Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods
Bacterial infection is a common impediment towards wound healing. Detecting bacterial infections is important to promote wound healing and curb chronic non-healing wounds. In this review, we firstly discuss bacterial communities, including aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in various types of wounds. F...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analyst (London) 2022-05, Vol.147 (9), p.1756-1776 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1776 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1756 |
container_title | Analyst (London) |
container_volume | 147 |
creator | Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte Tanaka, Yuki Sutarlie, Laura Su, Xiaodi |
description | Bacterial infection is a common impediment towards wound healing. Detecting bacterial infections is important to promote wound healing and curb chronic non-healing wounds. In this review, we firstly discuss bacterial communities, including aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in various types of wounds. Following the discussion of wound sampling methods (swab, biopsy) for different wounds, we then discuss laboratory based conventional methods (bacteria cultures, Gram staining, analytical profile index systems, polymerase chain reaction, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry), focusing on their recent improvement. After that we discussed the contemporary biosensor methods, including e-Nose, electrochemical sensors, surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay. Biosensors embedded into wound dressing, termed wearable sensors or smart wound dressing, are also discussed for their ability of enabling bacteria detection directly from wound sites without the need for obtaining swab/biopsy samples. We have compared all the detection methods for their performance according to their respective targets (either bacteria cells or volatile/non-volatile metabolites); after that we evaluate the suitability of various methods in providing timely and accurate diagnostic results towards real-time, point-of-care testing of bacterial infections.
Review on laboratory-based methods and biosensors and wearable sensors for detecting wound infection by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/d2an00157h |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2649998441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2649998441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ef9806b12d659c5fbf221de420b2389e2c5cefd6f9152546713b8b6080c54953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctu1DAUhi0EokPLhj3IEhuElOJ74u6qXihSVTawjmznmHGV2IOddNQ34LHxdNoisTq37_znSD9C7yg5poTrLwMzkRAq2_ULtKJciUZK1r1EK0IIb5iS4gC9KeW2lpRI8hodcCmoolqv0J9zmMHNIf7C1rgZcjAjDtHveimWmuJtWuJQTrDBGe4CbHHy2IZUIJaUCzZxwFsw2dgR8FOzrrk0bUwOJVWFMK9rHe8g7lTrhdHYlM2c8j2eYF6noRyhV96MBd4-xkP08_Lix9lVc_3967ez0-vGcd7OjQKvO6IsZYOS2klvPWN0AMGIZbzTwJx04AflNZVMCtVSbjurSEecFFryQ_Rpr7vJ6fcCZe6nUByMo4mQltIzJbTWnRC0oh__Q2_Tkuv7O0p2bcuV7ir1eU-5nErJ4PtNDpPJ9z0l_c6f_pyd3jz4c1XhD4-Si51geEafDKnA-z2Qi3ue_jOY_wV21Jar</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658773698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Royal Society of Chemistry Journals Archive (1841-2007)</source><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte ; Tanaka, Yuki ; Sutarlie, Laura ; Su, Xiaodi</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte ; Tanaka, Yuki ; Sutarlie, Laura ; Su, Xiaodi</creatorcontrib><description>Bacterial infection is a common impediment towards wound healing. Detecting bacterial infections is important to promote wound healing and curb chronic non-healing wounds. In this review, we firstly discuss bacterial communities, including aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in various types of wounds. Following the discussion of wound sampling methods (swab, biopsy) for different wounds, we then discuss laboratory based conventional methods (bacteria cultures, Gram staining, analytical profile index systems, polymerase chain reaction, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry), focusing on their recent improvement. After that we discussed the contemporary biosensor methods, including e-Nose, electrochemical sensors, surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay. Biosensors embedded into wound dressing, termed wearable sensors or smart wound dressing, are also discussed for their ability of enabling bacteria detection directly from wound sites without the need for obtaining swab/biopsy samples. We have compared all the detection methods for their performance according to their respective targets (either bacteria cells or volatile/non-volatile metabolites); after that we evaluate the suitability of various methods in providing timely and accurate diagnostic results towards real-time, point-of-care testing of bacterial infections.
Review on laboratory-based methods and biosensors and wearable sensors for detecting wound infection by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-5528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d2an00157h</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35416199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Bacterial infections ; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis ; Biopsy ; Biosensing Techniques ; Biosensors ; Chemical sensors ; Electronic noses ; Gas chromatography ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ; Humans ; Immunoassay ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Mass spectrometry ; Metabolites ; Nucleic acids ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Raman spectroscopy ; Sampling methods ; Sensors ; Smart sensors ; Wearable Electronic Devices ; Wearable technology ; Wound healing ; Wound Infection - diagnosis ; Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Analyst (London), 2022-05, Vol.147 (9), p.1756-1776</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ef9806b12d659c5fbf221de420b2389e2c5cefd6f9152546713b8b6080c54953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ef9806b12d659c5fbf221de420b2389e2c5cefd6f9152546713b8b6080c54953</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2164-4588</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2817,2818,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35416199$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutarlie, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Xiaodi</creatorcontrib><title>Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods</title><title>Analyst (London)</title><addtitle>Analyst</addtitle><description>Bacterial infection is a common impediment towards wound healing. Detecting bacterial infections is important to promote wound healing and curb chronic non-healing wounds. In this review, we firstly discuss bacterial communities, including aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in various types of wounds. Following the discussion of wound sampling methods (swab, biopsy) for different wounds, we then discuss laboratory based conventional methods (bacteria cultures, Gram staining, analytical profile index systems, polymerase chain reaction, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry), focusing on their recent improvement. After that we discussed the contemporary biosensor methods, including e-Nose, electrochemical sensors, surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay. Biosensors embedded into wound dressing, termed wearable sensors or smart wound dressing, are also discussed for their ability of enabling bacteria detection directly from wound sites without the need for obtaining swab/biopsy samples. We have compared all the detection methods for their performance according to their respective targets (either bacteria cells or volatile/non-volatile metabolites); after that we evaluate the suitability of various methods in providing timely and accurate diagnostic results towards real-time, point-of-care testing of bacterial infections.
Review on laboratory-based methods and biosensors and wearable sensors for detecting wound infection by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biosensing Techniques</subject><subject>Biosensors</subject><subject>Chemical sensors</subject><subject>Electronic noses</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Nucleic acids</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Raman spectroscopy</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Smart sensors</subject><subject>Wearable Electronic Devices</subject><subject>Wearable technology</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><subject>Wound Infection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><issn>0003-2654</issn><issn>1364-5528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctu1DAUhi0EokPLhj3IEhuElOJ74u6qXihSVTawjmznmHGV2IOddNQ34LHxdNoisTq37_znSD9C7yg5poTrLwMzkRAq2_ULtKJciUZK1r1EK0IIb5iS4gC9KeW2lpRI8hodcCmoolqv0J9zmMHNIf7C1rgZcjAjDtHveimWmuJtWuJQTrDBGe4CbHHy2IZUIJaUCzZxwFsw2dgR8FOzrrk0bUwOJVWFMK9rHe8g7lTrhdHYlM2c8j2eYF6noRyhV96MBd4-xkP08_Lix9lVc_3967ez0-vGcd7OjQKvO6IsZYOS2klvPWN0AMGIZbzTwJx04AflNZVMCtVSbjurSEecFFryQ_Rpr7vJ6fcCZe6nUByMo4mQltIzJbTWnRC0oh__Q2_Tkuv7O0p2bcuV7ir1eU-5nErJ4PtNDpPJ9z0l_c6f_pyd3jz4c1XhD4-Si51geEafDKnA-z2Qi3ue_jOY_wV21Jar</recordid><startdate>20220503</startdate><enddate>20220503</enddate><creator>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte</creator><creator>Tanaka, Yuki</creator><creator>Sutarlie, Laura</creator><creator>Su, Xiaodi</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-4588</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220503</creationdate><title>Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods</title><author>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte ; Tanaka, Yuki ; Sutarlie, Laura ; Su, Xiaodi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ef9806b12d659c5fbf221de420b2389e2c5cefd6f9152546713b8b6080c54953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biosensing Techniques</topic><topic>Biosensors</topic><topic>Chemical sensors</topic><topic>Electronic noses</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Nucleic acids</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Raman spectroscopy</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Smart sensors</topic><topic>Wearable Electronic Devices</topic><topic>Wearable technology</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><topic>Wound Infection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutarlie, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Xiaodi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analyst (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohamed Salleh, Nur Asinah binte</au><au>Tanaka, Yuki</au><au>Sutarlie, Laura</au><au>Su, Xiaodi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods</atitle><jtitle>Analyst (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Analyst</addtitle><date>2022-05-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>147</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1756</spage><epage>1776</epage><pages>1756-1776</pages><issn>0003-2654</issn><eissn>1364-5528</eissn><abstract>Bacterial infection is a common impediment towards wound healing. Detecting bacterial infections is important to promote wound healing and curb chronic non-healing wounds. In this review, we firstly discuss bacterial communities, including aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in various types of wounds. Following the discussion of wound sampling methods (swab, biopsy) for different wounds, we then discuss laboratory based conventional methods (bacteria cultures, Gram staining, analytical profile index systems, polymerase chain reaction, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry), focusing on their recent improvement. After that we discussed the contemporary biosensor methods, including e-Nose, electrochemical sensors, surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay. Biosensors embedded into wound dressing, termed wearable sensors or smart wound dressing, are also discussed for their ability of enabling bacteria detection directly from wound sites without the need for obtaining swab/biopsy samples. We have compared all the detection methods for their performance according to their respective targets (either bacteria cells or volatile/non-volatile metabolites); after that we evaluate the suitability of various methods in providing timely and accurate diagnostic results towards real-time, point-of-care testing of bacterial infections.
Review on laboratory-based methods and biosensors and wearable sensors for detecting wound infection by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><pmid>35416199</pmid><doi>10.1039/d2an00157h</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-4588</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2654 |
ispartof | Analyst (London), 2022-05, Vol.147 (9), p.1756-1776 |
issn | 0003-2654 1364-5528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2649998441 |
source | MEDLINE; Royal Society of Chemistry Journals Archive (1841-2007); Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bacteria Bacterial infections Bacterial Infections - diagnosis Biopsy Biosensing Techniques Biosensors Chemical sensors Electronic noses Gas chromatography Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Humans Immunoassay Infections Laboratories Mass spectrometry Metabolites Nucleic acids Polymerase chain reaction Raman spectroscopy Sampling methods Sensors Smart sensors Wearable Electronic Devices Wearable technology Wound healing Wound Infection - diagnosis Wound Infection - microbiology |
title | Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A05%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detecting%20bacterial%20infections%20in%20wounds:%20a%20review%20of%20biosensors%20and%20wearable%20sensors%20in%20comparison%20with%20conventional%20laboratory%20methods&rft.jtitle=Analyst%20(London)&rft.au=Mohamed%20Salleh,%20Nur%20Asinah%20binte&rft.date=2022-05-03&rft.volume=147&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1756&rft.epage=1776&rft.pages=1756-1776&rft.issn=0003-2654&rft.eissn=1364-5528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d2an00157h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649998441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658773698&rft_id=info:pmid/35416199&rfr_iscdi=true |