The effectiveness of extended-duration supervision training for nurses and allied health professionals: A realist evaluation

Training helps maintain high-quality supervision and its associated benefits (e.g. reduced burnout, improved care). While studies have previously evaluated extended-duration supervision training programmes, none have treated these as complex interventions so have not employed realist approaches. Bui...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nurse education today 2022-03, Vol.110, p.105225-105225, Article 105225
Hauptverfasser: Rees, Charlotte E., Nguyen, Van N.B., Ottrey, Ella, Davis, Corinne, Pope, Kirsty, Lee, Sarah, Waller, Susan, Palermo, Claire
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105225
container_issue
container_start_page 105225
container_title Nurse education today
container_volume 110
creator Rees, Charlotte E.
Nguyen, Van N.B.
Ottrey, Ella
Davis, Corinne
Pope, Kirsty
Lee, Sarah
Waller, Susan
Palermo, Claire
description Training helps maintain high-quality supervision and its associated benefits (e.g. reduced burnout, improved care). While studies have previously evaluated extended-duration supervision training programmes, none have treated these as complex interventions so have not employed realist approaches. Building on a previous realist synthesis, this evaluation tests and develops programme theory for extended-duration supervision training to answer the question: to what extent does the supervision training programme work, for whom, under what circumstances and why? We conducted a realist evaluation of a novel state-wide Victorian 3-month supervision training programme including one or two 3.5-h workshops followed by weekly reflexive longitudinal audio diaries (LADs) for up to 12 weeks. Realist evaluation data comprised 25 entrance interviews with nurses and allied health professionals, 176 LADs (and 29 written diaries), and 23 exit interviews. We employed team-based realist analysis to identify context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) to test and develop programme theory. We refined four recurring CMOCs from the realist synthesis programme theory, found insufficient evidence for two, and established five new recurring CMOCs. We identified multiple positive outcomes from our extended-duration supervision training programme (e.g. improved supervisor practices) through various mechanisms relating to pedagogy (e.g. weekly reflexivity), supervisors (e.g. engagement), and workplaces (e.g. enabling supervision cultures). Some negative outcomes were reported (e.g. decreased engagement) through various mechanisms (e.g. suboptimal training design). Such mechanisms were thought to come about by diverse contexts including supervisors (e.g. inexperienced/experienced), professions (nursing/allied health), and organisations (supervision-enabled/non-enabled cultures). Our findings extend the realist synthesis programme theory by highlighting various contexts triggering outcome-generating mechanisms. Programme outcomes are maximised through ongoing supervisor reflexivity paying attention to facilitator-supervisor relationships, as well as protected time for supervisors to translate learning into practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105225
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644962699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0260691721004822</els_id><sourcerecordid>2698703091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-415d557ceb72a5795c9547d3469881892953ccc152bfb3b6578f130e71901b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2OFCEUhYnROO3oC7gwJG7cVMtvURg3k4l_ySRuek8ouNh0qqkWqI6T-PBS9ujChSvI5TsnwIfQS0q2lND-7WGbwNctI4y2gWRMPkIbKjnrmNL8MdoQ1pOu11RdoWelHAghg2L8KbrikgsxCLJBP3d7wBACuBrPkKAUPAcMPyokD77zS7Y1zgmX5QT5HMu6r9nGFNM3HOaM05ILFGyTx3aaIni8BzvVPT7lObS6FrBTeYdvcG7zWCqGs52W363P0ZPQDuHFw3qNdh8_7G4_d3dfP325vbnrnGBD7QSVXkrlYFTMSqWl01Ioz0Wvh4EOmmnJnXNUsjGMfOylGgLlBBTVhI6MX6M3l9p2pe8LlGqOsTiYJptgXophvRC6Z73WDX39D3qYl7y-oFF6UIQTTRvFLpTLcykZgjnleLT53lBiVjXmYFY1ZlVjLmpa6NVD9TIewf-N_HHRgPcXANpXnCNkU1yE5MDH3PQYP8f_9f8ChQ6gKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2698703091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effectiveness of extended-duration supervision training for nurses and allied health professionals: A realist evaluation</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rees, Charlotte E. ; Nguyen, Van N.B. ; Ottrey, Ella ; Davis, Corinne ; Pope, Kirsty ; Lee, Sarah ; Waller, Susan ; Palermo, Claire</creator><creatorcontrib>Rees, Charlotte E. ; Nguyen, Van N.B. ; Ottrey, Ella ; Davis, Corinne ; Pope, Kirsty ; Lee, Sarah ; Waller, Susan ; Palermo, Claire</creatorcontrib><description>Training helps maintain high-quality supervision and its associated benefits (e.g. reduced burnout, improved care). While studies have previously evaluated extended-duration supervision training programmes, none have treated these as complex interventions so have not employed realist approaches. Building on a previous realist synthesis, this evaluation tests and develops programme theory for extended-duration supervision training to answer the question: to what extent does the supervision training programme work, for whom, under what circumstances and why? We conducted a realist evaluation of a novel state-wide Victorian 3-month supervision training programme including one or two 3.5-h workshops followed by weekly reflexive longitudinal audio diaries (LADs) for up to 12 weeks. Realist evaluation data comprised 25 entrance interviews with nurses and allied health professionals, 176 LADs (and 29 written diaries), and 23 exit interviews. We employed team-based realist analysis to identify context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) to test and develop programme theory. We refined four recurring CMOCs from the realist synthesis programme theory, found insufficient evidence for two, and established five new recurring CMOCs. We identified multiple positive outcomes from our extended-duration supervision training programme (e.g. improved supervisor practices) through various mechanisms relating to pedagogy (e.g. weekly reflexivity), supervisors (e.g. engagement), and workplaces (e.g. enabling supervision cultures). Some negative outcomes were reported (e.g. decreased engagement) through various mechanisms (e.g. suboptimal training design). Such mechanisms were thought to come about by diverse contexts including supervisors (e.g. inexperienced/experienced), professions (nursing/allied health), and organisations (supervision-enabled/non-enabled cultures). Our findings extend the realist synthesis programme theory by highlighting various contexts triggering outcome-generating mechanisms. Programme outcomes are maximised through ongoing supervisor reflexivity paying attention to facilitator-supervisor relationships, as well as protected time for supervisors to translate learning into practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-6917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105225</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35344840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Allied health ; Allied health professionals ; Burnout ; Continuing education ; Diaries ; Exit interviews ; Extended-duration ; Health Personnel ; Interviews ; Longitudinal audio diaries ; Measurement Techniques ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing education ; Professional training ; Realist evaluation ; Reflexivity ; Supervision ; Supervisors ; Teaching ; Teams ; Training ; Workplaces ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Nurse education today, 2022-03, Vol.110, p.105225-105225, Article 105225</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-415d557ceb72a5795c9547d3469881892953ccc152bfb3b6578f130e71901b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-415d557ceb72a5795c9547d3469881892953ccc152bfb3b6578f130e71901b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4828-1422 ; 0000-0002-6343-2260 ; 0000-0002-0982-2532 ; 0000-0002-0010-4091 ; 0000-0002-2979-548X ; 0000-0002-9423-5067 ; 0000-0002-2781-3082 ; 0000-0002-6309-0360</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691721004822$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,30978,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35344840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rees, Charlotte E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Van N.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottrey, Ella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Kirsty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, Claire</creatorcontrib><title>The effectiveness of extended-duration supervision training for nurses and allied health professionals: A realist evaluation</title><title>Nurse education today</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><description>Training helps maintain high-quality supervision and its associated benefits (e.g. reduced burnout, improved care). While studies have previously evaluated extended-duration supervision training programmes, none have treated these as complex interventions so have not employed realist approaches. Building on a previous realist synthesis, this evaluation tests and develops programme theory for extended-duration supervision training to answer the question: to what extent does the supervision training programme work, for whom, under what circumstances and why? We conducted a realist evaluation of a novel state-wide Victorian 3-month supervision training programme including one or two 3.5-h workshops followed by weekly reflexive longitudinal audio diaries (LADs) for up to 12 weeks. Realist evaluation data comprised 25 entrance interviews with nurses and allied health professionals, 176 LADs (and 29 written diaries), and 23 exit interviews. We employed team-based realist analysis to identify context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) to test and develop programme theory. We refined four recurring CMOCs from the realist synthesis programme theory, found insufficient evidence for two, and established five new recurring CMOCs. We identified multiple positive outcomes from our extended-duration supervision training programme (e.g. improved supervisor practices) through various mechanisms relating to pedagogy (e.g. weekly reflexivity), supervisors (e.g. engagement), and workplaces (e.g. enabling supervision cultures). Some negative outcomes were reported (e.g. decreased engagement) through various mechanisms (e.g. suboptimal training design). Such mechanisms were thought to come about by diverse contexts including supervisors (e.g. inexperienced/experienced), professions (nursing/allied health), and organisations (supervision-enabled/non-enabled cultures). Our findings extend the realist synthesis programme theory by highlighting various contexts triggering outcome-generating mechanisms. Programme outcomes are maximised through ongoing supervisor reflexivity paying attention to facilitator-supervisor relationships, as well as protected time for supervisors to translate learning into practice.</description><subject>Allied health</subject><subject>Allied health professionals</subject><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Continuing education</subject><subject>Diaries</subject><subject>Exit interviews</subject><subject>Extended-duration</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Longitudinal audio diaries</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Professional training</subject><subject>Realist evaluation</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>0260-6917</issn><issn>1532-2793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2OFCEUhYnROO3oC7gwJG7cVMtvURg3k4l_ySRuek8ouNh0qqkWqI6T-PBS9ujChSvI5TsnwIfQS0q2lND-7WGbwNctI4y2gWRMPkIbKjnrmNL8MdoQ1pOu11RdoWelHAghg2L8KbrikgsxCLJBP3d7wBACuBrPkKAUPAcMPyokD77zS7Y1zgmX5QT5HMu6r9nGFNM3HOaM05ILFGyTx3aaIni8BzvVPT7lObS6FrBTeYdvcG7zWCqGs52W363P0ZPQDuHFw3qNdh8_7G4_d3dfP325vbnrnGBD7QSVXkrlYFTMSqWl01Ioz0Wvh4EOmmnJnXNUsjGMfOylGgLlBBTVhI6MX6M3l9p2pe8LlGqOsTiYJptgXophvRC6Z73WDX39D3qYl7y-oFF6UIQTTRvFLpTLcykZgjnleLT53lBiVjXmYFY1ZlVjLmpa6NVD9TIewf-N_HHRgPcXANpXnCNkU1yE5MDH3PQYP8f_9f8ChQ6gKg</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Rees, Charlotte E.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Van N.B.</creator><creator>Ottrey, Ella</creator><creator>Davis, Corinne</creator><creator>Pope, Kirsty</creator><creator>Lee, Sarah</creator><creator>Waller, Susan</creator><creator>Palermo, Claire</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-1422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6343-2260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-2532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0010-4091</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2979-548X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9423-5067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2781-3082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6309-0360</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>The effectiveness of extended-duration supervision training for nurses and allied health professionals: A realist evaluation</title><author>Rees, Charlotte E. ; Nguyen, Van N.B. ; Ottrey, Ella ; Davis, Corinne ; Pope, Kirsty ; Lee, Sarah ; Waller, Susan ; Palermo, Claire</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-415d557ceb72a5795c9547d3469881892953ccc152bfb3b6578f130e71901b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Allied health</topic><topic>Allied health professionals</topic><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Continuing education</topic><topic>Diaries</topic><topic>Exit interviews</topic><topic>Extended-duration</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Longitudinal audio diaries</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Professional training</topic><topic>Realist evaluation</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rees, Charlotte E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Van N.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottrey, Ella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Kirsty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, Claire</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rees, Charlotte E.</au><au>Nguyen, Van N.B.</au><au>Ottrey, Ella</au><au>Davis, Corinne</au><au>Pope, Kirsty</au><au>Lee, Sarah</au><au>Waller, Susan</au><au>Palermo, Claire</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effectiveness of extended-duration supervision training for nurses and allied health professionals: A realist evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>105225</spage><epage>105225</epage><pages>105225-105225</pages><artnum>105225</artnum><issn>0260-6917</issn><eissn>1532-2793</eissn><abstract>Training helps maintain high-quality supervision and its associated benefits (e.g. reduced burnout, improved care). While studies have previously evaluated extended-duration supervision training programmes, none have treated these as complex interventions so have not employed realist approaches. Building on a previous realist synthesis, this evaluation tests and develops programme theory for extended-duration supervision training to answer the question: to what extent does the supervision training programme work, for whom, under what circumstances and why? We conducted a realist evaluation of a novel state-wide Victorian 3-month supervision training programme including one or two 3.5-h workshops followed by weekly reflexive longitudinal audio diaries (LADs) for up to 12 weeks. Realist evaluation data comprised 25 entrance interviews with nurses and allied health professionals, 176 LADs (and 29 written diaries), and 23 exit interviews. We employed team-based realist analysis to identify context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) to test and develop programme theory. We refined four recurring CMOCs from the realist synthesis programme theory, found insufficient evidence for two, and established five new recurring CMOCs. We identified multiple positive outcomes from our extended-duration supervision training programme (e.g. improved supervisor practices) through various mechanisms relating to pedagogy (e.g. weekly reflexivity), supervisors (e.g. engagement), and workplaces (e.g. enabling supervision cultures). Some negative outcomes were reported (e.g. decreased engagement) through various mechanisms (e.g. suboptimal training design). Such mechanisms were thought to come about by diverse contexts including supervisors (e.g. inexperienced/experienced), professions (nursing/allied health), and organisations (supervision-enabled/non-enabled cultures). Our findings extend the realist synthesis programme theory by highlighting various contexts triggering outcome-generating mechanisms. Programme outcomes are maximised through ongoing supervisor reflexivity paying attention to facilitator-supervisor relationships, as well as protected time for supervisors to translate learning into practice.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35344840</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105225</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-1422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6343-2260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-2532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0010-4091</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2979-548X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9423-5067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2781-3082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6309-0360</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0260-6917
ispartof Nurse education today, 2022-03, Vol.110, p.105225-105225, Article 105225
issn 0260-6917
1532-2793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644962699
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Allied health
Allied health professionals
Burnout
Continuing education
Diaries
Exit interviews
Extended-duration
Health Personnel
Interviews
Longitudinal audio diaries
Measurement Techniques
Medical personnel
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing education
Professional training
Realist evaluation
Reflexivity
Supervision
Supervisors
Teaching
Teams
Training
Workplaces
Workshops
title The effectiveness of extended-duration supervision training for nurses and allied health professionals: A realist evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A01%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effectiveness%20of%20extended-duration%20supervision%20training%20for%20nurses%20and%20allied%20health%20professionals:%20A%20realist%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20today&rft.au=Rees,%20Charlotte%20E.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=105225&rft.epage=105225&rft.pages=105225-105225&rft.artnum=105225&rft.issn=0260-6917&rft.eissn=1532-2793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105225&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2698703091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2698703091&rft_id=info:pmid/35344840&rft_els_id=S0260691721004822&rfr_iscdi=true