Chloride Toxicity to Native Freshwater Species in Natural and Reconstituted Prairie Pothole Waters

Oil and gas extraction in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of the northern USA has resulted in elevated chloride concentrations in ground and surface water due to widespread contamination with highly saline produced water, or brine. The toxicity of chloride is poorly understood in the high hardness...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology 2022-04, Vol.82 (3), p.416-428
Hauptverfasser: Harper, David D., Puglis, Holly J., Kunz, Bethany K., Farag, Aїda M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 428
container_issue 3
container_start_page 416
container_title Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology
container_volume 82
creator Harper, David D.
Puglis, Holly J.
Kunz, Bethany K.
Farag, Aїda M.
description Oil and gas extraction in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of the northern USA has resulted in elevated chloride concentrations in ground and surface water due to widespread contamination with highly saline produced water, or brine. The toxicity of chloride is poorly understood in the high hardness waters characteristic of the region. We evaluated the toxicity of chloride to two endemic species, Daphnia magna (water flea) and Lemna gibba (duckweed), exposed in field-collected waters (hardness ~ 3000 mg/L as CaCO 3 ) and reconstituted waters (hardness 370 mg/L as CaCO 3 ) intended to mimic PPR background waters. We also investigated the role of chloride in the toxicity of water reconstituted to mimic legacy brine-contaminated wetlands, using two populations of native Pseudacris maculata (Boreal Chorus Frog). Chloride toxicity was similar in field-collected and reconstituted waters for both D. magna (LC50s 3070–3788 mg Cl −1 /L) and L. gibba (IC50s 2441–2887). Although hardness can ameliorate chloride toxicity at low to high hardness, we did not observe additional protection as hardness increased from 370 to ~ 3000 mg/L. In P. maculata exposures, chloride did not fully explain toxicity. Chloride sensitivity also differed between populations, with mortality at 2000 mg Cl − /L in one population but not the other, and population-specific growth responses. Overall, these results (1) document toxicity to native species at chloride concentrations occurring in the PPR, (2) indicate that very high hardness in the region’s waters may not provide additional protection against chloride and (3) highlight challenges of brine investigations, including whether surrogate study populations are representative of local populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00244-022-00927-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644942298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2645687106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-35dbef29929b820c11b133b863d94a81ab59c441bac9accda99e9aefc1d89de33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLAzEUhYMoWh9_wIUE3LgZzavTZCnFqiAqPnAZMsmtjUwnNcn4-PfOWB_gwlVIznfOveQgtEvJISVkdJQIYUIUhLGCEMVGRbmCBlTw7joifBUNuldSCC7oBtpM6YkQyqQU62iDD7mQkrABqsazOkTvAN-FN299fsc54EuT_QvgSYQ0ezUZIr5dgPWQsG96sY2mxqZx-AZsaFL2uc3g8HU0PnrA1yHPQg34obembbQ2NXWCna9zC91PTu7GZ8XF1en5-PiisJyVueBDV8GUKcVUJRmxlFaU80qW3ClhJDXVUFkhaGWsMtY6oxQoA1NLnVQOON9CB8vcRQzPLaSs5z5ZqGvTQGiTZqUQSjCmZIfu_0GfQhubbrueGpZyREnZUWxJ2RhSijDVi-jnJr5rSnTfgF42oLsG9GcDujftfUW31Rzcj-X7yzuAL4HUSc0jxN_Z_8R-AIsfkbk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645687106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chloride Toxicity to Native Freshwater Species in Natural and Reconstituted Prairie Pothole Waters</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Harper, David D. ; Puglis, Holly J. ; Kunz, Bethany K. ; Farag, Aїda M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harper, David D. ; Puglis, Holly J. ; Kunz, Bethany K. ; Farag, Aїda M.</creatorcontrib><description>Oil and gas extraction in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of the northern USA has resulted in elevated chloride concentrations in ground and surface water due to widespread contamination with highly saline produced water, or brine. The toxicity of chloride is poorly understood in the high hardness waters characteristic of the region. We evaluated the toxicity of chloride to two endemic species, Daphnia magna (water flea) and Lemna gibba (duckweed), exposed in field-collected waters (hardness ~ 3000 mg/L as CaCO 3 ) and reconstituted waters (hardness 370 mg/L as CaCO 3 ) intended to mimic PPR background waters. We also investigated the role of chloride in the toxicity of water reconstituted to mimic legacy brine-contaminated wetlands, using two populations of native Pseudacris maculata (Boreal Chorus Frog). Chloride toxicity was similar in field-collected and reconstituted waters for both D. magna (LC50s 3070–3788 mg Cl −1 /L) and L. gibba (IC50s 2441–2887). Although hardness can ameliorate chloride toxicity at low to high hardness, we did not observe additional protection as hardness increased from 370 to ~ 3000 mg/L. In P. maculata exposures, chloride did not fully explain toxicity. Chloride sensitivity also differed between populations, with mortality at 2000 mg Cl − /L in one population but not the other, and population-specific growth responses. Overall, these results (1) document toxicity to native species at chloride concentrations occurring in the PPR, (2) indicate that very high hardness in the region’s waters may not provide additional protection against chloride and (3) highlight challenges of brine investigations, including whether surrogate study populations are representative of local populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00244-022-00927-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35348802</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aquatic plants ; Brines ; Calcium carbonate ; Chloride ; Chlorides ; Contamination ; Duckweed ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Endemic species ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Floating plants ; Hardness ; Indigenous species ; Local population ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Pollution ; Population studies ; Populations ; Potholes ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Surface water ; Toxicity ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2022-04, Vol.82 (3), p.416-428</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022</rights><rights>2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.</rights><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-35dbef29929b820c11b133b863d94a81ab59c441bac9accda99e9aefc1d89de33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7061-8461 ; 0000-0002-7193-9336 ; 0000-0003-4247-6763 ; 0000-0002-3090-6597</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00244-022-00927-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00244-022-00927-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35348802$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harper, David D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puglis, Holly J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Bethany K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farag, Aїda M.</creatorcontrib><title>Chloride Toxicity to Native Freshwater Species in Natural and Reconstituted Prairie Pothole Waters</title><title>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</title><addtitle>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><description>Oil and gas extraction in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of the northern USA has resulted in elevated chloride concentrations in ground and surface water due to widespread contamination with highly saline produced water, or brine. The toxicity of chloride is poorly understood in the high hardness waters characteristic of the region. We evaluated the toxicity of chloride to two endemic species, Daphnia magna (water flea) and Lemna gibba (duckweed), exposed in field-collected waters (hardness ~ 3000 mg/L as CaCO 3 ) and reconstituted waters (hardness 370 mg/L as CaCO 3 ) intended to mimic PPR background waters. We also investigated the role of chloride in the toxicity of water reconstituted to mimic legacy brine-contaminated wetlands, using two populations of native Pseudacris maculata (Boreal Chorus Frog). Chloride toxicity was similar in field-collected and reconstituted waters for both D. magna (LC50s 3070–3788 mg Cl −1 /L) and L. gibba (IC50s 2441–2887). Although hardness can ameliorate chloride toxicity at low to high hardness, we did not observe additional protection as hardness increased from 370 to ~ 3000 mg/L. In P. maculata exposures, chloride did not fully explain toxicity. Chloride sensitivity also differed between populations, with mortality at 2000 mg Cl − /L in one population but not the other, and population-specific growth responses. Overall, these results (1) document toxicity to native species at chloride concentrations occurring in the PPR, (2) indicate that very high hardness in the region’s waters may not provide additional protection against chloride and (3) highlight challenges of brine investigations, including whether surrogate study populations are representative of local populations.</description><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Brines</subject><subject>Calcium carbonate</subject><subject>Chloride</subject><subject>Chlorides</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Duckweed</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Endemic species</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Floating plants</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Local population</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Potholes</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>0090-4341</issn><issn>1432-0703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLAzEUhYMoWh9_wIUE3LgZzavTZCnFqiAqPnAZMsmtjUwnNcn4-PfOWB_gwlVIznfOveQgtEvJISVkdJQIYUIUhLGCEMVGRbmCBlTw7joifBUNuldSCC7oBtpM6YkQyqQU62iDD7mQkrABqsazOkTvAN-FN299fsc54EuT_QvgSYQ0ezUZIr5dgPWQsG96sY2mxqZx-AZsaFL2uc3g8HU0PnrA1yHPQg34obembbQ2NXWCna9zC91PTu7GZ8XF1en5-PiisJyVueBDV8GUKcVUJRmxlFaU80qW3ClhJDXVUFkhaGWsMtY6oxQoA1NLnVQOON9CB8vcRQzPLaSs5z5ZqGvTQGiTZqUQSjCmZIfu_0GfQhubbrueGpZyREnZUWxJ2RhSijDVi-jnJr5rSnTfgF42oLsG9GcDujftfUW31Rzcj-X7yzuAL4HUSc0jxN_Z_8R-AIsfkbk</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Harper, David D.</creator><creator>Puglis, Holly J.</creator><creator>Kunz, Bethany K.</creator><creator>Farag, Aїda M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-8461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7193-9336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4247-6763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-6597</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Chloride Toxicity to Native Freshwater Species in Natural and Reconstituted Prairie Pothole Waters</title><author>Harper, David D. ; Puglis, Holly J. ; Kunz, Bethany K. ; Farag, Aїda M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-35dbef29929b820c11b133b863d94a81ab59c441bac9accda99e9aefc1d89de33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Brines</topic><topic>Calcium carbonate</topic><topic>Chloride</topic><topic>Chlorides</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Duckweed</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Endemic species</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Floating plants</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Local population</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Potholes</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harper, David D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puglis, Holly J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Bethany K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farag, Aїda M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harper, David D.</au><au>Puglis, Holly J.</au><au>Kunz, Bethany K.</au><au>Farag, Aїda M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chloride Toxicity to Native Freshwater Species in Natural and Reconstituted Prairie Pothole Waters</atitle><jtitle>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle><stitle>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</stitle><addtitle>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>416-428</pages><issn>0090-4341</issn><eissn>1432-0703</eissn><abstract>Oil and gas extraction in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of the northern USA has resulted in elevated chloride concentrations in ground and surface water due to widespread contamination with highly saline produced water, or brine. The toxicity of chloride is poorly understood in the high hardness waters characteristic of the region. We evaluated the toxicity of chloride to two endemic species, Daphnia magna (water flea) and Lemna gibba (duckweed), exposed in field-collected waters (hardness ~ 3000 mg/L as CaCO 3 ) and reconstituted waters (hardness 370 mg/L as CaCO 3 ) intended to mimic PPR background waters. We also investigated the role of chloride in the toxicity of water reconstituted to mimic legacy brine-contaminated wetlands, using two populations of native Pseudacris maculata (Boreal Chorus Frog). Chloride toxicity was similar in field-collected and reconstituted waters for both D. magna (LC50s 3070–3788 mg Cl −1 /L) and L. gibba (IC50s 2441–2887). Although hardness can ameliorate chloride toxicity at low to high hardness, we did not observe additional protection as hardness increased from 370 to ~ 3000 mg/L. In P. maculata exposures, chloride did not fully explain toxicity. Chloride sensitivity also differed between populations, with mortality at 2000 mg Cl − /L in one population but not the other, and population-specific growth responses. Overall, these results (1) document toxicity to native species at chloride concentrations occurring in the PPR, (2) indicate that very high hardness in the region’s waters may not provide additional protection against chloride and (3) highlight challenges of brine investigations, including whether surrogate study populations are representative of local populations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35348802</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00244-022-00927-6</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-8461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7193-9336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4247-6763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-6597</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4341
ispartof Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2022-04, Vol.82 (3), p.416-428
issn 0090-4341
1432-0703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644942298
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Aquatic plants
Brines
Calcium carbonate
Chloride
Chlorides
Contamination
Duckweed
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Endemic species
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Health
Floating plants
Hardness
Indigenous species
Local population
Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
Pollution
Population studies
Populations
Potholes
Soil Science & Conservation
Surface water
Toxicity
Water pollution
title Chloride Toxicity to Native Freshwater Species in Natural and Reconstituted Prairie Pothole Waters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T04%3A28%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chloride%20Toxicity%20to%20Native%20Freshwater%20Species%20in%20Natural%20and%20Reconstituted%20Prairie%20Pothole%20Waters&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20environmental%20contamination%20and%20toxicology&rft.au=Harper,%20David%20D.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=416-428&rft.issn=0090-4341&rft.eissn=1432-0703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00244-022-00927-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2645687106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645687106&rft_id=info:pmid/35348802&rfr_iscdi=true