Robotic beyond total mesorectal excision surgery for primary and recurrent pelvic malignancy: Feasibility and short‐term outcomes

Aim To explore the feasibility and safety of robotic beyond total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for primary and recurrent pelvic malignancy. Methods Patients undergoing robotic beyond TME resections for primary or recurrent pelvic malignancy between July 2015 and July 2021 in a public quaternary and a private tertiary centre were included. Demographic and clinical data were recorded and outcomes analysed. Results Twenty‐four patients (50% males) were included, with a median age of 58 (45–70.8) years, and a BMI of 26 (24.3–28.1) kg/m2. Indication for surgery was rectal adenocarcinoma in nineteen, leiomyosarcoma in two, anal squamous cell carcinoma in one and combined rectal and prostatic adenocarcinoma in two patients. All patients required resection of at least one adjacent pelvic organ including genitourinary structures (n = 23), internal iliac vessels (n = 3) and/or bone (n = 2). Eleven patients had a restorative procedure. Of the 13 nonrestorative cases, nine needed perineal reconstruction with a flap. There was one conversion due to bleeding. The mean operating time was 370 (285–424) min, and the median blood loss was 400 (200–2,000) ml. The median length of stay was 16 (9.3–23.8) days. Fourteen patients (58.3%) had postoperative complications; eight of them (33.3%) were Clavien‐Dindo III or more complication. Twenty‐three (95.8%) patients had an R0 resection. During a median follow‐up of 10 (7–23.5) months, five patients (20.8%) had systemic recurrences. No local recurrences were identified during the study period. Conclusion Implementation of robotic beyond TME surgery for primary and recurrent pelvic malignancy is feasible within a highly specialised setting.