Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical HIV prevention intervention, reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by upwards of 90% for sexual encounters and 70% for injection drug use. If widely used, PrEP has the potential to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States.1 In 2015, the Centers f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of public health (1971) 2022-06, Vol.112 (6), p.834-838 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 838 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 834 |
container_title | American journal of public health (1971) |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Srikanth, Karishma Killelea, Amy Strumpf, Andrew Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin Horn, Tim McManus, Kathleen A |
description | HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical HIV prevention intervention, reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by upwards of 90% for sexual encounters and 70% for injection drug use. If widely used, PrEP has the potential to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States.1 In 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that approximately 1.2 million people were at high risk of acquiring HIV and had a clinical indication for PrEP.2 One of the four pillars of the federal government's Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative is increasing access to and use of PrEP; in fiscal year 2021, $386 million was appropriated for the EHE initiative, of which $102 million was allocated to provide "HIV testing, linkage to care, and prescription of PrEP."1 Additionally, an objective of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States (2022-2025) is to increase PrEP coverage to 50% from a 2017 baseline of 13.2%.3 Despite the first PrEP antiretroviral being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012, less than 20% of those at high risk of HIV received a PrEP prescription in 2019. There are inequities in PrEP uptake across communities at higher risk for HIV-Black and Hispanic communities, cisgender women, transgender women, and people living in the South-because of high brand-name medication costs and limited access to financial resources to cover costs of PrEP-associated medical visits and laboratory tests, among other factors.5 Counterintuitively, the most updated available PrEP-utilization data demonstrate that health systems and public health efforts have been less effective at reaching those most at risk for HIV. Black and Hispanic individuals are estimated to have higher rates of clinical indications for PrEP, at 43.7% and 24.7%, respectively.6 Despite this, in 2016, almost 70% of PrEP users were White, whereas only 11 % were Black and 13% were Hispanic.6 There are also disparities across gender, age, and geography. PrEP uptake among men was 14times higherthan uptake among women in 2016, and people aged 25 to 44 years were more likely to be PrEP users than people of other ages.6 The US South accounted for over half of new HIV diagnoses in 2016 but represents only 30% of all PrEP users.7 Overall, Southern states had the lowest levels of PrEP utilization relative to HIV diagnoses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306793 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651686331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2672393026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-9f6837fa6bdbd618c1fed9c3dca3c9bd083c6f73403cd21383b5d7c8a9cc740e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotn7cPUnAi5fWSWY3mxxrUasULPgBnpZsksUtbVOTXbD_3pRWD55mYJ73ZXgIuWAw5Azym9HTbDLkwPkQQRQKD0if5RkbAGTykPQBFKQdRY-cxDgHYEzl7Jj0MM84SIV98jGK0ZtGt87SsY9tpKPgqKa3OoTGBdp6Onl8p7Pg3Pfaxy4dZ8GvPzcL_d0k2BgXI21WtP109G3VbHte2lQXz8hRrRfRne_nKXm7v3sdTwbT54fH8Wg6MFxmOFC1kFjUWlS2soJJw2pnlUFrNBpVWZBoRF1gBmgsZyixym1hpFbGFBk4PCXXu9518F-di225bKJxi4VeOd_FkoucCSkQWUKv_qFz34VV-i5RBUeFwEWiYEeZ4GMMri7XoVnqsCkZlFvt5VZ7udVe7rSnyOW-uKuWzv4Ffj3jDzmzfHM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672393026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Srikanth, Karishma ; Killelea, Amy ; Strumpf, Andrew ; Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin ; Horn, Tim ; McManus, Kathleen A</creator><creatorcontrib>Srikanth, Karishma ; Killelea, Amy ; Strumpf, Andrew ; Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin ; Horn, Tim ; McManus, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><description>HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical HIV prevention intervention, reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by upwards of 90% for sexual encounters and 70% for injection drug use. If widely used, PrEP has the potential to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States.1 In 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that approximately 1.2 million people were at high risk of acquiring HIV and had a clinical indication for PrEP.2 One of the four pillars of the federal government's Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative is increasing access to and use of PrEP; in fiscal year 2021, $386 million was appropriated for the EHE initiative, of which $102 million was allocated to provide "HIV testing, linkage to care, and prescription of PrEP."1 Additionally, an objective of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States (2022-2025) is to increase PrEP coverage to 50% from a 2017 baseline of 13.2%.3 Despite the first PrEP antiretroviral being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012, less than 20% of those at high risk of HIV received a PrEP prescription in 2019. There are inequities in PrEP uptake across communities at higher risk for HIV-Black and Hispanic communities, cisgender women, transgender women, and people living in the South-because of high brand-name medication costs and limited access to financial resources to cover costs of PrEP-associated medical visits and laboratory tests, among other factors.5 Counterintuitively, the most updated available PrEP-utilization data demonstrate that health systems and public health efforts have been less effective at reaching those most at risk for HIV. Black and Hispanic individuals are estimated to have higher rates of clinical indications for PrEP, at 43.7% and 24.7%, respectively.6 Despite this, in 2016, almost 70% of PrEP users were White, whereas only 11 % were Black and 13% were Hispanic.6 There are also disparities across gender, age, and geography. PrEP uptake among men was 14times higherthan uptake among women in 2016, and people aged 25 to 44 years were more likely to be PrEP users than people of other ages.6 The US South accounted for over half of new HIV diagnoses in 2016 but represents only 30% of all PrEP users.7 Overall, Southern states had the lowest levels of PrEP utilization relative to HIV diagnoses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306793</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35420893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Public Health Association</publisher><subject>Access ; Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; AIDS ; Antiretroviral agents ; Cisgender ; Cost analysis ; Cost of living ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Disease transmission ; Drug prices ; Epidemics ; Federal government ; Food ; Geography ; Health care expenditures ; Hispanic people ; HIV ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Indigent care ; Insurance coverage ; Intervention ; Laboratory tests ; Medicaid ; Medical laboratories ; Prevention ; Prophylaxis ; Public health ; Risk ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; Stigma ; System effectiveness ; Transgender persons ; Uninsured people ; Women</subject><ispartof>American journal of public health (1971), 2022-06, Vol.112 (6), p.834-838</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Public Health Association Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-9f6837fa6bdbd618c1fed9c3dca3c9bd083c6f73403cd21383b5d7c8a9cc740e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-9f6837fa6bdbd618c1fed9c3dca3c9bd083c6f73403cd21383b5d7c8a9cc740e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35420893$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Srikanth, Karishma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killelea, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strumpf, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><title>Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States</title><title>American journal of public health (1971)</title><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><description>HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical HIV prevention intervention, reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by upwards of 90% for sexual encounters and 70% for injection drug use. If widely used, PrEP has the potential to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States.1 In 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that approximately 1.2 million people were at high risk of acquiring HIV and had a clinical indication for PrEP.2 One of the four pillars of the federal government's Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative is increasing access to and use of PrEP; in fiscal year 2021, $386 million was appropriated for the EHE initiative, of which $102 million was allocated to provide "HIV testing, linkage to care, and prescription of PrEP."1 Additionally, an objective of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States (2022-2025) is to increase PrEP coverage to 50% from a 2017 baseline of 13.2%.3 Despite the first PrEP antiretroviral being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012, less than 20% of those at high risk of HIV received a PrEP prescription in 2019. There are inequities in PrEP uptake across communities at higher risk for HIV-Black and Hispanic communities, cisgender women, transgender women, and people living in the South-because of high brand-name medication costs and limited access to financial resources to cover costs of PrEP-associated medical visits and laboratory tests, among other factors.5 Counterintuitively, the most updated available PrEP-utilization data demonstrate that health systems and public health efforts have been less effective at reaching those most at risk for HIV. Black and Hispanic individuals are estimated to have higher rates of clinical indications for PrEP, at 43.7% and 24.7%, respectively.6 Despite this, in 2016, almost 70% of PrEP users were White, whereas only 11 % were Black and 13% were Hispanic.6 There are also disparities across gender, age, and geography. PrEP uptake among men was 14times higherthan uptake among women in 2016, and people aged 25 to 44 years were more likely to be PrEP users than people of other ages.6 The US South accounted for over half of new HIV diagnoses in 2016 but represents only 30% of all PrEP users.7 Overall, Southern states had the lowest levels of PrEP utilization relative to HIV diagnoses.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Antiretroviral agents</subject><subject>Cisgender</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost of living</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug prices</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Hispanic people</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Indigent care</subject><subject>Insurance coverage</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical laboratories</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Transgender persons</subject><subject>Uninsured people</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0090-0036</issn><issn>1541-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotn7cPUnAi5fWSWY3mxxrUasULPgBnpZsksUtbVOTXbD_3pRWD55mYJ73ZXgIuWAw5Azym9HTbDLkwPkQQRQKD0if5RkbAGTykPQBFKQdRY-cxDgHYEzl7Jj0MM84SIV98jGK0ZtGt87SsY9tpKPgqKa3OoTGBdp6Onl8p7Pg3Pfaxy4dZ8GvPzcL_d0k2BgXI21WtP109G3VbHte2lQXz8hRrRfRne_nKXm7v3sdTwbT54fH8Wg6MFxmOFC1kFjUWlS2soJJw2pnlUFrNBpVWZBoRF1gBmgsZyixym1hpFbGFBk4PCXXu9518F-di225bKJxi4VeOd_FkoucCSkQWUKv_qFz34VV-i5RBUeFwEWiYEeZ4GMMri7XoVnqsCkZlFvt5VZ7udVe7rSnyOW-uKuWzv4Ffj3jDzmzfHM</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Srikanth, Karishma</creator><creator>Killelea, Amy</creator><creator>Strumpf, Andrew</creator><creator>Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin</creator><creator>Horn, Tim</creator><creator>McManus, Kathleen A</creator><general>American Public Health Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States</title><author>Srikanth, Karishma ; Killelea, Amy ; Strumpf, Andrew ; Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin ; Horn, Tim ; McManus, Kathleen A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-9f6837fa6bdbd618c1fed9c3dca3c9bd083c6f73403cd21383b5d7c8a9cc740e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Antiretroviral agents</topic><topic>Cisgender</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost of living</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug prices</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Hispanic people</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Indigent care</topic><topic>Insurance coverage</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical laboratories</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Transgender persons</topic><topic>Uninsured people</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Srikanth, Karishma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killelea, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strumpf, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Srikanth, Karishma</au><au>Killelea, Amy</au><au>Strumpf, Andrew</au><au>Corbin-Gutierrez, Edwin</au><au>Horn, Tim</au><au>McManus, Kathleen A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States</atitle><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>834</spage><epage>838</epage><pages>834-838</pages><issn>0090-0036</issn><eissn>1541-0048</eissn><abstract>HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical HIV prevention intervention, reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by upwards of 90% for sexual encounters and 70% for injection drug use. If widely used, PrEP has the potential to help end the HIV epidemic in the United States.1 In 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that approximately 1.2 million people were at high risk of acquiring HIV and had a clinical indication for PrEP.2 One of the four pillars of the federal government's Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative is increasing access to and use of PrEP; in fiscal year 2021, $386 million was appropriated for the EHE initiative, of which $102 million was allocated to provide "HIV testing, linkage to care, and prescription of PrEP."1 Additionally, an objective of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States (2022-2025) is to increase PrEP coverage to 50% from a 2017 baseline of 13.2%.3 Despite the first PrEP antiretroviral being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012, less than 20% of those at high risk of HIV received a PrEP prescription in 2019. There are inequities in PrEP uptake across communities at higher risk for HIV-Black and Hispanic communities, cisgender women, transgender women, and people living in the South-because of high brand-name medication costs and limited access to financial resources to cover costs of PrEP-associated medical visits and laboratory tests, among other factors.5 Counterintuitively, the most updated available PrEP-utilization data demonstrate that health systems and public health efforts have been less effective at reaching those most at risk for HIV. Black and Hispanic individuals are estimated to have higher rates of clinical indications for PrEP, at 43.7% and 24.7%, respectively.6 Despite this, in 2016, almost 70% of PrEP users were White, whereas only 11 % were Black and 13% were Hispanic.6 There are also disparities across gender, age, and geography. PrEP uptake among men was 14times higherthan uptake among women in 2016, and people aged 25 to 44 years were more likely to be PrEP users than people of other ages.6 The US South accounted for over half of new HIV diagnoses in 2016 but represents only 30% of all PrEP users.7 Overall, Southern states had the lowest levels of PrEP utilization relative to HIV diagnoses.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Public Health Association</pub><pmid>35420893</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.2022.306793</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-0036 |
ispartof | American journal of public health (1971), 2022-06, Vol.112 (6), p.834-838 |
issn | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651686331 |
source | PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Access Acquired immune deficiency syndrome AIDS Antiretroviral agents Cisgender Cost analysis Cost of living Disease control Disease prevention Disease transmission Drug prices Epidemics Federal government Food Geography Health care expenditures Hispanic people HIV Human immunodeficiency virus Indigent care Insurance coverage Intervention Laboratory tests Medicaid Medical laboratories Prevention Prophylaxis Public health Risk Sexually transmitted diseases STD Stigma System effectiveness Transgender persons Uninsured people Women |
title | Associated Costs Are a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Access in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A12%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associated%20Costs%20Are%20a%20Barrier%20to%20HIV%20Preexposure%20Prophylaxis%20Access%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20public%20health%20(1971)&rft.au=Srikanth,%20Karishma&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=834&rft.epage=838&rft.pages=834-838&rft.issn=0090-0036&rft.eissn=1541-0048&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306793&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2672393026%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672393026&rft_id=info:pmid/35420893&rfr_iscdi=true |