Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer
PSA is the most widely used diagnosticand prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).However, its lack of specificity has generated the needto search for new complementary markers. In thisscenario, blood plasma constitutes one of the sourcesof search for new markers, which have been tried tobe co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archivos españoles de urología 2022-03, Vol.75 (2), p.156-164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 164 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 156 |
container_title | Archivos españoles de urología |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Gómez Gómez, Enrique Puche Sanz, Ignacio Valero Rosa, J Carrasco Valiente, Julia Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo Anglada Curado, Francisco José |
description | PSA is the most widely used diagnosticand prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).However, its lack of specificity has generated the needto search for new complementary markers. In thisscenario, blood plasma constitutes one of the sourcesof search for new markers, which have been tried tobe combined with PSA and other clinical variables inorder to develop tests that increase their diagnosticspecificity.This narrative review of the literature provides anoverview of commercially available plasma biomarkers and tests for use in different clinical settingsfor PCa. The most studied markers to help select theappropriate patients for initial and / or repeat biopsyhave been: PHI, 4K, STHLM3. These markers havebeen oriented towards the diagnosis of the so-calledclinically signifi cant PCa, trying to validate and calibratetheir algorithms in different populations. Giventhe development and evolution in the diagnosis of PCa,there is still a lack of evidence of the impact of magneticresonance imaging (MRI) when used in combinationwith these new markers, as well as its possiblerole in the screening of the disease and not only in theearly diagnosis process. Furthermore, there are only asmall number of studies that have directly comparedthese tests with each other and with PSA, so there isnot enough evidence to know which test has the bestproperties in each clinical scenario. In order to clarifythe true diagnostic role of these new biomarkers, newprospective, comparative studies in different populationsare absolutely necessary to evaluate their clinicalutility in combination with MRI and fusion biopsy. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644023630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2644023630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p565-b55d42e1c17e8f019bd65ea0c0f077945a677874fb7bb1637b81a34f429d14613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j71OwzAURj2AaCm8AvLIEsmO_5IRVRSQKjHQPbq2r8GQxMVOBnh6ItFO33L0HZ0LsmaMyYppLlfkupRPxkTDlboiK6GEqJtGrcnuDfM8UBvTAPkLc6EhZeojvI-pxEJh9NR9QAY3YY6_MMU00hToMacywYTUwegw35DLAH3B29NuyGH3eNg-V_vXp5ftw746Kq0qq5SXNXLHDTaB8dZ6rRCYY4EZ00oF2pjGyGCNtVwLYxsOQgZZt55LzcWG3P_fLvrvGcvUDbE47HsYMc2lq7WUrBZasAW9O6GzHdB3xxyXwp_unC7-AFbiU68</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2644023630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gómez Gómez, Enrique ; Puche Sanz, Ignacio ; Valero Rosa, J ; Carrasco Valiente, Julia ; Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo ; Anglada Curado, Francisco José</creator><creatorcontrib>Gómez Gómez, Enrique ; Puche Sanz, Ignacio ; Valero Rosa, J ; Carrasco Valiente, Julia ; Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo ; Anglada Curado, Francisco José</creatorcontrib><description>PSA is the most widely used diagnosticand prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).However, its lack of specificity has generated the needto search for new complementary markers. In thisscenario, blood plasma constitutes one of the sourcesof search for new markers, which have been tried tobe combined with PSA and other clinical variables inorder to develop tests that increase their diagnosticspecificity.This narrative review of the literature provides anoverview of commercially available plasma biomarkers and tests for use in different clinical settingsfor PCa. The most studied markers to help select theappropriate patients for initial and / or repeat biopsyhave been: PHI, 4K, STHLM3. These markers havebeen oriented towards the diagnosis of the so-calledclinically signifi cant PCa, trying to validate and calibratetheir algorithms in different populations. Giventhe development and evolution in the diagnosis of PCa,there is still a lack of evidence of the impact of magneticresonance imaging (MRI) when used in combinationwith these new markers, as well as its possiblerole in the screening of the disease and not only in theearly diagnosis process. Furthermore, there are only asmall number of studies that have directly comparedthese tests with each other and with PSA, so there isnot enough evidence to know which test has the bestproperties in each clinical scenario. In order to clarifythe true diagnostic role of these new biomarkers, newprospective, comparative studies in different populationsare absolutely necessary to evaluate their clinicalutility in combination with MRI and fusion biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35332885</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Archivos españoles de urología, 2022-03, Vol.75 (2), p.156-164</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gómez Gómez, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puche Sanz, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valero Rosa, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco Valiente, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anglada Curado, Francisco José</creatorcontrib><title>Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer</title><title>Archivos españoles de urología</title><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><description>PSA is the most widely used diagnosticand prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).However, its lack of specificity has generated the needto search for new complementary markers. In thisscenario, blood plasma constitutes one of the sourcesof search for new markers, which have been tried tobe combined with PSA and other clinical variables inorder to develop tests that increase their diagnosticspecificity.This narrative review of the literature provides anoverview of commercially available plasma biomarkers and tests for use in different clinical settingsfor PCa. The most studied markers to help select theappropriate patients for initial and / or repeat biopsyhave been: PHI, 4K, STHLM3. These markers havebeen oriented towards the diagnosis of the so-calledclinically signifi cant PCa, trying to validate and calibratetheir algorithms in different populations. Giventhe development and evolution in the diagnosis of PCa,there is still a lack of evidence of the impact of magneticresonance imaging (MRI) when used in combinationwith these new markers, as well as its possiblerole in the screening of the disease and not only in theearly diagnosis process. Furthermore, there are only asmall number of studies that have directly comparedthese tests with each other and with PSA, so there isnot enough evidence to know which test has the bestproperties in each clinical scenario. In order to clarifythe true diagnostic role of these new biomarkers, newprospective, comparative studies in different populationsare absolutely necessary to evaluate their clinicalutility in combination with MRI and fusion biopsy.</description><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><issn>0004-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j71OwzAURj2AaCm8AvLIEsmO_5IRVRSQKjHQPbq2r8GQxMVOBnh6ItFO33L0HZ0LsmaMyYppLlfkupRPxkTDlboiK6GEqJtGrcnuDfM8UBvTAPkLc6EhZeojvI-pxEJh9NR9QAY3YY6_MMU00hToMacywYTUwegw35DLAH3B29NuyGH3eNg-V_vXp5ftw746Kq0qq5SXNXLHDTaB8dZ6rRCYY4EZ00oF2pjGyGCNtVwLYxsOQgZZt55LzcWG3P_fLvrvGcvUDbE47HsYMc2lq7WUrBZasAW9O6GzHdB3xxyXwp_unC7-AFbiU68</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Gómez Gómez, Enrique</creator><creator>Puche Sanz, Ignacio</creator><creator>Valero Rosa, J</creator><creator>Carrasco Valiente, Julia</creator><creator>Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo</creator><creator>Anglada Curado, Francisco José</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer</title><author>Gómez Gómez, Enrique ; Puche Sanz, Ignacio ; Valero Rosa, J ; Carrasco Valiente, Julia ; Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo ; Anglada Curado, Francisco José</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p565-b55d42e1c17e8f019bd65ea0c0f077945a677874fb7bb1637b81a34f429d14613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gómez Gómez, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puche Sanz, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valero Rosa, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco Valiente, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anglada Curado, Francisco José</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gómez Gómez, Enrique</au><au>Puche Sanz, Ignacio</au><au>Valero Rosa, J</au><au>Carrasco Valiente, Julia</au><au>Campos Hernandez, Juan Pablo</au><au>Anglada Curado, Francisco José</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>156-164</pages><issn>0004-0614</issn><abstract>PSA is the most widely used diagnosticand prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa).However, its lack of specificity has generated the needto search for new complementary markers. In thisscenario, blood plasma constitutes one of the sourcesof search for new markers, which have been tried tobe combined with PSA and other clinical variables inorder to develop tests that increase their diagnosticspecificity.This narrative review of the literature provides anoverview of commercially available plasma biomarkers and tests for use in different clinical settingsfor PCa. The most studied markers to help select theappropriate patients for initial and / or repeat biopsyhave been: PHI, 4K, STHLM3. These markers havebeen oriented towards the diagnosis of the so-calledclinically signifi cant PCa, trying to validate and calibratetheir algorithms in different populations. Giventhe development and evolution in the diagnosis of PCa,there is still a lack of evidence of the impact of magneticresonance imaging (MRI) when used in combinationwith these new markers, as well as its possiblerole in the screening of the disease and not only in theearly diagnosis process. Furthermore, there are only asmall number of studies that have directly comparedthese tests with each other and with PSA, so there isnot enough evidence to know which test has the bestproperties in each clinical scenario. In order to clarifythe true diagnostic role of these new biomarkers, newprospective, comparative studies in different populationsare absolutely necessary to evaluate their clinicalutility in combination with MRI and fusion biopsy.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>35332885</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-0614 |
ispartof | Archivos españoles de urología, 2022-03, Vol.75 (2), p.156-164 |
issn | 0004-0614 |
language | eng ; spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644023630 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biomarkers, Tumor Humans Male Prostate-Specific Antigen Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis |
title | Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A35%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serum%20biomarkers%20for%20diagnosis%20and%20characterization%20of%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Archivos%20espa%C3%B1oles%20de%20urolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=G%C3%B3mez%20G%C3%B3mez,%20Enrique&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=156-164&rft.issn=0004-0614&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2644023630%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2644023630&rft_id=info:pmid/35332885&rfr_iscdi=true |