1 to GKRS2 (4.4 cm3; p &lt; 0.001), and to the last follow-up (1.8 cm3; p &lt; 0.001). These significant differences in BM volume reduction were achieved in all three treatment groups. However, differences according to the primary tumor histology were apparent: while dose maintenance seemed to be the most effective treatment strategy for BMs from lung cancer or melanoma, dose escalation was the most beneficial treatment option for BMs from breast, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary cancer. Of note, the vast majority of patients who underwent dose-staged BM treatment did not show any significant postradiosurgical complications. In patients with large, high-risk BMs, dose-staged GKRS treatment represents an effective local treatment method with acceptable complication risks. Different dose-strategy options are available that may be chosen according to the primary tumor histology and treatment volume but may also be tailored to the findings at GKRS2.</description><issn>0022-3085</issn><issn>1933-0693</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMyGPLC7-SByHDVVAQRUMwBxdHKc1JHGxHSr-e1K1dLkb7r13ej-ELhmdCpaxG045n_Lp88sbZzxJ6BEas1wIQmUujtGYDmciqEpH6CyET0qZTCQ_RSORJlwqwcYozN0GR4crFwwJEZYGN-CH6Txe2eWKeBu-cOnBdrg1EQZJMOEWQ4ehicZ3EO2PwXHjSO1BR-s67KGyLvR-aTU0OHoDsTVdxLBeewd6dY5OamiCudjvCfp4uH-fzcni9fFpdrcgmvM8kqGJqphWsgSeUU4VlAqSSmS5TLUpk1pJxXSSC8jSWgiayUrTOmelkCKlTIkJut7lDm-_exNi0dqgTdNAZ1wfCi5TJnOWUj5I6U6qvQvBm7pYe9uC_y0YLbaoiy3qghcH1IPlap_el62pDoZ_tuIP7mV6Qg</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Cho, Anna</creator><creator>Medvedeva, Kira</creator><creator>Kranawetter, Beate</creator><creator>Untersteiner, Helena</creator><creator>Hirschmann, Dorian</creator><creator>Lepilina, Olga</creator><creator>Baulin, Anatoly</creator><creator>Buschmann, Martin</creator><creator>Ertl, Adolf</creator><creator>Marik, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Dorfer, Christian</creator><creator>Rössler, Karl</creator><creator>Gatterbauer, Brigitte</creator><creator>Ilyalov, Sergey</creator><creator>Frischer, Josa M</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>How to dose-stage large or high-risk brain metastases: an alternative two-fraction radiosurgical treatment approach</title><author>Cho, Anna ; Medvedeva, Kira ; Kranawetter, Beate ; Untersteiner, Helena ; Hirschmann, Dorian ; Lepilina, Olga ; Baulin, Anatoly ; Buschmann, Martin ; Ertl, Adolf ; Marik, Wolfgang ; Dorfer, Christian ; Rössler, Karl ; Gatterbauer, Brigitte ; Ilyalov, Sergey ; Frischer, Josa M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-1938d1c86ba270208ab8a4d37965ceb4f8681c493a75f33076dc0f91b36350183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cho, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medvedeva, Kira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranawetter, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Untersteiner, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschmann, Dorian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepilina, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baulin, Anatoly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buschmann, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ertl, Adolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marik, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorfer, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rössler, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatterbauer, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilyalov, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frischer, Josa M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cho, Anna</au><au>Medvedeva, Kira</au><au>Kranawetter, Beate</au><au>Untersteiner, Helena</au><au>Hirschmann, Dorian</au><au>Lepilina, Olga</au><au>Baulin, Anatoly</au><au>Buschmann, Martin</au><au>Ertl, Adolf</au><au>Marik, Wolfgang</au><au>Dorfer, Christian</au><au>Rössler, Karl</au><au>Gatterbauer, Brigitte</au><au>Ilyalov, Sergey</au><au>Frischer, Josa M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to dose-stage large or high-risk brain metastases: an alternative two-fraction radiosurgical treatment approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>1675</epage><pages>1-1675</pages><issn>0022-3085</issn><eissn>1933-0693</eissn><abstract>The authors sought to evaluate clinical outcome in patients with large, high-risk brain metastases (BMs) treated with different dose strategies by use of two-fraction dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). A retrospective analysis was performed with data from 142 patients from two centers who had been treated with two-fraction dose-staged GKRS between June 2015 and January 2020. Depending on the changes in marginal dose between the first (GKRS1) and second (GKRS2) GKRS treatments, the study population was divided into three treatment groups: dose escalation, dose maintenance, and dose de-escalation. The 142 study patients underwent two-fraction dose-staged GKRS treatments for 166 large, high-risk BMs. The median tumor volume of 7.4 cm3 decreased significantly from GKRS1 to GKRS2 (4.4 cm3; p &lt; 0.001), and to the last follow-up (1.8 cm3; p &lt; 0.001). These significant differences in BM volume reduction were achieved in all three treatment groups. However, differences according to the primary tumor histology were apparent: while dose maintenance seemed to be the most effective treatment strategy for BMs from lung cancer or melanoma, dose escalation was the most beneficial treatment option for BMs from breast, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary cancer. Of note, the vast majority of patients who underwent dose-staged BM treatment did not show any significant postradiosurgical complications. In patients with large, high-risk BMs, dose-staged GKRS treatment represents an effective local treatment method with acceptable complication risks. Different dose-strategy options are available that may be chosen according to the primary tumor histology and treatment volume but may also be tailored to the findings at GKRS2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35426831</pmid><doi>10.3171/2022.2.JNS212440</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3085
ispartof Journal of neurosurgery, 2022-12, Vol.137 (6), p.1-1675
issn 0022-3085
1933-0693
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651691502
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
title How to dose-stage large or high-risk brain metastases: an alternative two-fraction radiosurgical treatment approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A11%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20dose-stage%20large%20or%20high-risk%20brain%20metastases:%20an%20alternative%20two-fraction%20radiosurgical%20treatment%20approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Cho,%20Anna&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1675&rft.pages=1-1675&rft.issn=0022-3085&rft.eissn=1933-0693&rft_id=info:doi/10.3171/2022.2.JNS212440&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2651691502%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2651691502&rft_id=info:pmid/35426831&rfr_iscdi=true