The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes
Multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) are prescribed to inhibit myopia progression; these include aspheric and concentric designs. The effects of MFCLs on visual quality, accommodation and vergence in young-adult myopes were evaluated. Participants were twenty-six myopes (19–25 years, spherical equ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contact lens & anterior eye 2023-02, Vol.46 (1), p.101588-101588, Article 101588 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101588 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 101588 |
container_title | Contact lens & anterior eye |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Schmid, Katrina L Gifford, Kate L. Atchison, David A. |
description | Multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) are prescribed to inhibit myopia progression; these include aspheric and concentric designs. The effects of MFCLs on visual quality, accommodation and vergence in young-adult myopes were evaluated.
Participants were twenty-six myopes (19–25 years, spherical equivalent −0.50 to −5.75D), with normal binocular vision and no past myopia control. Pupil sizes were 4.4 ± 0.9 mm during distance viewing and 3.7 ± 0.8 mm at near. In random order, participants wore four MFCLs: Proclear single vision distance, MiSight concentric dual focus (+2.00D), distance center aspheric (Biofinity, +2.50D) (CooperVision lenses), and NaturalVue aspheric (Visioneering Technologies). Testing included visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson), stereoacuity, accommodation response, negative and positive relative accommodation, horizontal phorias, horizontal fusional vergence and AC/A ratio, and a visual quality questionnaire.
The four lenses differed in distance (p = 0.001) and near visual acuity (p = 0.011), and contrast sensitivity (p = 0.001). Compared with the single vision lens, the Biofinity aspheric had the greatest visual impact: 0.19 ± 0.14 logMAR distance acuity reduction, 0.22 ± 0.15 log contrast sensitivity reduction. Near acuity was affected less than distance acuity; the reduction was greatest with the NaturalVue (0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR reduction). The MFCLs altered the autorefraction measure at distance and near (p = 0.001); the accommodation response was less with aspheric lenses. Negative relative accommodation reduced with the aspheric lenses (p = 0.001): by 0.9 ± 0.5D with Biofinity and 0.5 ± 0.7D with NaturalVue. Exophoric shifts were greater with aspheric lenses (1.8 ± 2.4Δ Biofinity, 1.7 ± 1.7Δ NaturalVue) than with the concentric MiSight (0.5 ± 1.3Δ).
MFCLs alter visual performance, refraction and vergence; two aspheric lenses had greater effect than a concentric lens. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101588 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2640995985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1367048422000224</els_id><sourcerecordid>2640995985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f822ad13117fde475528bcf467660b312e67a570f33874227eb9e7291c421c0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1q3DAURkVoSdK0L5BF0bIbT_UvG7opIUkLA90kayHLVxkNtjSV7MC8fWRm2mVWV_dyvg90ELqlZEMJVd_3Gzda2DDC2HqQbXuBrqnQqpGC0g_1zZVuiGjFFfpUyp7UUNeRS3TFJSeCKHmN4tMOMHgPbsbJY5eigzjn4LCNA7blsIN1mZZxDj45O-KS_Lxys62REWKBglPEfYjJLaPN-DWUUA8h4mNa4gu2Qw3j6ZgOUD6jj96OBb6c5w16frh_uvvVbP88_r77uW0cl2pufMuYHSinVPsBhJaStb3zQmmlSM8pA6Wt1MRz3mrBmIa-A8066gSjjgz8Bn079R5y-rtAmc0UioNxtBHSUgxTgnSd7FpZUXZCXU6lZPDmkMNk89FQYlbPZm9Wz2b1bE6ea-jruX_pJxj-R_6JrcCPEwD1l68BsikuQJU7hFxdmyGF9_rfAMwHjss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640995985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Schmid, Katrina L ; Gifford, Kate L. ; Atchison, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Katrina L ; Gifford, Kate L. ; Atchison, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>Multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) are prescribed to inhibit myopia progression; these include aspheric and concentric designs. The effects of MFCLs on visual quality, accommodation and vergence in young-adult myopes were evaluated.
Participants were twenty-six myopes (19–25 years, spherical equivalent −0.50 to −5.75D), with normal binocular vision and no past myopia control. Pupil sizes were 4.4 ± 0.9 mm during distance viewing and 3.7 ± 0.8 mm at near. In random order, participants wore four MFCLs: Proclear single vision distance, MiSight concentric dual focus (+2.00D), distance center aspheric (Biofinity, +2.50D) (CooperVision lenses), and NaturalVue aspheric (Visioneering Technologies). Testing included visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson), stereoacuity, accommodation response, negative and positive relative accommodation, horizontal phorias, horizontal fusional vergence and AC/A ratio, and a visual quality questionnaire.
The four lenses differed in distance (p = 0.001) and near visual acuity (p = 0.011), and contrast sensitivity (p = 0.001). Compared with the single vision lens, the Biofinity aspheric had the greatest visual impact: 0.19 ± 0.14 logMAR distance acuity reduction, 0.22 ± 0.15 log contrast sensitivity reduction. Near acuity was affected less than distance acuity; the reduction was greatest with the NaturalVue (0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR reduction). The MFCLs altered the autorefraction measure at distance and near (p = 0.001); the accommodation response was less with aspheric lenses. Negative relative accommodation reduced with the aspheric lenses (p = 0.001): by 0.9 ± 0.5D with Biofinity and 0.5 ± 0.7D with NaturalVue. Exophoric shifts were greater with aspheric lenses (1.8 ± 2.4Δ Biofinity, 1.7 ± 1.7Δ NaturalVue) than with the concentric MiSight (0.5 ± 1.3Δ).
MFCLs alter visual performance, refraction and vergence; two aspheric lenses had greater effect than a concentric lens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-0484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5411</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101588</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35304065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accommodation ; Binocular vision ; Contact lenses ; Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic ; Humans ; Myopia ; Myopia - therapy ; Phoria ; Refraction ; Refraction, Ocular ; Vision, Binocular - physiology ; Visual Acuity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Contact lens & anterior eye, 2023-02, Vol.46 (1), p.101588-101588, Article 101588</ispartof><rights>2022 British Contact Lens Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f822ad13117fde475528bcf467660b312e67a570f33874227eb9e7291c421c0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f822ad13117fde475528bcf467660b312e67a570f33874227eb9e7291c421c0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2022.101588$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35304065$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Katrina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, Kate L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atchison, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes</title><title>Contact lens & anterior eye</title><addtitle>Cont Lens Anterior Eye</addtitle><description>Multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) are prescribed to inhibit myopia progression; these include aspheric and concentric designs. The effects of MFCLs on visual quality, accommodation and vergence in young-adult myopes were evaluated.
Participants were twenty-six myopes (19–25 years, spherical equivalent −0.50 to −5.75D), with normal binocular vision and no past myopia control. Pupil sizes were 4.4 ± 0.9 mm during distance viewing and 3.7 ± 0.8 mm at near. In random order, participants wore four MFCLs: Proclear single vision distance, MiSight concentric dual focus (+2.00D), distance center aspheric (Biofinity, +2.50D) (CooperVision lenses), and NaturalVue aspheric (Visioneering Technologies). Testing included visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson), stereoacuity, accommodation response, negative and positive relative accommodation, horizontal phorias, horizontal fusional vergence and AC/A ratio, and a visual quality questionnaire.
The four lenses differed in distance (p = 0.001) and near visual acuity (p = 0.011), and contrast sensitivity (p = 0.001). Compared with the single vision lens, the Biofinity aspheric had the greatest visual impact: 0.19 ± 0.14 logMAR distance acuity reduction, 0.22 ± 0.15 log contrast sensitivity reduction. Near acuity was affected less than distance acuity; the reduction was greatest with the NaturalVue (0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR reduction). The MFCLs altered the autorefraction measure at distance and near (p = 0.001); the accommodation response was less with aspheric lenses. Negative relative accommodation reduced with the aspheric lenses (p = 0.001): by 0.9 ± 0.5D with Biofinity and 0.5 ± 0.7D with NaturalVue. Exophoric shifts were greater with aspheric lenses (1.8 ± 2.4Δ Biofinity, 1.7 ± 1.7Δ NaturalVue) than with the concentric MiSight (0.5 ± 1.3Δ).
MFCLs alter visual performance, refraction and vergence; two aspheric lenses had greater effect than a concentric lens.</description><subject>Accommodation</subject><subject>Binocular vision</subject><subject>Contact lenses</subject><subject>Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Myopia</subject><subject>Myopia - therapy</subject><subject>Phoria</subject><subject>Refraction</subject><subject>Refraction, Ocular</subject><subject>Vision, Binocular - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1367-0484</issn><issn>1476-5411</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1q3DAURkVoSdK0L5BF0bIbT_UvG7opIUkLA90kayHLVxkNtjSV7MC8fWRm2mVWV_dyvg90ELqlZEMJVd_3Gzda2DDC2HqQbXuBrqnQqpGC0g_1zZVuiGjFFfpUyp7UUNeRS3TFJSeCKHmN4tMOMHgPbsbJY5eigzjn4LCNA7blsIN1mZZxDj45O-KS_Lxys62REWKBglPEfYjJLaPN-DWUUA8h4mNa4gu2Qw3j6ZgOUD6jj96OBb6c5w16frh_uvvVbP88_r77uW0cl2pufMuYHSinVPsBhJaStb3zQmmlSM8pA6Wt1MRz3mrBmIa-A8066gSjjgz8Bn079R5y-rtAmc0UioNxtBHSUgxTgnSd7FpZUXZCXU6lZPDmkMNk89FQYlbPZm9Wz2b1bE6ea-jruX_pJxj-R_6JrcCPEwD1l68BsikuQJU7hFxdmyGF9_rfAMwHjss</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Schmid, Katrina L</creator><creator>Gifford, Kate L.</creator><creator>Atchison, David A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes</title><author>Schmid, Katrina L ; Gifford, Kate L. ; Atchison, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f822ad13117fde475528bcf467660b312e67a570f33874227eb9e7291c421c0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accommodation</topic><topic>Binocular vision</topic><topic>Contact lenses</topic><topic>Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Myopia</topic><topic>Myopia - therapy</topic><topic>Phoria</topic><topic>Refraction</topic><topic>Refraction, Ocular</topic><topic>Vision, Binocular - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Katrina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, Kate L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atchison, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contact lens & anterior eye</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmid, Katrina L</au><au>Gifford, Kate L.</au><au>Atchison, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes</atitle><jtitle>Contact lens & anterior eye</jtitle><addtitle>Cont Lens Anterior Eye</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101588</spage><epage>101588</epage><pages>101588-101588</pages><artnum>101588</artnum><issn>1367-0484</issn><eissn>1476-5411</eissn><abstract>Multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) are prescribed to inhibit myopia progression; these include aspheric and concentric designs. The effects of MFCLs on visual quality, accommodation and vergence in young-adult myopes were evaluated.
Participants were twenty-six myopes (19–25 years, spherical equivalent −0.50 to −5.75D), with normal binocular vision and no past myopia control. Pupil sizes were 4.4 ± 0.9 mm during distance viewing and 3.7 ± 0.8 mm at near. In random order, participants wore four MFCLs: Proclear single vision distance, MiSight concentric dual focus (+2.00D), distance center aspheric (Biofinity, +2.50D) (CooperVision lenses), and NaturalVue aspheric (Visioneering Technologies). Testing included visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson), stereoacuity, accommodation response, negative and positive relative accommodation, horizontal phorias, horizontal fusional vergence and AC/A ratio, and a visual quality questionnaire.
The four lenses differed in distance (p = 0.001) and near visual acuity (p = 0.011), and contrast sensitivity (p = 0.001). Compared with the single vision lens, the Biofinity aspheric had the greatest visual impact: 0.19 ± 0.14 logMAR distance acuity reduction, 0.22 ± 0.15 log contrast sensitivity reduction. Near acuity was affected less than distance acuity; the reduction was greatest with the NaturalVue (0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR reduction). The MFCLs altered the autorefraction measure at distance and near (p = 0.001); the accommodation response was less with aspheric lenses. Negative relative accommodation reduced with the aspheric lenses (p = 0.001): by 0.9 ± 0.5D with Biofinity and 0.5 ± 0.7D with NaturalVue. Exophoric shifts were greater with aspheric lenses (1.8 ± 2.4Δ Biofinity, 1.7 ± 1.7Δ NaturalVue) than with the concentric MiSight (0.5 ± 1.3Δ).
MFCLs alter visual performance, refraction and vergence; two aspheric lenses had greater effect than a concentric lens.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35304065</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clae.2022.101588</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1367-0484 |
ispartof | Contact lens & anterior eye, 2023-02, Vol.46 (1), p.101588-101588, Article 101588 |
issn | 1367-0484 1476-5411 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2640995985 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Accommodation Binocular vision Contact lenses Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic Humans Myopia Myopia - therapy Phoria Refraction Refraction, Ocular Vision, Binocular - physiology Visual Acuity Young Adult |
title | The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A34%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20concentric%20and%20aspheric%20multifocal%20soft%20contact%20lenses%20on%20binocular%20vision%20in%20young%20adult%20myopes&rft.jtitle=Contact%20lens%20&%20anterior%20eye&rft.au=Schmid,%20Katrina%20L&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101588&rft.epage=101588&rft.pages=101588-101588&rft.artnum=101588&rft.issn=1367-0484&rft.eissn=1476-5411&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clae.2022.101588&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640995985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640995985&rft_id=info:pmid/35304065&rft_els_id=S1367048422000224&rfr_iscdi=true |