Extracorporeal Life-support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Multicenter Study

Despite potential clinical roles of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared to that of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), use of ECLS for OHCA is not strongly endorsed by current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this study is to invest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Shock (Augusta, Ga.) Ga.), 2022-05, Vol.57 (5), p.680-686
Hauptverfasser: Jeong, Daun, Lee, Gun Tak, Park, Jong Eun, Chang, Hansol, Kim, Taerim, Cha, Won Chul, Yoon, Hee, Hwang, Sung Yeon, Shin, Tae Gun, Sim, Min Sub, Jo, IkJoon, Lee, Seung-Hwa, Shin, Sang Do, Choi, Jin-Ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 686
container_issue 5
container_start_page 680
container_title Shock (Augusta, Ga.)
container_volume 57
creator Jeong, Daun
Lee, Gun Tak
Park, Jong Eun
Chang, Hansol
Kim, Taerim
Cha, Won Chul
Yoon, Hee
Hwang, Sung Yeon
Shin, Tae Gun
Sim, Min Sub
Jo, IkJoon
Lee, Seung-Hwa
Shin, Sang Do
Choi, Jin-Ho
description Despite potential clinical roles of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared to that of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), use of ECLS for OHCA is not strongly endorsed by current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical roles of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) compared with that of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. The outcomes of OHCA between 2015 and 2020, enrolled in the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium (KoCARC), a multicenter OHCA patient registry including 65 participating hospitals throughout the Republic of Korea (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03222999). Differences in clinical features were adjusted by matching the propensity for ECLS. The primary outcome was 30-day neurologically favorable survival with cerebral performance category of 1 or 2. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to compare outcomes between groups. Of 12,006 patients included, ECLS was applied to 272 patients (2.2%). The frequency of neurologically favorable survival was higher in the ECLS group than the CCPR group (RMST difference, 5.5 days [95% CI, 4.1-7.0 days], P 
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001924
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2638720671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2638720671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-1decefe4a2a3ba3ec861548d51d4f98c11faf7b973d4953078e38471a6b060173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkElPwzAQhS0EomX5BwjlyMXFW-KEW1WVRRQ4AFcixxmrgbQOtqPCv8dVyyJ8GY_05s2bD6ETSkaUFPL88fp2RP48WjCxg4Y0FQSTlIrd-CeSY8YZG6AD718JYYIXch8NeMpkFNIhepl-BKe0dZ11oNpk1hjAvu9iGxJjXfLQB2wNnlvfNSEKJsrVjdLJ2Dnw4SIZJ_cqNHa5ampI7vo2NBqWAVzyGPr68wjtGdV6ON7WQ_R8OX2aXOPZw9XNZDzDOkYpMK1BgwGhmOKV4qDzLMbL65TWwhS5ptQoI6tC8loUKScyB54LSVVWkYxQyQ_R2ca3c_a9j8HKReM1tK1agu19yTKeS0YySaNUbKTaWe8dmLJzzUK5z5KSck22jGTL_2Tj2Ol2Q18toP4Z-kb567uybbzfv7X9Clw5j1TDfO0XTXKGGWGMpLHFa-uCfwE-xYNX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638720671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extracorporeal Life-support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Multicenter Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Jeong, Daun ; Lee, Gun Tak ; Park, Jong Eun ; Chang, Hansol ; Kim, Taerim ; Cha, Won Chul ; Yoon, Hee ; Hwang, Sung Yeon ; Shin, Tae Gun ; Sim, Min Sub ; Jo, IkJoon ; Lee, Seung-Hwa ; Shin, Sang Do ; Choi, Jin-Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Daun ; Lee, Gun Tak ; Park, Jong Eun ; Chang, Hansol ; Kim, Taerim ; Cha, Won Chul ; Yoon, Hee ; Hwang, Sung Yeon ; Shin, Tae Gun ; Sim, Min Sub ; Jo, IkJoon ; Lee, Seung-Hwa ; Shin, Sang Do ; Choi, Jin-Ho</creatorcontrib><description>Despite potential clinical roles of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared to that of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), use of ECLS for OHCA is not strongly endorsed by current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical roles of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) compared with that of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. The outcomes of OHCA between 2015 and 2020, enrolled in the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium (KoCARC), a multicenter OHCA patient registry including 65 participating hospitals throughout the Republic of Korea (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03222999). Differences in clinical features were adjusted by matching the propensity for ECLS. The primary outcome was 30-day neurologically favorable survival with cerebral performance category of 1 or 2. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to compare outcomes between groups. Of 12,006 patients included, ECLS was applied to 272 patients (2.2%). The frequency of neurologically favorable survival was higher in the ECLS group than the CCPR group (RMST difference, 5.5 days [95% CI, 4.1-7.0 days], P &lt; 0.001). In propensity score-matched 271 pairs, the clinical outcome of ECLS and CCPR did not differ to a statistically significant extent (RMST difference, 0.4 days [95% CI -1.6 to 2.5 days], P = 0.67). Subgroup analyses revealed that the clinical roles of ECLS was evident in patients with nonshockable rhythm or CPR time ≥20 min (RMST difference, 2.7 days [95% CI 0.5-4.8 days], P = 0.015), but not in patients without these features (RMST difference, -3.7 days [95% CI -7.6 to 0.2 days], P = 0.07). In this real-world data analysis, ECLS compared to CCPR did not result in better overall clinical outcomes of OHCA. The clinical efficacy of ECLS may be limited to a subgroup of high-risk patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-0514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001924</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35271541</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Humans ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2022-05, Vol.57 (5), p.680-686</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 by the Shock Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-1decefe4a2a3ba3ec861548d51d4f98c11faf7b973d4953078e38471a6b060173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-1decefe4a2a3ba3ec861548d51d4f98c11faf7b973d4953078e38471a6b060173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00024382-202205000-00009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4595,27901,27902,65206</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271541$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Daun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Gun Tak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jong Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hansol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Taerim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Won Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Sung Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Tae Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Min Sub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jo, IkJoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sang Do</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin-Ho</creatorcontrib><title>Extracorporeal Life-support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Multicenter Study</title><title>Shock (Augusta, Ga.)</title><addtitle>Shock</addtitle><description>Despite potential clinical roles of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared to that of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), use of ECLS for OHCA is not strongly endorsed by current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical roles of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) compared with that of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. The outcomes of OHCA between 2015 and 2020, enrolled in the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium (KoCARC), a multicenter OHCA patient registry including 65 participating hospitals throughout the Republic of Korea (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03222999). Differences in clinical features were adjusted by matching the propensity for ECLS. The primary outcome was 30-day neurologically favorable survival with cerebral performance category of 1 or 2. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to compare outcomes between groups. Of 12,006 patients included, ECLS was applied to 272 patients (2.2%). The frequency of neurologically favorable survival was higher in the ECLS group than the CCPR group (RMST difference, 5.5 days [95% CI, 4.1-7.0 days], P &lt; 0.001). In propensity score-matched 271 pairs, the clinical outcome of ECLS and CCPR did not differ to a statistically significant extent (RMST difference, 0.4 days [95% CI -1.6 to 2.5 days], P = 0.67). Subgroup analyses revealed that the clinical roles of ECLS was evident in patients with nonshockable rhythm or CPR time ≥20 min (RMST difference, 2.7 days [95% CI 0.5-4.8 days], P = 0.015), but not in patients without these features (RMST difference, -3.7 days [95% CI -7.6 to 0.2 days], P = 0.07). In this real-world data analysis, ECLS compared to CCPR did not result in better overall clinical outcomes of OHCA. The clinical efficacy of ECLS may be limited to a subgroup of high-risk patients.</description><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>1073-2322</issn><issn>1540-0514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkElPwzAQhS0EomX5BwjlyMXFW-KEW1WVRRQ4AFcixxmrgbQOtqPCv8dVyyJ8GY_05s2bD6ETSkaUFPL88fp2RP48WjCxg4Y0FQSTlIrd-CeSY8YZG6AD718JYYIXch8NeMpkFNIhepl-BKe0dZ11oNpk1hjAvu9iGxJjXfLQB2wNnlvfNSEKJsrVjdLJ2Dnw4SIZJ_cqNHa5ampI7vo2NBqWAVzyGPr68wjtGdV6ON7WQ_R8OX2aXOPZw9XNZDzDOkYpMK1BgwGhmOKV4qDzLMbL65TWwhS5ptQoI6tC8loUKScyB54LSVVWkYxQyQ_R2ca3c_a9j8HKReM1tK1agu19yTKeS0YySaNUbKTaWe8dmLJzzUK5z5KSck22jGTL_2Tj2Ol2Q18toP4Z-kb567uybbzfv7X9Clw5j1TDfO0XTXKGGWGMpLHFa-uCfwE-xYNX</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Jeong, Daun</creator><creator>Lee, Gun Tak</creator><creator>Park, Jong Eun</creator><creator>Chang, Hansol</creator><creator>Kim, Taerim</creator><creator>Cha, Won Chul</creator><creator>Yoon, Hee</creator><creator>Hwang, Sung Yeon</creator><creator>Shin, Tae Gun</creator><creator>Sim, Min Sub</creator><creator>Jo, IkJoon</creator><creator>Lee, Seung-Hwa</creator><creator>Shin, Sang Do</creator><creator>Choi, Jin-Ho</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Extracorporeal Life-support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Multicenter Study</title><author>Jeong, Daun ; Lee, Gun Tak ; Park, Jong Eun ; Chang, Hansol ; Kim, Taerim ; Cha, Won Chul ; Yoon, Hee ; Hwang, Sung Yeon ; Shin, Tae Gun ; Sim, Min Sub ; Jo, IkJoon ; Lee, Seung-Hwa ; Shin, Sang Do ; Choi, Jin-Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-1decefe4a2a3ba3ec861548d51d4f98c11faf7b973d4953078e38471a6b060173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Daun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Gun Tak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jong Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hansol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Taerim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Won Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Sung Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Tae Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Min Sub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jo, IkJoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sang Do</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin-Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Shock (Augusta, Ga.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeong, Daun</au><au>Lee, Gun Tak</au><au>Park, Jong Eun</au><au>Chang, Hansol</au><au>Kim, Taerim</au><au>Cha, Won Chul</au><au>Yoon, Hee</au><au>Hwang, Sung Yeon</au><au>Shin, Tae Gun</au><au>Sim, Min Sub</au><au>Jo, IkJoon</au><au>Lee, Seung-Hwa</au><au>Shin, Sang Do</au><au>Choi, Jin-Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extracorporeal Life-support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Multicenter Study</atitle><jtitle>Shock (Augusta, Ga.)</jtitle><addtitle>Shock</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>680</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>680-686</pages><issn>1073-2322</issn><eissn>1540-0514</eissn><abstract>Despite potential clinical roles of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared to that of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), use of ECLS for OHCA is not strongly endorsed by current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical roles of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) compared with that of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. The outcomes of OHCA between 2015 and 2020, enrolled in the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium (KoCARC), a multicenter OHCA patient registry including 65 participating hospitals throughout the Republic of Korea (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03222999). Differences in clinical features were adjusted by matching the propensity for ECLS. The primary outcome was 30-day neurologically favorable survival with cerebral performance category of 1 or 2. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to compare outcomes between groups. Of 12,006 patients included, ECLS was applied to 272 patients (2.2%). The frequency of neurologically favorable survival was higher in the ECLS group than the CCPR group (RMST difference, 5.5 days [95% CI, 4.1-7.0 days], P &lt; 0.001). In propensity score-matched 271 pairs, the clinical outcome of ECLS and CCPR did not differ to a statistically significant extent (RMST difference, 0.4 days [95% CI -1.6 to 2.5 days], P = 0.67). Subgroup analyses revealed that the clinical roles of ECLS was evident in patients with nonshockable rhythm or CPR time ≥20 min (RMST difference, 2.7 days [95% CI 0.5-4.8 days], P = 0.015), but not in patients without these features (RMST difference, -3.7 days [95% CI -7.6 to 0.2 days], P = 0.07). In this real-world data analysis, ECLS compared to CCPR did not result in better overall clinical outcomes of OHCA. The clinical efficacy of ECLS may be limited to a subgroup of high-risk patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>35271541</pmid><doi>10.1097/SHK.0000000000001924</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1073-2322
ispartof Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2022-05, Vol.57 (5), p.680-686
issn 1073-2322
1540-0514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2638720671
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Humans
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
title Extracorporeal Life-support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Multicenter Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A57%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extracorporeal%20Life-support%20for%20Out-of-hospital%20Cardiac%20Arrest:%20A%20Nationwide%20Multicenter%20Study&rft.jtitle=Shock%20(Augusta,%20Ga.)&rft.au=Jeong,%20Daun&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=680&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=680-686&rft.issn=1073-2322&rft.eissn=1540-0514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001924&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638720671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638720671&rft_id=info:pmid/35271541&rfr_iscdi=true