Friction in bulk metal forming: a general friction model vs. the law of constant friction

Commercially available finite-element programs for the simulation of bulk metal-forming processes usually model the frictional restraint acting at the interface between the workpiece and the tools according to the law of constant friction. Such description is often inadequate and does not represent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of materials processing technology 1997-04, Vol.66 (1), p.186-194
Hauptverfasser: Petersen, S.B., Martins, P.A.F., Bay, N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 194
container_issue 1
container_start_page 186
container_title Journal of materials processing technology
container_volume 66
creator Petersen, S.B.
Martins, P.A.F.
Bay, N.
description Commercially available finite-element programs for the simulation of bulk metal-forming processes usually model the frictional restraint acting at the interface between the workpiece and the tools according to the law of constant friction. Such description is often inadequate and does not represent the state-of-the-art in tribology. In the present paper it is shown that the application of the general friction model, developed by Wanheim and Bay, involves a major improvement in the ability to simulate processes where low tool-workpiece interface stresses may prevail. This is confirmed by experimental and numerical investigations into the upsetting of a semi-tapered specimen between parallel dies. Additionally, it has led to the proposal of a new ring-compression test geometry intended to complement the conventional ring test for the calibration of friction models under conditions where the normal stresses over considerable parts of the tool-workpiece interface may be lower than the yield stress of the material.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02518-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26515730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0924013696025186</els_id><sourcerecordid>26515730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-6e074201deab8bb1f96b93ae2282241b6d849c962aac217f7c1351c36e80de253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhT2ARCn8BCRPCIYUPxInZkGoagGpEgMwMFmOc1MMiV1st4h_Tx_QlelKR9850v0QOqNkRAkVV09EsjwjlIsLKS4JK2iViQM02MdH6DjGd0JoSapqgF6nwZpkvcPW4XrZfeAeku5w60Nv3fwaazwHB2ET_ZG9b6DDqzjC6Q1wp7-wb7HxLibt0h47QYet7iKc_t4heplOnsf32ezx7mF8O8sMlyRlAkiZM0Ib0HVV17SVopZcA2MVYzmtRVPl0kjBtDaMlm1pKC-o4QIq0gAr-BCd73YXwX8uISbV22ig67QDv4yKiYIWJSdrsNiBJvgYA7RqEWyvw7eiRG3kqa08tbGkpFBbeUqseze7Hqy_WFkIKhoLzkBjA5ikGm__WfgBdNp4gw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26515730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Friction in bulk metal forming: a general friction model vs. the law of constant friction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Petersen, S.B. ; Martins, P.A.F. ; Bay, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Petersen, S.B. ; Martins, P.A.F. ; Bay, N.</creatorcontrib><description>Commercially available finite-element programs for the simulation of bulk metal-forming processes usually model the frictional restraint acting at the interface between the workpiece and the tools according to the law of constant friction. Such description is often inadequate and does not represent the state-of-the-art in tribology. In the present paper it is shown that the application of the general friction model, developed by Wanheim and Bay, involves a major improvement in the ability to simulate processes where low tool-workpiece interface stresses may prevail. This is confirmed by experimental and numerical investigations into the upsetting of a semi-tapered specimen between parallel dies. Additionally, it has led to the proposal of a new ring-compression test geometry intended to complement the conventional ring test for the calibration of friction models under conditions where the normal stresses over considerable parts of the tool-workpiece interface may be lower than the yield stress of the material.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-0136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02518-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Friction ; General friction model ; Law of constant friction ; Metal forming</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials processing technology, 1997-04, Vol.66 (1), p.186-194</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-6e074201deab8bb1f96b93ae2282241b6d849c962aac217f7c1351c36e80de253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-6e074201deab8bb1f96b93ae2282241b6d849c962aac217f7c1351c36e80de253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924013696025186$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petersen, S.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, P.A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bay, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Friction in bulk metal forming: a general friction model vs. the law of constant friction</title><title>Journal of materials processing technology</title><description>Commercially available finite-element programs for the simulation of bulk metal-forming processes usually model the frictional restraint acting at the interface between the workpiece and the tools according to the law of constant friction. Such description is often inadequate and does not represent the state-of-the-art in tribology. In the present paper it is shown that the application of the general friction model, developed by Wanheim and Bay, involves a major improvement in the ability to simulate processes where low tool-workpiece interface stresses may prevail. This is confirmed by experimental and numerical investigations into the upsetting of a semi-tapered specimen between parallel dies. Additionally, it has led to the proposal of a new ring-compression test geometry intended to complement the conventional ring test for the calibration of friction models under conditions where the normal stresses over considerable parts of the tool-workpiece interface may be lower than the yield stress of the material.</description><subject>Friction</subject><subject>General friction model</subject><subject>Law of constant friction</subject><subject>Metal forming</subject><issn>0924-0136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhT2ARCn8BCRPCIYUPxInZkGoagGpEgMwMFmOc1MMiV1st4h_Tx_QlelKR9850v0QOqNkRAkVV09EsjwjlIsLKS4JK2iViQM02MdH6DjGd0JoSapqgF6nwZpkvcPW4XrZfeAeku5w60Nv3fwaazwHB2ET_ZG9b6DDqzjC6Q1wp7-wb7HxLibt0h47QYet7iKc_t4heplOnsf32ezx7mF8O8sMlyRlAkiZM0Ib0HVV17SVopZcA2MVYzmtRVPl0kjBtDaMlm1pKC-o4QIq0gAr-BCd73YXwX8uISbV22ig67QDv4yKiYIWJSdrsNiBJvgYA7RqEWyvw7eiRG3kqa08tbGkpFBbeUqseze7Hqy_WFkIKhoLzkBjA5ikGm__WfgBdNp4gw</recordid><startdate>19970401</startdate><enddate>19970401</enddate><creator>Petersen, S.B.</creator><creator>Martins, P.A.F.</creator><creator>Bay, N.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970401</creationdate><title>Friction in bulk metal forming: a general friction model vs. the law of constant friction</title><author>Petersen, S.B. ; Martins, P.A.F. ; Bay, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-6e074201deab8bb1f96b93ae2282241b6d849c962aac217f7c1351c36e80de253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Friction</topic><topic>General friction model</topic><topic>Law of constant friction</topic><topic>Metal forming</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, S.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, P.A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bay, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials processing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, S.B.</au><au>Martins, P.A.F.</au><au>Bay, N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Friction in bulk metal forming: a general friction model vs. the law of constant friction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials processing technology</jtitle><date>1997-04-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>186</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>186-194</pages><issn>0924-0136</issn><abstract>Commercially available finite-element programs for the simulation of bulk metal-forming processes usually model the frictional restraint acting at the interface between the workpiece and the tools according to the law of constant friction. Such description is often inadequate and does not represent the state-of-the-art in tribology. In the present paper it is shown that the application of the general friction model, developed by Wanheim and Bay, involves a major improvement in the ability to simulate processes where low tool-workpiece interface stresses may prevail. This is confirmed by experimental and numerical investigations into the upsetting of a semi-tapered specimen between parallel dies. Additionally, it has led to the proposal of a new ring-compression test geometry intended to complement the conventional ring test for the calibration of friction models under conditions where the normal stresses over considerable parts of the tool-workpiece interface may be lower than the yield stress of the material.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02518-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-0136
ispartof Journal of materials processing technology, 1997-04, Vol.66 (1), p.186-194
issn 0924-0136
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26515730
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Friction
General friction model
Law of constant friction
Metal forming
title Friction in bulk metal forming: a general friction model vs. the law of constant friction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T00%3A37%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Friction%20in%20bulk%20metal%20forming:%20a%20general%20friction%20model%20vs.%20the%20law%20of%20constant%20friction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20processing%20technology&rft.au=Petersen,%20S.B.&rft.date=1997-04-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=186-194&rft.issn=0924-0136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02518-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26515730%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26515730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0924013696025186&rfr_iscdi=true