Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale on knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) in Chinese parents
To verify the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale about knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) among the Chinese parents. A questionnaire survey was conducted by convenience sampling in China using the KATE-S to assess knowledge of vaccines, attitudes towar...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2022-05, Vol.40 (21), p.2933-2939 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2939 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 21 |
| container_start_page | 2933 |
| container_title | Vaccine |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Tianshuo, Zhao Hanyu, Liu Bingfeng, Han Bei, Liu Jiang, Liu Juan, Du Ninghua, Huang Qingbin, Lu Yaqiong, Liu Fuqiang, Cui |
| description | To verify the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale about knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) among the Chinese parents.
A questionnaire survey was conducted by convenience sampling in China using the KATE-S to assess knowledge of vaccines, attitudes towards vaccines, trust in acquired information and vaccination environment and vaccination status of vaccine introduced in immunization program among children.
A total of 199 valid questionnaires were collected from the parents. Among those, 83 (41.7%) parents accepted all vaccines without hesitancy, 111 (55.8%) parents accepted all but had hesitancy intention, and 5 (2.5%) had hesitancy behaviour of refusing or delaying vaccination. The overall test–retest reliability, split-half reliability and Cronbach's coefficient values were 0.924, 0.885 and 0.823, respectively. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) of universal agreement was 0.867, and the average S-CVI was 0.978. Exploratory factor analysis extracted seven common factors from the scale, and the cumulative contribution rate was 56.8%. The correlation coefficients between the items and their dimensions ranged from 0.405 to 0.760, with a calibration success rate of 100% for convergent and discriminant validity. After adjusting for the basic characteristics, the knowledge level of hesitancy intention group and hesitancy behavior group were both lower than accept all group (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65–0.94; OR = 0.26, 95 %CI: 0.07–0.94).
The KATE-S has good reliability and validity in Chinese parents and would be considered to expand the sample size and survey areas to obtain more representative results. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.068 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2649589065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X22003887</els_id><sourcerecordid>2649589065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9462e596903368013692f39e4161ff3e4eaad43eaec5ad8feef54802c3a380d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCCBLbIrEDPZ47IxXqIrCj6jEgiKxs1z7DnGY2KntCcrD9F3xKNMu2HTlv--ca52D0GtKakqo-LCtD9oY56FuSNPUhNVEdE_QgnZLVjWcdk_RgjSirVpKfp2hFyltCSGcUfkcnTFebjvKF-hufdDDqLMLHoce5w3gCIPTN25w-Yi1t7gAzk6H8q7xPBVvILmsvTniZPQAuOj_-PB3APsb3mOds8ujLbscx5Rnn0l5GgX-4GLwO_AZX3y7vF5XP95h5_FqU7wT4L2O5Sm9RM96PSR4Na_n6Oen9fXqS3X1_fPX1eVVZZhkuZKtaIBLIQljoiOUCdn0TEJLBe17Bi1obVsGGgzXtusBet52pDFMs45Yzs7Rxcl3H8PtCCmrnUsGhkF7CGNSJUfJO0nEhL79D92GMfryu0LxEuxyydtC8RNlYkgpQq_20e10PCpK1NSf2qo5STX1pwhTpb-iezO7jzc7sA-q-8IK8PEEQInj4CCqZBx4A9ZFMFnZ4B4Z8Q_79q_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2653547754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale on knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) in Chinese parents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Tianshuo, Zhao ; Hanyu, Liu ; Bingfeng, Han ; Bei, Liu ; Jiang, Liu ; Juan, Du ; Ninghua, Huang ; Qingbin, Lu ; Yaqiong, Liu ; Fuqiang, Cui</creator><creatorcontrib>Tianshuo, Zhao ; Hanyu, Liu ; Bingfeng, Han ; Bei, Liu ; Jiang, Liu ; Juan, Du ; Ninghua, Huang ; Qingbin, Lu ; Yaqiong, Liu ; Fuqiang, Cui</creatorcontrib><description>To verify the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale about knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) among the Chinese parents.
A questionnaire survey was conducted by convenience sampling in China using the KATE-S to assess knowledge of vaccines, attitudes towards vaccines, trust in acquired information and vaccination environment and vaccination status of vaccine introduced in immunization program among children.
A total of 199 valid questionnaires were collected from the parents. Among those, 83 (41.7%) parents accepted all vaccines without hesitancy, 111 (55.8%) parents accepted all but had hesitancy intention, and 5 (2.5%) had hesitancy behaviour of refusing or delaying vaccination. The overall test–retest reliability, split-half reliability and Cronbach's coefficient values were 0.924, 0.885 and 0.823, respectively. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) of universal agreement was 0.867, and the average S-CVI was 0.978. Exploratory factor analysis extracted seven common factors from the scale, and the cumulative contribution rate was 56.8%. The correlation coefficients between the items and their dimensions ranged from 0.405 to 0.760, with a calibration success rate of 100% for convergent and discriminant validity. After adjusting for the basic characteristics, the knowledge level of hesitancy intention group and hesitancy behavior group were both lower than accept all group (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65–0.94; OR = 0.26, 95 %CI: 0.07–0.94).
The KATE-S has good reliability and validity in Chinese parents and would be considered to expand the sample size and survey areas to obtain more representative results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.068</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35410815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Basic converters ; Child ; Children ; Children & youth ; China ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Factor analysis ; Group dynamics ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Hepatitis ; Humans ; Immunization ; Knowledge ; Parents ; Parents & parenting ; Polls & surveys ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Scale ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Trust ; Vaccination ; Vaccination Hesitancy ; Vaccine hesitancy ; Vaccines ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2022-05, Vol.40 (21), p.2933-2939</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9462e596903368013692f39e4161ff3e4eaad43eaec5ad8feef54802c3a380d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9462e596903368013692f39e4161ff3e4eaad43eaec5ad8feef54802c3a380d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2653547754?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,64361,64363,64365,65309,72215</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tianshuo, Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanyu, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingfeng, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bei, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juan, Du</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ninghua, Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qingbin, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaqiong, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuqiang, Cui</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale on knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) in Chinese parents</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>To verify the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale about knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) among the Chinese parents.
A questionnaire survey was conducted by convenience sampling in China using the KATE-S to assess knowledge of vaccines, attitudes towards vaccines, trust in acquired information and vaccination environment and vaccination status of vaccine introduced in immunization program among children.
A total of 199 valid questionnaires were collected from the parents. Among those, 83 (41.7%) parents accepted all vaccines without hesitancy, 111 (55.8%) parents accepted all but had hesitancy intention, and 5 (2.5%) had hesitancy behaviour of refusing or delaying vaccination. The overall test–retest reliability, split-half reliability and Cronbach's coefficient values were 0.924, 0.885 and 0.823, respectively. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) of universal agreement was 0.867, and the average S-CVI was 0.978. Exploratory factor analysis extracted seven common factors from the scale, and the cumulative contribution rate was 56.8%. The correlation coefficients between the items and their dimensions ranged from 0.405 to 0.760, with a calibration success rate of 100% for convergent and discriminant validity. After adjusting for the basic characteristics, the knowledge level of hesitancy intention group and hesitancy behavior group were both lower than accept all group (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65–0.94; OR = 0.26, 95 %CI: 0.07–0.94).
The KATE-S has good reliability and validity in Chinese parents and would be considered to expand the sample size and survey areas to obtain more representative results.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Basic converters</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Scale</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccination Hesitancy</subject><subject>Vaccine hesitancy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCCBLbIrEDPZ47IxXqIrCj6jEgiKxs1z7DnGY2KntCcrD9F3xKNMu2HTlv--ca52D0GtKakqo-LCtD9oY56FuSNPUhNVEdE_QgnZLVjWcdk_RgjSirVpKfp2hFyltCSGcUfkcnTFebjvKF-hufdDDqLMLHoce5w3gCIPTN25w-Yi1t7gAzk6H8q7xPBVvILmsvTniZPQAuOj_-PB3APsb3mOds8ujLbscx5Rnn0l5GgX-4GLwO_AZX3y7vF5XP95h5_FqU7wT4L2O5Sm9RM96PSR4Na_n6Oen9fXqS3X1_fPX1eVVZZhkuZKtaIBLIQljoiOUCdn0TEJLBe17Bi1obVsGGgzXtusBet52pDFMs45Yzs7Rxcl3H8PtCCmrnUsGhkF7CGNSJUfJO0nEhL79D92GMfryu0LxEuxyydtC8RNlYkgpQq_20e10PCpK1NSf2qo5STX1pwhTpb-iezO7jzc7sA-q-8IK8PEEQInj4CCqZBx4A9ZFMFnZ4B4Z8Q_79q_M</recordid><startdate>20220509</startdate><enddate>20220509</enddate><creator>Tianshuo, Zhao</creator><creator>Hanyu, Liu</creator><creator>Bingfeng, Han</creator><creator>Bei, Liu</creator><creator>Jiang, Liu</creator><creator>Juan, Du</creator><creator>Ninghua, Huang</creator><creator>Qingbin, Lu</creator><creator>Yaqiong, Liu</creator><creator>Fuqiang, Cui</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220509</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale on knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) in Chinese parents</title><author>Tianshuo, Zhao ; Hanyu, Liu ; Bingfeng, Han ; Bei, Liu ; Jiang, Liu ; Juan, Du ; Ninghua, Huang ; Qingbin, Lu ; Yaqiong, Liu ; Fuqiang, Cui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9462e596903368013692f39e4161ff3e4eaad43eaec5ad8feef54802c3a380d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Basic converters</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Scale</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccination Hesitancy</topic><topic>Vaccine hesitancy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tianshuo, Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanyu, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingfeng, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bei, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juan, Du</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ninghua, Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qingbin, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaqiong, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuqiang, Cui</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tianshuo, Zhao</au><au>Hanyu, Liu</au><au>Bingfeng, Han</au><au>Bei, Liu</au><au>Jiang, Liu</au><au>Juan, Du</au><au>Ninghua, Huang</au><au>Qingbin, Lu</au><au>Yaqiong, Liu</au><au>Fuqiang, Cui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale on knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) in Chinese parents</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2022-05-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>2933</spage><epage>2939</epage><pages>2933-2939</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>To verify the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale about knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) among the Chinese parents.
A questionnaire survey was conducted by convenience sampling in China using the KATE-S to assess knowledge of vaccines, attitudes towards vaccines, trust in acquired information and vaccination environment and vaccination status of vaccine introduced in immunization program among children.
A total of 199 valid questionnaires were collected from the parents. Among those, 83 (41.7%) parents accepted all vaccines without hesitancy, 111 (55.8%) parents accepted all but had hesitancy intention, and 5 (2.5%) had hesitancy behaviour of refusing or delaying vaccination. The overall test–retest reliability, split-half reliability and Cronbach's coefficient values were 0.924, 0.885 and 0.823, respectively. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) of universal agreement was 0.867, and the average S-CVI was 0.978. Exploratory factor analysis extracted seven common factors from the scale, and the cumulative contribution rate was 56.8%. The correlation coefficients between the items and their dimensions ranged from 0.405 to 0.760, with a calibration success rate of 100% for convergent and discriminant validity. After adjusting for the basic characteristics, the knowledge level of hesitancy intention group and hesitancy behavior group were both lower than accept all group (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65–0.94; OR = 0.26, 95 %CI: 0.07–0.94).
The KATE-S has good reliability and validity in Chinese parents and would be considered to expand the sample size and survey areas to obtain more representative results.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35410815</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.068</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
| ispartof | Vaccine, 2022-05, Vol.40 (21), p.2933-2939 |
| issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2649589065 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Attitudes Basic converters Child Children Children & youth China Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Factor analysis Group dynamics Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Hepatitis Humans Immunization Knowledge Parents Parents & parenting Polls & surveys Questionnaires Reliability Reliability analysis Reproducibility of Results Scale Surveys and Questionnaires Trust Vaccination Vaccination Hesitancy Vaccine hesitancy Vaccines Validity |
| title | Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale on knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) in Chinese parents |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A52%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20a%20vaccine%20hesitancy%20scale%20on%20knowledge,%20attitude,%20trust%20and%20vaccination%20environment%20(KATE-S)%20in%20Chinese%20parents&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Tianshuo,%20Zhao&rft.date=2022-05-09&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=2933&rft.epage=2939&rft.pages=2933-2939&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649589065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2653547754&rft_id=info:pmid/35410815&rft_els_id=S0264410X22003887&rfr_iscdi=true |