A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan

Aim The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions. Methods This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2022-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1061-1075
Hauptverfasser: Takae, Seido, Kato, Keiichi, Watanabe, Chie, Nara, Kazuko, Koizumi, Tomoe, Kawai, Kiyotaka, Ota, Kuniaki, Yumura, Yasushi, Yabuuchi, Akiko, Kuwahara, Akira, Furui, Tatsuro, Takai, Yasushi, Irahara, Minoru, Suzuki, Nao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1075
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1061
container_title The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
container_volume 48
creator Takae, Seido
Kato, Keiichi
Watanabe, Chie
Nara, Kazuko
Koizumi, Tomoe
Kawai, Kiyotaka
Ota, Kuniaki
Yumura, Yasushi
Yabuuchi, Akiko
Kuwahara, Akira
Furui, Tatsuro
Takai, Yasushi
Irahara, Minoru
Suzuki, Nao
description Aim The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions. Methods This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016. Results Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40–41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44–45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified. Conclusions Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jog.15199
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2638714601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2638714601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-b780b9d1247c3af65ded469fece0fefe3ba3c87d8fbe7d6b5a76bacedc696d473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFKwzAYB_AgipvTgy8gBS966Ja0adIex9DpGOyieCxp-mXr6NqapJPefASf0Scxc9ODYC7JF375E_4IXRI8JG6N1vVySCKSJEeoTyjlPuYRO3bnkBI_xpz10Jkxa4wJT0h8inphFHBKMemjl7HXaCFtIUXpmVZvofNq5SnQtigL232-fzQaDOitsEVdeVaDsBuorPEKN63AM1Zo2zZesxIGdpcz0YjqHJ0oURq4OOwD9Hx_9zR58OeL6eNkPPclpWHiZzzGWZKTgHIZCsWiHHLKEgUSsAIFYSZCGfM8VhnwnGWR4CwTEnLJEpZTHg7QzT630fVrC8amm8JIKEtRQd2aNGBhzAllmDh6_Yeu61ZX7ndORVESBQHdqdu9kro2RoNKG11shO5SgtNd2-7VMv1u29mrQ2KbbSD_lT_1OjDag7eihO7_pHS2mO4jvwDnmYu0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655952241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Takae, Seido ; Kato, Keiichi ; Watanabe, Chie ; Nara, Kazuko ; Koizumi, Tomoe ; Kawai, Kiyotaka ; Ota, Kuniaki ; Yumura, Yasushi ; Yabuuchi, Akiko ; Kuwahara, Akira ; Furui, Tatsuro ; Takai, Yasushi ; Irahara, Minoru ; Suzuki, Nao</creator><creatorcontrib>Takae, Seido ; Kato, Keiichi ; Watanabe, Chie ; Nara, Kazuko ; Koizumi, Tomoe ; Kawai, Kiyotaka ; Ota, Kuniaki ; Yumura, Yasushi ; Yabuuchi, Akiko ; Kuwahara, Akira ; Furui, Tatsuro ; Takai, Yasushi ; Irahara, Minoru ; Suzuki, Nao</creatorcontrib><description>Aim The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions. Methods This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016. Results Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40–41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44–45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified. Conclusions Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-8076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1447-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jog.15199</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35274401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; cancer survivor ; Cryopreservation ; Female ; Fertility ; Fertility Preservation ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Japan ; Obstetrics ; oncofertility ; oocyte cryopreservation ; Oocytes ; Oocytes - physiology ; ovarian tissue cryopreservation ; Ovaries ; Patients ; Pregnancy ; Reproductive technologies ; Reproductive technology ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1061-1075</ispartof><rights>2022 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><rights>2022 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-b780b9d1247c3af65ded469fece0fefe3ba3c87d8fbe7d6b5a76bacedc696d473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-b780b9d1247c3af65ded469fece0fefe3ba3c87d8fbe7d6b5a76bacedc696d473</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2332-5671 ; 0000-0001-5009-3207 ; 0000-0003-4855-219X ; 0000-0002-3872-8481 ; 0000-0003-0909-478X ; 0000-0002-0783-0758 ; 0000-0003-3984-975X ; 0000-0001-8890-7683 ; 0000-0001-6807-0046 ; 0000-0003-4160-310X ; 0000-0002-5905-0737 ; 0000-0002-7440-8127</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjog.15199$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjog.15199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35274401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takae, Seido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Chie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nara, Kazuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Tomoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawai, Kiyotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yumura, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yabuuchi, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwahara, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furui, Tatsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irahara, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Nao</creatorcontrib><title>A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan</title><title>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Res</addtitle><description>Aim The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions. Methods This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016. Results Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40–41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44–45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified. Conclusions Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>cancer survivor</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>oncofertility</subject><subject>oocyte cryopreservation</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Oocytes - physiology</subject><subject>ovarian tissue cryopreservation</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Reproductive technology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1341-8076</issn><issn>1447-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MFKwzAYB_AgipvTgy8gBS966Ja0adIex9DpGOyieCxp-mXr6NqapJPefASf0Scxc9ODYC7JF375E_4IXRI8JG6N1vVySCKSJEeoTyjlPuYRO3bnkBI_xpz10Jkxa4wJT0h8inphFHBKMemjl7HXaCFtIUXpmVZvofNq5SnQtigL232-fzQaDOitsEVdeVaDsBuorPEKN63AM1Zo2zZesxIGdpcz0YjqHJ0oURq4OOwD9Hx_9zR58OeL6eNkPPclpWHiZzzGWZKTgHIZCsWiHHLKEgUSsAIFYSZCGfM8VhnwnGWR4CwTEnLJEpZTHg7QzT630fVrC8amm8JIKEtRQd2aNGBhzAllmDh6_Yeu61ZX7ndORVESBQHdqdu9kro2RoNKG11shO5SgtNd2-7VMv1u29mrQ2KbbSD_lT_1OjDag7eihO7_pHS2mO4jvwDnmYu0</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Takae, Seido</creator><creator>Kato, Keiichi</creator><creator>Watanabe, Chie</creator><creator>Nara, Kazuko</creator><creator>Koizumi, Tomoe</creator><creator>Kawai, Kiyotaka</creator><creator>Ota, Kuniaki</creator><creator>Yumura, Yasushi</creator><creator>Yabuuchi, Akiko</creator><creator>Kuwahara, Akira</creator><creator>Furui, Tatsuro</creator><creator>Takai, Yasushi</creator><creator>Irahara, Minoru</creator><creator>Suzuki, Nao</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2332-5671</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5009-3207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-8481</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0909-478X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-0758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-975X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-7683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-0046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-310X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5905-0737</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-8127</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan</title><author>Takae, Seido ; Kato, Keiichi ; Watanabe, Chie ; Nara, Kazuko ; Koizumi, Tomoe ; Kawai, Kiyotaka ; Ota, Kuniaki ; Yumura, Yasushi ; Yabuuchi, Akiko ; Kuwahara, Akira ; Furui, Tatsuro ; Takai, Yasushi ; Irahara, Minoru ; Suzuki, Nao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-b780b9d1247c3af65ded469fece0fefe3ba3c87d8fbe7d6b5a76bacedc696d473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>cancer survivor</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>oncofertility</topic><topic>oocyte cryopreservation</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Oocytes - physiology</topic><topic>ovarian tissue cryopreservation</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Reproductive technology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takae, Seido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Chie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nara, Kazuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Tomoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawai, Kiyotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yumura, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yabuuchi, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwahara, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furui, Tatsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irahara, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Nao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takae, Seido</au><au>Kato, Keiichi</au><au>Watanabe, Chie</au><au>Nara, Kazuko</au><au>Koizumi, Tomoe</au><au>Kawai, Kiyotaka</au><au>Ota, Kuniaki</au><au>Yumura, Yasushi</au><au>Yabuuchi, Akiko</au><au>Kuwahara, Akira</au><au>Furui, Tatsuro</au><au>Takai, Yasushi</au><au>Irahara, Minoru</au><au>Suzuki, Nao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan</atitle><jtitle>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research</jtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Res</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1061</spage><epage>1075</epage><pages>1061-1075</pages><issn>1341-8076</issn><eissn>1447-0756</eissn><abstract>Aim The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions. Methods This study was conducted as “Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016” which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016. Results Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40–41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44–45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified. Conclusions Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>35274401</pmid><doi>10.1111/jog.15199</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2332-5671</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5009-3207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-8481</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0909-478X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-0758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-975X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-7683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-0046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-310X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5905-0737</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-8127</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1341-8076
ispartof The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1061-1075
issn 1341-8076
1447-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2638714601
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Breast cancer
cancer survivor
Cryopreservation
Female
Fertility
Fertility Preservation
Gynecology
Humans
Japan
Obstetrics
oncofertility
oocyte cryopreservation
Oocytes
Oocytes - physiology
ovarian tissue cryopreservation
Ovaries
Patients
Pregnancy
Reproductive technologies
Reproductive technology
Surveys and Questionnaires
title A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T05%3A26%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20practical%20survey%20of%20fertility%E2%80%90preservation%20treatments%20in%20the%20startup%20phase%20in%20Japan&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology%20research&rft.au=Takae,%20Seido&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1061&rft.epage=1075&rft.pages=1061-1075&rft.issn=1341-8076&rft.eissn=1447-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jog.15199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638714601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655952241&rft_id=info:pmid/35274401&rfr_iscdi=true