Assessing the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback
Feedback is an effective strategy for improving performance and consists of multiple characteristics. One characteristic that can influence feedback efficacy is its nature (whether feedback is positive or corrective) and little is known about the conditions under which individuals may prefer correct...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied behavior analysis 2022-06, Vol.55 (3), p.727-745 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 745 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 727 |
| container_title | Journal of applied behavior analysis |
| container_volume | 55 |
| creator | Simonian, Michael J. Brand, Denys |
| description | Feedback is an effective strategy for improving performance and consists of multiple characteristics. One characteristic that can influence feedback efficacy is its nature (whether feedback is positive or corrective) and little is known about the conditions under which individuals may prefer corrective over positive feedback. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback during the acquisition of novel tasks. In the first phase, participants received either positive, corrective, or no feedback across three novel tasks. Participants only mastered the task in which they received corrective feedback. In the second phase, participants chose to receive either positive or corrective feedback after completing trials of the previous phase's control task. All participants chose to receive corrective feedback more frequently than positive feedback. We discuss the implications of the results for feedback delivery in the workplace and provide suggestions for future research. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jaba.911 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2640321636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1340621</ericid><sourcerecordid>2640321636</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3711-33bd6acf872873dfc949001b1bf3c0604b14e620dd24336b1465ae64ff0a33463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EoqUg8QKgSFy4pNhex0mOoSo_VREXOEeOs4aUNgl2C-rb47QFJCROq9F8mt0dQk4ZHTJK-dVMFWqYMrZH-iyFJISYwj7pe4uFSRJFPXLk3IxSxqmMDkkPIp7GVNA-ecicQ-eq-iVYvmKAxlRa6XXQmEDVZdBaNGix1hiYxgZt46pl9YEbTzfWot5Ig1gWSr8dkwOj5g5PdnNAnm_GT6O7cPp4ez_KpqGGmLEQoCil0iaJeRJDaXQqUn9cwQoDmkoqCiZQclqWXABIr2SkUApjqAIQEgbkcpvb2uZ9hW6ZLyqncT5XNTYrl3MpKHAmoUMv_qCzZmVrf52nEmAcWAS_gdo2zvmn89ZWC2XXOaN5V3HeVZz7ij16vgtcFQssf8DvTj1wtgXQVvrHHk8YCCp5FxBu_c9qjut_F-WT7DrrFn4BVYyMjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2683123153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Simonian, Michael J. ; Brand, Denys</creator><creatorcontrib>Simonian, Michael J. ; Brand, Denys</creatorcontrib><description>Feedback is an effective strategy for improving performance and consists of multiple characteristics. One characteristic that can influence feedback efficacy is its nature (whether feedback is positive or corrective) and little is known about the conditions under which individuals may prefer corrective over positive feedback. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback during the acquisition of novel tasks. In the first phase, participants received either positive, corrective, or no feedback across three novel tasks. Participants only mastered the task in which they received corrective feedback. In the second phase, participants chose to receive either positive or corrective feedback after completing trials of the previous phase's control task. All participants chose to receive corrective feedback more frequently than positive feedback. We discuss the implications of the results for feedback delivery in the workplace and provide suggestions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8855</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jaba.911</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35297040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>choice ; corrective ; Effectiveness ; Error Correction ; Feedback ; Feedback (Response) ; positive ; Positive Reinforcement ; preference ; Preferences</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2022-06, Vol.55 (3), p.727-745</ispartof><rights>2022 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (SEAB).</rights><rights>2022 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3711-33bd6acf872873dfc949001b1bf3c0604b14e620dd24336b1465ae64ff0a33463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3711-33bd6acf872873dfc949001b1bf3c0604b14e620dd24336b1465ae64ff0a33463</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8596-1975</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjaba.911$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjaba.911$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1340621$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simonian, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Denys</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback</title><title>Journal of applied behavior analysis</title><addtitle>J Appl Behav Anal</addtitle><description>Feedback is an effective strategy for improving performance and consists of multiple characteristics. One characteristic that can influence feedback efficacy is its nature (whether feedback is positive or corrective) and little is known about the conditions under which individuals may prefer corrective over positive feedback. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback during the acquisition of novel tasks. In the first phase, participants received either positive, corrective, or no feedback across three novel tasks. Participants only mastered the task in which they received corrective feedback. In the second phase, participants chose to receive either positive or corrective feedback after completing trials of the previous phase's control task. All participants chose to receive corrective feedback more frequently than positive feedback. We discuss the implications of the results for feedback delivery in the workplace and provide suggestions for future research.</description><subject>choice</subject><subject>corrective</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Error Correction</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>positive</subject><subject>Positive Reinforcement</subject><subject>preference</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><issn>0021-8855</issn><issn>1938-3703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EoqUg8QKgSFy4pNhex0mOoSo_VREXOEeOs4aUNgl2C-rb47QFJCROq9F8mt0dQk4ZHTJK-dVMFWqYMrZH-iyFJISYwj7pe4uFSRJFPXLk3IxSxqmMDkkPIp7GVNA-ecicQ-eq-iVYvmKAxlRa6XXQmEDVZdBaNGix1hiYxgZt46pl9YEbTzfWot5Ig1gWSr8dkwOj5g5PdnNAnm_GT6O7cPp4ez_KpqGGmLEQoCil0iaJeRJDaXQqUn9cwQoDmkoqCiZQclqWXABIr2SkUApjqAIQEgbkcpvb2uZ9hW6ZLyqncT5XNTYrl3MpKHAmoUMv_qCzZmVrf52nEmAcWAS_gdo2zvmn89ZWC2XXOaN5V3HeVZz7ij16vgtcFQssf8DvTj1wtgXQVvrHHk8YCCp5FxBu_c9qjut_F-WT7DrrFn4BVYyMjA</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Simonian, Michael J.</creator><creator>Brand, Denys</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-1975</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Assessing the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback</title><author>Simonian, Michael J. ; Brand, Denys</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3711-33bd6acf872873dfc949001b1bf3c0604b14e620dd24336b1465ae64ff0a33463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>choice</topic><topic>corrective</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Error Correction</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>positive</topic><topic>Positive Reinforcement</topic><topic>preference</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simonian, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Denys</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied behavior analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simonian, Michael J.</au><au>Brand, Denys</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1340621</ericid><atitle>Assessing the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied behavior analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Behav Anal</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>745</epage><pages>727-745</pages><issn>0021-8855</issn><eissn>1938-3703</eissn><abstract>Feedback is an effective strategy for improving performance and consists of multiple characteristics. One characteristic that can influence feedback efficacy is its nature (whether feedback is positive or corrective) and little is known about the conditions under which individuals may prefer corrective over positive feedback. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback during the acquisition of novel tasks. In the first phase, participants received either positive, corrective, or no feedback across three novel tasks. Participants only mastered the task in which they received corrective feedback. In the second phase, participants chose to receive either positive or corrective feedback after completing trials of the previous phase's control task. All participants chose to receive corrective feedback more frequently than positive feedback. We discuss the implications of the results for feedback delivery in the workplace and provide suggestions for future research.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35297040</pmid><doi>10.1002/jaba.911</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-1975</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8855 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2022-06, Vol.55 (3), p.727-745 |
| issn | 0021-8855 1938-3703 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2640321636 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library; PubMed Central |
| subjects | choice corrective Effectiveness Error Correction Feedback Feedback (Response) positive Positive Reinforcement preference Preferences |
| title | Assessing the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T12%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20efficacy%20of%20and%20preference%20for%20positive%20and%20corrective%20feedback&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20behavior%20analysis&rft.au=Simonian,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=745&rft.pages=727-745&rft.issn=0021-8855&rft.eissn=1938-3703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jaba.911&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640321636%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2683123153&rft_id=info:pmid/35297040&rft_ericid=EJ1340621&rfr_iscdi=true |