Impacted fetal head during second stage Caesarean birth: A prospective observational study
To determine the incidence of, and complication rates from, impacted fetal head at full dilatation Caesarean birth in the UK, and record what techniques were used. Prospective observational study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS). 159 (82%) of the 194 UK hospitals with obstetric uni...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2022-05, Vol.272, p.77-81 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 81 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 77 |
container_title | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology |
container_volume | 272 |
creator | Wyn Jones, Nia Mitchell, Eleanor J. Wakefield, Natalie Knight, Marian Dorling, Jon Thornton, Jim G. Walker, Kate F. |
description | To determine the incidence of, and complication rates from, impacted fetal head at full dilatation Caesarean birth in the UK, and record what techniques were used.
Prospective observational study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS).
159 (82%) of the 194 UK hospitals with obstetric units.
All women who underwent second stage Caesarean birth in the UK between 1st March and 31st August 2019. Further information was collected on cases where a dis-impaction technique was used, or the operating surgeon experienced ‘difficulty’ in delivering the head.
Prospective observational study.
Technique(s) used, maternal and neonatal outcomes.
3,518 s stage Caesarean births reported. The surgeon used a dis-impaction technique or reported ‘difficulty’ in 564 (16%) of these. The most common dis-impaction techniques used were manual elevation of the head by an assistant through the vagina (n = 235) and a fetal “pillow” (n = 176).
Thirteen babies (2%) died or sustained severe injury. Four babies died (two directly attributable to the impacted fetal head).
Difficulty with delivery of the fetal head and the use of dis-impaction techniques during second stage Caesarean sections are common but there is no consensus as to the best method to achieve delivery and in what order. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2640048573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211522002366</els_id><sourcerecordid>2640048573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-92c9e8c3e08025936967c2f1dc385a28a83c9c379a8b6808d51f3d015054d9673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P4zAQhi0EWkrZf4CQj1ySHdtx4nBAQhXLIiFx2b1wsRx7Uly1SbGdSv33uCrLkbnM5Xnn4yHkikHJgNW_ViWuxmXoSg6clyBKgOqEzJhqeNHUsjolMxDACs6YPCcXMa4glxDtD3IuJG9BNfWMvD5ttsYmdLTHZNb0DY2jbgp-WNKIdhwcjckskS4MRhPQDLTzIb3d0nu6DWPcok1-h3TsIoadSX4c8pSYJre_JGe9WUf8-dnn5N_vh7-LP8Xzy-PT4v65sBWoVLTctqisQFDAZSvqtm4s75mzQknDlVHCtlY0rVFdrUA5yXrhgEmQlcusmJOb49x8z_uEMemNjxbXazPgOEXN6yqrUbIRGa2OqM2nx4C93ga_MWGvGeiDVb3SR6v6YFWD0DmaY9efG6Zug-4r9F9jBu6OAOY_dx6DjtbjYNH5kAVpN_rvN3wAZqSJ0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640048573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacted fetal head during second stage Caesarean birth: A prospective observational study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wyn Jones, Nia ; Mitchell, Eleanor J. ; Wakefield, Natalie ; Knight, Marian ; Dorling, Jon ; Thornton, Jim G. ; Walker, Kate F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wyn Jones, Nia ; Mitchell, Eleanor J. ; Wakefield, Natalie ; Knight, Marian ; Dorling, Jon ; Thornton, Jim G. ; Walker, Kate F.</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the incidence of, and complication rates from, impacted fetal head at full dilatation Caesarean birth in the UK, and record what techniques were used.
Prospective observational study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS).
159 (82%) of the 194 UK hospitals with obstetric units.
All women who underwent second stage Caesarean birth in the UK between 1st March and 31st August 2019. Further information was collected on cases where a dis-impaction technique was used, or the operating surgeon experienced ‘difficulty’ in delivering the head.
Prospective observational study.
Technique(s) used, maternal and neonatal outcomes.
3,518 s stage Caesarean births reported. The surgeon used a dis-impaction technique or reported ‘difficulty’ in 564 (16%) of these. The most common dis-impaction techniques used were manual elevation of the head by an assistant through the vagina (n = 235) and a fetal “pillow” (n = 176).
Thirteen babies (2%) died or sustained severe injury. Four babies died (two directly attributable to the impacted fetal head).
Difficulty with delivery of the fetal head and the use of dis-impaction techniques during second stage Caesarean sections are common but there is no consensus as to the best method to achieve delivery and in what order.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35290876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Birth injury ; Birth trauma ; Caesarean ; Cesarean Section - adverse effects ; Cesarean Section - methods ; Female ; Fetus ; Head ; Humans ; Impacted fetal head ; Infant, Newborn ; Instrumental delivery ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Stillbirth</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2022-05, Vol.272, p.77-81</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-92c9e8c3e08025936967c2f1dc385a28a83c9c379a8b6808d51f3d015054d9673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-92c9e8c3e08025936967c2f1dc385a28a83c9c379a8b6808d51f3d015054d9673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211522002366$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wyn Jones, Nia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Eleanor J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakefield, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Marian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorling, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, Jim G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Kate F.</creatorcontrib><title>Impacted fetal head during second stage Caesarean birth: A prospective observational study</title><title>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>To determine the incidence of, and complication rates from, impacted fetal head at full dilatation Caesarean birth in the UK, and record what techniques were used.
Prospective observational study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS).
159 (82%) of the 194 UK hospitals with obstetric units.
All women who underwent second stage Caesarean birth in the UK between 1st March and 31st August 2019. Further information was collected on cases where a dis-impaction technique was used, or the operating surgeon experienced ‘difficulty’ in delivering the head.
Prospective observational study.
Technique(s) used, maternal and neonatal outcomes.
3,518 s stage Caesarean births reported. The surgeon used a dis-impaction technique or reported ‘difficulty’ in 564 (16%) of these. The most common dis-impaction techniques used were manual elevation of the head by an assistant through the vagina (n = 235) and a fetal “pillow” (n = 176).
Thirteen babies (2%) died or sustained severe injury. Four babies died (two directly attributable to the impacted fetal head).
Difficulty with delivery of the fetal head and the use of dis-impaction techniques during second stage Caesarean sections are common but there is no consensus as to the best method to achieve delivery and in what order.</description><subject>Birth injury</subject><subject>Birth trauma</subject><subject>Caesarean</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetus</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impacted fetal head</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Instrumental delivery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Stillbirth</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P4zAQhi0EWkrZf4CQj1ySHdtx4nBAQhXLIiFx2b1wsRx7Uly1SbGdSv33uCrLkbnM5Xnn4yHkikHJgNW_ViWuxmXoSg6clyBKgOqEzJhqeNHUsjolMxDACs6YPCcXMa4glxDtD3IuJG9BNfWMvD5ttsYmdLTHZNb0DY2jbgp-WNKIdhwcjckskS4MRhPQDLTzIb3d0nu6DWPcok1-h3TsIoadSX4c8pSYJre_JGe9WUf8-dnn5N_vh7-LP8Xzy-PT4v65sBWoVLTctqisQFDAZSvqtm4s75mzQknDlVHCtlY0rVFdrUA5yXrhgEmQlcusmJOb49x8z_uEMemNjxbXazPgOEXN6yqrUbIRGa2OqM2nx4C93ga_MWGvGeiDVb3SR6v6YFWD0DmaY9efG6Zug-4r9F9jBu6OAOY_dx6DjtbjYNH5kAVpN_rvN3wAZqSJ0Q</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Wyn Jones, Nia</creator><creator>Mitchell, Eleanor J.</creator><creator>Wakefield, Natalie</creator><creator>Knight, Marian</creator><creator>Dorling, Jon</creator><creator>Thornton, Jim G.</creator><creator>Walker, Kate F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Impacted fetal head during second stage Caesarean birth: A prospective observational study</title><author>Wyn Jones, Nia ; Mitchell, Eleanor J. ; Wakefield, Natalie ; Knight, Marian ; Dorling, Jon ; Thornton, Jim G. ; Walker, Kate F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-92c9e8c3e08025936967c2f1dc385a28a83c9c379a8b6808d51f3d015054d9673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Birth injury</topic><topic>Birth trauma</topic><topic>Caesarean</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetus</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impacted fetal head</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Instrumental delivery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Stillbirth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wyn Jones, Nia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Eleanor J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakefield, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Marian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorling, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, Jim G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Kate F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wyn Jones, Nia</au><au>Mitchell, Eleanor J.</au><au>Wakefield, Natalie</au><au>Knight, Marian</au><au>Dorling, Jon</au><au>Thornton, Jim G.</au><au>Walker, Kate F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacted fetal head during second stage Caesarean birth: A prospective observational study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>272</volume><spage>77</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>77-81</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>To determine the incidence of, and complication rates from, impacted fetal head at full dilatation Caesarean birth in the UK, and record what techniques were used.
Prospective observational study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS).
159 (82%) of the 194 UK hospitals with obstetric units.
All women who underwent second stage Caesarean birth in the UK between 1st March and 31st August 2019. Further information was collected on cases where a dis-impaction technique was used, or the operating surgeon experienced ‘difficulty’ in delivering the head.
Prospective observational study.
Technique(s) used, maternal and neonatal outcomes.
3,518 s stage Caesarean births reported. The surgeon used a dis-impaction technique or reported ‘difficulty’ in 564 (16%) of these. The most common dis-impaction techniques used were manual elevation of the head by an assistant through the vagina (n = 235) and a fetal “pillow” (n = 176).
Thirteen babies (2%) died or sustained severe injury. Four babies died (two directly attributable to the impacted fetal head).
Difficulty with delivery of the fetal head and the use of dis-impaction techniques during second stage Caesarean sections are common but there is no consensus as to the best method to achieve delivery and in what order.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35290876</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-2115 |
ispartof | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2022-05, Vol.272, p.77-81 |
issn | 0301-2115 1872-7654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2640048573 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Birth injury Birth trauma Caesarean Cesarean Section - adverse effects Cesarean Section - methods Female Fetus Head Humans Impacted fetal head Infant, Newborn Instrumental delivery Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications Prospective Studies Stillbirth |
title | Impacted fetal head during second stage Caesarean birth: A prospective observational study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A27%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacted%20fetal%20head%20during%20second%20stage%20Caesarean%20birth:%20A%20prospective%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Wyn%20Jones,%20Nia&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=272&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=77-81&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640048573%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640048573&rft_id=info:pmid/35290876&rft_els_id=S0301211522002366&rfr_iscdi=true |