Identification and characterisation of deprescribing tools for older patients: A scoping review

Deprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account patient preferences, prognosis and environment. This strategy is particularly relevant in older patients, mostly polymedicated individuals, since they are exposed to numerous adverse effects an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in social and administrative pharmacy 2022-09, Vol.18 (9), p.3484-3491
Hauptverfasser: Mejías-Trueba, Marta, Fernández-Rubio, Beatriz, Rodríguez-Pérez, Aitana, Bernabeu-Wittel, Máximo, Sánchez-FIdalgo, Susana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3491
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3484
container_title Research in social and administrative pharmacy
container_volume 18
creator Mejías-Trueba, Marta
Fernández-Rubio, Beatriz
Rodríguez-Pérez, Aitana
Bernabeu-Wittel, Máximo
Sánchez-FIdalgo, Susana
description Deprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account patient preferences, prognosis and environment. This strategy is particularly relevant in older patients, mostly polymedicated individuals, since they are exposed to numerous adverse effects and interactions and tend to have less adherence to treatments. To identify the deprescribing tools for older patients available in the scientific literature, classify them according to their design and describe their main features and potential applicability in clinical practice. A search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE for relevant literature published before July 2021. The PRISMA-ScR method was applied, extracting variables related to study and tool characteristics as well as potential clinical applicability. The main inclusion criteria were studies focused on designing or developing deprescribing tools for older patients and those that indicated the features of the deprescribing tool used in detail. Fourteen of 723 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 12 tools were identified: 6 “algorithm-based tools” and 6 “criterion-based tools”. Though all tools are aimed at older patients, there are certain peculiarities regarding their design, population, application setting and variables included. Of the 6 criterion-based tools found, 4 used the Delphi method for their design and development. Furthermore, most of them agree on the pharmacological groups that are likely to be deprescribed. Taking into account the importance of the clinical situation and priorities in the care plan in the deprescribing process, the authors believe that tools which help to evaluate these aspects are the most suitable for application in clinical practice. However, it is necessary to continue studying applicability in real-life clinical scenarios and to obtain health results. •The presence of “criterion-based” and “algorithm-based” tools in the literature is balanced, with six algorithms and six criteria identified.•Tools identified differ in the target population, the design used for their development, their potential setting of application and the variables included in each tool.•There are many deprescribing tools available in the literature, but it is still critical to identify its real usefulness in specific populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644004151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1551741122000845</els_id><sourcerecordid>2644004151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-885b42b3f4bf07434e145cf4a77ad74da27f760a87f8343412651fbb937ef2093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVpaD7an9CiYy92Rl-Wt5cSlnxBIJfkLGRp1GrxWq7kbci_j5bd9NrTiNEz7zAPIV8ZtAxYd7lpi51_27xtOXDegmgB-g_kjK2EbHqm4GN9K8UaLRk7JeelbACEBiY_kVOhhNBadWfE3Huclhiis0tME7WTp67GWrdgjuXQTIF6nDMWl-MQp190SWksNKRM0-gx07lyNab8oFe0uDTvmYx_I758JifBjgW_HOsFeb65flrfNQ-Pt_frq4fG8ZVamr5Xg-SDCHIIoKWQyKRyQVqtrdfSW66D7sD2OvSifjPeKRaGYSU0Bg4rcUG-H3LnnP7ssCxmG4vDcbQTpl0xvJMSQDLFKqoOqMuplIzBzDlubX41DMzerdmYo1uzd2tAmOq2zn07rtgNW_T_pt5lVuDnAcB6aD0-m-KqFoc-ZnSL8Sn-Z8Ub3DGOBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2644004151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification and characterisation of deprescribing tools for older patients: A scoping review</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Mejías-Trueba, Marta ; Fernández-Rubio, Beatriz ; Rodríguez-Pérez, Aitana ; Bernabeu-Wittel, Máximo ; Sánchez-FIdalgo, Susana</creator><creatorcontrib>Mejías-Trueba, Marta ; Fernández-Rubio, Beatriz ; Rodríguez-Pérez, Aitana ; Bernabeu-Wittel, Máximo ; Sánchez-FIdalgo, Susana</creatorcontrib><description>Deprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account patient preferences, prognosis and environment. This strategy is particularly relevant in older patients, mostly polymedicated individuals, since they are exposed to numerous adverse effects and interactions and tend to have less adherence to treatments. To identify the deprescribing tools for older patients available in the scientific literature, classify them according to their design and describe their main features and potential applicability in clinical practice. A search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE for relevant literature published before July 2021. The PRISMA-ScR method was applied, extracting variables related to study and tool characteristics as well as potential clinical applicability. The main inclusion criteria were studies focused on designing or developing deprescribing tools for older patients and those that indicated the features of the deprescribing tool used in detail. Fourteen of 723 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 12 tools were identified: 6 “algorithm-based tools” and 6 “criterion-based tools”. Though all tools are aimed at older patients, there are certain peculiarities regarding their design, population, application setting and variables included. Of the 6 criterion-based tools found, 4 used the Delphi method for their design and development. Furthermore, most of them agree on the pharmacological groups that are likely to be deprescribed. Taking into account the importance of the clinical situation and priorities in the care plan in the deprescribing process, the authors believe that tools which help to evaluate these aspects are the most suitable for application in clinical practice. However, it is necessary to continue studying applicability in real-life clinical scenarios and to obtain health results. •The presence of “criterion-based” and “algorithm-based” tools in the literature is balanced, with six algorithms and six criteria identified.•Tools identified differ in the target population, the design used for their development, their potential setting of application and the variables included in each tool.•There are many deprescribing tools available in the literature, but it is still critical to identify its real usefulness in specific populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-7411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35337756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Deprescribing ; Elderly ; Older</subject><ispartof>Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2022-09, Vol.18 (9), p.3484-3491</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-885b42b3f4bf07434e145cf4a77ad74da27f760a87f8343412651fbb937ef2093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-885b42b3f4bf07434e145cf4a77ad74da27f760a87f8343412651fbb937ef2093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9995-5899</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35337756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mejías-Trueba, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Rubio, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Pérez, Aitana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernabeu-Wittel, Máximo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-FIdalgo, Susana</creatorcontrib><title>Identification and characterisation of deprescribing tools for older patients: A scoping review</title><title>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</title><addtitle>Res Social Adm Pharm</addtitle><description>Deprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account patient preferences, prognosis and environment. This strategy is particularly relevant in older patients, mostly polymedicated individuals, since they are exposed to numerous adverse effects and interactions and tend to have less adherence to treatments. To identify the deprescribing tools for older patients available in the scientific literature, classify them according to their design and describe their main features and potential applicability in clinical practice. A search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE for relevant literature published before July 2021. The PRISMA-ScR method was applied, extracting variables related to study and tool characteristics as well as potential clinical applicability. The main inclusion criteria were studies focused on designing or developing deprescribing tools for older patients and those that indicated the features of the deprescribing tool used in detail. Fourteen of 723 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 12 tools were identified: 6 “algorithm-based tools” and 6 “criterion-based tools”. Though all tools are aimed at older patients, there are certain peculiarities regarding their design, population, application setting and variables included. Of the 6 criterion-based tools found, 4 used the Delphi method for their design and development. Furthermore, most of them agree on the pharmacological groups that are likely to be deprescribed. Taking into account the importance of the clinical situation and priorities in the care plan in the deprescribing process, the authors believe that tools which help to evaluate these aspects are the most suitable for application in clinical practice. However, it is necessary to continue studying applicability in real-life clinical scenarios and to obtain health results. •The presence of “criterion-based” and “algorithm-based” tools in the literature is balanced, with six algorithms and six criteria identified.•Tools identified differ in the target population, the design used for their development, their potential setting of application and the variables included in each tool.•There are many deprescribing tools available in the literature, but it is still critical to identify its real usefulness in specific populations.</description><subject>Deprescribing</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Older</subject><issn>1551-7411</issn><issn>1934-8150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVpaD7an9CiYy92Rl-Wt5cSlnxBIJfkLGRp1GrxWq7kbci_j5bd9NrTiNEz7zAPIV8ZtAxYd7lpi51_27xtOXDegmgB-g_kjK2EbHqm4GN9K8UaLRk7JeelbACEBiY_kVOhhNBadWfE3Huclhiis0tME7WTp67GWrdgjuXQTIF6nDMWl-MQp190SWksNKRM0-gx07lyNab8oFe0uDTvmYx_I758JifBjgW_HOsFeb65flrfNQ-Pt_frq4fG8ZVamr5Xg-SDCHIIoKWQyKRyQVqtrdfSW66D7sD2OvSifjPeKRaGYSU0Bg4rcUG-H3LnnP7ssCxmG4vDcbQTpl0xvJMSQDLFKqoOqMuplIzBzDlubX41DMzerdmYo1uzd2tAmOq2zn07rtgNW_T_pt5lVuDnAcB6aD0-m-KqFoc-ZnSL8Sn-Z8Ub3DGOBg</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Mejías-Trueba, Marta</creator><creator>Fernández-Rubio, Beatriz</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Pérez, Aitana</creator><creator>Bernabeu-Wittel, Máximo</creator><creator>Sánchez-FIdalgo, Susana</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9995-5899</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Identification and characterisation of deprescribing tools for older patients: A scoping review</title><author>Mejías-Trueba, Marta ; Fernández-Rubio, Beatriz ; Rodríguez-Pérez, Aitana ; Bernabeu-Wittel, Máximo ; Sánchez-FIdalgo, Susana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-885b42b3f4bf07434e145cf4a77ad74da27f760a87f8343412651fbb937ef2093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Deprescribing</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Older</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mejías-Trueba, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Rubio, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Pérez, Aitana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernabeu-Wittel, Máximo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-FIdalgo, Susana</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mejías-Trueba, Marta</au><au>Fernández-Rubio, Beatriz</au><au>Rodríguez-Pérez, Aitana</au><au>Bernabeu-Wittel, Máximo</au><au>Sánchez-FIdalgo, Susana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification and characterisation of deprescribing tools for older patients: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</jtitle><addtitle>Res Social Adm Pharm</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3484</spage><epage>3491</epage><pages>3484-3491</pages><issn>1551-7411</issn><eissn>1934-8150</eissn><abstract>Deprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account patient preferences, prognosis and environment. This strategy is particularly relevant in older patients, mostly polymedicated individuals, since they are exposed to numerous adverse effects and interactions and tend to have less adherence to treatments. To identify the deprescribing tools for older patients available in the scientific literature, classify them according to their design and describe their main features and potential applicability in clinical practice. A search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE for relevant literature published before July 2021. The PRISMA-ScR method was applied, extracting variables related to study and tool characteristics as well as potential clinical applicability. The main inclusion criteria were studies focused on designing or developing deprescribing tools for older patients and those that indicated the features of the deprescribing tool used in detail. Fourteen of 723 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 12 tools were identified: 6 “algorithm-based tools” and 6 “criterion-based tools”. Though all tools are aimed at older patients, there are certain peculiarities regarding their design, population, application setting and variables included. Of the 6 criterion-based tools found, 4 used the Delphi method for their design and development. Furthermore, most of them agree on the pharmacological groups that are likely to be deprescribed. Taking into account the importance of the clinical situation and priorities in the care plan in the deprescribing process, the authors believe that tools which help to evaluate these aspects are the most suitable for application in clinical practice. However, it is necessary to continue studying applicability in real-life clinical scenarios and to obtain health results. •The presence of “criterion-based” and “algorithm-based” tools in the literature is balanced, with six algorithms and six criteria identified.•Tools identified differ in the target population, the design used for their development, their potential setting of application and the variables included in each tool.•There are many deprescribing tools available in the literature, but it is still critical to identify its real usefulness in specific populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35337756</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.008</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9995-5899</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-7411
ispartof Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2022-09, Vol.18 (9), p.3484-3491
issn 1551-7411
1934-8150
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644004151
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Deprescribing
Elderly
Older
title Identification and characterisation of deprescribing tools for older patients: A scoping review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A59%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20and%20characterisation%20of%20deprescribing%20tools%20for%20older%20patients:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20social%20and%20administrative%20pharmacy&rft.au=Mej%C3%ADas-Trueba,%20Marta&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3484&rft.epage=3491&rft.pages=3484-3491&rft.issn=1551-7411&rft.eissn=1934-8150&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2644004151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2644004151&rft_id=info:pmid/35337756&rft_els_id=S1551741122000845&rfr_iscdi=true