The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches
Forest restoration is being scaled up globally to deliver critical ecosystem services and biodiversity benefits; however, there is a lack of rigorous comparison of cobenefit delivery across different restoration approaches. Through global synthesis, we used 25,950 matched data pairs from 264 studies...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 2022-05, Vol.376 (6595), p.839-844 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 844 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6595 |
| container_start_page | 839 |
| container_title | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) |
| container_volume | 376 |
| creator | Hua, Fangyuan Bruijnzeel, L Adrian Meli, Paula Martin, Philip A Zhang, Jun Nakagawa, Shinichi Miao, Xinran Wang, Weiyi McEvoy, Christopher Peña-Arancibia, Jorge Luis Brancalion, Pedro H S Smith, Pete Edwards, David P Balmford, Andrew |
| description | Forest restoration is being scaled up globally to deliver critical ecosystem services and biodiversity benefits; however, there is a lack of rigorous comparison of cobenefit delivery across different restoration approaches. Through global synthesis, we used 25,950 matched data pairs from 264 studies in 53 countries to assess how delivery of climate, soil, water, and wood production services, in addition to biodiversity, compares across a range of tree plantations and native forests. Benefits of aboveground carbon storage, water provisioning, and especially soil erosion control and biodiversity are better delivered by native forests, with compositionally simpler, younger plantations in drier regions performing particularly poorly. However, plantations exhibit an advantage in wood production. These results underscore important trade-offs among environmental and production goals that policy-makers must navigate in meeting forest restoration commitments. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1126/science.abl4649 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2641001450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2641001450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c76df16adc6e60e6c596843cf3e22a0303f4ffba5178dcbeac25dc114b762793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkL1PwzAQxS0EoqUwsyFLLCxp_Z1kRBVfUiWW7pFjn1VXbVzspFL_e1xaGFjuhvvdu3cPoXtKppQyNUvGQ2dgqtuNUKK-QGNKalnUjPBLNCaEq6IipRyhm5TWhORZza_RiEtWV6ysx8guV4BbH6zfQ0y-P2DdWQwmpEPqYYsTxL03gE3o-ujbofehSz9MH7WFIjiXcHDYhQipx8cSoj5SWO92MWizgnSLrpzeJLg79wlavr4s5-_F4vPtY_68KIygrC9MqayjSlujQBFQRtaqEtw4Doxpwgl3wrlWS1pW1rSgDZPWUCraUuVn-AQ9nWTz3a8hO2m2PhnYbHQHYUgNU4ISQoUkGX38h67DELtsLlOqJFUlpcjU7ESZGFKK4Jpd9FsdDw0lzTH_5px_c84_bzycdYd2C_aP_w2cfwN074V-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667088554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Science Magazine</source><creator>Hua, Fangyuan ; Bruijnzeel, L Adrian ; Meli, Paula ; Martin, Philip A ; Zhang, Jun ; Nakagawa, Shinichi ; Miao, Xinran ; Wang, Weiyi ; McEvoy, Christopher ; Peña-Arancibia, Jorge Luis ; Brancalion, Pedro H S ; Smith, Pete ; Edwards, David P ; Balmford, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Hua, Fangyuan ; Bruijnzeel, L Adrian ; Meli, Paula ; Martin, Philip A ; Zhang, Jun ; Nakagawa, Shinichi ; Miao, Xinran ; Wang, Weiyi ; McEvoy, Christopher ; Peña-Arancibia, Jorge Luis ; Brancalion, Pedro H S ; Smith, Pete ; Edwards, David P ; Balmford, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Forest restoration is being scaled up globally to deliver critical ecosystem services and biodiversity benefits; however, there is a lack of rigorous comparison of cobenefit delivery across different restoration approaches. Through global synthesis, we used 25,950 matched data pairs from 264 studies in 53 countries to assess how delivery of climate, soil, water, and wood production services, in addition to biodiversity, compares across a range of tree plantations and native forests. Benefits of aboveground carbon storage, water provisioning, and especially soil erosion control and biodiversity are better delivered by native forests, with compositionally simpler, younger plantations in drier regions performing particularly poorly. However, plantations exhibit an advantage in wood production. These results underscore important trade-offs among environmental and production goals that policy-makers must navigate in meeting forest restoration commitments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.abl4649</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35298279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Association for the Advancement of Science</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental restoration ; Erosion control ; Forest ecosystems ; Forests ; Plantations ; Reforestation ; Restoration ; Soil erosion ; Soil management ; Trees ; Water ; Water management ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2022-05, Vol.376 (6595), p.839-844</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c76df16adc6e60e6c596843cf3e22a0303f4ffba5178dcbeac25dc114b762793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c76df16adc6e60e6c596843cf3e22a0303f4ffba5178dcbeac25dc114b762793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8245-4062 ; 0000-0002-8378-6322 ; 0000-0001-8514-8757 ; 0000-0002-7765-5182 ; 0000-0002-3784-1124 ; 0000-0001-5390-7552 ; 0000-0001-5449-1093 ; 0000-0002-5346-8868 ; 0000-0002-1329-2837 ; 0000-0001-8562-3853 ; 0000-0003-1900-8857 ; 0000-0002-4952-9293 ; 0000-0003-1846-8915 ; 0000-0002-0144-3589</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,2888,2889,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35298279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hua, Fangyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruijnzeel, L Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meli, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Philip A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Xinran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEvoy, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peña-Arancibia, Jorge Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brancalion, Pedro H S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balmford, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><addtitle>Science</addtitle><description>Forest restoration is being scaled up globally to deliver critical ecosystem services and biodiversity benefits; however, there is a lack of rigorous comparison of cobenefit delivery across different restoration approaches. Through global synthesis, we used 25,950 matched data pairs from 264 studies in 53 countries to assess how delivery of climate, soil, water, and wood production services, in addition to biodiversity, compares across a range of tree plantations and native forests. Benefits of aboveground carbon storage, water provisioning, and especially soil erosion control and biodiversity are better delivered by native forests, with compositionally simpler, younger plantations in drier regions performing particularly poorly. However, plantations exhibit an advantage in wood production. These results underscore important trade-offs among environmental and production goals that policy-makers must navigate in meeting forest restoration commitments.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Erosion control</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkL1PwzAQxS0EoqUwsyFLLCxp_Z1kRBVfUiWW7pFjn1VXbVzspFL_e1xaGFjuhvvdu3cPoXtKppQyNUvGQ2dgqtuNUKK-QGNKalnUjPBLNCaEq6IipRyhm5TWhORZza_RiEtWV6ysx8guV4BbH6zfQ0y-P2DdWQwmpEPqYYsTxL03gE3o-ujbofehSz9MH7WFIjiXcHDYhQipx8cSoj5SWO92MWizgnSLrpzeJLg79wlavr4s5-_F4vPtY_68KIygrC9MqayjSlujQBFQRtaqEtw4Doxpwgl3wrlWS1pW1rSgDZPWUCraUuVn-AQ9nWTz3a8hO2m2PhnYbHQHYUgNU4ISQoUkGX38h67DELtsLlOqJFUlpcjU7ESZGFKK4Jpd9FsdDw0lzTH_5px_c84_bzycdYd2C_aP_w2cfwN074V-</recordid><startdate>20220520</startdate><enddate>20220520</enddate><creator>Hua, Fangyuan</creator><creator>Bruijnzeel, L Adrian</creator><creator>Meli, Paula</creator><creator>Martin, Philip A</creator><creator>Zhang, Jun</creator><creator>Nakagawa, Shinichi</creator><creator>Miao, Xinran</creator><creator>Wang, Weiyi</creator><creator>McEvoy, Christopher</creator><creator>Peña-Arancibia, Jorge Luis</creator><creator>Brancalion, Pedro H S</creator><creator>Smith, Pete</creator><creator>Edwards, David P</creator><creator>Balmford, Andrew</creator><general>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-4062</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8378-6322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8514-8757</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7765-5182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3784-1124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-7552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-1093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5346-8868</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1329-2837</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8562-3853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1900-8857</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4952-9293</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-8915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-3589</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220520</creationdate><title>The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches</title><author>Hua, Fangyuan ; Bruijnzeel, L Adrian ; Meli, Paula ; Martin, Philip A ; Zhang, Jun ; Nakagawa, Shinichi ; Miao, Xinran ; Wang, Weiyi ; McEvoy, Christopher ; Peña-Arancibia, Jorge Luis ; Brancalion, Pedro H S ; Smith, Pete ; Edwards, David P ; Balmford, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c76df16adc6e60e6c596843cf3e22a0303f4ffba5178dcbeac25dc114b762793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Erosion control</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hua, Fangyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruijnzeel, L Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meli, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Philip A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Xinran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEvoy, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peña-Arancibia, Jorge Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brancalion, Pedro H S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balmford, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hua, Fangyuan</au><au>Bruijnzeel, L Adrian</au><au>Meli, Paula</au><au>Martin, Philip A</au><au>Zhang, Jun</au><au>Nakagawa, Shinichi</au><au>Miao, Xinran</au><au>Wang, Weiyi</au><au>McEvoy, Christopher</au><au>Peña-Arancibia, Jorge Luis</au><au>Brancalion, Pedro H S</au><au>Smith, Pete</au><au>Edwards, David P</au><au>Balmford, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><addtitle>Science</addtitle><date>2022-05-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>376</volume><issue>6595</issue><spage>839</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>839-844</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><abstract>Forest restoration is being scaled up globally to deliver critical ecosystem services and biodiversity benefits; however, there is a lack of rigorous comparison of cobenefit delivery across different restoration approaches. Through global synthesis, we used 25,950 matched data pairs from 264 studies in 53 countries to assess how delivery of climate, soil, water, and wood production services, in addition to biodiversity, compares across a range of tree plantations and native forests. Benefits of aboveground carbon storage, water provisioning, and especially soil erosion control and biodiversity are better delivered by native forests, with compositionally simpler, younger plantations in drier regions performing particularly poorly. However, plantations exhibit an advantage in wood production. These results underscore important trade-offs among environmental and production goals that policy-makers must navigate in meeting forest restoration commitments.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</pub><pmid>35298279</pmid><doi>10.1126/science.abl4649</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-4062</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8378-6322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8514-8757</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7765-5182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3784-1124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-7552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-1093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5346-8868</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1329-2837</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8562-3853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1900-8857</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4952-9293</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-8915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-3589</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0036-8075 |
| ispartof | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2022-05, Vol.376 (6595), p.839-844 |
| issn | 0036-8075 1095-9203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2641001450 |
| source | MEDLINE; Science Magazine |
| subjects | Biodiversity Climate change Climate change mitigation Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Ecosystem Ecosystem services Ecosystems Environmental restoration Erosion control Forest ecosystems Forests Plantations Reforestation Restoration Soil erosion Soil management Trees Water Water management Water supply |
| title | The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T23%3A57%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20biodiversity%20and%20ecosystem%20service%20contributions%20and%20trade-offs%20of%20forest%20restoration%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Hua,%20Fangyuan&rft.date=2022-05-20&rft.volume=376&rft.issue=6595&rft.spage=839&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=839-844&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.abl4649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2641001450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667088554&rft_id=info:pmid/35298279&rfr_iscdi=true |