Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods

Bacterial infection is a common impediment towards wound healing. Detecting bacterial infections is important to promote wound healing and curb chronic non-healing wounds. In this review, we firstly discuss bacterial communities, including aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in various types of wounds. F...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analyst (London) 2022-05, Vol.147 (9), p.1756-1776
Hauptverfasser: Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte, Tanaka, Yuki, Sutarlie, Laura, Su, Xiaodi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1776
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1756
container_title Analyst (London)
container_volume 147
creator Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte
Tanaka, Yuki
Sutarlie, Laura
Su, Xiaodi
description Bacterial infection is a common impediment towards wound healing. Detecting bacterial infections is important to promote wound healing and curb chronic non-healing wounds. In this review, we firstly discuss bacterial communities, including aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in various types of wounds. Following the discussion of wound sampling methods (swab, biopsy) for different wounds, we then discuss laboratory based conventional methods (bacteria cultures, Gram staining, analytical profile index systems, polymerase chain reaction, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry), focusing on their recent improvement. After that we discussed the contemporary biosensor methods, including e-Nose, electrochemical sensors, surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay. Biosensors embedded into wound dressing, termed wearable sensors or smart wound dressing, are also discussed for their ability of enabling bacteria detection directly from wound sites without the need for obtaining swab/biopsy samples. We have compared all the detection methods for their performance according to their respective targets (either bacteria cells or volatile/non-volatile metabolites); after that we evaluate the suitability of various methods in providing timely and accurate diagnostic results towards real-time, point-of-care testing of bacterial infections. Review on laboratory-based methods and biosensors and wearable sensors for detecting wound infection by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/d2an00157h
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2649998441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2649998441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ef9806b12d659c5fbf221de420b2389e2c5cefd6f9152546713b8b6080c54953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctu1DAUhi0EokPLhj3IEhuElOJ74u6qXihSVTawjmznmHGV2IOddNQ34LHxdNoisTq37_znSD9C7yg5poTrLwMzkRAq2_ULtKJciUZK1r1EK0IIb5iS4gC9KeW2lpRI8hodcCmoolqv0J9zmMHNIf7C1rgZcjAjDtHveimWmuJtWuJQTrDBGe4CbHHy2IZUIJaUCzZxwFsw2dgR8FOzrrk0bUwOJVWFMK9rHe8g7lTrhdHYlM2c8j2eYF6noRyhV96MBd4-xkP08_Lix9lVc_3967ez0-vGcd7OjQKvO6IsZYOS2klvPWN0AMGIZbzTwJx04AflNZVMCtVSbjurSEecFFryQ_Rpr7vJ6fcCZe6nUByMo4mQltIzJbTWnRC0oh__Q2_Tkuv7O0p2bcuV7ir1eU-5nErJ4PtNDpPJ9z0l_c6f_pyd3jz4c1XhD4-Si51geEafDKnA-z2Qi3ue_jOY_wV21Jar</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658773698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Royal Society of Chemistry Journals Archive (1841-2007)</source><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte ; Tanaka, Yuki ; Sutarlie, Laura ; Su, Xiaodi</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte ; Tanaka, Yuki ; Sutarlie, Laura ; Su, Xiaodi</creatorcontrib><description>Bacterial infection is a common impediment towards wound healing. Detecting bacterial infections is important to promote wound healing and curb chronic non-healing wounds. In this review, we firstly discuss bacterial communities, including aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in various types of wounds. Following the discussion of wound sampling methods (swab, biopsy) for different wounds, we then discuss laboratory based conventional methods (bacteria cultures, Gram staining, analytical profile index systems, polymerase chain reaction, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry), focusing on their recent improvement. After that we discussed the contemporary biosensor methods, including e-Nose, electrochemical sensors, surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay. Biosensors embedded into wound dressing, termed wearable sensors or smart wound dressing, are also discussed for their ability of enabling bacteria detection directly from wound sites without the need for obtaining swab/biopsy samples. We have compared all the detection methods for their performance according to their respective targets (either bacteria cells or volatile/non-volatile metabolites); after that we evaluate the suitability of various methods in providing timely and accurate diagnostic results towards real-time, point-of-care testing of bacterial infections. Review on laboratory-based methods and biosensors and wearable sensors for detecting wound infection by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-5528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d2an00157h</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35416199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Bacterial infections ; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis ; Biopsy ; Biosensing Techniques ; Biosensors ; Chemical sensors ; Electronic noses ; Gas chromatography ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ; Humans ; Immunoassay ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Mass spectrometry ; Metabolites ; Nucleic acids ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Raman spectroscopy ; Sampling methods ; Sensors ; Smart sensors ; Wearable Electronic Devices ; Wearable technology ; Wound healing ; Wound Infection - diagnosis ; Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Analyst (London), 2022-05, Vol.147 (9), p.1756-1776</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ef9806b12d659c5fbf221de420b2389e2c5cefd6f9152546713b8b6080c54953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ef9806b12d659c5fbf221de420b2389e2c5cefd6f9152546713b8b6080c54953</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2164-4588</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2817,2818,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35416199$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutarlie, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Xiaodi</creatorcontrib><title>Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods</title><title>Analyst (London)</title><addtitle>Analyst</addtitle><description>Bacterial infection is a common impediment towards wound healing. Detecting bacterial infections is important to promote wound healing and curb chronic non-healing wounds. In this review, we firstly discuss bacterial communities, including aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in various types of wounds. Following the discussion of wound sampling methods (swab, biopsy) for different wounds, we then discuss laboratory based conventional methods (bacteria cultures, Gram staining, analytical profile index systems, polymerase chain reaction, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry), focusing on their recent improvement. After that we discussed the contemporary biosensor methods, including e-Nose, electrochemical sensors, surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay. Biosensors embedded into wound dressing, termed wearable sensors or smart wound dressing, are also discussed for their ability of enabling bacteria detection directly from wound sites without the need for obtaining swab/biopsy samples. We have compared all the detection methods for their performance according to their respective targets (either bacteria cells or volatile/non-volatile metabolites); after that we evaluate the suitability of various methods in providing timely and accurate diagnostic results towards real-time, point-of-care testing of bacterial infections. Review on laboratory-based methods and biosensors and wearable sensors for detecting wound infection by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biosensing Techniques</subject><subject>Biosensors</subject><subject>Chemical sensors</subject><subject>Electronic noses</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Nucleic acids</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Raman spectroscopy</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Smart sensors</subject><subject>Wearable Electronic Devices</subject><subject>Wearable technology</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><subject>Wound Infection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><issn>0003-2654</issn><issn>1364-5528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctu1DAUhi0EokPLhj3IEhuElOJ74u6qXihSVTawjmznmHGV2IOddNQ34LHxdNoisTq37_znSD9C7yg5poTrLwMzkRAq2_ULtKJciUZK1r1EK0IIb5iS4gC9KeW2lpRI8hodcCmoolqv0J9zmMHNIf7C1rgZcjAjDtHveimWmuJtWuJQTrDBGe4CbHHy2IZUIJaUCzZxwFsw2dgR8FOzrrk0bUwOJVWFMK9rHe8g7lTrhdHYlM2c8j2eYF6noRyhV96MBd4-xkP08_Lix9lVc_3967ez0-vGcd7OjQKvO6IsZYOS2klvPWN0AMGIZbzTwJx04AflNZVMCtVSbjurSEecFFryQ_Rpr7vJ6fcCZe6nUByMo4mQltIzJbTWnRC0oh__Q2_Tkuv7O0p2bcuV7ir1eU-5nErJ4PtNDpPJ9z0l_c6f_pyd3jz4c1XhD4-Si51geEafDKnA-z2Qi3ue_jOY_wV21Jar</recordid><startdate>20220503</startdate><enddate>20220503</enddate><creator>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte</creator><creator>Tanaka, Yuki</creator><creator>Sutarlie, Laura</creator><creator>Su, Xiaodi</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-4588</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220503</creationdate><title>Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods</title><author>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte ; Tanaka, Yuki ; Sutarlie, Laura ; Su, Xiaodi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ef9806b12d659c5fbf221de420b2389e2c5cefd6f9152546713b8b6080c54953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biosensing Techniques</topic><topic>Biosensors</topic><topic>Chemical sensors</topic><topic>Electronic noses</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Nucleic acids</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Raman spectroscopy</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Smart sensors</topic><topic>Wearable Electronic Devices</topic><topic>Wearable technology</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><topic>Wound Infection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutarlie, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Xiaodi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analyst (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte</au><au>Tanaka, Yuki</au><au>Sutarlie, Laura</au><au>Su, Xiaodi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods</atitle><jtitle>Analyst (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Analyst</addtitle><date>2022-05-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>147</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1756</spage><epage>1776</epage><pages>1756-1776</pages><issn>0003-2654</issn><eissn>1364-5528</eissn><abstract>Bacterial infection is a common impediment towards wound healing. Detecting bacterial infections is important to promote wound healing and curb chronic non-healing wounds. In this review, we firstly discuss bacterial communities, including aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in various types of wounds. Following the discussion of wound sampling methods (swab, biopsy) for different wounds, we then discuss laboratory based conventional methods (bacteria cultures, Gram staining, analytical profile index systems, polymerase chain reaction, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry), focusing on their recent improvement. After that we discussed the contemporary biosensor methods, including e-Nose, electrochemical sensors, surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay. Biosensors embedded into wound dressing, termed wearable sensors or smart wound dressing, are also discussed for their ability of enabling bacteria detection directly from wound sites without the need for obtaining swab/biopsy samples. We have compared all the detection methods for their performance according to their respective targets (either bacteria cells or volatile/non-volatile metabolites); after that we evaluate the suitability of various methods in providing timely and accurate diagnostic results towards real-time, point-of-care testing of bacterial infections. Review on laboratory-based methods and biosensors and wearable sensors for detecting wound infection by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><pmid>35416199</pmid><doi>10.1039/d2an00157h</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-4588</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2654
ispartof Analyst (London), 2022-05, Vol.147 (9), p.1756-1776
issn 0003-2654
1364-5528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2649998441
source MEDLINE; Royal Society of Chemistry Journals Archive (1841-2007); Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bacteria
Bacterial infections
Bacterial Infections - diagnosis
Biopsy
Biosensing Techniques
Biosensors
Chemical sensors
Electronic noses
Gas chromatography
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Humans
Immunoassay
Infections
Laboratories
Mass spectrometry
Metabolites
Nucleic acids
Polymerase chain reaction
Raman spectroscopy
Sampling methods
Sensors
Smart sensors
Wearable Electronic Devices
Wearable technology
Wound healing
Wound Infection - diagnosis
Wound Infection - microbiology
title Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A05%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detecting%20bacterial%20infections%20in%20wounds:%20a%20review%20of%20biosensors%20and%20wearable%20sensors%20in%20comparison%20with%20conventional%20laboratory%20methods&rft.jtitle=Analyst%20(London)&rft.au=Mohamed%20Salleh,%20Nur%20Asinah%20binte&rft.date=2022-05-03&rft.volume=147&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1756&rft.epage=1776&rft.pages=1756-1776&rft.issn=0003-2654&rft.eissn=1364-5528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d2an00157h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649998441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658773698&rft_id=info:pmid/35416199&rfr_iscdi=true