Universal Simplified Adhesive applied under different bonding technique's: 36-month Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial

To evaluate the clinical performance of a new dual-cure universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco) when applied using different application strategies in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 36 months. Futurabond U was applied in NCCLs of 50 subjects using four adhesion strategies (n = 50...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dentistry 2022-07, Vol.122, p.104120-104120, Article 104120
Hauptverfasser: de Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes, Warol, Flavio, Tardem, Chane, Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli, Poubel, Luiz Augusto, Matos, Thalita P., Souza, Jullian J., Reis, Alessandra, Barceleiro, Marcos O., Loguercio, Alessandro D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104120
container_issue
container_start_page 104120
container_title Journal of dentistry
container_volume 122
creator de Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes
Warol, Flavio
Tardem, Chane
Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli
Poubel, Luiz Augusto
Matos, Thalita P.
Souza, Jullian J.
Reis, Alessandra
Barceleiro, Marcos O.
Loguercio, Alessandro D.
description To evaluate the clinical performance of a new dual-cure universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco) when applied using different application strategies in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 36 months. Futurabond U was applied in NCCLs of 50 subjects using four adhesion strategies (n = 50 restorations per group): only self-etch (SEE); selective enamel etching + self-etch (SET); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERDry); and etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERWet). All cavities were restored using Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco). Restorations were evaluated after 36 months using the World Federation criteria (FDI) and the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The after 36-month retention rates were 87% (75–92%) for SEE, 94% (83–98%) for SET, 91% (80–97%) for ERDry, and 94% (83–98%) for ERWet. Forty-three restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal adaptation at the 36-month recall (18 for SEE, 12 for SET, 7 for ERDry, and 6 for ERWet; p > 0.05). One restoration was detected as a minor marginal discoloration at the 36-month recall (1 for SET; p > 0.05). No restorations showed postoperative sensitivity and caries recurrence at 36 months. The clinical performance of the Futurabond U did not depend on the employed bonding strategy, and it was considered reliable after 36 months of clinical evaluation. However, greater marginal discrepancy was observed in the self-etch groups. NCCLs restorations using a dual-cure universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes showed satisfactory clinical performance after 36 months.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104120
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2649256075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571222001774</els_id><sourcerecordid>2672693323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e2905eb3aefe75f6148605ec50133e2790192116287d36636e33caf217080b963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFrFTEUhYNY7LP6CwQJuNDNPG-SmWQiuCgPq0KLoC24C3nJHV-GmcwzmSnUX9-0r7pw0dWFw3fuudxDyCsGawZMvu_Xvcc4rzlwXpSacXhCVqxVumJK_nxKViAAqkYxfkye59wDQA1cPyPHohG6rRtYkZurGK4xZTvQH2HcD6EL6Omp32EuOrX7IhVhiR4T9aHrMJVMup2iD_EXndHtYvi94Nv8gQpZjVOcd_S7jX4aw59ivFiGObhiSUg3Q4jBlaTLFOzwghx1dsj48mGekKuzT5ebL9X5t89fN6fnlasFnyvkGhrcCosdqqaTrG5lEVwDTAjkSgPTnDHJW-WFlEKiEM52nCloYaulOCHvDnv3aSqH5tmMITscBhtxWrLhsta8kaCagr75D-2nJcVyXaEUl1oILgolDpRLU84JO7NPYbTpxjAwd82Y3tw3Y-6aMYdmiuv1w-5lO6L_5_lbRQE-HgAsz7gOmEx2AaNDHxK62fgpPBpwC2Ngn0E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672693323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Universal Simplified Adhesive applied under different bonding technique's: 36-month Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>de Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes ; Warol, Flavio ; Tardem, Chane ; Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli ; Poubel, Luiz Augusto ; Matos, Thalita P. ; Souza, Jullian J. ; Reis, Alessandra ; Barceleiro, Marcos O. ; Loguercio, Alessandro D.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes ; Warol, Flavio ; Tardem, Chane ; Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli ; Poubel, Luiz Augusto ; Matos, Thalita P. ; Souza, Jullian J. ; Reis, Alessandra ; Barceleiro, Marcos O. ; Loguercio, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the clinical performance of a new dual-cure universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco) when applied using different application strategies in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 36 months. Futurabond U was applied in NCCLs of 50 subjects using four adhesion strategies (n = 50 restorations per group): only self-etch (SEE); selective enamel etching + self-etch (SET); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERDry); and etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERWet). All cavities were restored using Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco). Restorations were evaluated after 36 months using the World Federation criteria (FDI) and the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The after 36-month retention rates were 87% (75–92%) for SEE, 94% (83–98%) for SET, 91% (80–97%) for ERDry, and 94% (83–98%) for ERWet. Forty-three restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal adaptation at the 36-month recall (18 for SEE, 12 for SET, 7 for ERDry, and 6 for ERWet; p &gt; 0.05). One restoration was detected as a minor marginal discoloration at the 36-month recall (1 for SET; p &gt; 0.05). No restorations showed postoperative sensitivity and caries recurrence at 36 months. The clinical performance of the Futurabond U did not depend on the employed bonding strategy, and it was considered reliable after 36 months of clinical evaluation. However, greater marginal discrepancy was observed in the self-etch groups. NCCLs restorations using a dual-cure universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes showed satisfactory clinical performance after 36 months.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104120</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35398450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acids ; Adhesives ; Chemical bonds ; Clinical longevity ; Clinical trial, Dental bonding, Dentin-bonding agents, Non-carious cervical lesions, Adhesive techniques ; Clinical trials ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Criteria ; Dental caries ; Dental enamel ; Dental restorations ; Dentin ; Dentistry ; Discoloration ; Enamel ; Etching ; Oral hygiene ; Performance evaluation ; Public health ; Recall ; Retention ; Self etching ; Systematic review ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2022-07, Vol.122, p.104120-104120, Article 104120</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e2905eb3aefe75f6148605ec50133e2790192116287d36636e33caf217080b963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e2905eb3aefe75f6148605ec50133e2790192116287d36636e33caf217080b963</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9880-4856 ; 0000-0003-2547-5961 ; 0000-0003-2974-4743</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571222001774$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35398450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warol, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tardem, Chane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poubel, Luiz Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Thalita P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Jullian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barceleiro, Marcos O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loguercio, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><title>Universal Simplified Adhesive applied under different bonding technique's: 36-month Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>To evaluate the clinical performance of a new dual-cure universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco) when applied using different application strategies in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 36 months. Futurabond U was applied in NCCLs of 50 subjects using four adhesion strategies (n = 50 restorations per group): only self-etch (SEE); selective enamel etching + self-etch (SET); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERDry); and etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERWet). All cavities were restored using Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco). Restorations were evaluated after 36 months using the World Federation criteria (FDI) and the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The after 36-month retention rates were 87% (75–92%) for SEE, 94% (83–98%) for SET, 91% (80–97%) for ERDry, and 94% (83–98%) for ERWet. Forty-three restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal adaptation at the 36-month recall (18 for SEE, 12 for SET, 7 for ERDry, and 6 for ERWet; p &gt; 0.05). One restoration was detected as a minor marginal discoloration at the 36-month recall (1 for SET; p &gt; 0.05). No restorations showed postoperative sensitivity and caries recurrence at 36 months. The clinical performance of the Futurabond U did not depend on the employed bonding strategy, and it was considered reliable after 36 months of clinical evaluation. However, greater marginal discrepancy was observed in the self-etch groups. NCCLs restorations using a dual-cure universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes showed satisfactory clinical performance after 36 months.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Chemical bonds</subject><subject>Clinical longevity</subject><subject>Clinical trial, Dental bonding, Dentin-bonding agents, Non-carious cervical lesions, Adhesive techniques</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental enamel</subject><subject>Dental restorations</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Discoloration</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Etching</subject><subject>Oral hygiene</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Self etching</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFrFTEUhYNY7LP6CwQJuNDNPG-SmWQiuCgPq0KLoC24C3nJHV-GmcwzmSnUX9-0r7pw0dWFw3fuudxDyCsGawZMvu_Xvcc4rzlwXpSacXhCVqxVumJK_nxKViAAqkYxfkye59wDQA1cPyPHohG6rRtYkZurGK4xZTvQH2HcD6EL6Omp32EuOrX7IhVhiR4T9aHrMJVMup2iD_EXndHtYvi94Nv8gQpZjVOcd_S7jX4aw59ivFiGObhiSUg3Q4jBlaTLFOzwghx1dsj48mGekKuzT5ebL9X5t89fN6fnlasFnyvkGhrcCosdqqaTrG5lEVwDTAjkSgPTnDHJW-WFlEKiEM52nCloYaulOCHvDnv3aSqH5tmMITscBhtxWrLhsta8kaCagr75D-2nJcVyXaEUl1oILgolDpRLU84JO7NPYbTpxjAwd82Y3tw3Y-6aMYdmiuv1w-5lO6L_5_lbRQE-HgAsz7gOmEx2AaNDHxK62fgpPBpwC2Ngn0E</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>de Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes</creator><creator>Warol, Flavio</creator><creator>Tardem, Chane</creator><creator>Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli</creator><creator>Poubel, Luiz Augusto</creator><creator>Matos, Thalita P.</creator><creator>Souza, Jullian J.</creator><creator>Reis, Alessandra</creator><creator>Barceleiro, Marcos O.</creator><creator>Loguercio, Alessandro D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-4856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2547-5961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-4743</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Universal Simplified Adhesive applied under different bonding technique's: 36-month Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial</title><author>de Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes ; Warol, Flavio ; Tardem, Chane ; Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli ; Poubel, Luiz Augusto ; Matos, Thalita P. ; Souza, Jullian J. ; Reis, Alessandra ; Barceleiro, Marcos O. ; Loguercio, Alessandro D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e2905eb3aefe75f6148605ec50133e2790192116287d36636e33caf217080b963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Chemical bonds</topic><topic>Clinical longevity</topic><topic>Clinical trial, Dental bonding, Dentin-bonding agents, Non-carious cervical lesions, Adhesive techniques</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental enamel</topic><topic>Dental restorations</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Discoloration</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Etching</topic><topic>Oral hygiene</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Self etching</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warol, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tardem, Chane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poubel, Luiz Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Thalita P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Jullian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barceleiro, Marcos O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loguercio, Alessandro D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes</au><au>Warol, Flavio</au><au>Tardem, Chane</au><au>Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli</au><au>Poubel, Luiz Augusto</au><au>Matos, Thalita P.</au><au>Souza, Jullian J.</au><au>Reis, Alessandra</au><au>Barceleiro, Marcos O.</au><au>Loguercio, Alessandro D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Universal Simplified Adhesive applied under different bonding technique's: 36-month Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>122</volume><spage>104120</spage><epage>104120</epage><pages>104120-104120</pages><artnum>104120</artnum><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the clinical performance of a new dual-cure universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco) when applied using different application strategies in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 36 months. Futurabond U was applied in NCCLs of 50 subjects using four adhesion strategies (n = 50 restorations per group): only self-etch (SEE); selective enamel etching + self-etch (SET); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERDry); and etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERWet). All cavities were restored using Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco). Restorations were evaluated after 36 months using the World Federation criteria (FDI) and the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The after 36-month retention rates were 87% (75–92%) for SEE, 94% (83–98%) for SET, 91% (80–97%) for ERDry, and 94% (83–98%) for ERWet. Forty-three restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal adaptation at the 36-month recall (18 for SEE, 12 for SET, 7 for ERDry, and 6 for ERWet; p &gt; 0.05). One restoration was detected as a minor marginal discoloration at the 36-month recall (1 for SET; p &gt; 0.05). No restorations showed postoperative sensitivity and caries recurrence at 36 months. The clinical performance of the Futurabond U did not depend on the employed bonding strategy, and it was considered reliable after 36 months of clinical evaluation. However, greater marginal discrepancy was observed in the self-etch groups. NCCLs restorations using a dual-cure universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes showed satisfactory clinical performance after 36 months.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35398450</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104120</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-4856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2547-5961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-4743</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5712
ispartof Journal of dentistry, 2022-07, Vol.122, p.104120-104120, Article 104120
issn 0300-5712
1879-176X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2649256075
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acids
Adhesives
Chemical bonds
Clinical longevity
Clinical trial, Dental bonding, Dentin-bonding agents, Non-carious cervical lesions, Adhesive techniques
Clinical trials
Colleges & universities
Criteria
Dental caries
Dental enamel
Dental restorations
Dentin
Dentistry
Discoloration
Enamel
Etching
Oral hygiene
Performance evaluation
Public health
Recall
Retention
Self etching
Systematic review
Teeth
title Universal Simplified Adhesive applied under different bonding technique's: 36-month Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Universal%20Simplified%20Adhesive%20applied%20under%20different%20bonding%20technique's:%2036-month%20Randomized%20Multicentre%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=de%20Albuquerque,%20Elisa%20Gomes&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=122&rft.spage=104120&rft.epage=104120&rft.pages=104120-104120&rft.artnum=104120&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104120&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2672693323%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672693323&rft_id=info:pmid/35398450&rft_els_id=S0300571222001774&rfr_iscdi=true