Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer

PSA is the most widely used diagnosticand prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).However, its lack of specificity has generated the needto search for new complementary markers. In thisscenario, blood plasma constitutes one of the sourcesof search for new markers, which have been tried tobe co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archivos españoles de urología 2022-03, Vol.75 (2), p.156-164
Hauptverfasser: Gómez Gómez, Enrique, Puche Sanz, Ignacio, Valero Rosa, J, Carrasco Valiente, Julia, Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo, Anglada Curado, Francisco José
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue 2
container_start_page 156
container_title Archivos españoles de urología
container_volume 75
creator Gómez Gómez, Enrique
Puche Sanz, Ignacio
Valero Rosa, J
Carrasco Valiente, Julia
Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo
Anglada Curado, Francisco José
description PSA is the most widely used diagnosticand prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).However, its lack of specificity has generated the needto search for new complementary markers. In thisscenario, blood plasma constitutes one of the sourcesof search for new markers, which have been tried tobe combined with PSA and other clinical variables inorder to develop tests that increase their diagnosticspecificity.This narrative review of the literature provides anoverview of commercially available plasma biomarkers and tests for use in different clinical settingsfor PCa. The most studied markers to help select theappropriate patients for initial and / or repeat biopsyhave been: PHI, 4K, STHLM3. These markers havebeen oriented towards the diagnosis of the so-calledclinically signifi cant PCa, trying to validate and calibratetheir algorithms in different populations. Giventhe development and evolution in the diagnosis of PCa,there is still a lack of evidence of the impact of magneticresonance imaging (MRI) when used in combinationwith these new markers, as well as its possiblerole in the screening of the disease and not only in theearly diagnosis process. Furthermore, there are only asmall number of studies that have directly comparedthese tests with each other and with PSA, so there isnot enough evidence to know which test has the bestproperties in each clinical scenario. In order to clarifythe true diagnostic role of these new biomarkers, newprospective, comparative studies in different populationsare absolutely necessary to evaluate their clinicalutility in combination with MRI and fusion biopsy.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644023630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2644023630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p565-b55d42e1c17e8f019bd65ea0c0f077945a677874fb7bb1637b81a34f429d14613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j71OwzAURj2AaCm8AvLIEsmO_5IRVRSQKjHQPbq2r8GQxMVOBnh6ItFO33L0HZ0LsmaMyYppLlfkupRPxkTDlboiK6GEqJtGrcnuDfM8UBvTAPkLc6EhZeojvI-pxEJh9NR9QAY3YY6_MMU00hToMacywYTUwegw35DLAH3B29NuyGH3eNg-V_vXp5ftw746Kq0qq5SXNXLHDTaB8dZ6rRCYY4EZ00oF2pjGyGCNtVwLYxsOQgZZt55LzcWG3P_fLvrvGcvUDbE47HsYMc2lq7WUrBZasAW9O6GzHdB3xxyXwp_unC7-AFbiU68</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2644023630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gómez Gómez, Enrique ; Puche Sanz, Ignacio ; Valero Rosa, J ; Carrasco Valiente, Julia ; Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo ; Anglada Curado, Francisco José</creator><creatorcontrib>Gómez Gómez, Enrique ; Puche Sanz, Ignacio ; Valero Rosa, J ; Carrasco Valiente, Julia ; Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo ; Anglada Curado, Francisco José</creatorcontrib><description>PSA is the most widely used diagnosticand prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).However, its lack of specificity has generated the needto search for new complementary markers. In thisscenario, blood plasma constitutes one of the sourcesof search for new markers, which have been tried tobe combined with PSA and other clinical variables inorder to develop tests that increase their diagnosticspecificity.This narrative review of the literature provides anoverview of commercially available plasma biomarkers and tests for use in different clinical settingsfor PCa. The most studied markers to help select theappropriate patients for initial and / or repeat biopsyhave been: PHI, 4K, STHLM3. These markers havebeen oriented towards the diagnosis of the so-calledclinically signifi cant PCa, trying to validate and calibratetheir algorithms in different populations. Giventhe development and evolution in the diagnosis of PCa,there is still a lack of evidence of the impact of magneticresonance imaging (MRI) when used in combinationwith these new markers, as well as its possiblerole in the screening of the disease and not only in theearly diagnosis process. Furthermore, there are only asmall number of studies that have directly comparedthese tests with each other and with PSA, so there isnot enough evidence to know which test has the bestproperties in each clinical scenario. In order to clarifythe true diagnostic role of these new biomarkers, newprospective, comparative studies in different populationsare absolutely necessary to evaluate their clinicalutility in combination with MRI and fusion biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35332885</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Archivos españoles de urología, 2022-03, Vol.75 (2), p.156-164</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gómez Gómez, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puche Sanz, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valero Rosa, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco Valiente, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anglada Curado, Francisco José</creatorcontrib><title>Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer</title><title>Archivos españoles de urología</title><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><description>PSA is the most widely used diagnosticand prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).However, its lack of specificity has generated the needto search for new complementary markers. In thisscenario, blood plasma constitutes one of the sourcesof search for new markers, which have been tried tobe combined with PSA and other clinical variables inorder to develop tests that increase their diagnosticspecificity.This narrative review of the literature provides anoverview of commercially available plasma biomarkers and tests for use in different clinical settingsfor PCa. The most studied markers to help select theappropriate patients for initial and / or repeat biopsyhave been: PHI, 4K, STHLM3. These markers havebeen oriented towards the diagnosis of the so-calledclinically signifi cant PCa, trying to validate and calibratetheir algorithms in different populations. Giventhe development and evolution in the diagnosis of PCa,there is still a lack of evidence of the impact of magneticresonance imaging (MRI) when used in combinationwith these new markers, as well as its possiblerole in the screening of the disease and not only in theearly diagnosis process. Furthermore, there are only asmall number of studies that have directly comparedthese tests with each other and with PSA, so there isnot enough evidence to know which test has the bestproperties in each clinical scenario. In order to clarifythe true diagnostic role of these new biomarkers, newprospective, comparative studies in different populationsare absolutely necessary to evaluate their clinicalutility in combination with MRI and fusion biopsy.</description><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><issn>0004-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j71OwzAURj2AaCm8AvLIEsmO_5IRVRSQKjHQPbq2r8GQxMVOBnh6ItFO33L0HZ0LsmaMyYppLlfkupRPxkTDlboiK6GEqJtGrcnuDfM8UBvTAPkLc6EhZeojvI-pxEJh9NR9QAY3YY6_MMU00hToMacywYTUwegw35DLAH3B29NuyGH3eNg-V_vXp5ftw746Kq0qq5SXNXLHDTaB8dZ6rRCYY4EZ00oF2pjGyGCNtVwLYxsOQgZZt55LzcWG3P_fLvrvGcvUDbE47HsYMc2lq7WUrBZasAW9O6GzHdB3xxyXwp_unC7-AFbiU68</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Gómez Gómez, Enrique</creator><creator>Puche Sanz, Ignacio</creator><creator>Valero Rosa, J</creator><creator>Carrasco Valiente, Julia</creator><creator>Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo</creator><creator>Anglada Curado, Francisco José</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer</title><author>Gómez Gómez, Enrique ; Puche Sanz, Ignacio ; Valero Rosa, J ; Carrasco Valiente, Julia ; Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo ; Anglada Curado, Francisco José</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p565-b55d42e1c17e8f019bd65ea0c0f077945a677874fb7bb1637b81a34f429d14613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gómez Gómez, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puche Sanz, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valero Rosa, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco Valiente, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anglada Curado, Francisco José</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gómez Gómez, Enrique</au><au>Puche Sanz, Ignacio</au><au>Valero Rosa, J</au><au>Carrasco Valiente, Julia</au><au>Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo</au><au>Anglada Curado, Francisco José</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>156-164</pages><issn>0004-0614</issn><abstract>PSA is the most widely used diagnosticand prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).However, its lack of specificity has generated the needto search for new complementary markers. In thisscenario, blood plasma constitutes one of the sourcesof search for new markers, which have been tried tobe combined with PSA and other clinical variables inorder to develop tests that increase their diagnosticspecificity.This narrative review of the literature provides anoverview of commercially available plasma biomarkers and tests for use in different clinical settingsfor PCa. The most studied markers to help select theappropriate patients for initial and / or repeat biopsyhave been: PHI, 4K, STHLM3. These markers havebeen oriented towards the diagnosis of the so-calledclinically signifi cant PCa, trying to validate and calibratetheir algorithms in different populations. Giventhe development and evolution in the diagnosis of PCa,there is still a lack of evidence of the impact of magneticresonance imaging (MRI) when used in combinationwith these new markers, as well as its possiblerole in the screening of the disease and not only in theearly diagnosis process. Furthermore, there are only asmall number of studies that have directly comparedthese tests with each other and with PSA, so there isnot enough evidence to know which test has the bestproperties in each clinical scenario. In order to clarifythe true diagnostic role of these new biomarkers, newprospective, comparative studies in different populationsare absolutely necessary to evaluate their clinicalutility in combination with MRI and fusion biopsy.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>35332885</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-0614
ispartof Archivos españoles de urología, 2022-03, Vol.75 (2), p.156-164
issn 0004-0614
language eng ; spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644023630
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biomarkers, Tumor
Humans
Male
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
title Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A35%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serum%20biomarkers%20for%20diagnosis%20and%20characterization%20of%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Archivos%20espa%C3%B1oles%20de%20urolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=G%C3%B3mez%20G%C3%B3mez,%20Enrique&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=156-164&rft.issn=0004-0614&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2644023630%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2644023630&rft_id=info:pmid/35332885&rfr_iscdi=true