Comparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are an effective choice for removal of reactive azo dyes used in the textile industry due to high solubility and low degradability. Within the scope of this study, reactive orange 122 (RO122) azo dye was removed using the UV-based AOPs of ultraviolet (UV) radiatio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2022-04, Vol.194 (4), p.302-302, Article 302 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 302 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 302 |
| container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| container_volume | 194 |
| creator | Çobanoğlu, Kübra Değermenci, Nejdet |
| description | Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are an effective choice for removal of reactive azo dyes used in the textile industry due to high solubility and low degradability. Within the scope of this study, reactive orange 122 (RO122) azo dye was removed using the UV-based AOPs of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, UV/hydrogen peroxide (UV/H
2
O
2
), UV/persulfate (UV/S
2
O
8
2−
), and UV/peroxymonosulfate (UV/HSO
5
−
). Oxidant concentration, initial solution pH, initial RO122 concentration, different anions (Cl
−
, NO
3
−
and SO
4
2−
), and solution temperature effects were compared. With only UV radiation (254 nm), 19.5% RO122 removal occurred at the end of 120 min. The RO122 removal reduced with the UV/oxidant processes at pH 9. Experimental results revealed RO122 removal followed pseudo-first-order (PFO) kinetics. There was a linear correlation identified between initial oxidant concentration and the PFO kinetic rate constant (
k
1
). Among the three UV-based processes, with oxidant concentration 50 mg/L, temperature 20 °C, and pH 5, RO122 removal efficiency was in the order UV/H
2
O
2
> UV/HSO
5
−
> UV/S
2
O
8
2−
. RO122 removal rate increased as initial oxidant concentration and temperature increased and reduced as initial RO122 concentration increased. Energy requirements and oxidant costs were assessed. The UV/H
2
O
2
process was concluded to be the most efficient and economic process for RO122 removal. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644944174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2644944174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6b41624fec28fd9f52d5427fab784dbae6d4703ba4f23a84544a82814ecf50143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1KAzEUhYMoWH9ewFXAjQtHkzt3MpOlFLVCoQut25DOJDoyndRkqrRP4NpH9EnMtILgwtX9-87lwCHkhLMLzlh-GTgTgicMIGFSCkzWO2TAszxNQGZylwwYF3kiUiH3yUEIL4wxmaMckHbo5gvt6-Ba6iz1Rpdd_WaoXjtarUxczN2bbuh73T3T6ePlCCZw3jf3MCng6-OT6rbaHO4nWT8uvCtNCCbQuqX6dWncMtDgmmVXuzYckT2rm2COf-ohmd5cPwxHyXhyeze8GiclFNAlYoZcAFoTR1tJm0GVIeRWz_ICq5k2osKcpTONFlJdYIaoCyg4mtJmjGN6SM62f6Od6CF0al6H0jSNbntDCgSiROR5j57-QV_c0rfR3YYCXjBeRAq2VOldCN5YtfD1XPuV4kz1EahtBCpGoDYRqHUUpVtRiHD7ZPzv639U34s4id0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2644218018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Çobanoğlu, Kübra ; Değermenci, Nejdet</creator><creatorcontrib>Çobanoğlu, Kübra ; Değermenci, Nejdet</creatorcontrib><description>Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are an effective choice for removal of reactive azo dyes used in the textile industry due to high solubility and low degradability. Within the scope of this study, reactive orange 122 (RO122) azo dye was removed using the UV-based AOPs of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, UV/hydrogen peroxide (UV/H
2
O
2
), UV/persulfate (UV/S
2
O
8
2−
), and UV/peroxymonosulfate (UV/HSO
5
−
). Oxidant concentration, initial solution pH, initial RO122 concentration, different anions (Cl
−
, NO
3
−
and SO
4
2−
), and solution temperature effects were compared. With only UV radiation (254 nm), 19.5% RO122 removal occurred at the end of 120 min. The RO122 removal reduced with the UV/oxidant processes at pH 9. Experimental results revealed RO122 removal followed pseudo-first-order (PFO) kinetics. There was a linear correlation identified between initial oxidant concentration and the PFO kinetic rate constant (
k
1
). Among the three UV-based processes, with oxidant concentration 50 mg/L, temperature 20 °C, and pH 5, RO122 removal efficiency was in the order UV/H
2
O
2
> UV/HSO
5
−
> UV/S
2
O
8
2−
. RO122 removal rate increased as initial oxidant concentration and temperature increased and reduced as initial RO122 concentration increased. Energy requirements and oxidant costs were assessed. The UV/H
2
O
2
process was concluded to be the most efficient and economic process for RO122 removal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Anions ; Aqueous solutions ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Azo dyes ; Color removal ; Cost assessments ; Degradability ; Dyes ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economics ; Ecotoxicology ; Energy costs ; Energy requirements ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental science ; Hydrogen ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Kinetics ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Oxidants ; Oxidation ; Oxidizing agents ; pH effects ; Radiation ; Removal ; Solubility ; Solutions ; Temperature effects ; Temperature requirements ; Temperature rise ; Textile industry ; Ultraviolet radiation</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022-04, Vol.194 (4), p.302-302, Article 302</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6b41624fec28fd9f52d5427fab784dbae6d4703ba4f23a84544a82814ecf50143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6b41624fec28fd9f52d5427fab784dbae6d4703ba4f23a84544a82814ecf50143</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3135-1471</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Çobanoğlu, Kübra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Değermenci, Nejdet</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are an effective choice for removal of reactive azo dyes used in the textile industry due to high solubility and low degradability. Within the scope of this study, reactive orange 122 (RO122) azo dye was removed using the UV-based AOPs of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, UV/hydrogen peroxide (UV/H
2
O
2
), UV/persulfate (UV/S
2
O
8
2−
), and UV/peroxymonosulfate (UV/HSO
5
−
). Oxidant concentration, initial solution pH, initial RO122 concentration, different anions (Cl
−
, NO
3
−
and SO
4
2−
), and solution temperature effects were compared. With only UV radiation (254 nm), 19.5% RO122 removal occurred at the end of 120 min. The RO122 removal reduced with the UV/oxidant processes at pH 9. Experimental results revealed RO122 removal followed pseudo-first-order (PFO) kinetics. There was a linear correlation identified between initial oxidant concentration and the PFO kinetic rate constant (
k
1
). Among the three UV-based processes, with oxidant concentration 50 mg/L, temperature 20 °C, and pH 5, RO122 removal efficiency was in the order UV/H
2
O
2
> UV/HSO
5
−
> UV/S
2
O
8
2−
. RO122 removal rate increased as initial oxidant concentration and temperature increased and reduced as initial RO122 concentration increased. Energy requirements and oxidant costs were assessed. The UV/H
2
O
2
process was concluded to be the most efficient and economic process for RO122 removal.</description><subject>Anions</subject><subject>Aqueous solutions</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Azo dyes</subject><subject>Color removal</subject><subject>Cost assessments</subject><subject>Degradability</subject><subject>Dyes</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Energy requirements</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Oxidants</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidizing agents</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Solubility</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Temperature requirements</subject><subject>Temperature rise</subject><subject>Textile industry</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1KAzEUhYMoWH9ewFXAjQtHkzt3MpOlFLVCoQut25DOJDoyndRkqrRP4NpH9EnMtILgwtX9-87lwCHkhLMLzlh-GTgTgicMIGFSCkzWO2TAszxNQGZylwwYF3kiUiH3yUEIL4wxmaMckHbo5gvt6-Ba6iz1Rpdd_WaoXjtarUxczN2bbuh73T3T6ePlCCZw3jf3MCng6-OT6rbaHO4nWT8uvCtNCCbQuqX6dWncMtDgmmVXuzYckT2rm2COf-ohmd5cPwxHyXhyeze8GiclFNAlYoZcAFoTR1tJm0GVIeRWz_ICq5k2osKcpTONFlJdYIaoCyg4mtJmjGN6SM62f6Od6CF0al6H0jSNbntDCgSiROR5j57-QV_c0rfR3YYCXjBeRAq2VOldCN5YtfD1XPuV4kz1EahtBCpGoDYRqHUUpVtRiHD7ZPzv639U34s4id0</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Çobanoğlu, Kübra</creator><creator>Değermenci, Nejdet</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3135-1471</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Comparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions</title><author>Çobanoğlu, Kübra ; Değermenci, Nejdet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6b41624fec28fd9f52d5427fab784dbae6d4703ba4f23a84544a82814ecf50143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anions</topic><topic>Aqueous solutions</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Azo dyes</topic><topic>Color removal</topic><topic>Cost assessments</topic><topic>Degradability</topic><topic>Dyes</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Energy requirements</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Oxidants</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidizing agents</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Solubility</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Temperature requirements</topic><topic>Temperature rise</topic><topic>Textile industry</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Çobanoğlu, Kübra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Değermenci, Nejdet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Çobanoğlu, Kübra</au><au>Değermenci, Nejdet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>194</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>302-302</pages><artnum>302</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are an effective choice for removal of reactive azo dyes used in the textile industry due to high solubility and low degradability. Within the scope of this study, reactive orange 122 (RO122) azo dye was removed using the UV-based AOPs of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, UV/hydrogen peroxide (UV/H
2
O
2
), UV/persulfate (UV/S
2
O
8
2−
), and UV/peroxymonosulfate (UV/HSO
5
−
). Oxidant concentration, initial solution pH, initial RO122 concentration, different anions (Cl
−
, NO
3
−
and SO
4
2−
), and solution temperature effects were compared. With only UV radiation (254 nm), 19.5% RO122 removal occurred at the end of 120 min. The RO122 removal reduced with the UV/oxidant processes at pH 9. Experimental results revealed RO122 removal followed pseudo-first-order (PFO) kinetics. There was a linear correlation identified between initial oxidant concentration and the PFO kinetic rate constant (
k
1
). Among the three UV-based processes, with oxidant concentration 50 mg/L, temperature 20 °C, and pH 5, RO122 removal efficiency was in the order UV/H
2
O
2
> UV/HSO
5
−
> UV/S
2
O
8
2−
. RO122 removal rate increased as initial oxidant concentration and temperature increased and reduced as initial RO122 concentration increased. Energy requirements and oxidant costs were assessed. The UV/H
2
O
2
process was concluded to be the most efficient and economic process for RO122 removal.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3135-1471</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
| ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022-04, Vol.194 (4), p.302-302, Article 302 |
| issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644944174 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Anions Aqueous solutions Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Azo dyes Color removal Cost assessments Degradability Dyes Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Economics Ecotoxicology Energy costs Energy requirements Environment Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Environmental science Hydrogen Hydrogen peroxide Kinetics Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Oxidants Oxidation Oxidizing agents pH effects Radiation Removal Solubility Solutions Temperature effects Temperature requirements Temperature rise Textile industry Ultraviolet radiation |
| title | Comparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T17%3A06%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20reactive%20azo%20dye%20removal%20with%20UV/H2O2,%20UV/S2O82%E2%88%92%20and%20UV/HSO5%E2%88%92%20processes%20in%20aqueous%20solutions&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=%C3%87obano%C4%9Flu,%20K%C3%BCbra&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=194&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=302-302&rft.artnum=302&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-022-09964-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2644944174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2644218018&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |