Shared decision making, patient-centered communication and patient satisfaction – A cross-sectional analysis

The integration of shared decision making (SDM) and patient-centered communication (PCC) is needed to actively involve patients in decision making. This study examined the relationship between shared decision making and patient-centered communication. In 82 videotaped hospital outpatient consultatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Patient education and counseling 2022-07, Vol.105 (7), p.2145-2150
Hauptverfasser: Siebinga, Veerle Y., Driever, Ellen M., Stiggelbout, Anne M., Brand, Paul L.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2150
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2145
container_title Patient education and counseling
container_volume 105
creator Siebinga, Veerle Y.
Driever, Ellen M.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Brand, Paul L.P.
description The integration of shared decision making (SDM) and patient-centered communication (PCC) is needed to actively involve patients in decision making. This study examined the relationship between shared decision making and patient-centered communication. In 82 videotaped hospital outpatient consultations by 41 medical specialists from 18 disciplines, we assessed the extent of shared decision making by the OPTION5 score and patient-centered communication by the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS), and analyzed the occurrence of a high versus low degree (above or below median) of SDM and/or PCC, and its relation to patient satisfaction scores. In comparison to earlier studies, we observed comparable 4HCS scores and relatively low OPTION5 scores. The correlation between the two was weak (r = 0.29, p = 0.009). In 38% of consultations, we observed a combination of high SDM and low PCC scores or vice versa. The combination of a high SDM and high PCC, which was observed in 23% of consultations, was associated with significantly higher patient satisfaction scores. Shared decision making and patient-centered communication are not synonymous and do not always co-exist. The value of integrated training of shared decision making and patient-centered communication should be further explored. •Shared decision making and patient-centered communication do not always co-exist.•Shared decision making and patient-centered communication are weakly correlated.•The combined occurrence is associated with higher patient satisfaction.•Further integration of shared decision making and patient-centeredness is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644002754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0738399122001276</els_id><sourcerecordid>2644002754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b167144c6046764d16b5993fc75857563ae4c5b0b581c223d2954abe47ff35293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLlOxDAQhi0EYpfjAWhQSgoSfDsR1WrFJa1EAdSW40zAS44lTpC24x14Q54E70VJMyPNfPPL_hA6IzghmMirebIAm1BMaYJZggndQ2OSKhYLwvg-GmPF0phlGRmhI-_nGGMpOTlEIyYYU4rQMWqe3kwHRVSAdd61TVSbd9e8XkYL0zto-tiGAivCtnU9NM6GecBMU-yQyIfuS2PXi5-v72gS2a71Pvawnpkq4KZaeudP0EFpKg-n236MXm5vnqf38ezx7mE6mcWWZbKPcyIV4dxKzKWSvCAyF1nGSqtEKpSQzAC3Ise5SImllBU0E9zkwFVZMkEzdowuNrmLrv0YwPe6dt5CVZkG2sFrKjnHmCrBA0o26PrNHZR60bnadEtNsF5p1nMdNOuVZo2ZDprDzfk2fshrKP4udl4DcL0BIHzy00GnvQ2uLBSuC1J00bp_4n8BGbqOvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2644002754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shared decision making, patient-centered communication and patient satisfaction – A cross-sectional analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Siebinga, Veerle Y. ; Driever, Ellen M. ; Stiggelbout, Anne M. ; Brand, Paul L.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Siebinga, Veerle Y. ; Driever, Ellen M. ; Stiggelbout, Anne M. ; Brand, Paul L.P.</creatorcontrib><description>The integration of shared decision making (SDM) and patient-centered communication (PCC) is needed to actively involve patients in decision making. This study examined the relationship between shared decision making and patient-centered communication. In 82 videotaped hospital outpatient consultations by 41 medical specialists from 18 disciplines, we assessed the extent of shared decision making by the OPTION5 score and patient-centered communication by the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS), and analyzed the occurrence of a high versus low degree (above or below median) of SDM and/or PCC, and its relation to patient satisfaction scores. In comparison to earlier studies, we observed comparable 4HCS scores and relatively low OPTION5 scores. The correlation between the two was weak (r = 0.29, p = 0.009). In 38% of consultations, we observed a combination of high SDM and low PCC scores or vice versa. The combination of a high SDM and high PCC, which was observed in 23% of consultations, was associated with significantly higher patient satisfaction scores. Shared decision making and patient-centered communication are not synonymous and do not always co-exist. The value of integrated training of shared decision making and patient-centered communication should be further explored. •Shared decision making and patient-centered communication do not always co-exist.•Shared decision making and patient-centered communication are weakly correlated.•The combined occurrence is associated with higher patient satisfaction.•Further integration of shared decision making and patient-centeredness is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-3991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35337712</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Communication ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Decision Making ; Decision Making, Shared ; Four Habits (4HCS) ; Humans ; Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION) ; Partnership ; Patient Participation ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patient-Centered Care ; Patient-centered communication ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Shared decision making</subject><ispartof>Patient education and counseling, 2022-07, Vol.105 (7), p.2145-2150</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b167144c6046764d16b5993fc75857563ae4c5b0b581c223d2954abe47ff35293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b167144c6046764d16b5993fc75857563ae4c5b0b581c223d2954abe47ff35293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35337712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siebinga, Veerle Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driever, Ellen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiggelbout, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Paul L.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Shared decision making, patient-centered communication and patient satisfaction – A cross-sectional analysis</title><title>Patient education and counseling</title><addtitle>Patient Educ Couns</addtitle><description>The integration of shared decision making (SDM) and patient-centered communication (PCC) is needed to actively involve patients in decision making. This study examined the relationship between shared decision making and patient-centered communication. In 82 videotaped hospital outpatient consultations by 41 medical specialists from 18 disciplines, we assessed the extent of shared decision making by the OPTION5 score and patient-centered communication by the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS), and analyzed the occurrence of a high versus low degree (above or below median) of SDM and/or PCC, and its relation to patient satisfaction scores. In comparison to earlier studies, we observed comparable 4HCS scores and relatively low OPTION5 scores. The correlation between the two was weak (r = 0.29, p = 0.009). In 38% of consultations, we observed a combination of high SDM and low PCC scores or vice versa. The combination of a high SDM and high PCC, which was observed in 23% of consultations, was associated with significantly higher patient satisfaction scores. Shared decision making and patient-centered communication are not synonymous and do not always co-exist. The value of integrated training of shared decision making and patient-centered communication should be further explored. •Shared decision making and patient-centered communication do not always co-exist.•Shared decision making and patient-centered communication are weakly correlated.•The combined occurrence is associated with higher patient satisfaction.•Further integration of shared decision making and patient-centeredness is needed.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision Making, Shared</subject><subject>Four Habits (4HCS)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION)</subject><subject>Partnership</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient-Centered Care</subject><subject>Patient-centered communication</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Shared decision making</subject><issn>0738-3991</issn><issn>1873-5134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLlOxDAQhi0EYpfjAWhQSgoSfDsR1WrFJa1EAdSW40zAS44lTpC24x14Q54E70VJMyPNfPPL_hA6IzghmMirebIAm1BMaYJZggndQ2OSKhYLwvg-GmPF0phlGRmhI-_nGGMpOTlEIyYYU4rQMWqe3kwHRVSAdd61TVSbd9e8XkYL0zto-tiGAivCtnU9NM6GecBMU-yQyIfuS2PXi5-v72gS2a71Pvawnpkq4KZaeudP0EFpKg-n236MXm5vnqf38ezx7mE6mcWWZbKPcyIV4dxKzKWSvCAyF1nGSqtEKpSQzAC3Ise5SImllBU0E9zkwFVZMkEzdowuNrmLrv0YwPe6dt5CVZkG2sFrKjnHmCrBA0o26PrNHZR60bnadEtNsF5p1nMdNOuVZo2ZDprDzfk2fshrKP4udl4DcL0BIHzy00GnvQ2uLBSuC1J00bp_4n8BGbqOvA</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Siebinga, Veerle Y.</creator><creator>Driever, Ellen M.</creator><creator>Stiggelbout, Anne M.</creator><creator>Brand, Paul L.P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Shared decision making, patient-centered communication and patient satisfaction – A cross-sectional analysis</title><author>Siebinga, Veerle Y. ; Driever, Ellen M. ; Stiggelbout, Anne M. ; Brand, Paul L.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b167144c6046764d16b5993fc75857563ae4c5b0b581c223d2954abe47ff35293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision Making, Shared</topic><topic>Four Habits (4HCS)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION)</topic><topic>Partnership</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient-Centered Care</topic><topic>Patient-centered communication</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Shared decision making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siebinga, Veerle Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driever, Ellen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiggelbout, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Paul L.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Patient education and counseling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siebinga, Veerle Y.</au><au>Driever, Ellen M.</au><au>Stiggelbout, Anne M.</au><au>Brand, Paul L.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shared decision making, patient-centered communication and patient satisfaction – A cross-sectional analysis</atitle><jtitle>Patient education and counseling</jtitle><addtitle>Patient Educ Couns</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2145</spage><epage>2150</epage><pages>2145-2150</pages><issn>0738-3991</issn><eissn>1873-5134</eissn><abstract>The integration of shared decision making (SDM) and patient-centered communication (PCC) is needed to actively involve patients in decision making. This study examined the relationship between shared decision making and patient-centered communication. In 82 videotaped hospital outpatient consultations by 41 medical specialists from 18 disciplines, we assessed the extent of shared decision making by the OPTION5 score and patient-centered communication by the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS), and analyzed the occurrence of a high versus low degree (above or below median) of SDM and/or PCC, and its relation to patient satisfaction scores. In comparison to earlier studies, we observed comparable 4HCS scores and relatively low OPTION5 scores. The correlation between the two was weak (r = 0.29, p = 0.009). In 38% of consultations, we observed a combination of high SDM and low PCC scores or vice versa. The combination of a high SDM and high PCC, which was observed in 23% of consultations, was associated with significantly higher patient satisfaction scores. Shared decision making and patient-centered communication are not synonymous and do not always co-exist. The value of integrated training of shared decision making and patient-centered communication should be further explored. •Shared decision making and patient-centered communication do not always co-exist.•Shared decision making and patient-centered communication are weakly correlated.•The combined occurrence is associated with higher patient satisfaction.•Further integration of shared decision making and patient-centeredness is needed.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35337712</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.012</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0738-3991
ispartof Patient education and counseling, 2022-07, Vol.105 (7), p.2145-2150
issn 0738-3991
1873-5134
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2644002754
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Communication
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making
Decision Making, Shared
Four Habits (4HCS)
Humans
Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION)
Partnership
Patient Participation
Patient Satisfaction
Patient-Centered Care
Patient-centered communication
Physician-Patient Relations
Shared decision making
title Shared decision making, patient-centered communication and patient satisfaction – A cross-sectional analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T08%3A56%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shared%20decision%20making,%20patient-centered%20communication%20and%20patient%20satisfaction%20%E2%80%93%20A%20cross-sectional%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Patient%20education%20and%20counseling&rft.au=Siebinga,%20Veerle%20Y.&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2145&rft.epage=2150&rft.pages=2145-2150&rft.issn=0738-3991&rft.eissn=1873-5134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2644002754%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2644002754&rft_id=info:pmid/35337712&rft_els_id=S0738399122001276&rfr_iscdi=true