Incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP with anesthesia assistance: a multicenter observational study

Incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP with anesthesia assistance: a multicenter observational study

Anesthesia assistance is commonly used for ERCP. General anesthesia (GA) may provide greater airway protection but may lead to hypotension. We aimed to compare GA versus sedation without planned intubation (SWPI) on the incidence of hypoxemia and hypotension. We also explored risk factors for conver...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2022-08, Vol.96 (2), p.269-281.e1
Hauptverfasser: Cummings, Linda C., Liang, Chen, Mascha, Edward J., Saager, Leif, Smith, Zachary L., Bhavani, Sekar, Vargo, John J., Cummings, Kenneth C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 281.e1
container_issue 2
container_start_page 269
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 96
creator Cummings, Linda C.
Liang, Chen
Mascha, Edward J.
Saager, Leif
Smith, Zachary L.
Bhavani, Sekar
Vargo, John J.
Cummings, Kenneth C.
description Anesthesia assistance is commonly used for ERCP. General anesthesia (GA) may provide greater airway protection but may lead to hypotension. We aimed to compare GA versus sedation without planned intubation (SWPI) on the incidence of hypoxemia and hypotension. We also explored risk factors for conversion from SWPI to GA. This observational study used data from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I to IV undergoing ERCP between 2006 and 2019 were included. We compared GA and SWPI on incidence of hypoxemia (oxygen saturation 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2647654208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510722002450</els_id><sourcerecordid>2647654208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6862f4b241bd7458f8116e5e13c7faf375851ac51c40c62cc7d0508690c111c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAURS1ERaeFD2CDvGST8GzHTgZWaFRKpUqtEKwtj_3SepRJip-Tqn9fD1NYsvJbnHt1fRh7L6AWIMynXX0XsZYgZQ2qBqlesZWAdVuZtl2_ZisoUKUFtKfsjGgHAJ1U4g07VVp1opwrtlyNPgYcPfKp54TB5TiNVcLBZQzchQUTIccFx0w8zCmOd_zix-aWP8Z8z92IlO-RouOOKFJ2pekzd3w_Dzn6EsLEpy1hWv4Uu4FTnsPTW3bSu4Hw3ct7zn59u_i5-V5d31xebb5eV75MzJXpjOybrWzENrSN7vpOCIMahfJt73rV6k4L57XwDXgjvW8DaOjMGrwQwoM6Zx-PvQ9p-j2XrXYfyeMwlOHTTFaapjW6kdAVVBxRnyaihL19SHHv0pMVYA-67c4W3fag24KyRXfJfHipn7d7DP8Sf_0W4MsRwPLJJWKy5OPBdogJfbZhiv-pfwZstZEd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2647654208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP with anesthesia assistance: a multicenter observational study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Cummings, Linda C. ; Liang, Chen ; Mascha, Edward J. ; Saager, Leif ; Smith, Zachary L. ; Bhavani, Sekar ; Vargo, John J. ; Cummings, Kenneth C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Linda C. ; Liang, Chen ; Mascha, Edward J. ; Saager, Leif ; Smith, Zachary L. ; Bhavani, Sekar ; Vargo, John J. ; Cummings, Kenneth C.</creatorcontrib><description>Anesthesia assistance is commonly used for ERCP. General anesthesia (GA) may provide greater airway protection but may lead to hypotension. We aimed to compare GA versus sedation without planned intubation (SWPI) on the incidence of hypoxemia and hypotension. We also explored risk factors for conversion from SWPI to GA. This observational study used data from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I to IV undergoing ERCP between 2006 and 2019 were included. We compared GA and SWPI on incidence of hypoxemia (oxygen saturation &lt;90% for ≥3 minutes) and hypotension (mean arterial pressure &lt;65 mm Hg for ≥5 minutes) using joint hypothesis testing. The association between anesthetic approach and outcomes was assessed using logistic regression. The noninferiority delta for hypoxemia and hypotension was an odds ratio of 1.20. One approach was deemed better if it was noninferior on both outcomes and superior on at least 1 outcome. To explore risk factors associated with conversion from SWPI to GA, we constructed a logistic regression model. Among 61,735 cases from 42 institutions, 38,830 (63%) received GA and 22,905 (37%) received SWPI. The GA group had 1.27 times (97.5% confidence interval, 1.19-1.35) higher odds of hypotension but .71 times (97.5% confidence interval, .63-.80) lower odds of hypoxemia. Neither group was noninferior to the other on both outcomes. Conversion from SWPI to GA occurred in 6.5% of cases and was associated with baseline comorbidities and higher institutional procedure volume. GA for ERCP was associated with less hypoxemia, whereas SWPI was associated with less hypotension. Neither approach was better on the combined incidence of hypotension and hypoxemia. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35381231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022-08, Vol.96 (2), p.269-281.e1</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6862f4b241bd7458f8116e5e13c7faf375851ac51c40c62cc7d0508690c111c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6862f4b241bd7458f8116e5e13c7faf375851ac51c40c62cc7d0508690c111c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8767-2795</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510722002450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Linda C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascha, Edward J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saager, Leif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Zachary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavani, Sekar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargo, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Kenneth C.</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP with anesthesia assistance: a multicenter observational study</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Anesthesia assistance is commonly used for ERCP. General anesthesia (GA) may provide greater airway protection but may lead to hypotension. We aimed to compare GA versus sedation without planned intubation (SWPI) on the incidence of hypoxemia and hypotension. We also explored risk factors for conversion from SWPI to GA. This observational study used data from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I to IV undergoing ERCP between 2006 and 2019 were included. We compared GA and SWPI on incidence of hypoxemia (oxygen saturation &lt;90% for ≥3 minutes) and hypotension (mean arterial pressure &lt;65 mm Hg for ≥5 minutes) using joint hypothesis testing. The association between anesthetic approach and outcomes was assessed using logistic regression. The noninferiority delta for hypoxemia and hypotension was an odds ratio of 1.20. One approach was deemed better if it was noninferior on both outcomes and superior on at least 1 outcome. To explore risk factors associated with conversion from SWPI to GA, we constructed a logistic regression model. Among 61,735 cases from 42 institutions, 38,830 (63%) received GA and 22,905 (37%) received SWPI. The GA group had 1.27 times (97.5% confidence interval, 1.19-1.35) higher odds of hypotension but .71 times (97.5% confidence interval, .63-.80) lower odds of hypoxemia. Neither group was noninferior to the other on both outcomes. Conversion from SWPI to GA occurred in 6.5% of cases and was associated with baseline comorbidities and higher institutional procedure volume. GA for ERCP was associated with less hypoxemia, whereas SWPI was associated with less hypotension. Neither approach was better on the combined incidence of hypotension and hypoxemia. [Display omitted]</description><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAURS1ERaeFD2CDvGST8GzHTgZWaFRKpUqtEKwtj_3SepRJip-Tqn9fD1NYsvJbnHt1fRh7L6AWIMynXX0XsZYgZQ2qBqlesZWAdVuZtl2_ZisoUKUFtKfsjGgHAJ1U4g07VVp1opwrtlyNPgYcPfKp54TB5TiNVcLBZQzchQUTIccFx0w8zCmOd_zix-aWP8Z8z92IlO-RouOOKFJ2pekzd3w_Dzn6EsLEpy1hWv4Uu4FTnsPTW3bSu4Hw3ct7zn59u_i5-V5d31xebb5eV75MzJXpjOybrWzENrSN7vpOCIMahfJt73rV6k4L57XwDXgjvW8DaOjMGrwQwoM6Zx-PvQ9p-j2XrXYfyeMwlOHTTFaapjW6kdAVVBxRnyaihL19SHHv0pMVYA-67c4W3fag24KyRXfJfHipn7d7DP8Sf_0W4MsRwPLJJWKy5OPBdogJfbZhiv-pfwZstZEd</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Cummings, Linda C.</creator><creator>Liang, Chen</creator><creator>Mascha, Edward J.</creator><creator>Saager, Leif</creator><creator>Smith, Zachary L.</creator><creator>Bhavani, Sekar</creator><creator>Vargo, John J.</creator><creator>Cummings, Kenneth C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-2795</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP with anesthesia assistance: a multicenter observational study</title><author>Cummings, Linda C. ; Liang, Chen ; Mascha, Edward J. ; Saager, Leif ; Smith, Zachary L. ; Bhavani, Sekar ; Vargo, John J. ; Cummings, Kenneth C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6862f4b241bd7458f8116e5e13c7faf375851ac51c40c62cc7d0508690c111c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Linda C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascha, Edward J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saager, Leif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Zachary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavani, Sekar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargo, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Kenneth C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cummings, Linda C.</au><au>Liang, Chen</au><au>Mascha, Edward J.</au><au>Saager, Leif</au><au>Smith, Zachary L.</au><au>Bhavani, Sekar</au><au>Vargo, John J.</au><au>Cummings, Kenneth C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP with anesthesia assistance: a multicenter observational study</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>281.e1</epage><pages>269-281.e1</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>Anesthesia assistance is commonly used for ERCP. General anesthesia (GA) may provide greater airway protection but may lead to hypotension. We aimed to compare GA versus sedation without planned intubation (SWPI) on the incidence of hypoxemia and hypotension. We also explored risk factors for conversion from SWPI to GA. This observational study used data from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I to IV undergoing ERCP between 2006 and 2019 were included. We compared GA and SWPI on incidence of hypoxemia (oxygen saturation &lt;90% for ≥3 minutes) and hypotension (mean arterial pressure &lt;65 mm Hg for ≥5 minutes) using joint hypothesis testing. The association between anesthetic approach and outcomes was assessed using logistic regression. The noninferiority delta for hypoxemia and hypotension was an odds ratio of 1.20. One approach was deemed better if it was noninferior on both outcomes and superior on at least 1 outcome. To explore risk factors associated with conversion from SWPI to GA, we constructed a logistic regression model. Among 61,735 cases from 42 institutions, 38,830 (63%) received GA and 22,905 (37%) received SWPI. The GA group had 1.27 times (97.5% confidence interval, 1.19-1.35) higher odds of hypotension but .71 times (97.5% confidence interval, .63-.80) lower odds of hypoxemia. Neither group was noninferior to the other on both outcomes. Conversion from SWPI to GA occurred in 6.5% of cases and was associated with baseline comorbidities and higher institutional procedure volume. GA for ERCP was associated with less hypoxemia, whereas SWPI was associated with less hypotension. Neither approach was better on the combined incidence of hypotension and hypoxemia. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35381231</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.023</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-2795</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022-08, Vol.96 (2), p.269-281.e1
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2647654208
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title Incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP with anesthesia assistance: a multicenter observational study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20of%20sedation-related%20adverse%20events%20during%20ERCP%20with%20anesthesia%20assistance:%20a%20multicenter%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Cummings,%20Linda%20C.&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=281.e1&rft.pages=269-281.e1&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2647654208%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2647654208&rft_id=info:pmid/35381231&rft_els_id=S0016510722002450&rfr_iscdi=true