A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan
Aim The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions. Methods This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2022-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1061-1075 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1075 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1061 |
container_title | The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Takae, Seido Kato, Keiichi Watanabe, Chie Nara, Kazuko Koizumi, Tomoe Kawai, Kiyotaka Ota, Kuniaki Yumura, Yasushi Yabuuchi, Akiko Kuwahara, Akira Furui, Tatsuro Takai, Yasushi Irahara, Minoru Suzuki, Nao |
description | Aim
The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions.
Methods
This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016.
Results
Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40–41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44–45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified.
Conclusions
Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jog.15199 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2638714601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2638714601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-b780b9d1247c3af65ded469fece0fefe3ba3c87d8fbe7d6b5a76bacedc696d473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFKwzAYB_AgipvTgy8gBS966Ja0adIex9DpGOyieCxp-mXr6NqapJPefASf0Scxc9ODYC7JF375E_4IXRI8JG6N1vVySCKSJEeoTyjlPuYRO3bnkBI_xpz10Jkxa4wJT0h8inphFHBKMemjl7HXaCFtIUXpmVZvofNq5SnQtigL232-fzQaDOitsEVdeVaDsBuorPEKN63AM1Zo2zZesxIGdpcz0YjqHJ0oURq4OOwD9Hx_9zR58OeL6eNkPPclpWHiZzzGWZKTgHIZCsWiHHLKEgUSsAIFYSZCGfM8VhnwnGWR4CwTEnLJEpZTHg7QzT630fVrC8amm8JIKEtRQd2aNGBhzAllmDh6_Yeu61ZX7ndORVESBQHdqdu9kro2RoNKG11shO5SgtNd2-7VMv1u29mrQ2KbbSD_lT_1OjDag7eihO7_pHS2mO4jvwDnmYu0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655952241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Takae, Seido ; Kato, Keiichi ; Watanabe, Chie ; Nara, Kazuko ; Koizumi, Tomoe ; Kawai, Kiyotaka ; Ota, Kuniaki ; Yumura, Yasushi ; Yabuuchi, Akiko ; Kuwahara, Akira ; Furui, Tatsuro ; Takai, Yasushi ; Irahara, Minoru ; Suzuki, Nao</creator><creatorcontrib>Takae, Seido ; Kato, Keiichi ; Watanabe, Chie ; Nara, Kazuko ; Koizumi, Tomoe ; Kawai, Kiyotaka ; Ota, Kuniaki ; Yumura, Yasushi ; Yabuuchi, Akiko ; Kuwahara, Akira ; Furui, Tatsuro ; Takai, Yasushi ; Irahara, Minoru ; Suzuki, Nao</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions.
Methods
This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016.
Results
Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40–41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44–45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified.
Conclusions
Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-8076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1447-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jog.15199</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35274401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; cancer survivor ; Cryopreservation ; Female ; Fertility ; Fertility Preservation ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Japan ; Obstetrics ; oncofertility ; oocyte cryopreservation ; Oocytes ; Oocytes - physiology ; ovarian tissue cryopreservation ; Ovaries ; Patients ; Pregnancy ; Reproductive technologies ; Reproductive technology ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1061-1075</ispartof><rights>2022 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><rights>2022 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-b780b9d1247c3af65ded469fece0fefe3ba3c87d8fbe7d6b5a76bacedc696d473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-b780b9d1247c3af65ded469fece0fefe3ba3c87d8fbe7d6b5a76bacedc696d473</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2332-5671 ; 0000-0001-5009-3207 ; 0000-0003-4855-219X ; 0000-0002-3872-8481 ; 0000-0003-0909-478X ; 0000-0002-0783-0758 ; 0000-0003-3984-975X ; 0000-0001-8890-7683 ; 0000-0001-6807-0046 ; 0000-0003-4160-310X ; 0000-0002-5905-0737 ; 0000-0002-7440-8127</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjog.15199$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjog.15199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35274401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takae, Seido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Chie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nara, Kazuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Tomoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawai, Kiyotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yumura, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yabuuchi, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwahara, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furui, Tatsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irahara, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Nao</creatorcontrib><title>A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan</title><title>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Res</addtitle><description>Aim
The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions.
Methods
This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016.
Results
Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40–41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44–45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified.
Conclusions
Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>cancer survivor</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>oncofertility</subject><subject>oocyte cryopreservation</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Oocytes - physiology</subject><subject>ovarian tissue cryopreservation</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Reproductive technology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1341-8076</issn><issn>1447-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MFKwzAYB_AgipvTgy8gBS966Ja0adIex9DpGOyieCxp-mXr6NqapJPefASf0Scxc9ODYC7JF375E_4IXRI8JG6N1vVySCKSJEeoTyjlPuYRO3bnkBI_xpz10Jkxa4wJT0h8inphFHBKMemjl7HXaCFtIUXpmVZvofNq5SnQtigL232-fzQaDOitsEVdeVaDsBuorPEKN63AM1Zo2zZesxIGdpcz0YjqHJ0oURq4OOwD9Hx_9zR58OeL6eNkPPclpWHiZzzGWZKTgHIZCsWiHHLKEgUSsAIFYSZCGfM8VhnwnGWR4CwTEnLJEpZTHg7QzT630fVrC8amm8JIKEtRQd2aNGBhzAllmDh6_Yeu61ZX7ndORVESBQHdqdu9kro2RoNKG11shO5SgtNd2-7VMv1u29mrQ2KbbSD_lT_1OjDag7eihO7_pHS2mO4jvwDnmYu0</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Takae, Seido</creator><creator>Kato, Keiichi</creator><creator>Watanabe, Chie</creator><creator>Nara, Kazuko</creator><creator>Koizumi, Tomoe</creator><creator>Kawai, Kiyotaka</creator><creator>Ota, Kuniaki</creator><creator>Yumura, Yasushi</creator><creator>Yabuuchi, Akiko</creator><creator>Kuwahara, Akira</creator><creator>Furui, Tatsuro</creator><creator>Takai, Yasushi</creator><creator>Irahara, Minoru</creator><creator>Suzuki, Nao</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2332-5671</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5009-3207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-8481</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0909-478X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-0758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-975X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-7683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-0046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-310X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5905-0737</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-8127</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan</title><author>Takae, Seido ; Kato, Keiichi ; Watanabe, Chie ; Nara, Kazuko ; Koizumi, Tomoe ; Kawai, Kiyotaka ; Ota, Kuniaki ; Yumura, Yasushi ; Yabuuchi, Akiko ; Kuwahara, Akira ; Furui, Tatsuro ; Takai, Yasushi ; Irahara, Minoru ; Suzuki, Nao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-b780b9d1247c3af65ded469fece0fefe3ba3c87d8fbe7d6b5a76bacedc696d473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>cancer survivor</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>oncofertility</topic><topic>oocyte cryopreservation</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Oocytes - physiology</topic><topic>ovarian tissue cryopreservation</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Reproductive technology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takae, Seido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Chie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nara, Kazuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Tomoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawai, Kiyotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yumura, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yabuuchi, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwahara, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furui, Tatsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irahara, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Nao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takae, Seido</au><au>Kato, Keiichi</au><au>Watanabe, Chie</au><au>Nara, Kazuko</au><au>Koizumi, Tomoe</au><au>Kawai, Kiyotaka</au><au>Ota, Kuniaki</au><au>Yumura, Yasushi</au><au>Yabuuchi, Akiko</au><au>Kuwahara, Akira</au><au>Furui, Tatsuro</au><au>Takai, Yasushi</au><au>Irahara, Minoru</au><au>Suzuki, Nao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan</atitle><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Res</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1061</spage><epage>1075</epage><pages>1061-1075</pages><issn>1341-8076</issn><eissn>1447-0756</eissn><abstract>Aim
The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions.
Methods
This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016.
Results
Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40–41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44–45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified.
Conclusions
Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>35274401</pmid><doi>10.1111/jog.15199</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2332-5671</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5009-3207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-8481</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0909-478X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-0758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-975X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-7683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-0046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-310X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5905-0737</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-8127</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1341-8076 |
ispartof | The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1061-1075 |
issn | 1341-8076 1447-0756 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2638714601 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Breast cancer cancer survivor Cryopreservation Female Fertility Fertility Preservation Gynecology Humans Japan Obstetrics oncofertility oocyte cryopreservation Oocytes Oocytes - physiology ovarian tissue cryopreservation Ovaries Patients Pregnancy Reproductive technologies Reproductive technology Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T05%3A26%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20practical%20survey%20of%20fertility%E2%80%90preservation%20treatments%20in%20the%20startup%20phase%20in%20Japan&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology%20research&rft.au=Takae,%20Seido&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1061&rft.epage=1075&rft.pages=1061-1075&rft.issn=1341-8076&rft.eissn=1447-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jog.15199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638714601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655952241&rft_id=info:pmid/35274401&rfr_iscdi=true |