Regional citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Introduction This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of citrate and heparin in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for critically ill patients. Methods Searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Results Analyses showed that there no difference existed in mortalit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis 2022-12, Vol.26 (6), p.1086-1097 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of citrate and heparin in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for critically ill patients.
Methods
Searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases.
Results
Analyses showed that there no difference existed in mortality, metabolic alkalosis, circuit loss, and the number of transfused between the two groups (RR = 0.95, p = 0.40; RR = 1.73, p = 0.40; RR = 0.64, p = 0.09; RR = 1.05, p = 0.70). The filter life of the citrate group was longer than the heparin group (MD = 16.98, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1744-9979 1744-9987 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1744-9987.13850 |