Forensic investigation of glass microfragments exposed to heat
The comparative analysis of glasses based on refractive index (RI) is a widely used method in forensic examinations. However, it cannot be directly applied if the control sample has previously been altered by heat or fire, since RI can change significantly in this process. For this reason, the refra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forensic science international 2022-05, Vol.334, p.111265-111265, Article 111265 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 111265 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111265 |
container_title | Forensic science international |
container_volume | 334 |
creator | Voros, Tamás Vörös Takacs, Krisztina Takács Szabo, Attila Szabó Krizsan Attila Krizsán |
description | The comparative analysis of glasses based on refractive index (RI) is a widely used method in forensic examinations. However, it cannot be directly applied if the control sample has previously been altered by heat or fire, since RI can change significantly in this process. For this reason, the refractive index of the fragments recovered from the perpetrator’s clothing can also differ from the control sample recovered after the fire, although they originate from the same source. In the present study, annealing was used as a possible way for the examination of glass microfragments exposed to heat. The appropriate conditions of annealing were investigated first. Then fragments from a toughened and a non-toughened glass were heated in a furnace for various times at 450 and 650 °C and cooled down immediately to model different heat expositions. It resulted in a significant change in the RIs in all cases. These fragments, together with the non-treated samples from the same pane of glasses, were annealed using the optimized parameters. In a similar process, further glasses exposed to real fire were examined. It was found, both in the model experiments and for the fragments exposed to fire, that – regardless of the heat exposure conditions – annealing resulted in the same RI for fragments from the same source, while for different samples different values were observed. Altogether, 11 glasses were examined in 38 experiments, and it was found that annealing combined with refractive index measurement could be a possible way for the examination of heated fragments. The changes in RIs and standard deviations observed during the experiments are consistent with literature data.
•Fire changes the refractive index, precluding direct comparison of glass fragments.•Microfragments of 11 glass samples were tested in altogether 38 experiments.•Annealing equalized refractive index of pre- and non-treated fragments.•Refractive index and standard deviation changes are consistent with former results.•Annealing could be an examination method of glass microfragments exposed to heat. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111265 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2642328347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0379073822000950</els_id><sourcerecordid>2649246255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-bee63dbef9bf5921e1fd9e71c94e13d08023d5b85b15875d72fc1288068b61c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOAzEQRS0EIiHwC7ASDc0GP9aPbZAixEuKRJPe2rXHwVF2HexNBH-PowAFDdU0Z-7cOQhdETwlmIjb1dSFmIz3_TClmNIpIYQKfoTGRElaCqrYMRpjJusSS6ZG6CylFcaYcypO0YhxRoSUfIzuHkOEPnlT-H4HafDLZvChL4IrlusmpaLzJgYXm2UH_ZAK-NiEBLYYQvEGzXCOTlyzTnDxPSdo8fiwuH8u569PL_ezeWmqSg1lCyCYbcHVreM1JUCcrUESU1dAmMUKU2Z5q3hLuJLcSuoMoUphoVpBDJugm0PsJob3ba6pO58MrNdND2GbNBUVZfnnSmb0-g-6CtvY53J7qqaVoJxnSh6o_FxKEZzeRN818VMTrPeG9Ur_GtZ7w_pgOG9efudv2w7s796P0gzMDgBkHzsPUecU6A1YH8EM2gb_75Ev4g6QWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649246255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forensic investigation of glass microfragments exposed to heat</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Voros, Tamás Vörös ; Takacs, Krisztina Takács ; Szabo, Attila Szabó ; Krizsan Attila Krizsán</creator><creatorcontrib>Voros, Tamás Vörös ; Takacs, Krisztina Takács ; Szabo, Attila Szabó ; Krizsan Attila Krizsán</creatorcontrib><description>The comparative analysis of glasses based on refractive index (RI) is a widely used method in forensic examinations. However, it cannot be directly applied if the control sample has previously been altered by heat or fire, since RI can change significantly in this process. For this reason, the refractive index of the fragments recovered from the perpetrator’s clothing can also differ from the control sample recovered after the fire, although they originate from the same source. In the present study, annealing was used as a possible way for the examination of glass microfragments exposed to heat. The appropriate conditions of annealing were investigated first. Then fragments from a toughened and a non-toughened glass were heated in a furnace for various times at 450 and 650 °C and cooled down immediately to model different heat expositions. It resulted in a significant change in the RIs in all cases. These fragments, together with the non-treated samples from the same pane of glasses, were annealed using the optimized parameters. In a similar process, further glasses exposed to real fire were examined. It was found, both in the model experiments and for the fragments exposed to fire, that – regardless of the heat exposure conditions – annealing resulted in the same RI for fragments from the same source, while for different samples different values were observed. Altogether, 11 glasses were examined in 38 experiments, and it was found that annealing combined with refractive index measurement could be a possible way for the examination of heated fragments. The changes in RIs and standard deviations observed during the experiments are consistent with literature data.
•Fire changes the refractive index, precluding direct comparison of glass fragments.•Microfragments of 11 glass samples were tested in altogether 38 experiments.•Annealing equalized refractive index of pre- and non-treated fragments.•Refractive index and standard deviation changes are consistent with former results.•Annealing could be an examination method of glass microfragments exposed to heat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-0738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111265</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35316775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Annealing ; Calibration ; Comparative analysis ; Crime ; Crime evidence ; Criminal investigations ; Experiments ; Exposure ; Fire ; Fire exposure ; Forensic science ; Forensic sciences ; Fragments ; Glass ; Glass - analysis ; Glass microfragments ; Heat ; Hot Temperature ; Laboratories ; Microtrace ; Process parameters ; Refractive index ; Refractivity ; Refractometry ; Safety glass ; Scientific imaging ; Standard deviation ; Temperature</subject><ispartof>Forensic science international, 2022-05, Vol.334, p.111265-111265, Article 111265</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-bee63dbef9bf5921e1fd9e71c94e13d08023d5b85b15875d72fc1288068b61c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-bee63dbef9bf5921e1fd9e71c94e13d08023d5b85b15875d72fc1288068b61c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2649246255?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35316775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voros, Tamás Vörös</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takacs, Krisztina Takács</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabo, Attila Szabó</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krizsan Attila Krizsán</creatorcontrib><title>Forensic investigation of glass microfragments exposed to heat</title><title>Forensic science international</title><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><description>The comparative analysis of glasses based on refractive index (RI) is a widely used method in forensic examinations. However, it cannot be directly applied if the control sample has previously been altered by heat or fire, since RI can change significantly in this process. For this reason, the refractive index of the fragments recovered from the perpetrator’s clothing can also differ from the control sample recovered after the fire, although they originate from the same source. In the present study, annealing was used as a possible way for the examination of glass microfragments exposed to heat. The appropriate conditions of annealing were investigated first. Then fragments from a toughened and a non-toughened glass were heated in a furnace for various times at 450 and 650 °C and cooled down immediately to model different heat expositions. It resulted in a significant change in the RIs in all cases. These fragments, together with the non-treated samples from the same pane of glasses, were annealed using the optimized parameters. In a similar process, further glasses exposed to real fire were examined. It was found, both in the model experiments and for the fragments exposed to fire, that – regardless of the heat exposure conditions – annealing resulted in the same RI for fragments from the same source, while for different samples different values were observed. Altogether, 11 glasses were examined in 38 experiments, and it was found that annealing combined with refractive index measurement could be a possible way for the examination of heated fragments. The changes in RIs and standard deviations observed during the experiments are consistent with literature data.
•Fire changes the refractive index, precluding direct comparison of glass fragments.•Microfragments of 11 glass samples were tested in altogether 38 experiments.•Annealing equalized refractive index of pre- and non-treated fragments.•Refractive index and standard deviation changes are consistent with former results.•Annealing could be an examination method of glass microfragments exposed to heat.</description><subject>Annealing</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Crime evidence</subject><subject>Criminal investigations</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Fire</subject><subject>Fire exposure</subject><subject>Forensic science</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Fragments</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Glass - analysis</subject><subject>Glass microfragments</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Microtrace</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Refractive index</subject><subject>Refractivity</subject><subject>Refractometry</subject><subject>Safety glass</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><issn>0379-0738</issn><issn>1872-6283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtOAzEQRS0EIiHwC7ASDc0GP9aPbZAixEuKRJPe2rXHwVF2HexNBH-PowAFDdU0Z-7cOQhdETwlmIjb1dSFmIz3_TClmNIpIYQKfoTGRElaCqrYMRpjJusSS6ZG6CylFcaYcypO0YhxRoSUfIzuHkOEPnlT-H4HafDLZvChL4IrlusmpaLzJgYXm2UH_ZAK-NiEBLYYQvEGzXCOTlyzTnDxPSdo8fiwuH8u569PL_ezeWmqSg1lCyCYbcHVreM1JUCcrUESU1dAmMUKU2Z5q3hLuJLcSuoMoUphoVpBDJugm0PsJob3ba6pO58MrNdND2GbNBUVZfnnSmb0-g-6CtvY53J7qqaVoJxnSh6o_FxKEZzeRN818VMTrPeG9Ur_GtZ7w_pgOG9efudv2w7s796P0gzMDgBkHzsPUecU6A1YH8EM2gb_75Ev4g6QWw</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Voros, Tamás Vörös</creator><creator>Takacs, Krisztina Takács</creator><creator>Szabo, Attila Szabó</creator><creator>Krizsan Attila Krizsán</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Forensic investigation of glass microfragments exposed to heat</title><author>Voros, Tamás Vörös ; Takacs, Krisztina Takács ; Szabo, Attila Szabó ; Krizsan Attila Krizsán</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-bee63dbef9bf5921e1fd9e71c94e13d08023d5b85b15875d72fc1288068b61c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Annealing</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Crime evidence</topic><topic>Criminal investigations</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Fire</topic><topic>Fire exposure</topic><topic>Forensic science</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Fragments</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Glass - analysis</topic><topic>Glass microfragments</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Microtrace</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Refractive index</topic><topic>Refractivity</topic><topic>Refractometry</topic><topic>Safety glass</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voros, Tamás Vörös</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takacs, Krisztina Takács</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabo, Attila Szabó</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krizsan Attila Krizsán</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voros, Tamás Vörös</au><au>Takacs, Krisztina Takács</au><au>Szabo, Attila Szabó</au><au>Krizsan Attila Krizsán</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forensic investigation of glass microfragments exposed to heat</atitle><jtitle>Forensic science international</jtitle><addtitle>Forensic Sci Int</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>334</volume><spage>111265</spage><epage>111265</epage><pages>111265-111265</pages><artnum>111265</artnum><issn>0379-0738</issn><eissn>1872-6283</eissn><abstract>The comparative analysis of glasses based on refractive index (RI) is a widely used method in forensic examinations. However, it cannot be directly applied if the control sample has previously been altered by heat or fire, since RI can change significantly in this process. For this reason, the refractive index of the fragments recovered from the perpetrator’s clothing can also differ from the control sample recovered after the fire, although they originate from the same source. In the present study, annealing was used as a possible way for the examination of glass microfragments exposed to heat. The appropriate conditions of annealing were investigated first. Then fragments from a toughened and a non-toughened glass were heated in a furnace for various times at 450 and 650 °C and cooled down immediately to model different heat expositions. It resulted in a significant change in the RIs in all cases. These fragments, together with the non-treated samples from the same pane of glasses, were annealed using the optimized parameters. In a similar process, further glasses exposed to real fire were examined. It was found, both in the model experiments and for the fragments exposed to fire, that – regardless of the heat exposure conditions – annealing resulted in the same RI for fragments from the same source, while for different samples different values were observed. Altogether, 11 glasses were examined in 38 experiments, and it was found that annealing combined with refractive index measurement could be a possible way for the examination of heated fragments. The changes in RIs and standard deviations observed during the experiments are consistent with literature data.
•Fire changes the refractive index, precluding direct comparison of glass fragments.•Microfragments of 11 glass samples were tested in altogether 38 experiments.•Annealing equalized refractive index of pre- and non-treated fragments.•Refractive index and standard deviation changes are consistent with former results.•Annealing could be an examination method of glass microfragments exposed to heat.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35316775</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111265</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0379-0738 |
ispartof | Forensic science international, 2022-05, Vol.334, p.111265-111265, Article 111265 |
issn | 0379-0738 1872-6283 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2642328347 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Annealing Calibration Comparative analysis Crime Crime evidence Criminal investigations Experiments Exposure Fire Fire exposure Forensic science Forensic sciences Fragments Glass Glass - analysis Glass microfragments Heat Hot Temperature Laboratories Microtrace Process parameters Refractive index Refractivity Refractometry Safety glass Scientific imaging Standard deviation Temperature |
title | Forensic investigation of glass microfragments exposed to heat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A41%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forensic%20investigation%20of%20glass%20microfragments%20exposed%20to%20heat&rft.jtitle=Forensic%20science%20international&rft.au=Voros,%20Tam%C3%A1s%20V%C3%B6r%C3%B6s&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=334&rft.spage=111265&rft.epage=111265&rft.pages=111265-111265&rft.artnum=111265&rft.issn=0379-0738&rft.eissn=1872-6283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111265&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649246255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649246255&rft_id=info:pmid/35316775&rft_els_id=S0379073822000950&rfr_iscdi=true |