Clinical algorithms for management of third stage abnormalities
Aims To develop algorithms for identifying, managing and monitoring postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and other third stage of labour abnormalities after vaginal delivery. Population Women with low‐risk singleton term pregnancies who have had a vaginal delivery. Setting Hospital settings with a particula...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2024-08, Vol.131 (S2), p.37-48 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 48 |
---|---|
container_issue | S2 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Marcus, JK Fawcus, S. Althabe, Fernando Blennerhassett, Anna Bonet, Mercedes Browne, Joyce Ciabati, Livia De Oliveira, Lariza Laura Fawcus, Sue Metin Gülmezoglu, A GÜLÜMSER, Çağri Hofmeyr, Justus Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan Lissauer, David Meher, Shireen Oladapo, Olufemi Rijken, Marcus Souza, Renato |
description | Aims
To develop algorithms for identifying, managing and monitoring postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and other third stage of labour abnormalities after vaginal delivery.
Population
Women with low‐risk singleton term pregnancies who have had a vaginal delivery.
Setting
Hospital settings with a particular focus on healthcare facilities in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs).
Search strategy
Searches for international and national guidance documents, research databases (Cochrane, Medline and CINAHL) and published systematic reviews. Searches were limited to work published in English between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018.
Case scenarios
Four interlinked case scenarios were identified for algorithm development: (1) an approach to PPH after vaginal delivery, (2) uterine atony, (3) genital tract trauma and (4) retained placenta/placental products.
Conclusions
The development of clear approaches to the assessment, resuscitation, treatment and monitoring of the four case scenarios are presented as algorithms, based on available evidence. They need to be field tested and evaluated for effectiveness, and may be adapted for electronic decision support tools using artificial intelligence in different settings. Further research is needed around multimodal sequential packages of care for PPH, conservative surgical measures, resuscitation in LMICs, and how a respectful maternity care focus can be incorporated into the algorithms.
Tweetable
Algorithm development for standardised approaches to managing PPH in low‐resource settings.
Tweetable
Algorithm development for standardised approaches to managing PPH in low‐resource settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1471-0528.16729 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2649590856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3095840903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-5cdf3035de347dc031f6724f91e00ee0f9e495e81fd69eb173be14430d5ff1603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EoqUws6FILCxpr-M4jScEFU9V6gKz5SbXras8ip0I9d_jNKUDC15sXZ3vu9Yh5JrCmPozofGUhsCjdEyTaSROyPA4Od2_IQQWpQNy4dwGgCYRsHMyYDymXWBI7meFqUymikAVq9qaZl26QNc2KFWlVlhi1QS1Dpq1sXngGj8K1LKqbakK0xh0l-RMq8Lh1eEekc_np4_ZazhfvLzNHuZhxiIuQp7lmgHjObJ4mmfAqPbrYy0oAiCCFhgLjinVeSJwSadsiTSOGeRca5oAG5G7vndr668WXSNL4zIsClVh3ToZJT4vIOWJR2__oJu6tZX_nWQgeBqDAOapSU9ltnbOopZba0pld5KC7NzKzqTsTMq9W5-4OfS2yxLzI_8r0wO8B75Ngbv_-uTj-6Iv_gEwk4Gq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3095840903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical algorithms for management of third stage abnormalities</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Marcus, JK ; Fawcus, S. ; Althabe, Fernando ; Blennerhassett, Anna ; Bonet, Mercedes ; Browne, Joyce ; Ciabati, Livia ; De Oliveira, Lariza Laura ; Fawcus, Sue ; Metin Gülmezoglu, A ; GÜLÜMSER, Çağri ; Hofmeyr, Justus ; Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan ; Lissauer, David ; Meher, Shireen ; Oladapo, Olufemi ; Rijken, Marcus ; Souza, Renato</creator><creatorcontrib>Marcus, JK ; Fawcus, S. ; Althabe, Fernando ; Blennerhassett, Anna ; Bonet, Mercedes ; Browne, Joyce ; Ciabati, Livia ; De Oliveira, Lariza Laura ; Fawcus, Sue ; Metin Gülmezoglu, A ; GÜLÜMSER, Çağri ; Hofmeyr, Justus ; Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan ; Lissauer, David ; Meher, Shireen ; Oladapo, Olufemi ; Rijken, Marcus ; Souza, Renato ; WHO Intrapartum Care Algorithms Working Group ; the WHO Intrapartum Care Algorithms Working Group</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
To develop algorithms for identifying, managing and monitoring postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and other third stage of labour abnormalities after vaginal delivery.
Population
Women with low‐risk singleton term pregnancies who have had a vaginal delivery.
Setting
Hospital settings with a particular focus on healthcare facilities in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs).
Search strategy
Searches for international and national guidance documents, research databases (Cochrane, Medline and CINAHL) and published systematic reviews. Searches were limited to work published in English between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018.
Case scenarios
Four interlinked case scenarios were identified for algorithm development: (1) an approach to PPH after vaginal delivery, (2) uterine atony, (3) genital tract trauma and (4) retained placenta/placental products.
Conclusions
The development of clear approaches to the assessment, resuscitation, treatment and monitoring of the four case scenarios are presented as algorithms, based on available evidence. They need to be field tested and evaluated for effectiveness, and may be adapted for electronic decision support tools using artificial intelligence in different settings. Further research is needed around multimodal sequential packages of care for PPH, conservative surgical measures, resuscitation in LMICs, and how a respectful maternity care focus can be incorporated into the algorithms.
Tweetable
Algorithm development for standardised approaches to managing PPH in low‐resource settings.
Tweetable
Algorithm development for standardised approaches to managing PPH in low‐resource settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16729</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35411672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Childbirth & labor ; emergency obstetric care ; Genital tract ; Hemorrhage ; low‐ and middle‐income countries ; low‐resource settings ; management ; postpartum haemorrhage ; prevention ; Sub‐Saharan Africa ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2024-08, Vol.131 (S2), p.37-48</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-5cdf3035de347dc031f6724f91e00ee0f9e495e81fd69eb173be14430d5ff1603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8520-5755</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1471-0528.16729$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1471-0528.16729$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marcus, JK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawcus, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althabe, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blennerhassett, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonet, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciabati, Livia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Oliveira, Lariza Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawcus, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metin Gülmezoglu, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÜLÜMSER, Çağri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeyr, Justus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissauer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meher, Shireen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oladapo, Olufemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijken, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHO Intrapartum Care Algorithms Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the WHO Intrapartum Care Algorithms Working Group</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical algorithms for management of third stage abnormalities</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Aims
To develop algorithms for identifying, managing and monitoring postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and other third stage of labour abnormalities after vaginal delivery.
Population
Women with low‐risk singleton term pregnancies who have had a vaginal delivery.
Setting
Hospital settings with a particular focus on healthcare facilities in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs).
Search strategy
Searches for international and national guidance documents, research databases (Cochrane, Medline and CINAHL) and published systematic reviews. Searches were limited to work published in English between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018.
Case scenarios
Four interlinked case scenarios were identified for algorithm development: (1) an approach to PPH after vaginal delivery, (2) uterine atony, (3) genital tract trauma and (4) retained placenta/placental products.
Conclusions
The development of clear approaches to the assessment, resuscitation, treatment and monitoring of the four case scenarios are presented as algorithms, based on available evidence. They need to be field tested and evaluated for effectiveness, and may be adapted for electronic decision support tools using artificial intelligence in different settings. Further research is needed around multimodal sequential packages of care for PPH, conservative surgical measures, resuscitation in LMICs, and how a respectful maternity care focus can be incorporated into the algorithms.
Tweetable
Algorithm development for standardised approaches to managing PPH in low‐resource settings.
Tweetable
Algorithm development for standardised approaches to managing PPH in low‐resource settings.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>emergency obstetric care</subject><subject>Genital tract</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>low‐ and middle‐income countries</subject><subject>low‐resource settings</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>postpartum haemorrhage</subject><subject>prevention</subject><subject>Sub‐Saharan Africa</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EoqUws6FILCxpr-M4jScEFU9V6gKz5SbXras8ip0I9d_jNKUDC15sXZ3vu9Yh5JrCmPozofGUhsCjdEyTaSROyPA4Od2_IQQWpQNy4dwGgCYRsHMyYDymXWBI7meFqUymikAVq9qaZl26QNc2KFWlVlhi1QS1Dpq1sXngGj8K1LKqbakK0xh0l-RMq8Lh1eEekc_np4_ZazhfvLzNHuZhxiIuQp7lmgHjObJ4mmfAqPbrYy0oAiCCFhgLjinVeSJwSadsiTSOGeRca5oAG5G7vndr668WXSNL4zIsClVh3ToZJT4vIOWJR2__oJu6tZX_nWQgeBqDAOapSU9ltnbOopZba0pld5KC7NzKzqTsTMq9W5-4OfS2yxLzI_8r0wO8B75Ngbv_-uTj-6Iv_gEwk4Gq</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Marcus, JK</creator><creator>Fawcus, S.</creator><creator>Althabe, Fernando</creator><creator>Blennerhassett, Anna</creator><creator>Bonet, Mercedes</creator><creator>Browne, Joyce</creator><creator>Ciabati, Livia</creator><creator>De Oliveira, Lariza Laura</creator><creator>Fawcus, Sue</creator><creator>Metin Gülmezoglu, A</creator><creator>GÜLÜMSER, Çağri</creator><creator>Hofmeyr, Justus</creator><creator>Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan</creator><creator>Lissauer, David</creator><creator>Meher, Shireen</creator><creator>Oladapo, Olufemi</creator><creator>Rijken, Marcus</creator><creator>Souza, Renato</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8520-5755</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Clinical algorithms for management of third stage abnormalities</title><author>Marcus, JK ; Fawcus, S. ; Althabe, Fernando ; Blennerhassett, Anna ; Bonet, Mercedes ; Browne, Joyce ; Ciabati, Livia ; De Oliveira, Lariza Laura ; Fawcus, Sue ; Metin Gülmezoglu, A ; GÜLÜMSER, Çağri ; Hofmeyr, Justus ; Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan ; Lissauer, David ; Meher, Shireen ; Oladapo, Olufemi ; Rijken, Marcus ; Souza, Renato</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-5cdf3035de347dc031f6724f91e00ee0f9e495e81fd69eb173be14430d5ff1603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>emergency obstetric care</topic><topic>Genital tract</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>low‐ and middle‐income countries</topic><topic>low‐resource settings</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>postpartum haemorrhage</topic><topic>prevention</topic><topic>Sub‐Saharan Africa</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marcus, JK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawcus, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althabe, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blennerhassett, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonet, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciabati, Livia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Oliveira, Lariza Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawcus, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metin Gülmezoglu, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÜLÜMSER, Çağri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeyr, Justus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissauer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meher, Shireen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oladapo, Olufemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijken, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHO Intrapartum Care Algorithms Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the WHO Intrapartum Care Algorithms Working Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marcus, JK</au><au>Fawcus, S.</au><au>Althabe, Fernando</au><au>Blennerhassett, Anna</au><au>Bonet, Mercedes</au><au>Browne, Joyce</au><au>Ciabati, Livia</au><au>De Oliveira, Lariza Laura</au><au>Fawcus, Sue</au><au>Metin Gülmezoglu, A</au><au>GÜLÜMSER, Çağri</au><au>Hofmeyr, Justus</au><au>Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan</au><au>Lissauer, David</au><au>Meher, Shireen</au><au>Oladapo, Olufemi</au><au>Rijken, Marcus</au><au>Souza, Renato</au><aucorp>WHO Intrapartum Care Algorithms Working Group</aucorp><aucorp>the WHO Intrapartum Care Algorithms Working Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical algorithms for management of third stage abnormalities</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>37-48</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><abstract>Aims
To develop algorithms for identifying, managing and monitoring postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and other third stage of labour abnormalities after vaginal delivery.
Population
Women with low‐risk singleton term pregnancies who have had a vaginal delivery.
Setting
Hospital settings with a particular focus on healthcare facilities in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs).
Search strategy
Searches for international and national guidance documents, research databases (Cochrane, Medline and CINAHL) and published systematic reviews. Searches were limited to work published in English between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018.
Case scenarios
Four interlinked case scenarios were identified for algorithm development: (1) an approach to PPH after vaginal delivery, (2) uterine atony, (3) genital tract trauma and (4) retained placenta/placental products.
Conclusions
The development of clear approaches to the assessment, resuscitation, treatment and monitoring of the four case scenarios are presented as algorithms, based on available evidence. They need to be field tested and evaluated for effectiveness, and may be adapted for electronic decision support tools using artificial intelligence in different settings. Further research is needed around multimodal sequential packages of care for PPH, conservative surgical measures, resuscitation in LMICs, and how a respectful maternity care focus can be incorporated into the algorithms.
Tweetable
Algorithm development for standardised approaches to managing PPH in low‐resource settings.
Tweetable
Algorithm development for standardised approaches to managing PPH in low‐resource settings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35411672</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.16729</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8520-5755</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-0328 |
ispartof | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2024-08, Vol.131 (S2), p.37-48 |
issn | 1470-0328 1471-0528 1471-0528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2649590856 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Algorithms Artificial intelligence Childbirth & labor emergency obstetric care Genital tract Hemorrhage low‐ and middle‐income countries low‐resource settings management postpartum haemorrhage prevention Sub‐Saharan Africa Vagina |
title | Clinical algorithms for management of third stage abnormalities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A51%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20algorithms%20for%20management%20of%20third%20stage%20abnormalities&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Marcus,%20JK&rft.aucorp=WHO%20Intrapartum%20Care%20Algorithms%20Working%20Group&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=37-48&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.16729&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3095840903%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3095840903&rft_id=info:pmid/35411672&rfr_iscdi=true |