The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control

To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological review 2023-07, Vol.130 (4), p.953-976
Hauptverfasser: Declerck, Mathieu, Koch, Iring
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 976
container_issue 4
container_start_page 953
container_title Psychological review
container_volume 130
creator Declerck, Mathieu
Koch, Iring
description To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effects linked to bilingual inhibition in language production (i.e., asymmetrical switch costs, n−2 language repetition costs, reversed language dominance, and the blocked language order effect). We argue that these effects require more empirical examination in order to arrive at a firmer basis for the assumption that inhibition plays a major role during bilingual language control. In particular, the empirical replicability of the phenomena themselves needs to be established more firmly, the underlying theoretical assumptions need further examination, and the alternative explanations of the empirical effects need to be scrutinized. In turn, we conclude that inhibitory control may provide a coherent framework for bilingual language production while outlining the challenges that the inhibition account still needs to face.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/rev0000367
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651686164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2830354267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-b64766f867d8319ec415059858f228ab0c74a9b05ae7f7116ed21896fa2451483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90F1LwzAUBuAgis7pjT9ACt6I2JnTfF_q8GMw8GaCdyHtUhfp0pq0wv69LZsKXpibA-Hh5ZwXoTPAE8BE3AT7iftHuNhDI1BEpUAF7KNR_0fSTLHXI3Qc4_uAQKlDdEQYzbCkfIQmi5VNprUvbNMmdZnM_MrlrnW1T5xP7lzl_FtnqoG0oa5O0EFpqmhPd3OMXh7uF9OndP78OJvezlNDCW3TnFPBeSm5WEoCyhYUGGZKMllmmTQ5LgQ1KsfMWFEKAG6XGUjFS5NRBlSSMbrc5jah_uhsbPXaxcJWlfG27qLOOAMuOXDa04s_9L3ugu-305kkeDiVi38VZ0N5ANCrq60qQh1jsKVuglubsNGA9dC1_u26x-e7yC5f2-UP_S63B9dbYBqjm7gpTGhdUdlYdCFY3w5hGgjWVCtGyBcwUITJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2650036111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Declerck, Mathieu ; Koch, Iring</creator><contributor>Grigorenko, Elena L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Declerck, Mathieu ; Koch, Iring ; Grigorenko, Elena L</creatorcontrib><description>To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effects linked to bilingual inhibition in language production (i.e., asymmetrical switch costs, n−2 language repetition costs, reversed language dominance, and the blocked language order effect). We argue that these effects require more empirical examination in order to arrive at a firmer basis for the assumption that inhibition plays a major role during bilingual language control. In particular, the empirical replicability of the phenomena themselves needs to be established more firmly, the underlying theoretical assumptions need further examination, and the alternative explanations of the empirical effects need to be scrutinized. In turn, we conclude that inhibitory control may provide a coherent framework for bilingual language production while outlining the challenges that the inhibition account still needs to face.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-295X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/rev0000367</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35420846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Assumptions ; Bilingualism ; Cognitive Control ; Control ; Dominance ; Human ; Language dominance ; Language processing ; Proactive Inhibition ; Psychological research ; Repetition ; Response Inhibition ; Theoretical linguistics</subject><ispartof>Psychological review, 2023-07, Vol.130 (4), p.953-976</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-b64766f867d8319ec415059858f228ab0c74a9b05ae7f7116ed21896fa2451483</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-9664-8220 ; 0000-0002-7161-2974</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35420846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Grigorenko, Elena L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Declerck, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Iring</creatorcontrib><title>The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control</title><title>Psychological review</title><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effects linked to bilingual inhibition in language production (i.e., asymmetrical switch costs, n−2 language repetition costs, reversed language dominance, and the blocked language order effect). We argue that these effects require more empirical examination in order to arrive at a firmer basis for the assumption that inhibition plays a major role during bilingual language control. In particular, the empirical replicability of the phenomena themselves needs to be established more firmly, the underlying theoretical assumptions need further examination, and the alternative explanations of the empirical effects need to be scrutinized. In turn, we conclude that inhibitory control may provide a coherent framework for bilingual language production while outlining the challenges that the inhibition account still needs to face.</description><subject>Assumptions</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Cognitive Control</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Language dominance</subject><subject>Language processing</subject><subject>Proactive Inhibition</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Repetition</subject><subject>Response Inhibition</subject><subject>Theoretical linguistics</subject><issn>0033-295X</issn><issn>1939-1471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90F1LwzAUBuAgis7pjT9ACt6I2JnTfF_q8GMw8GaCdyHtUhfp0pq0wv69LZsKXpibA-Hh5ZwXoTPAE8BE3AT7iftHuNhDI1BEpUAF7KNR_0fSTLHXI3Qc4_uAQKlDdEQYzbCkfIQmi5VNprUvbNMmdZnM_MrlrnW1T5xP7lzl_FtnqoG0oa5O0EFpqmhPd3OMXh7uF9OndP78OJvezlNDCW3TnFPBeSm5WEoCyhYUGGZKMllmmTQ5LgQ1KsfMWFEKAG6XGUjFS5NRBlSSMbrc5jah_uhsbPXaxcJWlfG27qLOOAMuOXDa04s_9L3ugu-305kkeDiVi38VZ0N5ANCrq60qQh1jsKVuglubsNGA9dC1_u26x-e7yC5f2-UP_S63B9dbYBqjm7gpTGhdUdlYdCFY3w5hGgjWVCtGyBcwUITJ</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Declerck, Mathieu</creator><creator>Koch, Iring</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9664-8220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7161-2974</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control</title><author>Declerck, Mathieu ; Koch, Iring</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-b64766f867d8319ec415059858f228ab0c74a9b05ae7f7116ed21896fa2451483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Assumptions</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Cognitive Control</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Language dominance</topic><topic>Language processing</topic><topic>Proactive Inhibition</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Repetition</topic><topic>Response Inhibition</topic><topic>Theoretical linguistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Declerck, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Iring</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Declerck, Mathieu</au><au>Koch, Iring</au><au>Grigorenko, Elena L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control</atitle><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>953</spage><epage>976</epage><pages>953-976</pages><issn>0033-295X</issn><eissn>1939-1471</eissn><abstract>To achieve fluent language processing as a bilingual, a dominant theoretical framework assumes that the nontarget language is inhibited. This assumption is based on several empirical effects that are typically explained with inhibitory control. In the current article, we discuss four prominent effects linked to bilingual inhibition in language production (i.e., asymmetrical switch costs, n−2 language repetition costs, reversed language dominance, and the blocked language order effect). We argue that these effects require more empirical examination in order to arrive at a firmer basis for the assumption that inhibition plays a major role during bilingual language control. In particular, the empirical replicability of the phenomena themselves needs to be established more firmly, the underlying theoretical assumptions need further examination, and the alternative explanations of the empirical effects need to be scrutinized. In turn, we conclude that inhibitory control may provide a coherent framework for bilingual language production while outlining the challenges that the inhibition account still needs to face.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>35420846</pmid><doi>10.1037/rev0000367</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9664-8220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7161-2974</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-295X
ispartof Psychological review, 2023-07, Vol.130 (4), p.953-976
issn 0033-295X
1939-1471
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2651686164
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Assumptions
Bilingualism
Cognitive Control
Control
Dominance
Human
Language dominance
Language processing
Proactive Inhibition
Psychological research
Repetition
Response Inhibition
Theoretical linguistics
title The Concept of Inhibition in Bilingual Control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T17%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Concept%20of%20Inhibition%20in%20Bilingual%20Control&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20review&rft.au=Declerck,%20Mathieu&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=953&rft.epage=976&rft.pages=953-976&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.eissn=1939-1471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/rev0000367&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2830354267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2650036111&rft_id=info:pmid/35420846&rfr_iscdi=true