Nickel and cobalt release from beauty tools: A field study in the German cosmetics trade
Background Relevant nickel and cobalt release from hairdressing tools has recently been evidenced. Comparable data are not available for tools used in beauty salons. Objectives Screening of beauty tools for nickel and cobalt release. Methods/Materials Three hundred eight beauty tools were tested in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contact dermatitis 2022-08, Vol.87 (2), p.162-169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 169 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | Contact dermatitis |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Symanzik, Cara Uter, Wolfgang Becker, Selina‐Marie Skudlik, Christoph John, Swen M. |
description | Background
Relevant nickel and cobalt release from hairdressing tools has recently been evidenced. Comparable data are not available for tools used in beauty salons.
Objectives
Screening of beauty tools for nickel and cobalt release.
Methods/Materials
Three hundred eight beauty tools were tested in seven beauty salons located in two North‐German states. A nickel spot test and a cobalt spot test were used to test the tools for nickel release and cobalt release, respectively.
Results
One hundred forty‐three of 308 beauty tools overall (46.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.8%‐52.2%) released nickel and 18 of 308 beauty tools overall (5.8%; 95%CI: 3.5%‐9.1%) released cobalt. Nickel release was found in 22 of 99 metal tools (22.2%; 95%CI: 14.5%‐31.7%) and 121 of 209 tools with metallic parts (57.9%; 95%CI: 50.9%‐64.7%); cobalt release was detected in 3 of 99 metal tools (3.0%; 95%CI: 0.63%‐8.6%) and 15 of 209 tools with metallic parts (7.2%; 95%CI: 4.1%‐11.6%).
Conclusions
Nickel and cobalt are emitted at allergologically relevant levels by a wide range of beauty tools (i.e., metal tools and tools with metallic parts) utilized in the German cosmetics trade. Beauty tools should thus be considered occupational sources of nickel and cobalt exposure.
One hundred forty‐three of 308 beauty tools (46.4%; 95%CI: 40.8%‐52.2%) released nickel.
Eighteen of 308 beauty tools (5.8%; 95%CI: 3.5%‐9.1%) released cobalt.
Beauty tools should be considered occupational sources of nickel and cobalt exposure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cod.14107 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2639227288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2639227288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3187-c719e1788426f7c202b3a0c50818a89e6d914b03a9417040c22e2fccea4404253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgijNeFr6ABNzoouPJpW3qTsYriG4U3JU0PcWOaTMmLTJvb3TUheDZZPPl55yfkAMGMxbn1Lh6xiSDfINMWQaQQCqyTTIFBmnCVC4mZCeEBQDLJFfbZCJSrlQh1ZQ837fmFS3VfU2Nq7QdqEeLOiBtvOtohXocVnRwzoYzek6bFm1NwzDWK9r2dHhBeo2-0338HTocWhPo4HWNe2Sr0Tbg_ve7S56uLh_nN8ndw_Xt_PwuMSJulpicFchypSTPmtxw4JXQYFJQTGlVYFYXTFYgdCFZDhIM58gbY1BLCZKnYpccr3OX3r2NGIaya4NBa3WPbgwlz0TBeR7vjfToD1240fdxu6hUkWYq5SKqk7Uy3oXgsSmXvu20X5UMys-6y1h3-VV3tIffiWPVYf0rf_qN4HQN3luLq_-TyvnDxTryAzg3hpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2689568523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nickel and cobalt release from beauty tools: A field study in the German cosmetics trade</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Symanzik, Cara ; Uter, Wolfgang ; Becker, Selina‐Marie ; Skudlik, Christoph ; John, Swen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Symanzik, Cara ; Uter, Wolfgang ; Becker, Selina‐Marie ; Skudlik, Christoph ; John, Swen M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Relevant nickel and cobalt release from hairdressing tools has recently been evidenced. Comparable data are not available for tools used in beauty salons.
Objectives
Screening of beauty tools for nickel and cobalt release.
Methods/Materials
Three hundred eight beauty tools were tested in seven beauty salons located in two North‐German states. A nickel spot test and a cobalt spot test were used to test the tools for nickel release and cobalt release, respectively.
Results
One hundred forty‐three of 308 beauty tools overall (46.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.8%‐52.2%) released nickel and 18 of 308 beauty tools overall (5.8%; 95%CI: 3.5%‐9.1%) released cobalt. Nickel release was found in 22 of 99 metal tools (22.2%; 95%CI: 14.5%‐31.7%) and 121 of 209 tools with metallic parts (57.9%; 95%CI: 50.9%‐64.7%); cobalt release was detected in 3 of 99 metal tools (3.0%; 95%CI: 0.63%‐8.6%) and 15 of 209 tools with metallic parts (7.2%; 95%CI: 4.1%‐11.6%).
Conclusions
Nickel and cobalt are emitted at allergologically relevant levels by a wide range of beauty tools (i.e., metal tools and tools with metallic parts) utilized in the German cosmetics trade. Beauty tools should thus be considered occupational sources of nickel and cobalt exposure.
One hundred forty‐three of 308 beauty tools (46.4%; 95%CI: 40.8%‐52.2%) released nickel.
Eighteen of 308 beauty tools (5.8%; 95%CI: 3.5%‐9.1%) released cobalt.
Beauty tools should be considered occupational sources of nickel and cobalt exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cod.14107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35288948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>aesthetician ; beautician ; Beauty salons ; Cobalt ; cosmetician ; Cosmetics ; Germany ; Nickel ; Occupational exposure ; spot test</subject><ispartof>Contact dermatitis, 2022-08, Vol.87 (2), p.162-169</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3187-c719e1788426f7c202b3a0c50818a89e6d914b03a9417040c22e2fccea4404253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3187-c719e1788426f7c202b3a0c50818a89e6d914b03a9417040c22e2fccea4404253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4090-6726 ; 0000-0001-5406-9458 ; 0000-0002-4498-3710 ; 0000-0002-5670-8396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcod.14107$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcod.14107$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35288948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Symanzik, Cara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uter, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Selina‐Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skudlik, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Swen M.</creatorcontrib><title>Nickel and cobalt release from beauty tools: A field study in the German cosmetics trade</title><title>Contact dermatitis</title><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><description>Background
Relevant nickel and cobalt release from hairdressing tools has recently been evidenced. Comparable data are not available for tools used in beauty salons.
Objectives
Screening of beauty tools for nickel and cobalt release.
Methods/Materials
Three hundred eight beauty tools were tested in seven beauty salons located in two North‐German states. A nickel spot test and a cobalt spot test were used to test the tools for nickel release and cobalt release, respectively.
Results
One hundred forty‐three of 308 beauty tools overall (46.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.8%‐52.2%) released nickel and 18 of 308 beauty tools overall (5.8%; 95%CI: 3.5%‐9.1%) released cobalt. Nickel release was found in 22 of 99 metal tools (22.2%; 95%CI: 14.5%‐31.7%) and 121 of 209 tools with metallic parts (57.9%; 95%CI: 50.9%‐64.7%); cobalt release was detected in 3 of 99 metal tools (3.0%; 95%CI: 0.63%‐8.6%) and 15 of 209 tools with metallic parts (7.2%; 95%CI: 4.1%‐11.6%).
Conclusions
Nickel and cobalt are emitted at allergologically relevant levels by a wide range of beauty tools (i.e., metal tools and tools with metallic parts) utilized in the German cosmetics trade. Beauty tools should thus be considered occupational sources of nickel and cobalt exposure.
One hundred forty‐three of 308 beauty tools (46.4%; 95%CI: 40.8%‐52.2%) released nickel.
Eighteen of 308 beauty tools (5.8%; 95%CI: 3.5%‐9.1%) released cobalt.
Beauty tools should be considered occupational sources of nickel and cobalt exposure.</description><subject>aesthetician</subject><subject>beautician</subject><subject>Beauty salons</subject><subject>Cobalt</subject><subject>cosmetician</subject><subject>Cosmetics</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>spot test</subject><issn>0105-1873</issn><issn>1600-0536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgijNeFr6ABNzoouPJpW3qTsYriG4U3JU0PcWOaTMmLTJvb3TUheDZZPPl55yfkAMGMxbn1Lh6xiSDfINMWQaQQCqyTTIFBmnCVC4mZCeEBQDLJFfbZCJSrlQh1ZQ837fmFS3VfU2Nq7QdqEeLOiBtvOtohXocVnRwzoYzek6bFm1NwzDWK9r2dHhBeo2-0338HTocWhPo4HWNe2Sr0Tbg_ve7S56uLh_nN8ndw_Xt_PwuMSJulpicFchypSTPmtxw4JXQYFJQTGlVYFYXTFYgdCFZDhIM58gbY1BLCZKnYpccr3OX3r2NGIaya4NBa3WPbgwlz0TBeR7vjfToD1240fdxu6hUkWYq5SKqk7Uy3oXgsSmXvu20X5UMys-6y1h3-VV3tIffiWPVYf0rf_qN4HQN3luLq_-TyvnDxTryAzg3hpA</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Symanzik, Cara</creator><creator>Uter, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Becker, Selina‐Marie</creator><creator>Skudlik, Christoph</creator><creator>John, Swen M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4090-6726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5406-9458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-3710</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-8396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Nickel and cobalt release from beauty tools: A field study in the German cosmetics trade</title><author>Symanzik, Cara ; Uter, Wolfgang ; Becker, Selina‐Marie ; Skudlik, Christoph ; John, Swen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3187-c719e1788426f7c202b3a0c50818a89e6d914b03a9417040c22e2fccea4404253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>aesthetician</topic><topic>beautician</topic><topic>Beauty salons</topic><topic>Cobalt</topic><topic>cosmetician</topic><topic>Cosmetics</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>spot test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Symanzik, Cara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uter, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Selina‐Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skudlik, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Swen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Symanzik, Cara</au><au>Uter, Wolfgang</au><au>Becker, Selina‐Marie</au><au>Skudlik, Christoph</au><au>John, Swen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nickel and cobalt release from beauty tools: A field study in the German cosmetics trade</atitle><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>162-169</pages><issn>0105-1873</issn><eissn>1600-0536</eissn><abstract>Background
Relevant nickel and cobalt release from hairdressing tools has recently been evidenced. Comparable data are not available for tools used in beauty salons.
Objectives
Screening of beauty tools for nickel and cobalt release.
Methods/Materials
Three hundred eight beauty tools were tested in seven beauty salons located in two North‐German states. A nickel spot test and a cobalt spot test were used to test the tools for nickel release and cobalt release, respectively.
Results
One hundred forty‐three of 308 beauty tools overall (46.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.8%‐52.2%) released nickel and 18 of 308 beauty tools overall (5.8%; 95%CI: 3.5%‐9.1%) released cobalt. Nickel release was found in 22 of 99 metal tools (22.2%; 95%CI: 14.5%‐31.7%) and 121 of 209 tools with metallic parts (57.9%; 95%CI: 50.9%‐64.7%); cobalt release was detected in 3 of 99 metal tools (3.0%; 95%CI: 0.63%‐8.6%) and 15 of 209 tools with metallic parts (7.2%; 95%CI: 4.1%‐11.6%).
Conclusions
Nickel and cobalt are emitted at allergologically relevant levels by a wide range of beauty tools (i.e., metal tools and tools with metallic parts) utilized in the German cosmetics trade. Beauty tools should thus be considered occupational sources of nickel and cobalt exposure.
One hundred forty‐three of 308 beauty tools (46.4%; 95%CI: 40.8%‐52.2%) released nickel.
Eighteen of 308 beauty tools (5.8%; 95%CI: 3.5%‐9.1%) released cobalt.
Beauty tools should be considered occupational sources of nickel and cobalt exposure.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35288948</pmid><doi>10.1111/cod.14107</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4090-6726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5406-9458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-3710</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-8396</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0105-1873 |
ispartof | Contact dermatitis, 2022-08, Vol.87 (2), p.162-169 |
issn | 0105-1873 1600-0536 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2639227288 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | aesthetician beautician Beauty salons Cobalt cosmetician Cosmetics Germany Nickel Occupational exposure spot test |
title | Nickel and cobalt release from beauty tools: A field study in the German cosmetics trade |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A24%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nickel%20and%20cobalt%20release%20from%20beauty%20tools:%20A%20field%20study%20in%20the%20German%20cosmetics%20trade&rft.jtitle=Contact%20dermatitis&rft.au=Symanzik,%20Cara&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=162-169&rft.issn=0105-1873&rft.eissn=1600-0536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cod.14107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2639227288%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2689568523&rft_id=info:pmid/35288948&rfr_iscdi=true |