Role of Preoperational Imaging Traits for Guiding Treatment in Single ≤ 5 cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background Imaging traits including nonsmooth tumor margins, internal arteries, peritumoral enhancement, and absence of hypodense halos can reflect tumor aggressiveness preoperatively and may affect treatment selection. This study aimed to explore the role of these four imaging traits in treatment s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2022-08, Vol.29 (8), p.5144-5153
Hauptverfasser: Wei, Mengchao, Lin, Manxia, Zhong, Xian, Dai, Zihao, Shen, Shunli, Li, Shaoqiang, Peng, Zhenwei, Kuang, Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5153
container_issue 8
container_start_page 5144
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 29
creator Wei, Mengchao
Lin, Manxia
Zhong, Xian
Dai, Zihao
Shen, Shunli
Li, Shaoqiang
Peng, Zhenwei
Kuang, Ming
description Background Imaging traits including nonsmooth tumor margins, internal arteries, peritumoral enhancement, and absence of hypodense halos can reflect tumor aggressiveness preoperatively and may affect treatment selection. This study aimed to explore the role of these four imaging traits in treatment selection between surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients with single ≤ 5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods Three hundred eight-one patients with single ≤ 5 cm HCC who underwent SR ( n  = 202) or RFA ( n  = 179) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from April 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. The efficacy of SR and RFA in patients with the imaging traits that significantly influenced recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) was compared and analyzed. Results Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified that having internal arteries ( P  = 0.001) was an independent influencing factor for RFS, while internal arteries ( P  = 0.005) and peritumoral enhancement ( P  = 0.001) were independent influencing factors for OS. In patients with internal arteries, subgroup analysis based on tumor size demonstrated that both RFS and OS of SR were superior to those of RFA in patients with 3–5 cm HCC (RFS, P  = 0.023; OS, P  = 0.015). In patients with peritumoral enhancement, both RFS and OS of SR were superior to those of RFA (RFS, P  = 0.019; OS, P  = 0.042). Conclusion SR may be associated with improved survival compared with RFA in patients with single 3–5 cm HCC having internal arteries and patients with single ≤ 5 cm HCC having peritumoral enhancement.
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-022-11344-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2641508507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2682578138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-57c3fe1bef0f0ea0f09d0e618bab73777ba21ebc254aa27cd3030b95035140233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1OHDEQha2IKBCSC7BAlrJh00n5r92zjEb8SUhECVlb1T3VI6Pu9sTuXnAEbsGCk3AUThJPGojEgo3LevX5uezH2IGAr0Jq8y0J0EoXIGUhhNK6UO_YnjBZ0mUldvIeyqpYyNLsso8pXQMIq8B8YLvKKLAVmD3mf4aOeGj5j0hhQxFHHwbs-HmPaz-s-VVEPybehshPJ7-aJcKxp2HkfuC_spINHm_vH-7Mw13T8zPa4Bga6rqpw8iXGBs_hB4_sfctdok-P9V99vvk-Gp5Vlxcnp4vv18UjbJmLIxtVEuiphZaIMzLYgVUiqrG2iprbY1SUN1IoxGlbVYKFNQLA8oIDVKpfXY0-25i-DNRGl3v03YcHChMyclSCwOVAZvRL6_Q6zDF_PwtVUljK6GqTMmZamJIKVLrNtH3GG-cALcNws1BuByE-xeE205x-GQ91T2tXo48_3wG1Ayk3BrWFP_f_YbtXw4plSc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2682578138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of Preoperational Imaging Traits for Guiding Treatment in Single ≤ 5 cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wei, Mengchao ; Lin, Manxia ; Zhong, Xian ; Dai, Zihao ; Shen, Shunli ; Li, Shaoqiang ; Peng, Zhenwei ; Kuang, Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Mengchao ; Lin, Manxia ; Zhong, Xian ; Dai, Zihao ; Shen, Shunli ; Li, Shaoqiang ; Peng, Zhenwei ; Kuang, Ming</creatorcontrib><description>Background Imaging traits including nonsmooth tumor margins, internal arteries, peritumoral enhancement, and absence of hypodense halos can reflect tumor aggressiveness preoperatively and may affect treatment selection. This study aimed to explore the role of these four imaging traits in treatment selection between surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients with single ≤ 5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods Three hundred eight-one patients with single ≤ 5 cm HCC who underwent SR ( n  = 202) or RFA ( n  = 179) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from April 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. The efficacy of SR and RFA in patients with the imaging traits that significantly influenced recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) was compared and analyzed. Results Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified that having internal arteries ( P  = 0.001) was an independent influencing factor for RFS, while internal arteries ( P  = 0.005) and peritumoral enhancement ( P  = 0.001) were independent influencing factors for OS. In patients with internal arteries, subgroup analysis based on tumor size demonstrated that both RFS and OS of SR were superior to those of RFA in patients with 3–5 cm HCC (RFS, P  = 0.023; OS, P  = 0.015). In patients with peritumoral enhancement, both RFS and OS of SR were superior to those of RFA (RFS, P  = 0.019; OS, P  = 0.042). Conclusion SR may be associated with improved survival compared with RFA in patients with single 3–5 cm HCC having internal arteries and patients with single ≤ 5 cm HCC having peritumoral enhancement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11344-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35307805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Arteries ; Hepatobiliary Tumors ; Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Liver cancer ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Oncology ; Patients ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Survival ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-08, Vol.29 (8), p.5144-5153</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2022</rights><rights>2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-57c3fe1bef0f0ea0f09d0e618bab73777ba21ebc254aa27cd3030b95035140233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-57c3fe1bef0f0ea0f09d0e618bab73777ba21ebc254aa27cd3030b95035140233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-022-11344-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-022-11344-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35307805$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Mengchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Manxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Zihao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Shunli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shaoqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Zhenwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuang, Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Role of Preoperational Imaging Traits for Guiding Treatment in Single ≤ 5 cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background Imaging traits including nonsmooth tumor margins, internal arteries, peritumoral enhancement, and absence of hypodense halos can reflect tumor aggressiveness preoperatively and may affect treatment selection. This study aimed to explore the role of these four imaging traits in treatment selection between surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients with single ≤ 5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods Three hundred eight-one patients with single ≤ 5 cm HCC who underwent SR ( n  = 202) or RFA ( n  = 179) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from April 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. The efficacy of SR and RFA in patients with the imaging traits that significantly influenced recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) was compared and analyzed. Results Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified that having internal arteries ( P  = 0.001) was an independent influencing factor for RFS, while internal arteries ( P  = 0.005) and peritumoral enhancement ( P  = 0.001) were independent influencing factors for OS. In patients with internal arteries, subgroup analysis based on tumor size demonstrated that both RFS and OS of SR were superior to those of RFA in patients with 3–5 cm HCC (RFS, P  = 0.023; OS, P  = 0.015). In patients with peritumoral enhancement, both RFS and OS of SR were superior to those of RFA (RFS, P  = 0.019; OS, P  = 0.042). Conclusion SR may be associated with improved survival compared with RFA in patients with single 3–5 cm HCC having internal arteries and patients with single ≤ 5 cm HCC having peritumoral enhancement.</description><subject>Arteries</subject><subject>Hepatobiliary Tumors</subject><subject>Hepatocellular carcinoma</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1OHDEQha2IKBCSC7BAlrJh00n5r92zjEb8SUhECVlb1T3VI6Pu9sTuXnAEbsGCk3AUThJPGojEgo3LevX5uezH2IGAr0Jq8y0J0EoXIGUhhNK6UO_YnjBZ0mUldvIeyqpYyNLsso8pXQMIq8B8YLvKKLAVmD3mf4aOeGj5j0hhQxFHHwbs-HmPaz-s-VVEPybehshPJ7-aJcKxp2HkfuC_spINHm_vH-7Mw13T8zPa4Bga6rqpw8iXGBs_hB4_sfctdok-P9V99vvk-Gp5Vlxcnp4vv18UjbJmLIxtVEuiphZaIMzLYgVUiqrG2iprbY1SUN1IoxGlbVYKFNQLA8oIDVKpfXY0-25i-DNRGl3v03YcHChMyclSCwOVAZvRL6_Q6zDF_PwtVUljK6GqTMmZamJIKVLrNtH3GG-cALcNws1BuByE-xeE205x-GQ91T2tXo48_3wG1Ayk3BrWFP_f_YbtXw4plSc</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Wei, Mengchao</creator><creator>Lin, Manxia</creator><creator>Zhong, Xian</creator><creator>Dai, Zihao</creator><creator>Shen, Shunli</creator><creator>Li, Shaoqiang</creator><creator>Peng, Zhenwei</creator><creator>Kuang, Ming</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Role of Preoperational Imaging Traits for Guiding Treatment in Single ≤ 5 cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma</title><author>Wei, Mengchao ; Lin, Manxia ; Zhong, Xian ; Dai, Zihao ; Shen, Shunli ; Li, Shaoqiang ; Peng, Zhenwei ; Kuang, Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-57c3fe1bef0f0ea0f09d0e618bab73777ba21ebc254aa27cd3030b95035140233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Arteries</topic><topic>Hepatobiliary Tumors</topic><topic>Hepatocellular carcinoma</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Mengchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Manxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Zihao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Shunli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shaoqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Zhenwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuang, Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Mengchao</au><au>Lin, Manxia</au><au>Zhong, Xian</au><au>Dai, Zihao</au><au>Shen, Shunli</au><au>Li, Shaoqiang</au><au>Peng, Zhenwei</au><au>Kuang, Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of Preoperational Imaging Traits for Guiding Treatment in Single ≤ 5 cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>5144</spage><epage>5153</epage><pages>5144-5153</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background Imaging traits including nonsmooth tumor margins, internal arteries, peritumoral enhancement, and absence of hypodense halos can reflect tumor aggressiveness preoperatively and may affect treatment selection. This study aimed to explore the role of these four imaging traits in treatment selection between surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients with single ≤ 5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods Three hundred eight-one patients with single ≤ 5 cm HCC who underwent SR ( n  = 202) or RFA ( n  = 179) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from April 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. The efficacy of SR and RFA in patients with the imaging traits that significantly influenced recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) was compared and analyzed. Results Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified that having internal arteries ( P  = 0.001) was an independent influencing factor for RFS, while internal arteries ( P  = 0.005) and peritumoral enhancement ( P  = 0.001) were independent influencing factors for OS. In patients with internal arteries, subgroup analysis based on tumor size demonstrated that both RFS and OS of SR were superior to those of RFA in patients with 3–5 cm HCC (RFS, P  = 0.023; OS, P  = 0.015). In patients with peritumoral enhancement, both RFS and OS of SR were superior to those of RFA (RFS, P  = 0.019; OS, P  = 0.042). Conclusion SR may be associated with improved survival compared with RFA in patients with single 3–5 cm HCC having internal arteries and patients with single ≤ 5 cm HCC having peritumoral enhancement.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35307805</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-022-11344-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-08, Vol.29 (8), p.5144-5153
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2641508507
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Arteries
Hepatobiliary Tumors
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Liver cancer
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Oncology
Patients
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Survival
Tumors
title Role of Preoperational Imaging Traits for Guiding Treatment in Single ≤ 5 cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A04%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20Preoperational%20Imaging%20Traits%20for%20Guiding%20Treatment%20in%20Single%20%E2%89%A4%C2%A05%C2%A0cm%20Hepatocellular%20Carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Wei,%20Mengchao&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=5144&rft.epage=5153&rft.pages=5144-5153&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-022-11344-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2682578138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2682578138&rft_id=info:pmid/35307805&rfr_iscdi=true