Starting CT-guided robotic interventional oncology at a UK centre
A commercially available CT-guided robot offers enhanced abilities in planning, targeting, and confirming accurate needle placement. In this short communication, we describe our first UK experience of robotic interventional oncology procedures. We describe the device, discuss installation, operation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 2022-06, Vol.95 (1134), p.20220217-20220217 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20220217 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1134 |
container_start_page | 20220217 |
container_title | British journal of radiology |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Johnston, Edward W Basso, Jodie Winfield, Jessica McCall, James Khan, Nasir Messiou, Christina Koh, Dow-Mu Fotiadis, Nicos |
description | A commercially available CT-guided robot offers enhanced abilities in planning, targeting, and confirming accurate needle placement. In this short communication, we describe our first UK experience of robotic interventional oncology procedures.
We describe the device, discuss installation, operation, and report upon needle insertion success, accuracy (path deviation; PD and tip deviation; TD), number of adjustments, complications, and procedural success.
Nine patients (seven males), median age 66 years (range 43-79) were consented for biopsy or ablation between March and April 2021. Needle placement in biopsy was more accurate than ablation (median 1
11 mm PD and 1
20 mm TD) and required fewer adjustments (median 0
5). No complications arose, and all procedures were successful (diagnostic material obtained or complete ablation at follow-up).
Short procedure times and very high levels of accuracy were readily achieved with biopsy procedures, although tumour ablation was less accurate which likely reflects higher procedural complexity.
Achieving highly accurate robotic biopsy with is feasible within a very short time span. Further work is required to maximise the potential of robotic guidance in tumour ablation procedures, which is likely due to higher complexity giving a longer learning curve. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/bjr.20220217 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2640049474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2640049474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e4ce950f690fe5e6c5e131b257e23418700a2a89b6894e25edd62f6bee254c023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM9LwzAUx4Mobk5vniVHD3a-pEmbHMfwFw48uIG3kqavo6NrZpIK--_tmBMevPflffgePoTcMpgyLvVjufFTDnwYlp-RMcuFSpSCr3MyBoA8YVzJEbkKYXOIUsMlGaWSawCtxmT2GY2PTbem82Wy7psKK-pd6WJjadNF9D_YxcZ1pqWus6516z01kRq6eqd2eHm8Jhe1aQPe_O0JWT0_LeevyeLj5W0-WyQ25TomKCxqCXWmoUaJmZXIUlZymSNPBVM5gOFG6TJTWiCXWFUZr7MSh1tY4OmE3B97d9599xhisW2CxbY1Hbo-FDwTAEKLXAzowxG13oXgsS52vtkavy8YFAdpxSCtOEkb8Lu_5r7cYvUPnyylv8CnZr4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640049474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Starting CT-guided robotic interventional oncology at a UK centre</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Johnston, Edward W ; Basso, Jodie ; Winfield, Jessica ; McCall, James ; Khan, Nasir ; Messiou, Christina ; Koh, Dow-Mu ; Fotiadis, Nicos</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Edward W ; Basso, Jodie ; Winfield, Jessica ; McCall, James ; Khan, Nasir ; Messiou, Christina ; Koh, Dow-Mu ; Fotiadis, Nicos</creatorcontrib><description>A commercially available CT-guided robot offers enhanced abilities in planning, targeting, and confirming accurate needle placement. In this short communication, we describe our first UK experience of robotic interventional oncology procedures.
We describe the device, discuss installation, operation, and report upon needle insertion success, accuracy (path deviation; PD and tip deviation; TD), number of adjustments, complications, and procedural success.
Nine patients (seven males), median age 66 years (range 43-79) were consented for biopsy or ablation between March and April 2021. Needle placement in biopsy was more accurate than ablation (median 1
11 mm PD and 1
20 mm TD) and required fewer adjustments (median 0
5). No complications arose, and all procedures were successful (diagnostic material obtained or complete ablation at follow-up).
Short procedure times and very high levels of accuracy were readily achieved with biopsy procedures, although tumour ablation was less accurate which likely reflects higher procedural complexity.
Achieving highly accurate robotic biopsy with is feasible within a very short time span. Further work is required to maximise the potential of robotic guidance in tumour ablation procedures, which is likely due to higher complexity giving a longer learning curve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220217</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35290098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Needles ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Robotics ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2022-06, Vol.95 (1134), p.20220217-20220217</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e4ce950f690fe5e6c5e131b257e23418700a2a89b6894e25edd62f6bee254c023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e4ce950f690fe5e6c5e131b257e23418700a2a89b6894e25edd62f6bee254c023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8504-2968</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290098$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Edward W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basso, Jodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winfield, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCall, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Nasir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messiou, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Dow-Mu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotiadis, Nicos</creatorcontrib><title>Starting CT-guided robotic interventional oncology at a UK centre</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>A commercially available CT-guided robot offers enhanced abilities in planning, targeting, and confirming accurate needle placement. In this short communication, we describe our first UK experience of robotic interventional oncology procedures.
We describe the device, discuss installation, operation, and report upon needle insertion success, accuracy (path deviation; PD and tip deviation; TD), number of adjustments, complications, and procedural success.
Nine patients (seven males), median age 66 years (range 43-79) were consented for biopsy or ablation between March and April 2021. Needle placement in biopsy was more accurate than ablation (median 1
11 mm PD and 1
20 mm TD) and required fewer adjustments (median 0
5). No complications arose, and all procedures were successful (diagnostic material obtained or complete ablation at follow-up).
Short procedure times and very high levels of accuracy were readily achieved with biopsy procedures, although tumour ablation was less accurate which likely reflects higher procedural complexity.
Achieving highly accurate robotic biopsy with is feasible within a very short time span. Further work is required to maximise the potential of robotic guidance in tumour ablation procedures, which is likely due to higher complexity giving a longer learning curve.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needles</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM9LwzAUx4Mobk5vniVHD3a-pEmbHMfwFw48uIG3kqavo6NrZpIK--_tmBMevPflffgePoTcMpgyLvVjufFTDnwYlp-RMcuFSpSCr3MyBoA8YVzJEbkKYXOIUsMlGaWSawCtxmT2GY2PTbem82Wy7psKK-pd6WJjadNF9D_YxcZ1pqWus6516z01kRq6eqd2eHm8Jhe1aQPe_O0JWT0_LeevyeLj5W0-WyQ25TomKCxqCXWmoUaJmZXIUlZymSNPBVM5gOFG6TJTWiCXWFUZr7MSh1tY4OmE3B97d9599xhisW2CxbY1Hbo-FDwTAEKLXAzowxG13oXgsS52vtkavy8YFAdpxSCtOEkb8Lu_5r7cYvUPnyylv8CnZr4</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Johnston, Edward W</creator><creator>Basso, Jodie</creator><creator>Winfield, Jessica</creator><creator>McCall, James</creator><creator>Khan, Nasir</creator><creator>Messiou, Christina</creator><creator>Koh, Dow-Mu</creator><creator>Fotiadis, Nicos</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8504-2968</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Starting CT-guided robotic interventional oncology at a UK centre</title><author>Johnston, Edward W ; Basso, Jodie ; Winfield, Jessica ; McCall, James ; Khan, Nasir ; Messiou, Christina ; Koh, Dow-Mu ; Fotiadis, Nicos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e4ce950f690fe5e6c5e131b257e23418700a2a89b6894e25edd62f6bee254c023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needles</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Edward W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basso, Jodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winfield, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCall, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Nasir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messiou, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Dow-Mu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotiadis, Nicos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnston, Edward W</au><au>Basso, Jodie</au><au>Winfield, Jessica</au><au>McCall, James</au><au>Khan, Nasir</au><au>Messiou, Christina</au><au>Koh, Dow-Mu</au><au>Fotiadis, Nicos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Starting CT-guided robotic interventional oncology at a UK centre</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1134</issue><spage>20220217</spage><epage>20220217</epage><pages>20220217-20220217</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>A commercially available CT-guided robot offers enhanced abilities in planning, targeting, and confirming accurate needle placement. In this short communication, we describe our first UK experience of robotic interventional oncology procedures.
We describe the device, discuss installation, operation, and report upon needle insertion success, accuracy (path deviation; PD and tip deviation; TD), number of adjustments, complications, and procedural success.
Nine patients (seven males), median age 66 years (range 43-79) were consented for biopsy or ablation between March and April 2021. Needle placement in biopsy was more accurate than ablation (median 1
11 mm PD and 1
20 mm TD) and required fewer adjustments (median 0
5). No complications arose, and all procedures were successful (diagnostic material obtained or complete ablation at follow-up).
Short procedure times and very high levels of accuracy were readily achieved with biopsy procedures, although tumour ablation was less accurate which likely reflects higher procedural complexity.
Achieving highly accurate robotic biopsy with is feasible within a very short time span. Further work is required to maximise the potential of robotic guidance in tumour ablation procedures, which is likely due to higher complexity giving a longer learning curve.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>35290098</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20220217</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8504-2968</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
ispartof | British journal of radiology, 2022-06, Vol.95 (1134), p.20220217-20220217 |
issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2640049474 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Humans Male Middle Aged Needles Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Robotics Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods United Kingdom |
title | Starting CT-guided robotic interventional oncology at a UK centre |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T07%3A27%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Starting%20CT-guided%20robotic%20interventional%20oncology%20at%20a%20UK%20centre&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Johnston,%20Edward%20W&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1134&rft.spage=20220217&rft.epage=20220217&rft.pages=20220217-20220217&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20220217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640049474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640049474&rft_id=info:pmid/35290098&rfr_iscdi=true |