Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical HIV prevention intervention, reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by upwards of 90% for sexual encounters and 70% for injection drug use. If widely used, PrEP has the potential to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States.1 In 2015, the Centers f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of public health (1971) 2022-06, Vol.112 (6), p.834-838
Hauptverfasser: Srikanth, Karishma, Killelea, Amy, Strumpf, Andrew, Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin, Horn, Tim, McManus, Kathleen A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 838
container_issue 6
container_start_page 834
container_title American journal of public health (1971)
container_volume 112
creator Srikanth, Karishma
Killelea, Amy
Strumpf, Andrew
Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin
Horn, Tim
McManus, Kathleen A
description HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical HIV prevention intervention, reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by upwards of 90% for sexual encounters and 70% for injection drug use. If widely used, PrEP has the potential to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States.1 In 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that approximately 1.2 million people were at high risk of acquiring HIV and had a clinical indication for PrEP.2 One of the four pillars of the federal government's Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative is increasing access to and use of PrEP; in fiscal year 2021, $386 million was appropriated for the EHE initiative, of which $102 million was allocated to provide "HIV testing, linkage to care, and prescription of PrEP."1 Additionally, an objective of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States (2022-2025) is to increase PrEP coverage to 50% from a 2017 baseline of 13.2%.3 Despite the first PrEP antiretroviral being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012, less than 20% of those at high risk of HIV received a PrEP prescription in 2019. There are inequities in PrEP uptake across communities at higher risk for HIV-Black and Hispanic communities, cisgender women, transgender women, and people living in the South-because of high brand-name medication costs and limited access to financial resources to cover costs of PrEP-associated medical visits and laboratory tests, among other factors.5 Counterintuitively, the most updated available PrEP-utilization data demonstrate that health systems and public health efforts have been less effective at reaching those most at risk for HIV. Black and Hispanic individuals are estimated to have higher rates of clinical indications for PrEP, at 43.7% and 24.7%, respectively.6 Despite this, in 2016, almost 70% of PrEP users were White, whereas only 11 % were Black and 13% were Hispanic.6 There are also disparities across gender, age, and geography. PrEP uptake among men was 14times higherthan uptake among women in 2016, and people aged 25 to 44 years were more likely to be PrEP users than people of other ages.6 The US South accounted for over half of new HIV diagnoses in 2016 but represents only 30% of all PrEP users.7 Overall, Southern states had the lowest levels of PrEP utilization relative to HIV diagnoses.
doi_str_mv 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306793
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651686331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2672393026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-9f6837fa6bdbd618c1fed9c3dca3c9bd083c6f73403cd21383b5d7c8a9cc740e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotn7cPUnAi5fWSWY3mxxrUasULPgBnpZsksUtbVOTXbD_3pRWD55mYJ73ZXgIuWAw5Azym9HTbDLkwPkQQRQKD0if5RkbAGTykPQBFKQdRY-cxDgHYEzl7Jj0MM84SIV98jGK0ZtGt87SsY9tpKPgqKa3OoTGBdp6Onl8p7Pg3Pfaxy4dZ8GvPzcL_d0k2BgXI21WtP109G3VbHte2lQXz8hRrRfRne_nKXm7v3sdTwbT54fH8Wg6MFxmOFC1kFjUWlS2soJJw2pnlUFrNBpVWZBoRF1gBmgsZyixym1hpFbGFBk4PCXXu9518F-di225bKJxi4VeOd_FkoucCSkQWUKv_qFz34VV-i5RBUeFwEWiYEeZ4GMMri7XoVnqsCkZlFvt5VZ7udVe7rSnyOW-uKuWzv4Ffj3jDzmzfHM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672393026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Srikanth, Karishma ; Killelea, Amy ; Strumpf, Andrew ; Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin ; Horn, Tim ; McManus, Kathleen A</creator><creatorcontrib>Srikanth, Karishma ; Killelea, Amy ; Strumpf, Andrew ; Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin ; Horn, Tim ; McManus, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><description>HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical HIV prevention intervention, reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by upwards of 90% for sexual encounters and 70% for injection drug use. If widely used, PrEP has the potential to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States.1 In 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that approximately 1.2 million people were at high risk of acquiring HIV and had a clinical indication for PrEP.2 One of the four pillars of the federal government's Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative is increasing access to and use of PrEP; in fiscal year 2021, $386 million was appropriated for the EHE initiative, of which $102 million was allocated to provide "HIV testing, linkage to care, and prescription of PrEP."1 Additionally, an objective of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States (2022-2025) is to increase PrEP coverage to 50% from a 2017 baseline of 13.2%.3 Despite the first PrEP antiretroviral being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012, less than 20% of those at high risk of HIV received a PrEP prescription in 2019. There are inequities in PrEP uptake across communities at higher risk for HIV-Black and Hispanic communities, cisgender women, transgender women, and people living in the South-because of high brand-name medication costs and limited access to financial resources to cover costs of PrEP-associated medical visits and laboratory tests, among other factors.5 Counterintuitively, the most updated available PrEP-utilization data demonstrate that health systems and public health efforts have been less effective at reaching those most at risk for HIV. Black and Hispanic individuals are estimated to have higher rates of clinical indications for PrEP, at 43.7% and 24.7%, respectively.6 Despite this, in 2016, almost 70% of PrEP users were White, whereas only 11 % were Black and 13% were Hispanic.6 There are also disparities across gender, age, and geography. PrEP uptake among men was 14times higherthan uptake among women in 2016, and people aged 25 to 44 years were more likely to be PrEP users than people of other ages.6 The US South accounted for over half of new HIV diagnoses in 2016 but represents only 30% of all PrEP users.7 Overall, Southern states had the lowest levels of PrEP utilization relative to HIV diagnoses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306793</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35420893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Public Health Association</publisher><subject>Access ; Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; AIDS ; Antiretroviral agents ; Cisgender ; Cost analysis ; Cost of living ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Disease transmission ; Drug prices ; Epidemics ; Federal government ; Food ; Geography ; Health care expenditures ; Hispanic people ; HIV ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Indigent care ; Insurance coverage ; Intervention ; Laboratory tests ; Medicaid ; Medical laboratories ; Prevention ; Prophylaxis ; Public health ; Risk ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; Stigma ; System effectiveness ; Transgender persons ; Uninsured people ; Women</subject><ispartof>American journal of public health (1971), 2022-06, Vol.112 (6), p.834-838</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Public Health Association Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-9f6837fa6bdbd618c1fed9c3dca3c9bd083c6f73403cd21383b5d7c8a9cc740e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-9f6837fa6bdbd618c1fed9c3dca3c9bd083c6f73403cd21383b5d7c8a9cc740e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35420893$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Srikanth, Karishma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killelea, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strumpf, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><title>Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States</title><title>American journal of public health (1971)</title><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><description>HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical HIV prevention intervention, reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by upwards of 90% for sexual encounters and 70% for injection drug use. If widely used, PrEP has the potential to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States.1 In 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that approximately 1.2 million people were at high risk of acquiring HIV and had a clinical indication for PrEP.2 One of the four pillars of the federal government's Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative is increasing access to and use of PrEP; in fiscal year 2021, $386 million was appropriated for the EHE initiative, of which $102 million was allocated to provide "HIV testing, linkage to care, and prescription of PrEP."1 Additionally, an objective of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States (2022-2025) is to increase PrEP coverage to 50% from a 2017 baseline of 13.2%.3 Despite the first PrEP antiretroviral being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012, less than 20% of those at high risk of HIV received a PrEP prescription in 2019. There are inequities in PrEP uptake across communities at higher risk for HIV-Black and Hispanic communities, cisgender women, transgender women, and people living in the South-because of high brand-name medication costs and limited access to financial resources to cover costs of PrEP-associated medical visits and laboratory tests, among other factors.5 Counterintuitively, the most updated available PrEP-utilization data demonstrate that health systems and public health efforts have been less effective at reaching those most at risk for HIV. Black and Hispanic individuals are estimated to have higher rates of clinical indications for PrEP, at 43.7% and 24.7%, respectively.6 Despite this, in 2016, almost 70% of PrEP users were White, whereas only 11 % were Black and 13% were Hispanic.6 There are also disparities across gender, age, and geography. PrEP uptake among men was 14times higherthan uptake among women in 2016, and people aged 25 to 44 years were more likely to be PrEP users than people of other ages.6 The US South accounted for over half of new HIV diagnoses in 2016 but represents only 30% of all PrEP users.7 Overall, Southern states had the lowest levels of PrEP utilization relative to HIV diagnoses.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Antiretroviral agents</subject><subject>Cisgender</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost of living</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug prices</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Hispanic people</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Indigent care</subject><subject>Insurance coverage</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical laboratories</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Transgender persons</subject><subject>Uninsured people</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0090-0036</issn><issn>1541-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotn7cPUnAi5fWSWY3mxxrUasULPgBnpZsksUtbVOTXbD_3pRWD55mYJ73ZXgIuWAw5Azym9HTbDLkwPkQQRQKD0if5RkbAGTykPQBFKQdRY-cxDgHYEzl7Jj0MM84SIV98jGK0ZtGt87SsY9tpKPgqKa3OoTGBdp6Onl8p7Pg3Pfaxy4dZ8GvPzcL_d0k2BgXI21WtP109G3VbHte2lQXz8hRrRfRne_nKXm7v3sdTwbT54fH8Wg6MFxmOFC1kFjUWlS2soJJw2pnlUFrNBpVWZBoRF1gBmgsZyixym1hpFbGFBk4PCXXu9518F-di225bKJxi4VeOd_FkoucCSkQWUKv_qFz34VV-i5RBUeFwEWiYEeZ4GMMri7XoVnqsCkZlFvt5VZ7udVe7rSnyOW-uKuWzv4Ffj3jDzmzfHM</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Srikanth, Karishma</creator><creator>Killelea, Amy</creator><creator>Strumpf, Andrew</creator><creator>Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin</creator><creator>Horn, Tim</creator><creator>McManus, Kathleen A</creator><general>American Public Health Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States</title><author>Srikanth, Karishma ; Killelea, Amy ; Strumpf, Andrew ; Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin ; Horn, Tim ; McManus, Kathleen A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-9f6837fa6bdbd618c1fed9c3dca3c9bd083c6f73403cd21383b5d7c8a9cc740e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Antiretroviral agents</topic><topic>Cisgender</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost of living</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug prices</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Hispanic people</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Indigent care</topic><topic>Insurance coverage</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical laboratories</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Transgender persons</topic><topic>Uninsured people</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Srikanth, Karishma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killelea, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strumpf, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Srikanth, Karishma</au><au>Killelea, Amy</au><au>Strumpf, Andrew</au><au>Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin</au><au>Horn, Tim</au><au>McManus, Kathleen A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States</atitle><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>834</spage><epage>838</epage><pages>834-838</pages><issn>0090-0036</issn><eissn>1541-0048</eissn><abstract>HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical HIV prevention intervention, reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by upwards of 90% for sexual encounters and 70% for injection drug use. If widely used, PrEP has the potential to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States.1 In 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that approximately 1.2 million people were at high risk of acquiring HIV and had a clinical indication for PrEP.2 One of the four pillars of the federal government's Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative is increasing access to and use of PrEP; in fiscal year 2021, $386 million was appropriated for the EHE initiative, of which $102 million was allocated to provide "HIV testing, linkage to care, and prescription of PrEP."1 Additionally, an objective of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States (2022-2025) is to increase PrEP coverage to 50% from a 2017 baseline of 13.2%.3 Despite the first PrEP antiretroviral being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012, less than 20% of those at high risk of HIV received a PrEP prescription in 2019. There are inequities in PrEP uptake across communities at higher risk for HIV-Black and Hispanic communities, cisgender women, transgender women, and people living in the South-because of high brand-name medication costs and limited access to financial resources to cover costs of PrEP-associated medical visits and laboratory tests, among other factors.5 Counterintuitively, the most updated available PrEP-utilization data demonstrate that health systems and public health efforts have been less effective at reaching those most at risk for HIV. Black and Hispanic individuals are estimated to have higher rates of clinical indications for PrEP, at 43.7% and 24.7%, respectively.6 Despite this, in 2016, almost 70% of PrEP users were White, whereas only 11 % were Black and 13% were Hispanic.6 There are also disparities across gender, age, and geography. PrEP uptake among men was 14times higherthan uptake among women in 2016, and people aged 25 to 44 years were more likely to be PrEP users than people of other ages.6 The US South accounted for over half of new HIV diagnoses in 2016 but represents only 30% of all PrEP users.7 Overall, Southern states had the lowest levels of PrEP utilization relative to HIV diagnoses.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Public Health Association</pub><pmid>35420893</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.2022.306793</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-0036
ispartof American journal of public health (1971), 2022-06, Vol.112 (6), p.834-838
issn 0090-0036
1541-0048
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651686331
source PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Access
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
AIDS
Antiretroviral agents
Cisgender
Cost analysis
Cost of living
Disease control
Disease prevention
Disease transmission
Drug prices
Epidemics
Federal government
Food
Geography
Health care expenditures
Hispanic people
HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
Indigent care
Insurance coverage
Intervention
Laboratory tests
Medicaid
Medical laboratories
Prevention
Prophylaxis
Public health
Risk
Sexually transmitted diseases
STD
Stigma
System effectiveness
Transgender persons
Uninsured people
Women
title Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A12%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associated%20Costs%20Are%20a%20Barrier%20to%20HIV%20Preexposure%20Prophylaxis%20Access%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20public%20health%20(1971)&rft.au=Srikanth,%20Karishma&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=834&rft.epage=838&rft.pages=834-838&rft.issn=0090-0036&rft.eissn=1541-0048&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306793&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2672393026%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672393026&rft_id=info:pmid/35420893&rfr_iscdi=true