The virtual interview format for fellowship recruitment in obstetrics and gynecology: a nationwide survey of program directors

Due to Covid-19, fellowship programs could not conduct in-person interviews during the 2020-2021 interview cycle and were forced to implement virtual interviews. We conducted two nationwide surveys of residency and fellowship Program Directors (PDs) involved in the Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical education online 2022-12, Vol.27 (1), p.2054304-2054304
Hauptverfasser: Ponterio, Jane M., Keslar, Melissa, Lakhi, Nisha A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2054304
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2054304
container_title Medical education online
container_volume 27
creator Ponterio, Jane M.
Keslar, Melissa
Lakhi, Nisha A.
description Due to Covid-19, fellowship programs could not conduct in-person interviews during the 2020-2021 interview cycle and were forced to implement virtual interviews. We conducted two nationwide surveys of residency and fellowship Program Directors (PDs) involved in the Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) Subspecialty Fellowship match cycle to gain a better understanding of virtual interviews from each of their perspectives. 1) Fellowship PDs' confidence in using a virtual platform to holistically evaluate applicants during the 2020-2021 match cycle, 2) Residency PD's perception of virtual interviews and impact on their program's operations, and 3) to assess the desire of fellowship and residency PDs to continue virtual recruitment during forthcoming interview seasons. Two separate nationwide web-based surveys were administered to 1) Ob/Gyn fellowship PDs and 2) residency PDs through SurveyMonkey from July-September 2020 to assess the impact of virtual interviews form each parties' perspective. Surveys solicited demographic information, four-point Likert scale questions, and free response questions Of programs meeting inclusion criteria, 75/111 (67.6%) fellowship PDs and 67/117 (57.3%) residency PDs responded to their respective surveys. Most fellowship PDs believed that they could confidently assess applicants' professionalism (88%) during a virtual interview and (90.7%) felt confident in making a rank-order list. However, only 73.3% were just as confident in preparing a rank list after a virtual interview as they have been with in-person interviews. Most residency PDs (69.9%) believed that virtual interviews made it easier for their program to comply with duty hours, and 76.8% agreed that virtual interviews allowed their residents to accept more interviews than an in-person format. Most fellowship PDs found virtual interviews convenient. However, difficulty in observing social interaction and gauging applicant interest may be the biggest challenge moving forward.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10872981.2022.2054304
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2641865359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5e26d20f1aef4027b6d2ff0ec9a78a15</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2641865359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-8990d65da753a2151cfc7b501070fe7454d527db1875530198b7b6fa6eeaecd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1vEzEQXSEQ_YCfALLEhUuK7V3vBwdUVBWoVIlLOVtee5w42rXD2JsoF3473iatWg5cZjwzb57tp1cU7xi9YLSln3JoeNeyC045z0FUJa1eFKdzfzEPXj45nxRnMa4p5Q0V9evipBQlE03FTos_dysgW4dpUgNxPgFuHeyIDTiqNCdiYRjCLq7chiBonFwawaeMJaGPCRI6HYnyhiz3HnQYwnL_mSjiVXLB75wBEifcwp4ESzYYlqhGYlymSgHjm-KVVUOEt8d8Xvz6dn139WNx-_P7zdXX24UWNU-LtuuoqYVRjSgVZ4Jpq5teUEYbaqGpRGUEb0zP2kaIkrKu7Zu-tqoGUKANLc-LmwOvCWotN-hGhXsZlJP3jYBLqTA5PYAUwGvDqWUKbJUV63NlLQXdqaZVTGSuLweuzdSPYHRWA9XwjPT5xLuVXIatbLuKCzETfDwSYPg9QUxydFFnmZWHMEXJ64q1tShFl6Ef_oGuw4Q-SyV529VC8KotM0ocUBpDjAj28TGMytkt8sEtcnaLPLol771_-pPHrQd7ZMDlAeD8vSN2AQcjk9oPAS0qr12U5f_v-Ave69HU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2896552483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The virtual interview format for fellowship recruitment in obstetrics and gynecology: a nationwide survey of program directors</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Co-Action Open Access Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ponterio, Jane M. ; Keslar, Melissa ; Lakhi, Nisha A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ponterio, Jane M. ; Keslar, Melissa ; Lakhi, Nisha A.</creatorcontrib><description>Due to Covid-19, fellowship programs could not conduct in-person interviews during the 2020-2021 interview cycle and were forced to implement virtual interviews. We conducted two nationwide surveys of residency and fellowship Program Directors (PDs) involved in the Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) Subspecialty Fellowship match cycle to gain a better understanding of virtual interviews from each of their perspectives. 1) Fellowship PDs' confidence in using a virtual platform to holistically evaluate applicants during the 2020-2021 match cycle, 2) Residency PD's perception of virtual interviews and impact on their program's operations, and 3) to assess the desire of fellowship and residency PDs to continue virtual recruitment during forthcoming interview seasons. Two separate nationwide web-based surveys were administered to 1) Ob/Gyn fellowship PDs and 2) residency PDs through SurveyMonkey from July-September 2020 to assess the impact of virtual interviews form each parties' perspective. Surveys solicited demographic information, four-point Likert scale questions, and free response questions Of programs meeting inclusion criteria, 75/111 (67.6%) fellowship PDs and 67/117 (57.3%) residency PDs responded to their respective surveys. Most fellowship PDs believed that they could confidently assess applicants' professionalism (88%) during a virtual interview and (90.7%) felt confident in making a rank-order list. However, only 73.3% were just as confident in preparing a rank list after a virtual interview as they have been with in-person interviews. Most residency PDs (69.9%) believed that virtual interviews made it easier for their program to comply with duty hours, and 76.8% agreed that virtual interviews allowed their residents to accept more interviews than an in-person format. Most fellowship PDs found virtual interviews convenient. However, difficulty in observing social interaction and gauging applicant interest may be the biggest challenge moving forward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-2981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1087-2981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2054304</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35315741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Applicants ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Fellowships and Scholarships ; Gynecology ; Gynecology - education ; Humans ; Internet ; Internship and Residency ; Interviews ; Medical education ; Obstetrics ; Obstetrics - education ; obstetrics and gynecology ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Professionalism ; program directors ; Recruitment ; Social interaction ; subspecialty fellowship ; virtual interviews</subject><ispartof>Medical education online, 2022-12, Vol.27 (1), p.2054304-2054304</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-8990d65da753a2151cfc7b501070fe7454d527db1875530198b7b6fa6eeaecd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-8990d65da753a2151cfc7b501070fe7454d527db1875530198b7b6fa6eeaecd03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8413-4684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942555/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942555/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,12826,27481,27903,27904,30978,53769,53771,59119,59120</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35315741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ponterio, Jane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keslar, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakhi, Nisha A.</creatorcontrib><title>The virtual interview format for fellowship recruitment in obstetrics and gynecology: a nationwide survey of program directors</title><title>Medical education online</title><addtitle>Med Educ Online</addtitle><description>Due to Covid-19, fellowship programs could not conduct in-person interviews during the 2020-2021 interview cycle and were forced to implement virtual interviews. We conducted two nationwide surveys of residency and fellowship Program Directors (PDs) involved in the Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) Subspecialty Fellowship match cycle to gain a better understanding of virtual interviews from each of their perspectives. 1) Fellowship PDs' confidence in using a virtual platform to holistically evaluate applicants during the 2020-2021 match cycle, 2) Residency PD's perception of virtual interviews and impact on their program's operations, and 3) to assess the desire of fellowship and residency PDs to continue virtual recruitment during forthcoming interview seasons. Two separate nationwide web-based surveys were administered to 1) Ob/Gyn fellowship PDs and 2) residency PDs through SurveyMonkey from July-September 2020 to assess the impact of virtual interviews form each parties' perspective. Surveys solicited demographic information, four-point Likert scale questions, and free response questions Of programs meeting inclusion criteria, 75/111 (67.6%) fellowship PDs and 67/117 (57.3%) residency PDs responded to their respective surveys. Most fellowship PDs believed that they could confidently assess applicants' professionalism (88%) during a virtual interview and (90.7%) felt confident in making a rank-order list. However, only 73.3% were just as confident in preparing a rank list after a virtual interview as they have been with in-person interviews. Most residency PDs (69.9%) believed that virtual interviews made it easier for their program to comply with duty hours, and 76.8% agreed that virtual interviews allowed their residents to accept more interviews than an in-person format. Most fellowship PDs found virtual interviews convenient. However, difficulty in observing social interaction and gauging applicant interest may be the biggest challenge moving forward.</description><subject>Applicants</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Fellowships and Scholarships</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Gynecology - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Obstetrics - education</subject><subject>obstetrics and gynecology</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>program directors</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>subspecialty fellowship</subject><subject>virtual interviews</subject><issn>1087-2981</issn><issn>1087-2981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1vEzEQXSEQ_YCfALLEhUuK7V3vBwdUVBWoVIlLOVtee5w42rXD2JsoF3473iatWg5cZjwzb57tp1cU7xi9YLSln3JoeNeyC045z0FUJa1eFKdzfzEPXj45nxRnMa4p5Q0V9evipBQlE03FTos_dysgW4dpUgNxPgFuHeyIDTiqNCdiYRjCLq7chiBonFwawaeMJaGPCRI6HYnyhiz3HnQYwnL_mSjiVXLB75wBEifcwp4ESzYYlqhGYlymSgHjm-KVVUOEt8d8Xvz6dn139WNx-_P7zdXX24UWNU-LtuuoqYVRjSgVZ4Jpq5teUEYbaqGpRGUEb0zP2kaIkrKu7Zu-tqoGUKANLc-LmwOvCWotN-hGhXsZlJP3jYBLqTA5PYAUwGvDqWUKbJUV63NlLQXdqaZVTGSuLweuzdSPYHRWA9XwjPT5xLuVXIatbLuKCzETfDwSYPg9QUxydFFnmZWHMEXJ64q1tShFl6Ef_oGuw4Q-SyV529VC8KotM0ocUBpDjAj28TGMytkt8sEtcnaLPLol771_-pPHrQd7ZMDlAeD8vSN2AQcjk9oPAS0qr12U5f_v-Ave69HU</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Ponterio, Jane M.</creator><creator>Keslar, Melissa</creator><creator>Lakhi, Nisha A.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8413-4684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>The virtual interview format for fellowship recruitment in obstetrics and gynecology: a nationwide survey of program directors</title><author>Ponterio, Jane M. ; Keslar, Melissa ; Lakhi, Nisha A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-8990d65da753a2151cfc7b501070fe7454d527db1875530198b7b6fa6eeaecd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Applicants</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Fellowships and Scholarships</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Gynecology - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Obstetrics - education</topic><topic>obstetrics and gynecology</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>program directors</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>subspecialty fellowship</topic><topic>virtual interviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ponterio, Jane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keslar, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakhi, Nisha A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Medical education online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ponterio, Jane M.</au><au>Keslar, Melissa</au><au>Lakhi, Nisha A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The virtual interview format for fellowship recruitment in obstetrics and gynecology: a nationwide survey of program directors</atitle><jtitle>Medical education online</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ Online</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2054304</spage><epage>2054304</epage><pages>2054304-2054304</pages><issn>1087-2981</issn><eissn>1087-2981</eissn><abstract>Due to Covid-19, fellowship programs could not conduct in-person interviews during the 2020-2021 interview cycle and were forced to implement virtual interviews. We conducted two nationwide surveys of residency and fellowship Program Directors (PDs) involved in the Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) Subspecialty Fellowship match cycle to gain a better understanding of virtual interviews from each of their perspectives. 1) Fellowship PDs' confidence in using a virtual platform to holistically evaluate applicants during the 2020-2021 match cycle, 2) Residency PD's perception of virtual interviews and impact on their program's operations, and 3) to assess the desire of fellowship and residency PDs to continue virtual recruitment during forthcoming interview seasons. Two separate nationwide web-based surveys were administered to 1) Ob/Gyn fellowship PDs and 2) residency PDs through SurveyMonkey from July-September 2020 to assess the impact of virtual interviews form each parties' perspective. Surveys solicited demographic information, four-point Likert scale questions, and free response questions Of programs meeting inclusion criteria, 75/111 (67.6%) fellowship PDs and 67/117 (57.3%) residency PDs responded to their respective surveys. Most fellowship PDs believed that they could confidently assess applicants' professionalism (88%) during a virtual interview and (90.7%) felt confident in making a rank-order list. However, only 73.3% were just as confident in preparing a rank list after a virtual interview as they have been with in-person interviews. Most residency PDs (69.9%) believed that virtual interviews made it easier for their program to comply with duty hours, and 76.8% agreed that virtual interviews allowed their residents to accept more interviews than an in-person format. Most fellowship PDs found virtual interviews convenient. However, difficulty in observing social interaction and gauging applicant interest may be the biggest challenge moving forward.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>35315741</pmid><doi>10.1080/10872981.2022.2054304</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8413-4684</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1087-2981
ispartof Medical education online, 2022-12, Vol.27 (1), p.2054304-2054304
issn 1087-2981
1087-2981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2641865359
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Co-Action Open Access Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Applicants
COVID-19
COVID-19 - epidemiology
Fellowships and Scholarships
Gynecology
Gynecology - education
Humans
Internet
Internship and Residency
Interviews
Medical education
Obstetrics
Obstetrics - education
obstetrics and gynecology
Polls & surveys
Professionalism
program directors
Recruitment
Social interaction
subspecialty fellowship
virtual interviews
title The virtual interview format for fellowship recruitment in obstetrics and gynecology: a nationwide survey of program directors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T02%3A32%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20virtual%20interview%20format%20for%20fellowship%20recruitment%20in%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology:%20a%20nationwide%20survey%20of%20program%20directors&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education%20online&rft.au=Ponterio,%20Jane%20M.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2054304&rft.epage=2054304&rft.pages=2054304-2054304&rft.issn=1087-2981&rft.eissn=1087-2981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10872981.2022.2054304&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2641865359%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2896552483&rft_id=info:pmid/35315741&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5e26d20f1aef4027b6d2ff0ec9a78a15&rfr_iscdi=true