The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control
To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological review 2023-07, Vol.130 (4), p.953-976 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 976 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 953 |
container_title | Psychological review |
container_volume | 130 |
creator | Declerck, Mathieu Koch, Iring |
description | To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effects linked to bilingual inhibition in language production (i.e., asymmetrical switch costs, n−2 language repetition costs, reversed language dominance, and the blocked language order effect). We argue that these effects require more empirical examination in order to arrive at a firmer basis for the assumption that inhibition plays a major role during bilingual language control. In particular, the empirical replicability of the phenomena themselves needs to be established more firmly, the underlying theoretical assumptions need further examination, and the alternative explanations of the empirical effects need to be scrutinized. In turn, we conclude that inhibitory control may provide a coherent framework for bilingual language production while outlining the challenges that the inhibition account still needs to face. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/rev0000367 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651686164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2830354267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-b64766f867d8319ec415059858f228ab0c74a9b05ae7f7116ed21896fa2451483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90F1LwzAUBuAgis7pjT9ACt6I2JnTfF_q8GMw8GaCdyHtUhfp0pq0wv69LZsKXpibA-Hh5ZwXoTPAE8BE3AT7iftHuNhDI1BEpUAF7KNR_0fSTLHXI3Qc4_uAQKlDdEQYzbCkfIQmi5VNprUvbNMmdZnM_MrlrnW1T5xP7lzl_FtnqoG0oa5O0EFpqmhPd3OMXh7uF9OndP78OJvezlNDCW3TnFPBeSm5WEoCyhYUGGZKMllmmTQ5LgQ1KsfMWFEKAG6XGUjFS5NRBlSSMbrc5jah_uhsbPXaxcJWlfG27qLOOAMuOXDa04s_9L3ugu-305kkeDiVi38VZ0N5ANCrq60qQh1jsKVuglubsNGA9dC1_u26x-e7yC5f2-UP_S63B9dbYBqjm7gpTGhdUdlYdCFY3w5hGgjWVCtGyBcwUITJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2650036111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Declerck, Mathieu ; Koch, Iring</creator><contributor>Grigorenko, Elena L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Declerck, Mathieu ; Koch, Iring ; Grigorenko, Elena L</creatorcontrib><description>To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effects linked to bilingual inhibition in language production (i.e., asymmetrical switch costs, n−2 language repetition costs, reversed language dominance, and the blocked language order effect). We argue that these effects require more empirical examination in order to arrive at a firmer basis for the assumption that inhibition plays a major role during bilingual language control. In particular, the empirical replicability of the phenomena themselves needs to be established more firmly, the underlying theoretical assumptions need further examination, and the alternative explanations of the empirical effects need to be scrutinized. In turn, we conclude that inhibitory control may provide a coherent framework for bilingual language production while outlining the challenges that the inhibition account still needs to face.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-295X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/rev0000367</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35420846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Assumptions ; Bilingualism ; Cognitive Control ; Control ; Dominance ; Human ; Language dominance ; Language processing ; Proactive Inhibition ; Psychological research ; Repetition ; Response Inhibition ; Theoretical linguistics</subject><ispartof>Psychological review, 2023-07, Vol.130 (4), p.953-976</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-b64766f867d8319ec415059858f228ab0c74a9b05ae7f7116ed21896fa2451483</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-9664-8220 ; 0000-0002-7161-2974</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35420846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Grigorenko, Elena L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Declerck, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Iring</creatorcontrib><title>The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control</title><title>Psychological review</title><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effects linked to bilingual inhibition in language production (i.e., asymmetrical switch costs, n−2 language repetition costs, reversed language dominance, and the blocked language order effect). We argue that these effects require more empirical examination in order to arrive at a firmer basis for the assumption that inhibition plays a major role during bilingual language control. In particular, the empirical replicability of the phenomena themselves needs to be established more firmly, the underlying theoretical assumptions need further examination, and the alternative explanations of the empirical effects need to be scrutinized. In turn, we conclude that inhibitory control may provide a coherent framework for bilingual language production while outlining the challenges that the inhibition account still needs to face.</description><subject>Assumptions</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Cognitive Control</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Language dominance</subject><subject>Language processing</subject><subject>Proactive Inhibition</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Repetition</subject><subject>Response Inhibition</subject><subject>Theoretical linguistics</subject><issn>0033-295X</issn><issn>1939-1471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90F1LwzAUBuAgis7pjT9ACt6I2JnTfF_q8GMw8GaCdyHtUhfp0pq0wv69LZsKXpibA-Hh5ZwXoTPAE8BE3AT7iftHuNhDI1BEpUAF7KNR_0fSTLHXI3Qc4_uAQKlDdEQYzbCkfIQmi5VNprUvbNMmdZnM_MrlrnW1T5xP7lzl_FtnqoG0oa5O0EFpqmhPd3OMXh7uF9OndP78OJvezlNDCW3TnFPBeSm5WEoCyhYUGGZKMllmmTQ5LgQ1KsfMWFEKAG6XGUjFS5NRBlSSMbrc5jah_uhsbPXaxcJWlfG27qLOOAMuOXDa04s_9L3ugu-305kkeDiVi38VZ0N5ANCrq60qQh1jsKVuglubsNGA9dC1_u26x-e7yC5f2-UP_S63B9dbYBqjm7gpTGhdUdlYdCFY3w5hGgjWVCtGyBcwUITJ</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Declerck, Mathieu</creator><creator>Koch, Iring</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9664-8220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7161-2974</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control</title><author>Declerck, Mathieu ; Koch, Iring</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-b64766f867d8319ec415059858f228ab0c74a9b05ae7f7116ed21896fa2451483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Assumptions</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Cognitive Control</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Language dominance</topic><topic>Language processing</topic><topic>Proactive Inhibition</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Repetition</topic><topic>Response Inhibition</topic><topic>Theoretical linguistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Declerck, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Iring</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Declerck, Mathieu</au><au>Koch, Iring</au><au>Grigorenko, Elena L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control</atitle><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>953</spage><epage>976</epage><pages>953-976</pages><issn>0033-295X</issn><eissn>1939-1471</eissn><abstract>To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effects linked to bilingual inhibition in language production (i.e., asymmetrical switch costs, n−2 language repetition costs, reversed language dominance, and the blocked language order effect). We argue that these effects require more empirical examination in order to arrive at a firmer basis for the assumption that inhibition plays a major role during bilingual language control. In particular, the empirical replicability of the phenomena themselves needs to be established more firmly, the underlying theoretical assumptions need further examination, and the alternative explanations of the empirical effects need to be scrutinized. In turn, we conclude that inhibitory control may provide a coherent framework for bilingual language production while outlining the challenges that the inhibition account still needs to face.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>35420846</pmid><doi>10.1037/rev0000367</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9664-8220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7161-2974</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-295X |
ispartof | Psychological review, 2023-07, Vol.130 (4), p.953-976 |
issn | 0033-295X 1939-1471 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651686164 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Assumptions Bilingualism Cognitive Control Control Dominance Human Language dominance Language processing Proactive Inhibition Psychological research Repetition Response Inhibition Theoretical linguistics |
title | The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T17%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Concept%20of%20Inhibition%20in%20Bilingual%20Control&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20review&rft.au=Declerck,%20Mathieu&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=953&rft.epage=976&rft.pages=953-976&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.eissn=1939-1471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/rev0000367&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2830354267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2650036111&rft_id=info:pmid/35420846&rfr_iscdi=true |