The impact of lot splitting on due date performance
The primary purpose of the research project was to determine if the flow time reductions that occur from splitting jobs into smaller transfer batches result in improved due data performance. The research was performed using a computer simulation of a five machine open job shop. In the open shop envi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of operations management 1994-10, Vol.12 (1), p.13-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | Journal of operations management |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Wagner, Bret J. Ragatz, Gary L. |
description | The primary purpose of the research project was to determine if the flow time reductions that occur from splitting jobs into smaller transfer batches result in improved due data performance. The research was performed using a computer simulation of a five machine open job shop. In the open shop environment, each job is unique, and the flow time reductions are solely a result of overlapping operations rather than saved setups from processing similar jobs in sequence. To determine the impact of lot splitting on due date performance, two questions had to be answered. First, how does the impact of lot splitting vary with the magnitude of setup times? Second, how does the size of the transfer batch affect lot splitting performance?
This study shows the benefits from lot splitting improve monotonically with decreasing transfer batch size and that lot splitting provides improvements that are essentially independent of the setup time as long as the total utilization (ratio of setup and processing time to available time) is constant. As for the primary research question, lot splitting can provide substantial reductions in mean tardiness (up to 39%) and number of jobs tardy in the open shop environment.
The repetitive lots logic developed by Jacobs and Bragg (1988) is reformulated to clearly show that it can be used in combination with any dispatching rule. This rule demonstrates that the repetitive lots logic makes surprisingly good scheduling decisions in spite of its simplicity.
Lot splitting is shown to be a simple and effective means of improving the performance of an open job shop. Based on its robust performance in this study, the benefits should be able to be realized in combination with other shop floor control techniques, such as order review release and order expediting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0272-6963(94)90003-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26452131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0272696394900035</els_id><sourcerecordid>52246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3263-b07d4978c564525f248e87fa6efb35f22bcc93912ca1d2c14702b8e1f07212493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUQIMoOI7-gYvgQnRRzaOvbAQZfDIym3Ed2vRGM7RNTVpl_t7UigsX4ioEzrm5OQgdU3JBCU0vCctYlIqUn4n4XBBCeJTsoBnNMx5RTrNdNPtB9tGB95vA0DhjM8TXr4BN0xWqx1bj2vbYd7Xpe9O-YNviagBcFT3gDpy2rilaBYdoTxe1h6Pvc46eb2_Wi_toubp7WFwvI8VZyqOSZFUsslwlaZywRLM4hzzTRQq65OHKSqUEF5SpglZMhX0IK3OgmmSMsljwOTqd5nbOvg3ge9kYr6Cuixbs4CUb54b_BfDkF7ixg2vDbpJRkeSc0xGKJ0g5670DLTtnmsJtJSVyzCjHRnJsJEUsvzLKJGj5pH2YGrb_cuTjavVEeVCvJhVCpHcDTnplIASsjAPVy8qav9_-BATPhvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219583311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of lot splitting on due date performance</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wagner, Bret J. ; Ragatz, Gary L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Bret J. ; Ragatz, Gary L.</creatorcontrib><description>The primary purpose of the research project was to determine if the flow time reductions that occur from splitting jobs into smaller transfer batches result in improved due data performance. The research was performed using a computer simulation of a five machine open job shop. In the open shop environment, each job is unique, and the flow time reductions are solely a result of overlapping operations rather than saved setups from processing similar jobs in sequence. To determine the impact of lot splitting on due date performance, two questions had to be answered. First, how does the impact of lot splitting vary with the magnitude of setup times? Second, how does the size of the transfer batch affect lot splitting performance?
This study shows the benefits from lot splitting improve monotonically with decreasing transfer batch size and that lot splitting provides improvements that are essentially independent of the setup time as long as the total utilization (ratio of setup and processing time to available time) is constant. As for the primary research question, lot splitting can provide substantial reductions in mean tardiness (up to 39%) and number of jobs tardy in the open shop environment.
The repetitive lots logic developed by Jacobs and Bragg (1988) is reformulated to clearly show that it can be used in combination with any dispatching rule. This rule demonstrates that the repetitive lots logic makes surprisingly good scheduling decisions in spite of its simplicity.
Lot splitting is shown to be a simple and effective means of improving the performance of an open job shop. Based on its robust performance in this study, the benefits should be able to be realized in combination with other shop floor control techniques, such as order review release and order expediting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-6963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1317</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0272-6963(94)90003-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Batch processing ; Computer simulation ; Impacts ; Job shops ; Operations research ; Production planning ; Production scheduling ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of operations management, 1994-10, Vol.12 (1), p.13-25</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><rights>1994 APICS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Oct 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3263-b07d4978c564525f248e87fa6efb35f22bcc93912ca1d2c14702b8e1f07212493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3263-b07d4978c564525f248e87fa6efb35f22bcc93912ca1d2c14702b8e1f07212493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(94)90003-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Bret J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragatz, Gary L.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of lot splitting on due date performance</title><title>Journal of operations management</title><description>The primary purpose of the research project was to determine if the flow time reductions that occur from splitting jobs into smaller transfer batches result in improved due data performance. The research was performed using a computer simulation of a five machine open job shop. In the open shop environment, each job is unique, and the flow time reductions are solely a result of overlapping operations rather than saved setups from processing similar jobs in sequence. To determine the impact of lot splitting on due date performance, two questions had to be answered. First, how does the impact of lot splitting vary with the magnitude of setup times? Second, how does the size of the transfer batch affect lot splitting performance?
This study shows the benefits from lot splitting improve monotonically with decreasing transfer batch size and that lot splitting provides improvements that are essentially independent of the setup time as long as the total utilization (ratio of setup and processing time to available time) is constant. As for the primary research question, lot splitting can provide substantial reductions in mean tardiness (up to 39%) and number of jobs tardy in the open shop environment.
The repetitive lots logic developed by Jacobs and Bragg (1988) is reformulated to clearly show that it can be used in combination with any dispatching rule. This rule demonstrates that the repetitive lots logic makes surprisingly good scheduling decisions in spite of its simplicity.
Lot splitting is shown to be a simple and effective means of improving the performance of an open job shop. Based on its robust performance in this study, the benefits should be able to be realized in combination with other shop floor control techniques, such as order review release and order expediting.</description><subject>Batch processing</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Impacts</subject><subject>Job shops</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Production planning</subject><subject>Production scheduling</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0272-6963</issn><issn>1873-1317</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUQIMoOI7-gYvgQnRRzaOvbAQZfDIym3Ed2vRGM7RNTVpl_t7UigsX4ioEzrm5OQgdU3JBCU0vCctYlIqUn4n4XBBCeJTsoBnNMx5RTrNdNPtB9tGB95vA0DhjM8TXr4BN0xWqx1bj2vbYd7Xpe9O-YNviagBcFT3gDpy2rilaBYdoTxe1h6Pvc46eb2_Wi_toubp7WFwvI8VZyqOSZFUsslwlaZywRLM4hzzTRQq65OHKSqUEF5SpglZMhX0IK3OgmmSMsljwOTqd5nbOvg3ge9kYr6Cuixbs4CUb54b_BfDkF7ixg2vDbpJRkeSc0xGKJ0g5670DLTtnmsJtJSVyzCjHRnJsJEUsvzLKJGj5pH2YGrb_cuTjavVEeVCvJhVCpHcDTnplIASsjAPVy8qav9_-BATPhvg</recordid><startdate>199410</startdate><enddate>199410</enddate><creator>Wagner, Bret J.</creator><creator>Ragatz, Gary L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199410</creationdate><title>The impact of lot splitting on due date performance</title><author>Wagner, Bret J. ; Ragatz, Gary L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3263-b07d4978c564525f248e87fa6efb35f22bcc93912ca1d2c14702b8e1f07212493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Batch processing</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Impacts</topic><topic>Job shops</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Production planning</topic><topic>Production scheduling</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Bret J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragatz, Gary L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wagner, Bret J.</au><au>Ragatz, Gary L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of lot splitting on due date performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of operations management</jtitle><date>1994-10</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>13-25</pages><issn>0272-6963</issn><eissn>1873-1317</eissn><abstract>The primary purpose of the research project was to determine if the flow time reductions that occur from splitting jobs into smaller transfer batches result in improved due data performance. The research was performed using a computer simulation of a five machine open job shop. In the open shop environment, each job is unique, and the flow time reductions are solely a result of overlapping operations rather than saved setups from processing similar jobs in sequence. To determine the impact of lot splitting on due date performance, two questions had to be answered. First, how does the impact of lot splitting vary with the magnitude of setup times? Second, how does the size of the transfer batch affect lot splitting performance?
This study shows the benefits from lot splitting improve monotonically with decreasing transfer batch size and that lot splitting provides improvements that are essentially independent of the setup time as long as the total utilization (ratio of setup and processing time to available time) is constant. As for the primary research question, lot splitting can provide substantial reductions in mean tardiness (up to 39%) and number of jobs tardy in the open shop environment.
The repetitive lots logic developed by Jacobs and Bragg (1988) is reformulated to clearly show that it can be used in combination with any dispatching rule. This rule demonstrates that the repetitive lots logic makes surprisingly good scheduling decisions in spite of its simplicity.
Lot splitting is shown to be a simple and effective means of improving the performance of an open job shop. Based on its robust performance in this study, the benefits should be able to be realized in combination with other shop floor control techniques, such as order review release and order expediting.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0272-6963(94)90003-5</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-6963 |
ispartof | Journal of operations management, 1994-10, Vol.12 (1), p.13-25 |
issn | 0272-6963 1873-1317 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26452131 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Batch processing Computer simulation Impacts Job shops Operations research Production planning Production scheduling Studies |
title | The impact of lot splitting on due date performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A53%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20lot%20splitting%20on%20due%20date%20performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20operations%20management&rft.au=Wagner,%20Bret%20J.&rft.date=1994-10&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=13-25&rft.issn=0272-6963&rft.eissn=1873-1317&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0272-6963(94)90003-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E52246%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219583311&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0272696394900035&rfr_iscdi=true |