Can prior informed consent create virtuous cycle between biodiversity conservation and genetic resources utilization?

This study attempted to predict the effectiveness of prior informed consent (PIC) as a mechanism under the Nagoya Protocol (NP) through the case of Japan, a developed country with a wealth of genetic biodiversity. The NP to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims at creating a virtuous cyc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2021-12, Vol.300, p.113767-113767, Article 113767
Hauptverfasser: Uehara, Takuro, Sono, Miharu, Tsuge, Takahiro, Onuma, Ayumi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113767
container_issue
container_start_page 113767
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 300
creator Uehara, Takuro
Sono, Miharu
Tsuge, Takahiro
Onuma, Ayumi
description This study attempted to predict the effectiveness of prior informed consent (PIC) as a mechanism under the Nagoya Protocol (NP) through the case of Japan, a developed country with a wealth of genetic biodiversity. The NP to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims at creating a virtuous cycle between biodiversity conservation and the utilization of genetic resources through fair and equitable benefit sharing. As PIC is a crucial component of the NP for promoting fair and equitable sharing, this study investigated whether introducing PIC creates a virtuous cycle. Considering the limitations of empirical data, this study adopted a policy Delphi comprising experts in an iterative group communication process that used consecutive questionnaires to reveal diverse issues as input for policymaking. We identified six related issues that were evaluated for the case of introduction and three for the case of no introduction of PIC. Their relative importance as a policy concern was measured through best–worst scaling to narrow down policy-relevant issues. This study revealed that contrary to the NP's intent, the overall contribution to the virtuous cycle is limited. In designing PIC mechanisms, policymakers must pay particular attention to bequest and research and development. This study identified three paths through which the negative impacts on research and development further negatively affect bequest, that is, slackening the identification of important genetic resources and ecosystems to conserve, disincentivizing biodiversity conservation for genetic resource use, and dampening ex-situ conservation efforts. [Display omitted] •Prior informed consent (PIC) has limited impacts on biodiversity conservation.•Policy Delphi was applied to predict the impacts of PIC.•Policymakers need to pay attention to PIC's impact on bequest and research.•Active research is key to the bequest of genetic resources as natural capital.•Demotivating research activities deters ex-situ conservation of genetic resources.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113767
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2636789986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479721018296</els_id><sourcerecordid>2576654321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-517b58199b1ae34f57df16ea5413ed03cd3d9db860fc760ffbb909ffee3033f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9PxCAUxInRxHX1I5hw9NIVlhbKyZiN_xITL3omFB6GTRdWoDXrp7da717eu8xMMvND6JKSFSWUX29XWwjjTofVmqzpilImuDhCC0pkU7WckWO0IIzQqhZSnKKznLeEELamYoGGjQ54n3xM2AcX0w4sNjFkCAWbBLoAHn0qQxwyNgfTA-6gfAIE3Plo_Qgp-3KYLWnUxceAdbD4HQIUb3CCHIdkIOOh-N5__SpuztGJ032Gi7-_RG_3d6-bx-r55eFpc_tcmbptS9VQ0TUtlbKjGljtGmEd5aCbmjKwhBnLrLRdy4kzYjqu6ySRzgEwwpir2RJdzbn7FD8GyEXtfDbQ9zrA1EitOeOilXIa6V9pIzhv6mm1SdrMUpNizgmcmgbc6XRQlKgfImqr_oioHyJqJjL5bmYfTJVHD0ll4yEYsD6BKcpG_0_CN8ZUmqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576654321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can prior informed consent create virtuous cycle between biodiversity conservation and genetic resources utilization?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Uehara, Takuro ; Sono, Miharu ; Tsuge, Takahiro ; Onuma, Ayumi</creator><creatorcontrib>Uehara, Takuro ; Sono, Miharu ; Tsuge, Takahiro ; Onuma, Ayumi</creatorcontrib><description>This study attempted to predict the effectiveness of prior informed consent (PIC) as a mechanism under the Nagoya Protocol (NP) through the case of Japan, a developed country with a wealth of genetic biodiversity. The NP to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims at creating a virtuous cycle between biodiversity conservation and the utilization of genetic resources through fair and equitable benefit sharing. As PIC is a crucial component of the NP for promoting fair and equitable sharing, this study investigated whether introducing PIC creates a virtuous cycle. Considering the limitations of empirical data, this study adopted a policy Delphi comprising experts in an iterative group communication process that used consecutive questionnaires to reveal diverse issues as input for policymaking. We identified six related issues that were evaluated for the case of introduction and three for the case of no introduction of PIC. Their relative importance as a policy concern was measured through best–worst scaling to narrow down policy-relevant issues. This study revealed that contrary to the NP's intent, the overall contribution to the virtuous cycle is limited. In designing PIC mechanisms, policymakers must pay particular attention to bequest and research and development. This study identified three paths through which the negative impacts on research and development further negatively affect bequest, that is, slackening the identification of important genetic resources and ecosystems to conserve, disincentivizing biodiversity conservation for genetic resource use, and dampening ex-situ conservation efforts. [Display omitted] •Prior informed consent (PIC) has limited impacts on biodiversity conservation.•Policy Delphi was applied to predict the impacts of PIC.•Policymakers need to pay attention to PIC's impact on bequest and research.•Active research is key to the bequest of genetic resources as natural capital.•Demotivating research activities deters ex-situ conservation of genetic resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113767</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Access and benefit-sharing ; Best–worst scaling ; biodiversity ; biodiversity conservation ; Convention on biological diversity ; Delphi method ; developed countries ; environmental management ; ex situ conservation ; Genetic resources ; issues and policy ; Japan ; Prior informed consent ; protocols ; research and development</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2021-12, Vol.300, p.113767-113767, Article 113767</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-517b58199b1ae34f57df16ea5413ed03cd3d9db860fc760ffbb909ffee3033f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-517b58199b1ae34f57df16ea5413ed03cd3d9db860fc760ffbb909ffee3033f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6144-4527</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479721018296$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uehara, Takuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sono, Miharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuge, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onuma, Ayumi</creatorcontrib><title>Can prior informed consent create virtuous cycle between biodiversity conservation and genetic resources utilization?</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><description>This study attempted to predict the effectiveness of prior informed consent (PIC) as a mechanism under the Nagoya Protocol (NP) through the case of Japan, a developed country with a wealth of genetic biodiversity. The NP to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims at creating a virtuous cycle between biodiversity conservation and the utilization of genetic resources through fair and equitable benefit sharing. As PIC is a crucial component of the NP for promoting fair and equitable sharing, this study investigated whether introducing PIC creates a virtuous cycle. Considering the limitations of empirical data, this study adopted a policy Delphi comprising experts in an iterative group communication process that used consecutive questionnaires to reveal diverse issues as input for policymaking. We identified six related issues that were evaluated for the case of introduction and three for the case of no introduction of PIC. Their relative importance as a policy concern was measured through best–worst scaling to narrow down policy-relevant issues. This study revealed that contrary to the NP's intent, the overall contribution to the virtuous cycle is limited. In designing PIC mechanisms, policymakers must pay particular attention to bequest and research and development. This study identified three paths through which the negative impacts on research and development further negatively affect bequest, that is, slackening the identification of important genetic resources and ecosystems to conserve, disincentivizing biodiversity conservation for genetic resource use, and dampening ex-situ conservation efforts. [Display omitted] •Prior informed consent (PIC) has limited impacts on biodiversity conservation.•Policy Delphi was applied to predict the impacts of PIC.•Policymakers need to pay attention to PIC's impact on bequest and research.•Active research is key to the bequest of genetic resources as natural capital.•Demotivating research activities deters ex-situ conservation of genetic resources.</description><subject>Access and benefit-sharing</subject><subject>Best–worst scaling</subject><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Convention on biological diversity</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>developed countries</subject><subject>environmental management</subject><subject>ex situ conservation</subject><subject>Genetic resources</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Prior informed consent</subject><subject>protocols</subject><subject>research and development</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9PxCAUxInRxHX1I5hw9NIVlhbKyZiN_xITL3omFB6GTRdWoDXrp7da717eu8xMMvND6JKSFSWUX29XWwjjTofVmqzpilImuDhCC0pkU7WckWO0IIzQqhZSnKKznLeEELamYoGGjQ54n3xM2AcX0w4sNjFkCAWbBLoAHn0qQxwyNgfTA-6gfAIE3Plo_Qgp-3KYLWnUxceAdbD4HQIUb3CCHIdkIOOh-N5__SpuztGJ032Gi7-_RG_3d6-bx-r55eFpc_tcmbptS9VQ0TUtlbKjGljtGmEd5aCbmjKwhBnLrLRdy4kzYjqu6ySRzgEwwpir2RJdzbn7FD8GyEXtfDbQ9zrA1EitOeOilXIa6V9pIzhv6mm1SdrMUpNizgmcmgbc6XRQlKgfImqr_oioHyJqJjL5bmYfTJVHD0ll4yEYsD6BKcpG_0_CN8ZUmqU</recordid><startdate>20211215</startdate><enddate>20211215</enddate><creator>Uehara, Takuro</creator><creator>Sono, Miharu</creator><creator>Tsuge, Takahiro</creator><creator>Onuma, Ayumi</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6144-4527</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211215</creationdate><title>Can prior informed consent create virtuous cycle between biodiversity conservation and genetic resources utilization?</title><author>Uehara, Takuro ; Sono, Miharu ; Tsuge, Takahiro ; Onuma, Ayumi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-517b58199b1ae34f57df16ea5413ed03cd3d9db860fc760ffbb909ffee3033f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access and benefit-sharing</topic><topic>Best–worst scaling</topic><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Convention on biological diversity</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>developed countries</topic><topic>environmental management</topic><topic>ex situ conservation</topic><topic>Genetic resources</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Prior informed consent</topic><topic>protocols</topic><topic>research and development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uehara, Takuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sono, Miharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuge, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onuma, Ayumi</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uehara, Takuro</au><au>Sono, Miharu</au><au>Tsuge, Takahiro</au><au>Onuma, Ayumi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can prior informed consent create virtuous cycle between biodiversity conservation and genetic resources utilization?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><date>2021-12-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>300</volume><spage>113767</spage><epage>113767</epage><pages>113767-113767</pages><artnum>113767</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>This study attempted to predict the effectiveness of prior informed consent (PIC) as a mechanism under the Nagoya Protocol (NP) through the case of Japan, a developed country with a wealth of genetic biodiversity. The NP to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims at creating a virtuous cycle between biodiversity conservation and the utilization of genetic resources through fair and equitable benefit sharing. As PIC is a crucial component of the NP for promoting fair and equitable sharing, this study investigated whether introducing PIC creates a virtuous cycle. Considering the limitations of empirical data, this study adopted a policy Delphi comprising experts in an iterative group communication process that used consecutive questionnaires to reveal diverse issues as input for policymaking. We identified six related issues that were evaluated for the case of introduction and three for the case of no introduction of PIC. Their relative importance as a policy concern was measured through best–worst scaling to narrow down policy-relevant issues. This study revealed that contrary to the NP's intent, the overall contribution to the virtuous cycle is limited. In designing PIC mechanisms, policymakers must pay particular attention to bequest and research and development. This study identified three paths through which the negative impacts on research and development further negatively affect bequest, that is, slackening the identification of important genetic resources and ecosystems to conserve, disincentivizing biodiversity conservation for genetic resource use, and dampening ex-situ conservation efforts. [Display omitted] •Prior informed consent (PIC) has limited impacts on biodiversity conservation.•Policy Delphi was applied to predict the impacts of PIC.•Policymakers need to pay attention to PIC's impact on bequest and research.•Active research is key to the bequest of genetic resources as natural capital.•Demotivating research activities deters ex-situ conservation of genetic resources.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113767</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6144-4527</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2021-12, Vol.300, p.113767-113767, Article 113767
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2636789986
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Access and benefit-sharing
Best–worst scaling
biodiversity
biodiversity conservation
Convention on biological diversity
Delphi method
developed countries
environmental management
ex situ conservation
Genetic resources
issues and policy
Japan
Prior informed consent
protocols
research and development
title Can prior informed consent create virtuous cycle between biodiversity conservation and genetic resources utilization?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A10%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20prior%20informed%20consent%20create%20virtuous%20cycle%20between%20biodiversity%20conservation%20and%20genetic%20resources%20utilization?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Uehara,%20Takuro&rft.date=2021-12-15&rft.volume=300&rft.spage=113767&rft.epage=113767&rft.pages=113767-113767&rft.artnum=113767&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113767&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2576654321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576654321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301479721018296&rfr_iscdi=true