Site-specific ecological risk assessment of metal-contaminated soils based on the TRIAD approach
Ecological risk assessment based on scientific data is crucial for understanding causal relationships between chemical pollution and environmental risks. Simultaneously, a balance is required between socioeconomic factors and scientific evidence. The TRIAD approach, which incorporates three lines of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hazardous materials 2022-07, Vol.434, p.128883-128883, Article 128883 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 128883 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 128883 |
container_title | Journal of hazardous materials |
container_volume | 434 |
creator | Kim, Dokyung Kwak, Jin Il Hwang, Wonjae Lee, Yong-ho Lee, Yun-Sik Kim, Ji-In Hong, Sunhee Hyun, Seunghun An, Youn-Joo |
description | Ecological risk assessment based on scientific data is crucial for understanding causal relationships between chemical pollution and environmental risks. Simultaneously, a balance is required between socioeconomic factors and scientific evidence. The TRIAD approach, which incorporates three lines of evidence (LoE)—chemical (Chem-LoE), ecotoxicological (Ecotox-LoE), and ecological (Eco-LoE)—was applied in five sites of an abandoned mine for site-specific soil ecological risk assessment (SERA). In combination, the three LoEs showed that two sites had extremely high risks, one site had moderate risk, and the other site had low risk. At all sites, Chem-LoE exhibited high-integrated risk values. In Ecotox-LoE and Eco-LoE, some species were not affected despite high metal concentrations in the soil samples collected from the sites, indicating that the bioavailability of metals differed according to the physiochemical properties of the soil medium. This study is significant as multiple analyses were performed considering ecosystem structure to reduce uncertainty in SERA. The results provide information to support effective decision-making risk management to protect the soil ecosystem. Moreover, these findings will be useful in establishing policies and priorities for soil risk management.
[Display omitted]
•Site-specific soil ecological risk assessment was conducted based on TRIAD approach.•Three lines of evidence (LoE) were combined into an index of integrated risk (IR).•In all sites, chemical-LoE contributed the highest integrated risk values.•There was no effect on some species due to the low bioavailability of metals.•High risk sites were prioritized based on the results of the TRIAD approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128883 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651690541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304389422006720</els_id><sourcerecordid>2651690541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-ce045152a4b57d6fb7af49a2b6f173db0a82caea5896bff69d5a68796393886f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMuO1DAQRS0EYpqBTwB5ySaN33FWaDS8RhoJCYa1qThl2k0SNyk3Enw9GXXDllXV4ty6qsPYcym2Ukj3ar_d7-D3BHWrhFJbqbz3-gHbSN_qRmvtHrKN0MI02nfmgj0h2gshZGvNY3ahrVFt58yGff2cKzZ0wJhTjhxjGcu3HGHkS6bvHIiQaMK58pL4hBXGJpa5wpRnqDhwKnkk3gOte5l53SG_-3Rz9YbD4bAUiLun7FGCkfDZeV6yL-_e3l1_aG4_vr-5vrptoupsbSIKY6VVYHrbDi71LSTTgepdkq0eegFeRUCwvnN9Sq4bLDi__qA77b1L-pK9PN1da38ckWqYMkUcR5ixHCkoZ6XrhDVyRe0JjUshWjCFw5InWH4FKcK93LAPZ7nhXm44yV1zL84Vx37C4V_qr80VeH0CcH30Z8YlUMw4RxzygrGGoeT_VPwBYLiOWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2651690541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Site-specific ecological risk assessment of metal-contaminated soils based on the TRIAD approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kim, Dokyung ; Kwak, Jin Il ; Hwang, Wonjae ; Lee, Yong-ho ; Lee, Yun-Sik ; Kim, Ji-In ; Hong, Sunhee ; Hyun, Seunghun ; An, Youn-Joo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dokyung ; Kwak, Jin Il ; Hwang, Wonjae ; Lee, Yong-ho ; Lee, Yun-Sik ; Kim, Ji-In ; Hong, Sunhee ; Hyun, Seunghun ; An, Youn-Joo</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological risk assessment based on scientific data is crucial for understanding causal relationships between chemical pollution and environmental risks. Simultaneously, a balance is required between socioeconomic factors and scientific evidence. The TRIAD approach, which incorporates three lines of evidence (LoE)—chemical (Chem-LoE), ecotoxicological (Ecotox-LoE), and ecological (Eco-LoE)—was applied in five sites of an abandoned mine for site-specific soil ecological risk assessment (SERA). In combination, the three LoEs showed that two sites had extremely high risks, one site had moderate risk, and the other site had low risk. At all sites, Chem-LoE exhibited high-integrated risk values. In Ecotox-LoE and Eco-LoE, some species were not affected despite high metal concentrations in the soil samples collected from the sites, indicating that the bioavailability of metals differed according to the physiochemical properties of the soil medium. This study is significant as multiple analyses were performed considering ecosystem structure to reduce uncertainty in SERA. The results provide information to support effective decision-making risk management to protect the soil ecosystem. Moreover, these findings will be useful in establishing policies and priorities for soil risk management.
[Display omitted]
•Site-specific soil ecological risk assessment was conducted based on TRIAD approach.•Three lines of evidence (LoE) were combined into an index of integrated risk (IR).•In all sites, chemical-LoE contributed the highest integrated risk values.•There was no effect on some species due to the low bioavailability of metals.•High risk sites were prioritized based on the results of the TRIAD approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3336</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35427964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Chemical line of evidence ; Ecological line of evidence ; Ecosystem ; Ecotoxicological line of evidence ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental Pollution ; Hazardous materials ; Integrated risk ; Metals - analysis ; Metals - toxicity ; Metals, Heavy - analysis ; Metals, Heavy - toxicity ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Soil - chemistry ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Soil Pollutants - toxicity</subject><ispartof>Journal of hazardous materials, 2022-07, Vol.434, p.128883-128883, Article 128883</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-ce045152a4b57d6fb7af49a2b6f173db0a82caea5896bff69d5a68796393886f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-ce045152a4b57d6fb7af49a2b6f173db0a82caea5896bff69d5a68796393886f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128883$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35427964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dokyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Jin Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Wonjae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yong-ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yun-Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ji-In</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Sunhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Seunghun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Youn-Joo</creatorcontrib><title>Site-specific ecological risk assessment of metal-contaminated soils based on the TRIAD approach</title><title>Journal of hazardous materials</title><addtitle>J Hazard Mater</addtitle><description>Ecological risk assessment based on scientific data is crucial for understanding causal relationships between chemical pollution and environmental risks. Simultaneously, a balance is required between socioeconomic factors and scientific evidence. The TRIAD approach, which incorporates three lines of evidence (LoE)—chemical (Chem-LoE), ecotoxicological (Ecotox-LoE), and ecological (Eco-LoE)—was applied in five sites of an abandoned mine for site-specific soil ecological risk assessment (SERA). In combination, the three LoEs showed that two sites had extremely high risks, one site had moderate risk, and the other site had low risk. At all sites, Chem-LoE exhibited high-integrated risk values. In Ecotox-LoE and Eco-LoE, some species were not affected despite high metal concentrations in the soil samples collected from the sites, indicating that the bioavailability of metals differed according to the physiochemical properties of the soil medium. This study is significant as multiple analyses were performed considering ecosystem structure to reduce uncertainty in SERA. The results provide information to support effective decision-making risk management to protect the soil ecosystem. Moreover, these findings will be useful in establishing policies and priorities for soil risk management.
[Display omitted]
•Site-specific soil ecological risk assessment was conducted based on TRIAD approach.•Three lines of evidence (LoE) were combined into an index of integrated risk (IR).•In all sites, chemical-LoE contributed the highest integrated risk values.•There was no effect on some species due to the low bioavailability of metals.•High risk sites were prioritized based on the results of the TRIAD approach.</description><subject>Chemical line of evidence</subject><subject>Ecological line of evidence</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecotoxicological line of evidence</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution</subject><subject>Hazardous materials</subject><subject>Integrated risk</subject><subject>Metals - analysis</subject><subject>Metals - toxicity</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - analysis</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - toxicity</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - toxicity</subject><issn>0304-3894</issn><issn>1873-3336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMuO1DAQRS0EYpqBTwB5ySaN33FWaDS8RhoJCYa1qThl2k0SNyk3Enw9GXXDllXV4ty6qsPYcym2Ukj3ar_d7-D3BHWrhFJbqbz3-gHbSN_qRmvtHrKN0MI02nfmgj0h2gshZGvNY3ahrVFt58yGff2cKzZ0wJhTjhxjGcu3HGHkS6bvHIiQaMK58pL4hBXGJpa5wpRnqDhwKnkk3gOte5l53SG_-3Rz9YbD4bAUiLun7FGCkfDZeV6yL-_e3l1_aG4_vr-5vrptoupsbSIKY6VVYHrbDi71LSTTgepdkq0eegFeRUCwvnN9Sq4bLDi__qA77b1L-pK9PN1da38ckWqYMkUcR5ixHCkoZ6XrhDVyRe0JjUshWjCFw5InWH4FKcK93LAPZ7nhXm44yV1zL84Vx37C4V_qr80VeH0CcH30Z8YlUMw4RxzygrGGoeT_VPwBYLiOWQ</recordid><startdate>20220715</startdate><enddate>20220715</enddate><creator>Kim, Dokyung</creator><creator>Kwak, Jin Il</creator><creator>Hwang, Wonjae</creator><creator>Lee, Yong-ho</creator><creator>Lee, Yun-Sik</creator><creator>Kim, Ji-In</creator><creator>Hong, Sunhee</creator><creator>Hyun, Seunghun</creator><creator>An, Youn-Joo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220715</creationdate><title>Site-specific ecological risk assessment of metal-contaminated soils based on the TRIAD approach</title><author>Kim, Dokyung ; Kwak, Jin Il ; Hwang, Wonjae ; Lee, Yong-ho ; Lee, Yun-Sik ; Kim, Ji-In ; Hong, Sunhee ; Hyun, Seunghun ; An, Youn-Joo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-ce045152a4b57d6fb7af49a2b6f173db0a82caea5896bff69d5a68796393886f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Chemical line of evidence</topic><topic>Ecological line of evidence</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecotoxicological line of evidence</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution</topic><topic>Hazardous materials</topic><topic>Integrated risk</topic><topic>Metals - analysis</topic><topic>Metals - toxicity</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - analysis</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - toxicity</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dokyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Jin Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Wonjae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yong-ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yun-Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ji-In</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Sunhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Seunghun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Youn-Joo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hazardous materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Dokyung</au><au>Kwak, Jin Il</au><au>Hwang, Wonjae</au><au>Lee, Yong-ho</au><au>Lee, Yun-Sik</au><au>Kim, Ji-In</au><au>Hong, Sunhee</au><au>Hyun, Seunghun</au><au>An, Youn-Joo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Site-specific ecological risk assessment of metal-contaminated soils based on the TRIAD approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hazardous materials</jtitle><addtitle>J Hazard Mater</addtitle><date>2022-07-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>434</volume><spage>128883</spage><epage>128883</epage><pages>128883-128883</pages><artnum>128883</artnum><issn>0304-3894</issn><eissn>1873-3336</eissn><abstract>Ecological risk assessment based on scientific data is crucial for understanding causal relationships between chemical pollution and environmental risks. Simultaneously, a balance is required between socioeconomic factors and scientific evidence. The TRIAD approach, which incorporates three lines of evidence (LoE)—chemical (Chem-LoE), ecotoxicological (Ecotox-LoE), and ecological (Eco-LoE)—was applied in five sites of an abandoned mine for site-specific soil ecological risk assessment (SERA). In combination, the three LoEs showed that two sites had extremely high risks, one site had moderate risk, and the other site had low risk. At all sites, Chem-LoE exhibited high-integrated risk values. In Ecotox-LoE and Eco-LoE, some species were not affected despite high metal concentrations in the soil samples collected from the sites, indicating that the bioavailability of metals differed according to the physiochemical properties of the soil medium. This study is significant as multiple analyses were performed considering ecosystem structure to reduce uncertainty in SERA. The results provide information to support effective decision-making risk management to protect the soil ecosystem. Moreover, these findings will be useful in establishing policies and priorities for soil risk management.
[Display omitted]
•Site-specific soil ecological risk assessment was conducted based on TRIAD approach.•Three lines of evidence (LoE) were combined into an index of integrated risk (IR).•In all sites, chemical-LoE contributed the highest integrated risk values.•There was no effect on some species due to the low bioavailability of metals.•High risk sites were prioritized based on the results of the TRIAD approach.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35427964</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128883</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-3894 |
ispartof | Journal of hazardous materials, 2022-07, Vol.434, p.128883-128883, Article 128883 |
issn | 0304-3894 1873-3336 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651690541 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Chemical line of evidence Ecological line of evidence Ecosystem Ecotoxicological line of evidence Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental Pollution Hazardous materials Integrated risk Metals - analysis Metals - toxicity Metals, Heavy - analysis Metals, Heavy - toxicity Risk Assessment - methods Soil - chemistry Soil Pollutants - analysis Soil Pollutants - toxicity |
title | Site-specific ecological risk assessment of metal-contaminated soils based on the TRIAD approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A06%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Site-specific%20ecological%20risk%20assessment%20of%20metal-contaminated%20soils%20based%20on%20the%20TRIAD%20approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hazardous%20materials&rft.au=Kim,%20Dokyung&rft.date=2022-07-15&rft.volume=434&rft.spage=128883&rft.epage=128883&rft.pages=128883-128883&rft.artnum=128883&rft.issn=0304-3894&rft.eissn=1873-3336&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128883&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2651690541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2651690541&rft_id=info:pmid/35427964&rft_els_id=S0304389422006720&rfr_iscdi=true |