Regional citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of citrate and heparin in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for critically ill patients. Methods Searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Results Analyses showed that there no difference existed in mortalit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis 2022-12, Vol.26 (6), p.1086-1097
Hauptverfasser: Li, Rui, Gao, Xiang, Zhou, Tao, Li, Yunjie, Wang, Jianhui, Zhang, Peirong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of citrate and heparin in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for critically ill patients. Methods Searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Results Analyses showed that there no difference existed in mortality, metabolic alkalosis, circuit loss, and the number of transfused between the two groups (RR = 0.95, p = 0.40; RR = 1.73, p = 0.40; RR = 0.64, p = 0.09; RR = 1.05, p = 0.70). The filter life of the citrate group was longer than the heparin group (MD = 16.98, p 
ISSN:1744-9979
1744-9987
DOI:10.1111/1744-9987.13850