Surgical treatment of fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex: effect of fixation on repositioning and stability. A systematic review
Management of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures can be challenging. Consequently, there is a difference in treatment amongst clinicians. In the literature it remains unclear if the number of fixation points affects the quality of the anatomical reduction, stability through time, and potent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2022-05, Vol.60 (4), p.397-411 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 411 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 397 |
container_title | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Raghoebar, Iva I. Rozema, Frederik R. de Lange, Jan Dubois, Leander |
description | Management of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures can be challenging. Consequently, there is a difference in treatment amongst clinicians. In the literature it remains unclear if the number of fixation points affects the quality of the anatomical reduction, stability through time, and potential complications. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the outcome of no fixation, one-point fixation and multiple-point fixation of ZMC fractures. MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify eligible studies. After screening 925 articles, 17 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Based on this systematic review no clear conclusions can be drawn on how stability, repositioning, and postoperative complications are affected by the number of fixation points. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that the advantage of multiple approaches is direct visualisation, and the downside is potentially approach-related complications. This review suggests that intraoperatively assisted cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can help improve the quality of the repositioning and by minimising the number of fixation points, the number of postoperative complications could be further reduced. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2638727458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266435621002540</els_id><sourcerecordid>2638727458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c0416c6fea28f117c9f24c0f080d9613bc7e24e1f052de50956356e0c6f122493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVJabZpnyAQdMzF7kiWZTuQQwhtWgj0kPQstPJoq8W2NpLc7uYR-tTRZpMcC0LSwPfP8M9PyCmDkgGTX9blcu3HWHLgrISmBJDvyILVFS9YJ-CILIBLWYiqlsfkY4xrAKg5qz-Q46rmDW9luyD_7uawckYPNAXUacQpUW-pDdqkOWDcF-k30sfdyo86OZPvrRsGHXY0_zcDbi8oWovmoHPbDPmJ5hNw46PbV25aUT31NCa9dINLu5Je0biLCZ9bZvKPw7-fyHurh4ifX94T8uvb1_vr78Xtz5sf11e3hREgUmFAMGmkRc1by1hjOsuFAQst9J1k1dI0yAUym832WENXy7wBhCxhnIuuOiHnh76b4B9mjEmNLhrMnib0c1RcVm3DG1G3Ga0OqAk-xoBWbYIbs3fFQO1DUGv1HILah6CgUTmErDp7GTAvR-zfNK9bz8DlAcBsM1sPKhqHk8HehbxI1Xv33wFPllicOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638727458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical treatment of fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex: effect of fixation on repositioning and stability. A systematic review</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Raghoebar, Iva I. ; Rozema, Frederik R. ; de Lange, Jan ; Dubois, Leander</creator><creatorcontrib>Raghoebar, Iva I. ; Rozema, Frederik R. ; de Lange, Jan ; Dubois, Leander</creatorcontrib><description>Management of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures can be challenging. Consequently, there is a difference in treatment amongst clinicians. In the literature it remains unclear if the number of fixation points affects the quality of the anatomical reduction, stability through time, and potential complications. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the outcome of no fixation, one-point fixation and multiple-point fixation of ZMC fractures. MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify eligible studies. After screening 925 articles, 17 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Based on this systematic review no clear conclusions can be drawn on how stability, repositioning, and postoperative complications are affected by the number of fixation points. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that the advantage of multiple approaches is direct visualisation, and the downside is potentially approach-related complications. This review suggests that intraoperatively assisted cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can help improve the quality of the repositioning and by minimising the number of fixation points, the number of postoperative complications could be further reduced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35272868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Fixation ; Fractures ; Open reduction ; Stability ; Zygomaticomaxillary complex</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2022-05, Vol.60 (4), p.397-411</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c0416c6fea28f117c9f24c0f080d9613bc7e24e1f052de50956356e0c6f122493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c0416c6fea28f117c9f24c0f080d9613bc7e24e1f052de50956356e0c6f122493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272868$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raghoebar, Iva I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozema, Frederik R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, Leander</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical treatment of fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex: effect of fixation on repositioning and stability. A systematic review</title><title>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Management of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures can be challenging. Consequently, there is a difference in treatment amongst clinicians. In the literature it remains unclear if the number of fixation points affects the quality of the anatomical reduction, stability through time, and potential complications. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the outcome of no fixation, one-point fixation and multiple-point fixation of ZMC fractures. MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify eligible studies. After screening 925 articles, 17 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Based on this systematic review no clear conclusions can be drawn on how stability, repositioning, and postoperative complications are affected by the number of fixation points. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that the advantage of multiple approaches is direct visualisation, and the downside is potentially approach-related complications. This review suggests that intraoperatively assisted cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can help improve the quality of the repositioning and by minimising the number of fixation points, the number of postoperative complications could be further reduced.</description><subject>Fixation</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Open reduction</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Zygomaticomaxillary complex</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVJabZpnyAQdMzF7kiWZTuQQwhtWgj0kPQstPJoq8W2NpLc7uYR-tTRZpMcC0LSwPfP8M9PyCmDkgGTX9blcu3HWHLgrISmBJDvyILVFS9YJ-CILIBLWYiqlsfkY4xrAKg5qz-Q46rmDW9luyD_7uawckYPNAXUacQpUW-pDdqkOWDcF-k30sfdyo86OZPvrRsGHXY0_zcDbi8oWovmoHPbDPmJ5hNw46PbV25aUT31NCa9dINLu5Je0biLCZ9bZvKPw7-fyHurh4ifX94T8uvb1_vr78Xtz5sf11e3hREgUmFAMGmkRc1by1hjOsuFAQst9J1k1dI0yAUym832WENXy7wBhCxhnIuuOiHnh76b4B9mjEmNLhrMnib0c1RcVm3DG1G3Ga0OqAk-xoBWbYIbs3fFQO1DUGv1HILah6CgUTmErDp7GTAvR-zfNK9bz8DlAcBsM1sPKhqHk8HehbxI1Xv33wFPllicOw</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Raghoebar, Iva I.</creator><creator>Rozema, Frederik R.</creator><creator>de Lange, Jan</creator><creator>Dubois, Leander</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Surgical treatment of fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex: effect of fixation on repositioning and stability. A systematic review</title><author>Raghoebar, Iva I. ; Rozema, Frederik R. ; de Lange, Jan ; Dubois, Leander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c0416c6fea28f117c9f24c0f080d9613bc7e24e1f052de50956356e0c6f122493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Fixation</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Open reduction</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Zygomaticomaxillary complex</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raghoebar, Iva I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozema, Frederik R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, Leander</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raghoebar, Iva I.</au><au>Rozema, Frederik R.</au><au>de Lange, Jan</au><au>Dubois, Leander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical treatment of fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex: effect of fixation on repositioning and stability. A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>397-411</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>Management of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures can be challenging. Consequently, there is a difference in treatment amongst clinicians. In the literature it remains unclear if the number of fixation points affects the quality of the anatomical reduction, stability through time, and potential complications. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the outcome of no fixation, one-point fixation and multiple-point fixation of ZMC fractures. MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify eligible studies. After screening 925 articles, 17 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Based on this systematic review no clear conclusions can be drawn on how stability, repositioning, and postoperative complications are affected by the number of fixation points. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that the advantage of multiple approaches is direct visualisation, and the downside is potentially approach-related complications. This review suggests that intraoperatively assisted cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can help improve the quality of the repositioning and by minimising the number of fixation points, the number of postoperative complications could be further reduced.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35272868</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.006</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4356 |
ispartof | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2022-05, Vol.60 (4), p.397-411 |
issn | 0266-4356 1532-1940 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2638727458 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Fixation Fractures Open reduction Stability Zygomaticomaxillary complex |
title | Surgical treatment of fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex: effect of fixation on repositioning and stability. A systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A44%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20treatment%20of%20fractures%20of%20the%20zygomaticomaxillary%20complex:%20effect%20of%20fixation%20on%20repositioning%20and%20stability.%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Raghoebar,%20Iva%20I.&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=397-411&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638727458%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638727458&rft_id=info:pmid/35272868&rft_els_id=S0266435621002540&rfr_iscdi=true |