Evaluating the performance of temporal and spatial early warning statistics of algal blooms

Regime shifts have large consequences for ecosystems and the services they provide. However, understanding the potential for, causes of, proximity to, and thresholds for regime shifts in nearly all settings is difficult. Generic statistical indicators of resilience have been proposed and studied in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2022-07, Vol.32 (5), p.e2616-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Buelo, C. D., Pace, M. L., Carpenter, S. R., Stanley, E. H., Ortiz, D. A., Ha, D. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page e2616
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 32
creator Buelo, C. D.
Pace, M. L.
Carpenter, S. R.
Stanley, E. H.
Ortiz, D. A.
Ha, D. T.
description Regime shifts have large consequences for ecosystems and the services they provide. However, understanding the potential for, causes of, proximity to, and thresholds for regime shifts in nearly all settings is difficult. Generic statistical indicators of resilience have been proposed and studied in a wide range of ecosystems as a method to detect when regime shifts are becoming more likely without direct knowledge of underlying system dynamics or thresholds. These early warning statistics (EWS) have been studied separately but there have been few examples that directly compare temporal and spatial EWS in ecosystem‐scale empirical data. To test these methods, we collected high‐frequency time series and high‐resolution spatial data during a whole‐lake fertilization experiment while also monitoring an adjacent reference lake. We calculated two common EWS, standard deviation and autocorrelation, in both time series and spatial data to evaluate their performance prior to the resulting algal bloom. We also applied the quickest detection method to generate binary alarms of resilience change from temporal EWS. One temporal EWS, rolling window standard deviation, provided advanced warning in most variables prior to the bloom, showing trends and between‐lake patterns consistent with theory. In contrast, temporal autocorrelation and both measures of spatial EWS (spatial SD, Moran's  I) provided little or no warning. By compiling time series data from this and past experiments with and without nutrient additions, we were able to evaluate temporal EWS performance for both constant and changing resilience conditions. True positive alarm rates were 2.5–8.3 times higher for rolling window standard deviation when a lake was being pushed towards a bloom than the rate of false positives when it was not. For rolling window autocorrelation, alarm rates were much lower and no variable had a higher true positive than false positive alarm rate. Our findings suggest temporal EWS provide advanced warning of algal blooms and that this approach could help managers prepare for and/or minimize negative bloom impacts.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eap.2616
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2646941505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2684211231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2796-a569c2c877bd786a13c287a1cfbaf4a446b26d497983d50c34d7a4a3e928a2ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2Cv0ACXrxE9zvJsZT6AQU96MlDmGw2NWWTjbuJpf_era0KgnOZYXjmYXgROif4mmBMbzR011QSeYDGJGNZLERKD8OMBYlxIskInXi_wqEopcdoxASTKWF8jF7nH2AG6Ot2GfVvOuq0q6xroFU6slXU66azDkwEbRn5LnBh1uDMJlqDa7dXvg9b39fKbw_ALANRGGsbf4qOKjBen-37BL3czp9n9_Hi8e5hNl3EiiaZjEHITFGVJklRJqkEwhRNEyCqKqDiwLksqCx5lmQpKwVWjJcJcGA6oylQKNgEXe28nbPvg_Z93tReaWOg1XbwOZVcZpwILAJ6-Qdd2cG14btApZwSQhn5FSpnvXe6yjtXN-A2OcH5NvA8BJ5vAw_oxV44FI0uf8DvhAMQ74B1bfTmX1E-nz59CT8BGhyJQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2684211231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the performance of temporal and spatial early warning statistics of algal blooms</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Buelo, C. D. ; Pace, M. L. ; Carpenter, S. R. ; Stanley, E. H. ; Ortiz, D. A. ; Ha, D. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buelo, C. D. ; Pace, M. L. ; Carpenter, S. R. ; Stanley, E. H. ; Ortiz, D. A. ; Ha, D. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Regime shifts have large consequences for ecosystems and the services they provide. However, understanding the potential for, causes of, proximity to, and thresholds for regime shifts in nearly all settings is difficult. Generic statistical indicators of resilience have been proposed and studied in a wide range of ecosystems as a method to detect when regime shifts are becoming more likely without direct knowledge of underlying system dynamics or thresholds. These early warning statistics (EWS) have been studied separately but there have been few examples that directly compare temporal and spatial EWS in ecosystem‐scale empirical data. To test these methods, we collected high‐frequency time series and high‐resolution spatial data during a whole‐lake fertilization experiment while also monitoring an adjacent reference lake. We calculated two common EWS, standard deviation and autocorrelation, in both time series and spatial data to evaluate their performance prior to the resulting algal bloom. We also applied the quickest detection method to generate binary alarms of resilience change from temporal EWS. One temporal EWS, rolling window standard deviation, provided advanced warning in most variables prior to the bloom, showing trends and between‐lake patterns consistent with theory. In contrast, temporal autocorrelation and both measures of spatial EWS (spatial SD, Moran's  I) provided little or no warning. By compiling time series data from this and past experiments with and without nutrient additions, we were able to evaluate temporal EWS performance for both constant and changing resilience conditions. True positive alarm rates were 2.5–8.3 times higher for rolling window standard deviation when a lake was being pushed towards a bloom than the rate of false positives when it was not. For rolling window autocorrelation, alarm rates were much lower and no variable had a higher true positive than false positive alarm rate. Our findings suggest temporal EWS provide advanced warning of algal blooms and that this approach could help managers prepare for and/or minimize negative bloom impacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eap.2616</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35368134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Algae ; Algal blooms ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Autocorrelation ; early warning statistics ; Ecosystems ; Eutrophication ; Fertilization ; Lakes ; Performance evaluation ; regime shift ; Resilience ; Spatial data ; Standard deviation ; Statistics ; System dynamics ; Thresholds ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2022-07, Vol.32 (5), p.e2616-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jul 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2796-a569c2c877bd786a13c287a1cfbaf4a446b26d497983d50c34d7a4a3e928a2ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2796-a569c2c877bd786a13c287a1cfbaf4a446b26d497983d50c34d7a4a3e928a2ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8097-8700 ; 0000-0001-7909-1440 ; 0000-0003-4031-4373 ; 0000-0001-5945-6131 ; 0000-0003-4922-8121 ; 0000-0003-4605-3530</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feap.2616$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feap.2616$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368134$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buelo, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pace, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, E. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, D. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the performance of temporal and spatial early warning statistics of algal blooms</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Regime shifts have large consequences for ecosystems and the services they provide. However, understanding the potential for, causes of, proximity to, and thresholds for regime shifts in nearly all settings is difficult. Generic statistical indicators of resilience have been proposed and studied in a wide range of ecosystems as a method to detect when regime shifts are becoming more likely without direct knowledge of underlying system dynamics or thresholds. These early warning statistics (EWS) have been studied separately but there have been few examples that directly compare temporal and spatial EWS in ecosystem‐scale empirical data. To test these methods, we collected high‐frequency time series and high‐resolution spatial data during a whole‐lake fertilization experiment while also monitoring an adjacent reference lake. We calculated two common EWS, standard deviation and autocorrelation, in both time series and spatial data to evaluate their performance prior to the resulting algal bloom. We also applied the quickest detection method to generate binary alarms of resilience change from temporal EWS. One temporal EWS, rolling window standard deviation, provided advanced warning in most variables prior to the bloom, showing trends and between‐lake patterns consistent with theory. In contrast, temporal autocorrelation and both measures of spatial EWS (spatial SD, Moran's  I) provided little or no warning. By compiling time series data from this and past experiments with and without nutrient additions, we were able to evaluate temporal EWS performance for both constant and changing resilience conditions. True positive alarm rates were 2.5–8.3 times higher for rolling window standard deviation when a lake was being pushed towards a bloom than the rate of false positives when it was not. For rolling window autocorrelation, alarm rates were much lower and no variable had a higher true positive than false positive alarm rate. Our findings suggest temporal EWS provide advanced warning of algal blooms and that this approach could help managers prepare for and/or minimize negative bloom impacts.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Algal blooms</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Autocorrelation</subject><subject>early warning statistics</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>regime shift</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>System dynamics</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2Cv0ACXrxE9zvJsZT6AQU96MlDmGw2NWWTjbuJpf_era0KgnOZYXjmYXgROif4mmBMbzR011QSeYDGJGNZLERKD8OMBYlxIskInXi_wqEopcdoxASTKWF8jF7nH2AG6Ot2GfVvOuq0q6xroFU6slXU66azDkwEbRn5LnBh1uDMJlqDa7dXvg9b39fKbw_ALANRGGsbf4qOKjBen-37BL3czp9n9_Hi8e5hNl3EiiaZjEHITFGVJklRJqkEwhRNEyCqKqDiwLksqCx5lmQpKwVWjJcJcGA6oylQKNgEXe28nbPvg_Z93tReaWOg1XbwOZVcZpwILAJ6-Qdd2cG14btApZwSQhn5FSpnvXe6yjtXN-A2OcH5NvA8BJ5vAw_oxV44FI0uf8DvhAMQ74B1bfTmX1E-nz59CT8BGhyJQw</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Buelo, C. D.</creator><creator>Pace, M. L.</creator><creator>Carpenter, S. R.</creator><creator>Stanley, E. H.</creator><creator>Ortiz, D. A.</creator><creator>Ha, D. T.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-8700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7909-1440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4031-4373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-6131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-8121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-3530</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Evaluating the performance of temporal and spatial early warning statistics of algal blooms</title><author>Buelo, C. D. ; Pace, M. L. ; Carpenter, S. R. ; Stanley, E. H. ; Ortiz, D. A. ; Ha, D. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2796-a569c2c877bd786a13c287a1cfbaf4a446b26d497983d50c34d7a4a3e928a2ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Algal blooms</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Autocorrelation</topic><topic>early warning statistics</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>regime shift</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>System dynamics</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buelo, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pace, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, E. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, D. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buelo, C. D.</au><au>Pace, M. L.</au><au>Carpenter, S. R.</au><au>Stanley, E. H.</au><au>Ortiz, D. A.</au><au>Ha, D. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the performance of temporal and spatial early warning statistics of algal blooms</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e2616</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2616-n/a</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Regime shifts have large consequences for ecosystems and the services they provide. However, understanding the potential for, causes of, proximity to, and thresholds for regime shifts in nearly all settings is difficult. Generic statistical indicators of resilience have been proposed and studied in a wide range of ecosystems as a method to detect when regime shifts are becoming more likely without direct knowledge of underlying system dynamics or thresholds. These early warning statistics (EWS) have been studied separately but there have been few examples that directly compare temporal and spatial EWS in ecosystem‐scale empirical data. To test these methods, we collected high‐frequency time series and high‐resolution spatial data during a whole‐lake fertilization experiment while also monitoring an adjacent reference lake. We calculated two common EWS, standard deviation and autocorrelation, in both time series and spatial data to evaluate their performance prior to the resulting algal bloom. We also applied the quickest detection method to generate binary alarms of resilience change from temporal EWS. One temporal EWS, rolling window standard deviation, provided advanced warning in most variables prior to the bloom, showing trends and between‐lake patterns consistent with theory. In contrast, temporal autocorrelation and both measures of spatial EWS (spatial SD, Moran's  I) provided little or no warning. By compiling time series data from this and past experiments with and without nutrient additions, we were able to evaluate temporal EWS performance for both constant and changing resilience conditions. True positive alarm rates were 2.5–8.3 times higher for rolling window standard deviation when a lake was being pushed towards a bloom than the rate of false positives when it was not. For rolling window autocorrelation, alarm rates were much lower and no variable had a higher true positive than false positive alarm rate. Our findings suggest temporal EWS provide advanced warning of algal blooms and that this approach could help managers prepare for and/or minimize negative bloom impacts.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35368134</pmid><doi>10.1002/eap.2616</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-8700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7909-1440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4031-4373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-6131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-8121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-3530</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2022-07, Vol.32 (5), p.e2616-n/a
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2646941505
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Algae
Algal blooms
Aquatic ecosystems
Autocorrelation
early warning statistics
Ecosystems
Eutrophication
Fertilization
Lakes
Performance evaluation
regime shift
Resilience
Spatial data
Standard deviation
Statistics
System dynamics
Thresholds
Time series
title Evaluating the performance of temporal and spatial early warning statistics of algal blooms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A48%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20performance%20of%20temporal%20and%20spatial%20early%20warning%20statistics%20of%20algal%20blooms&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Buelo,%20C.%20D.&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e2616&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2616-n/a&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eap.2616&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2684211231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2684211231&rft_id=info:pmid/35368134&rfr_iscdi=true