Volumetric wireless coil for wrist MRI at 1.5 T as a practical alternative to Tx/Rx extremity coil: a comparative study
[Display omitted] •Wireless coil inductively coupled to the body coil can replace the local Tx/Rx coil.•Wireless coil outperforms the Tx/Rx extremity coil’s SNR with up to 1.40-fold gain.•Wireless coil provides 2.5-fold higher global SAR efficiency versus local Tx/Rx coil. This work performs a detai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance (1997) 2022-06, Vol.339, p.107209-107209, Article 107209 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 107209 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 107209 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance (1997) |
container_volume | 339 |
creator | Brui, Ekaterina Mikhailovskaya, Anna Solomakha, Georgiy Efimtcev, Alexander Andreychenko, Anna Shchelokova, Alena |
description | [Display omitted]
•Wireless coil inductively coupled to the body coil can replace the local Tx/Rx coil.•Wireless coil outperforms the Tx/Rx extremity coil’s SNR with up to 1.40-fold gain.•Wireless coil provides 2.5-fold higher global SAR efficiency versus local Tx/Rx coil.
This work performs a detailed assessment of radiofrequency (RF) safety and imaging performance of a volumetric wireless coil based on periodically coupled split-loop resonators (SLRs) for 1.5 T wrist MRI versus a commercially available transceive extremity coil. In particular, we evaluated the transmit efficiency and RF safety for three setups: a whole-body birdcage coil, a transceive extremity birdcage coil, and a volumetric wireless coil inductively coupled to the whole-body birdcage coil. The imaging performance of the two latter setups was studied experimentally for nine subjects. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the images acquired with several standard pulse sequences for osteoarthritis wrist imaging was assessed. Application of the wireless coil significantly improved the specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiency of the whole-body birdcage coil, with at least 4.3-fold and 7.6-fold improvement of local and global SAR efficiencies, respectively. This setup also outperformed the transceive extremity coil in terms of SNR (up to 1.40-fold gain) with a moderate (11%) reduction of the local SAR efficiency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107209 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2648899769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1090780722000672</els_id><sourcerecordid>2648899769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-e8890ee5c34376c4a3492741e26ada0e1766698845b0e6193516ab76452cfdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoXqoP4EaydDM1l5lkoisp3kARSnEb0swppMw0NcnY9u2Njrp0lRP4_v9wPoTOKRlTQsXVcrzswpgRxvJfMqL20DElShSkrsT-90wKWRN5hE5iXBJCaSXJITriFVeSE3WMNm--7TtIwVm8cQFaiBFb71q88AFvgosJv0yfsEmYjis8wyZig9fB2OSsabFpE4SVSe4DcPJ4tr2abjFsU4DOpd1303UOWN-tTRiwmPpmd4oOFqaNcPbzjtDs_m42eSyeXx-eJrfPhWU1TwXUtSIAleUll8KWhpeKyZICE6YxBKgUQqi6Lqs5AUEVr6gwcynKitlFM-cjdDnUroN_7yEm3blooW3NCnwfNRNl3qCkUBmlA2qDjzHAQq-D60zYaUr0l2691Fm3_tKtB905c_FT3887aP4Sv34zcDMAkG_8cBB0tA5WFprs2ibdePdP_Scv0Y9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2648899769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Volumetric wireless coil for wrist MRI at 1.5 T as a practical alternative to Tx/Rx extremity coil: a comparative study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brui, Ekaterina ; Mikhailovskaya, Anna ; Solomakha, Georgiy ; Efimtcev, Alexander ; Andreychenko, Anna ; Shchelokova, Alena</creator><creatorcontrib>Brui, Ekaterina ; Mikhailovskaya, Anna ; Solomakha, Georgiy ; Efimtcev, Alexander ; Andreychenko, Anna ; Shchelokova, Alena</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Wireless coil inductively coupled to the body coil can replace the local Tx/Rx coil.•Wireless coil outperforms the Tx/Rx extremity coil’s SNR with up to 1.40-fold gain.•Wireless coil provides 2.5-fold higher global SAR efficiency versus local Tx/Rx coil.
This work performs a detailed assessment of radiofrequency (RF) safety and imaging performance of a volumetric wireless coil based on periodically coupled split-loop resonators (SLRs) for 1.5 T wrist MRI versus a commercially available transceive extremity coil. In particular, we evaluated the transmit efficiency and RF safety for three setups: a whole-body birdcage coil, a transceive extremity birdcage coil, and a volumetric wireless coil inductively coupled to the whole-body birdcage coil. The imaging performance of the two latter setups was studied experimentally for nine subjects. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the images acquired with several standard pulse sequences for osteoarthritis wrist imaging was assessed. Application of the wireless coil significantly improved the specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiency of the whole-body birdcage coil, with at least 4.3-fold and 7.6-fold improvement of local and global SAR efficiencies, respectively. This setup also outperformed the transceive extremity coil in terms of SNR (up to 1.40-fold gain) with a moderate (11%) reduction of the local SAR efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-7807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0856</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107209</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35397309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Metamaterials ; Radiofrequency coils ; Radiofrequency safety ; SNR enhancement ; Specific absorption rate ; Transmit efficiency ; Wireless coil ; Wrist MRI</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance (1997), 2022-06, Vol.339, p.107209-107209, Article 107209</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-e8890ee5c34376c4a3492741e26ada0e1766698845b0e6193516ab76452cfdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-e8890ee5c34376c4a3492741e26ada0e1766698845b0e6193516ab76452cfdb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090780722000672$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35397309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brui, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikhailovskaya, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomakha, Georgiy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efimtcev, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreychenko, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shchelokova, Alena</creatorcontrib><title>Volumetric wireless coil for wrist MRI at 1.5 T as a practical alternative to Tx/Rx extremity coil: a comparative study</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance (1997)</title><addtitle>J Magn Reson</addtitle><description>[Display omitted]
•Wireless coil inductively coupled to the body coil can replace the local Tx/Rx coil.•Wireless coil outperforms the Tx/Rx extremity coil’s SNR with up to 1.40-fold gain.•Wireless coil provides 2.5-fold higher global SAR efficiency versus local Tx/Rx coil.
This work performs a detailed assessment of radiofrequency (RF) safety and imaging performance of a volumetric wireless coil based on periodically coupled split-loop resonators (SLRs) for 1.5 T wrist MRI versus a commercially available transceive extremity coil. In particular, we evaluated the transmit efficiency and RF safety for three setups: a whole-body birdcage coil, a transceive extremity birdcage coil, and a volumetric wireless coil inductively coupled to the whole-body birdcage coil. The imaging performance of the two latter setups was studied experimentally for nine subjects. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the images acquired with several standard pulse sequences for osteoarthritis wrist imaging was assessed. Application of the wireless coil significantly improved the specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiency of the whole-body birdcage coil, with at least 4.3-fold and 7.6-fold improvement of local and global SAR efficiencies, respectively. This setup also outperformed the transceive extremity coil in terms of SNR (up to 1.40-fold gain) with a moderate (11%) reduction of the local SAR efficiency.</description><subject>Metamaterials</subject><subject>Radiofrequency coils</subject><subject>Radiofrequency safety</subject><subject>SNR enhancement</subject><subject>Specific absorption rate</subject><subject>Transmit efficiency</subject><subject>Wireless coil</subject><subject>Wrist MRI</subject><issn>1090-7807</issn><issn>1096-0856</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoXqoP4EaydDM1l5lkoisp3kARSnEb0swppMw0NcnY9u2Njrp0lRP4_v9wPoTOKRlTQsXVcrzswpgRxvJfMqL20DElShSkrsT-90wKWRN5hE5iXBJCaSXJITriFVeSE3WMNm--7TtIwVm8cQFaiBFb71q88AFvgosJv0yfsEmYjis8wyZig9fB2OSsabFpE4SVSe4DcPJ4tr2abjFsU4DOpd1303UOWN-tTRiwmPpmd4oOFqaNcPbzjtDs_m42eSyeXx-eJrfPhWU1TwXUtSIAleUll8KWhpeKyZICE6YxBKgUQqi6Lqs5AUEVr6gwcynKitlFM-cjdDnUroN_7yEm3blooW3NCnwfNRNl3qCkUBmlA2qDjzHAQq-D60zYaUr0l2691Fm3_tKtB905c_FT3887aP4Sv34zcDMAkG_8cBB0tA5WFprs2ibdePdP_Scv0Y9s</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Brui, Ekaterina</creator><creator>Mikhailovskaya, Anna</creator><creator>Solomakha, Georgiy</creator><creator>Efimtcev, Alexander</creator><creator>Andreychenko, Anna</creator><creator>Shchelokova, Alena</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Volumetric wireless coil for wrist MRI at 1.5 T as a practical alternative to Tx/Rx extremity coil: a comparative study</title><author>Brui, Ekaterina ; Mikhailovskaya, Anna ; Solomakha, Georgiy ; Efimtcev, Alexander ; Andreychenko, Anna ; Shchelokova, Alena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-e8890ee5c34376c4a3492741e26ada0e1766698845b0e6193516ab76452cfdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Metamaterials</topic><topic>Radiofrequency coils</topic><topic>Radiofrequency safety</topic><topic>SNR enhancement</topic><topic>Specific absorption rate</topic><topic>Transmit efficiency</topic><topic>Wireless coil</topic><topic>Wrist MRI</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brui, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikhailovskaya, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomakha, Georgiy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efimtcev, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreychenko, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shchelokova, Alena</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance (1997)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brui, Ekaterina</au><au>Mikhailovskaya, Anna</au><au>Solomakha, Georgiy</au><au>Efimtcev, Alexander</au><au>Andreychenko, Anna</au><au>Shchelokova, Alena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Volumetric wireless coil for wrist MRI at 1.5 T as a practical alternative to Tx/Rx extremity coil: a comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance (1997)</jtitle><addtitle>J Magn Reson</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>339</volume><spage>107209</spage><epage>107209</epage><pages>107209-107209</pages><artnum>107209</artnum><issn>1090-7807</issn><eissn>1096-0856</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Wireless coil inductively coupled to the body coil can replace the local Tx/Rx coil.•Wireless coil outperforms the Tx/Rx extremity coil’s SNR with up to 1.40-fold gain.•Wireless coil provides 2.5-fold higher global SAR efficiency versus local Tx/Rx coil.
This work performs a detailed assessment of radiofrequency (RF) safety and imaging performance of a volumetric wireless coil based on periodically coupled split-loop resonators (SLRs) for 1.5 T wrist MRI versus a commercially available transceive extremity coil. In particular, we evaluated the transmit efficiency and RF safety for three setups: a whole-body birdcage coil, a transceive extremity birdcage coil, and a volumetric wireless coil inductively coupled to the whole-body birdcage coil. The imaging performance of the two latter setups was studied experimentally for nine subjects. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the images acquired with several standard pulse sequences for osteoarthritis wrist imaging was assessed. Application of the wireless coil significantly improved the specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiency of the whole-body birdcage coil, with at least 4.3-fold and 7.6-fold improvement of local and global SAR efficiencies, respectively. This setup also outperformed the transceive extremity coil in terms of SNR (up to 1.40-fold gain) with a moderate (11%) reduction of the local SAR efficiency.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35397309</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107209</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1090-7807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance (1997), 2022-06, Vol.339, p.107209-107209, Article 107209 |
issn | 1090-7807 1096-0856 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2648899769 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Metamaterials Radiofrequency coils Radiofrequency safety SNR enhancement Specific absorption rate Transmit efficiency Wireless coil Wrist MRI |
title | Volumetric wireless coil for wrist MRI at 1.5 T as a practical alternative to Tx/Rx extremity coil: a comparative study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T14%3A20%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Volumetric%20wireless%20coil%20for%20wrist%20MRI%20at%201.5%20T%20as%20a%20practical%20alternative%20to%20Tx/Rx%20extremity%20coil:%20a%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20(1997)&rft.au=Brui,%20Ekaterina&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=339&rft.spage=107209&rft.epage=107209&rft.pages=107209-107209&rft.artnum=107209&rft.issn=1090-7807&rft.eissn=1096-0856&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2648899769%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2648899769&rft_id=info:pmid/35397309&rft_els_id=S1090780722000672&rfr_iscdi=true |