Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison
Recent calls to do climate policy research with, rather than for, stakeholders have been answered in non-modelling science. Notwithstanding progress in modelling literature, however, very little of the scenario space traces back to what stakeholders are ultimately concerned about. With a suite of el...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Science of the total environment 2021-11, Vol.793, p.148549-148549, Article 148549 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 148549 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 148549 |
container_title | The Science of the total environment |
container_volume | 793 |
creator | Nikas, Alexandros Elia, Alessia Boitier, Baptiste Koasidis, Konstantinos Doukas, Haris Cassetti, Gabriele Anger-Kraavi, Annela Bui, Ha Campagnolo, Lorenza De Miglio, Rocco Delpiazzo, Elisa Fougeyrollas, Arnaud Gambhir, Ajay Gargiulo, Maurizio Giarola, Sara Grant, Neil Hawkes, Adam Herbst, Andrea Köberle, Alexandre C. Kolpakov, Andrey Le Mouël, Pierre McWilliams, Ben Mittal, Shivika Moreno, Jorge Neuner, Felix Perdana, Sigit Peters, Glen P. Plötz, Patrick Rogelj, Joeri Sognnæs, Ida Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan Vielle, Marc Zachmann, Georg Zagamé, Paul Chiodi, Alessandro |
description | Recent calls to do climate policy research with, rather than for, stakeholders have been answered in non-modelling science. Notwithstanding progress in modelling literature, however, very little of the scenario space traces back to what stakeholders are ultimately concerned about. With a suite of eleven integrated assessment, energy system and sectoral models, we carry out a model inter-comparison for the EU, the scenario logic and research questions of which have been formulated based on stakeholders' concerns. The output of this process is a scenario framework exploring where the region is headed rather than how to achieve its goals, extrapolating its current policy efforts into the future. We find that Europe is currently on track to overperforming its pre-2020 40% target yet far from its newest ambition of 55% emissions cuts by 2030, as well as looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 emissions range in 2050. Aside from the importance of transport electrification, deployment levels of carbon capture and storage are found intertwined with deeper emissions cuts and with hydrogen diffusion, with most hydrogen produced post-2040 being blue. Finally, the multi-model exercise has highlighted benefits from deeper decarbonisation in terms of energy security and jobs, and moderate to high renewables-dominated investment needs.
[Display omitted]
•We define the scenario logic & scope of a model inter-comparison with stakeholders.•We explore the EU's energy future, if its current policy is projected in the long run.•The diverse modelling ensemble employed includes seven global and four regional models.•Far from its new 2030 goal the EU is looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 2050 emissions range.•We further assess CCS, hydrogen, transport electrification, energy security, and jobs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148549 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2636468872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969721036214</els_id><sourcerecordid>2545596393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-600c283d7a932561f757d43c11d2deadeabe3d890972ce650a695b357eeb8f6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLQzEQhYMoWB-_wSzd3JrHzWslRXyB4EZxGdJkrk29valJWvDfe2vFrbMZGL5zmJmD0AUlU0qovFpOi481VRi2U0YYndJWi9YcoAnVyjSUMHmIJoS0ujHSqGN0UsqSjKU0naDwtoAMOBZcF4BvX_ECXICA3-MWBhxrwX6TMwwV-z6uXAW8Tn30X9d4hkt1H7BIfYDchPwjWKUAPY5DHUc-rdYux5KGM3TUub7A-W8_Ra93ty83D83T8_3jzeyp8S0ntZGEeKZ5UM5wJiTtlFCh5Z7SwMJuLTcHHrQhRjEPUhAnjZhzoQDmupMdP0WXe991Tp8bKNWuYvHQ926AtCmWSS5bqbVi_6OiFcJIbviIqj3qcyolQ2fXeXxF_rKU2F0Edmn_IrC7COw-glE52ythPHobIe84GDyEmMFXG1L81-MbNMWUww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545596393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nikas, Alexandros ; Elia, Alessia ; Boitier, Baptiste ; Koasidis, Konstantinos ; Doukas, Haris ; Cassetti, Gabriele ; Anger-Kraavi, Annela ; Bui, Ha ; Campagnolo, Lorenza ; De Miglio, Rocco ; Delpiazzo, Elisa ; Fougeyrollas, Arnaud ; Gambhir, Ajay ; Gargiulo, Maurizio ; Giarola, Sara ; Grant, Neil ; Hawkes, Adam ; Herbst, Andrea ; Köberle, Alexandre C. ; Kolpakov, Andrey ; Le Mouël, Pierre ; McWilliams, Ben ; Mittal, Shivika ; Moreno, Jorge ; Neuner, Felix ; Perdana, Sigit ; Peters, Glen P. ; Plötz, Patrick ; Rogelj, Joeri ; Sognnæs, Ida ; Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan ; Vielle, Marc ; Zachmann, Georg ; Zagamé, Paul ; Chiodi, Alessandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Nikas, Alexandros ; Elia, Alessia ; Boitier, Baptiste ; Koasidis, Konstantinos ; Doukas, Haris ; Cassetti, Gabriele ; Anger-Kraavi, Annela ; Bui, Ha ; Campagnolo, Lorenza ; De Miglio, Rocco ; Delpiazzo, Elisa ; Fougeyrollas, Arnaud ; Gambhir, Ajay ; Gargiulo, Maurizio ; Giarola, Sara ; Grant, Neil ; Hawkes, Adam ; Herbst, Andrea ; Köberle, Alexandre C. ; Kolpakov, Andrey ; Le Mouël, Pierre ; McWilliams, Ben ; Mittal, Shivika ; Moreno, Jorge ; Neuner, Felix ; Perdana, Sigit ; Peters, Glen P. ; Plötz, Patrick ; Rogelj, Joeri ; Sognnæs, Ida ; Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan ; Vielle, Marc ; Zachmann, Georg ; Zagamé, Paul ; Chiodi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><description>Recent calls to do climate policy research with, rather than for, stakeholders have been answered in non-modelling science. Notwithstanding progress in modelling literature, however, very little of the scenario space traces back to what stakeholders are ultimately concerned about. With a suite of eleven integrated assessment, energy system and sectoral models, we carry out a model inter-comparison for the EU, the scenario logic and research questions of which have been formulated based on stakeholders' concerns. The output of this process is a scenario framework exploring where the region is headed rather than how to achieve its goals, extrapolating its current policy efforts into the future. We find that Europe is currently on track to overperforming its pre-2020 40% target yet far from its newest ambition of 55% emissions cuts by 2030, as well as looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 emissions range in 2050. Aside from the importance of transport electrification, deployment levels of carbon capture and storage are found intertwined with deeper emissions cuts and with hydrogen diffusion, with most hydrogen produced post-2040 being blue. Finally, the multi-model exercise has highlighted benefits from deeper decarbonisation in terms of energy security and jobs, and moderate to high renewables-dominated investment needs.
[Display omitted]
•We define the scenario logic & scope of a model inter-comparison with stakeholders.•We explore the EU's energy future, if its current policy is projected in the long run.•The diverse modelling ensemble employed includes seven global and four regional models.•Far from its new 2030 goal the EU is looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 2050 emissions range.•We further assess CCS, hydrogen, transport electrification, energy security, and jobs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148549</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>carbon sequestration ; Climate policy ; energy ; Energy system models ; environment ; environmental policy ; Europe ; exercise ; hydrogen ; Integrated assessment models ; Model inter-comparison ; Stakeholder engagement ; stakeholders</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2021-11, Vol.793, p.148549-148549, Article 148549</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-600c283d7a932561f757d43c11d2deadeabe3d890972ce650a695b357eeb8f6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-600c283d7a932561f757d43c11d2deadeabe3d890972ce650a695b357eeb8f6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148549$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nikas, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elia, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boitier, Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koasidis, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doukas, Haris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassetti, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anger-Kraavi, Annela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campagnolo, Lorenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Miglio, Rocco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delpiazzo, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fougeyrollas, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gambhir, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gargiulo, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giarola, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbst, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köberle, Alexandre C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolpakov, Andrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Mouël, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Shivika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuner, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdana, Sigit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Glen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plötz, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogelj, Joeri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sognnæs, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vielle, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zachmann, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagamé, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiodi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><title>Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><description>Recent calls to do climate policy research with, rather than for, stakeholders have been answered in non-modelling science. Notwithstanding progress in modelling literature, however, very little of the scenario space traces back to what stakeholders are ultimately concerned about. With a suite of eleven integrated assessment, energy system and sectoral models, we carry out a model inter-comparison for the EU, the scenario logic and research questions of which have been formulated based on stakeholders' concerns. The output of this process is a scenario framework exploring where the region is headed rather than how to achieve its goals, extrapolating its current policy efforts into the future. We find that Europe is currently on track to overperforming its pre-2020 40% target yet far from its newest ambition of 55% emissions cuts by 2030, as well as looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 emissions range in 2050. Aside from the importance of transport electrification, deployment levels of carbon capture and storage are found intertwined with deeper emissions cuts and with hydrogen diffusion, with most hydrogen produced post-2040 being blue. Finally, the multi-model exercise has highlighted benefits from deeper decarbonisation in terms of energy security and jobs, and moderate to high renewables-dominated investment needs.
[Display omitted]
•We define the scenario logic & scope of a model inter-comparison with stakeholders.•We explore the EU's energy future, if its current policy is projected in the long run.•The diverse modelling ensemble employed includes seven global and four regional models.•Far from its new 2030 goal the EU is looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 2050 emissions range.•We further assess CCS, hydrogen, transport electrification, energy security, and jobs.</description><subject>carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy system models</subject><subject>environment</subject><subject>environmental policy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>exercise</subject><subject>hydrogen</subject><subject>Integrated assessment models</subject><subject>Model inter-comparison</subject><subject>Stakeholder engagement</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtLQzEQhYMoWB-_wSzd3JrHzWslRXyB4EZxGdJkrk29valJWvDfe2vFrbMZGL5zmJmD0AUlU0qovFpOi481VRi2U0YYndJWi9YcoAnVyjSUMHmIJoS0ujHSqGN0UsqSjKU0naDwtoAMOBZcF4BvX_ECXICA3-MWBhxrwX6TMwwV-z6uXAW8Tn30X9d4hkt1H7BIfYDchPwjWKUAPY5DHUc-rdYux5KGM3TUub7A-W8_Ra93ty83D83T8_3jzeyp8S0ntZGEeKZ5UM5wJiTtlFCh5Z7SwMJuLTcHHrQhRjEPUhAnjZhzoQDmupMdP0WXe991Tp8bKNWuYvHQ926AtCmWSS5bqbVi_6OiFcJIbviIqj3qcyolQ2fXeXxF_rKU2F0Edmn_IrC7COw-glE52ythPHobIe84GDyEmMFXG1L81-MbNMWUww</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Nikas, Alexandros</creator><creator>Elia, Alessia</creator><creator>Boitier, Baptiste</creator><creator>Koasidis, Konstantinos</creator><creator>Doukas, Haris</creator><creator>Cassetti, Gabriele</creator><creator>Anger-Kraavi, Annela</creator><creator>Bui, Ha</creator><creator>Campagnolo, Lorenza</creator><creator>De Miglio, Rocco</creator><creator>Delpiazzo, Elisa</creator><creator>Fougeyrollas, Arnaud</creator><creator>Gambhir, Ajay</creator><creator>Gargiulo, Maurizio</creator><creator>Giarola, Sara</creator><creator>Grant, Neil</creator><creator>Hawkes, Adam</creator><creator>Herbst, Andrea</creator><creator>Köberle, Alexandre C.</creator><creator>Kolpakov, Andrey</creator><creator>Le Mouël, Pierre</creator><creator>McWilliams, Ben</creator><creator>Mittal, Shivika</creator><creator>Moreno, Jorge</creator><creator>Neuner, Felix</creator><creator>Perdana, Sigit</creator><creator>Peters, Glen P.</creator><creator>Plötz, Patrick</creator><creator>Rogelj, Joeri</creator><creator>Sognnæs, Ida</creator><creator>Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan</creator><creator>Vielle, Marc</creator><creator>Zachmann, Georg</creator><creator>Zagamé, Paul</creator><creator>Chiodi, Alessandro</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison</title><author>Nikas, Alexandros ; Elia, Alessia ; Boitier, Baptiste ; Koasidis, Konstantinos ; Doukas, Haris ; Cassetti, Gabriele ; Anger-Kraavi, Annela ; Bui, Ha ; Campagnolo, Lorenza ; De Miglio, Rocco ; Delpiazzo, Elisa ; Fougeyrollas, Arnaud ; Gambhir, Ajay ; Gargiulo, Maurizio ; Giarola, Sara ; Grant, Neil ; Hawkes, Adam ; Herbst, Andrea ; Köberle, Alexandre C. ; Kolpakov, Andrey ; Le Mouël, Pierre ; McWilliams, Ben ; Mittal, Shivika ; Moreno, Jorge ; Neuner, Felix ; Perdana, Sigit ; Peters, Glen P. ; Plötz, Patrick ; Rogelj, Joeri ; Sognnæs, Ida ; Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan ; Vielle, Marc ; Zachmann, Georg ; Zagamé, Paul ; Chiodi, Alessandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-600c283d7a932561f757d43c11d2deadeabe3d890972ce650a695b357eeb8f6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy system models</topic><topic>environment</topic><topic>environmental policy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>exercise</topic><topic>hydrogen</topic><topic>Integrated assessment models</topic><topic>Model inter-comparison</topic><topic>Stakeholder engagement</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nikas, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elia, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boitier, Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koasidis, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doukas, Haris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassetti, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anger-Kraavi, Annela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campagnolo, Lorenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Miglio, Rocco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delpiazzo, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fougeyrollas, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gambhir, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gargiulo, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giarola, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbst, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köberle, Alexandre C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolpakov, Andrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Mouël, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Shivika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuner, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdana, Sigit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Glen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plötz, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogelj, Joeri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sognnæs, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vielle, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zachmann, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagamé, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiodi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nikas, Alexandros</au><au>Elia, Alessia</au><au>Boitier, Baptiste</au><au>Koasidis, Konstantinos</au><au>Doukas, Haris</au><au>Cassetti, Gabriele</au><au>Anger-Kraavi, Annela</au><au>Bui, Ha</au><au>Campagnolo, Lorenza</au><au>De Miglio, Rocco</au><au>Delpiazzo, Elisa</au><au>Fougeyrollas, Arnaud</au><au>Gambhir, Ajay</au><au>Gargiulo, Maurizio</au><au>Giarola, Sara</au><au>Grant, Neil</au><au>Hawkes, Adam</au><au>Herbst, Andrea</au><au>Köberle, Alexandre C.</au><au>Kolpakov, Andrey</au><au>Le Mouël, Pierre</au><au>McWilliams, Ben</au><au>Mittal, Shivika</au><au>Moreno, Jorge</au><au>Neuner, Felix</au><au>Perdana, Sigit</au><au>Peters, Glen P.</au><au>Plötz, Patrick</au><au>Rogelj, Joeri</au><au>Sognnæs, Ida</au><au>Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan</au><au>Vielle, Marc</au><au>Zachmann, Georg</au><au>Zagamé, Paul</au><au>Chiodi, Alessandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>793</volume><spage>148549</spage><epage>148549</epage><pages>148549-148549</pages><artnum>148549</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Recent calls to do climate policy research with, rather than for, stakeholders have been answered in non-modelling science. Notwithstanding progress in modelling literature, however, very little of the scenario space traces back to what stakeholders are ultimately concerned about. With a suite of eleven integrated assessment, energy system and sectoral models, we carry out a model inter-comparison for the EU, the scenario logic and research questions of which have been formulated based on stakeholders' concerns. The output of this process is a scenario framework exploring where the region is headed rather than how to achieve its goals, extrapolating its current policy efforts into the future. We find that Europe is currently on track to overperforming its pre-2020 40% target yet far from its newest ambition of 55% emissions cuts by 2030, as well as looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 emissions range in 2050. Aside from the importance of transport electrification, deployment levels of carbon capture and storage are found intertwined with deeper emissions cuts and with hydrogen diffusion, with most hydrogen produced post-2040 being blue. Finally, the multi-model exercise has highlighted benefits from deeper decarbonisation in terms of energy security and jobs, and moderate to high renewables-dominated investment needs.
[Display omitted]
•We define the scenario logic & scope of a model inter-comparison with stakeholders.•We explore the EU's energy future, if its current policy is projected in the long run.•The diverse modelling ensemble employed includes seven global and four regional models.•Far from its new 2030 goal the EU is looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 2050 emissions range.•We further assess CCS, hydrogen, transport electrification, energy security, and jobs.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148549</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2021-11, Vol.793, p.148549-148549, Article 148549 |
issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2636468872 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | carbon sequestration Climate policy energy Energy system models environment environmental policy Europe exercise hydrogen Integrated assessment models Model inter-comparison Stakeholder engagement stakeholders |
title | Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A22%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Where%20is%20the%20EU%20headed%20given%20its%20current%20climate%20policy?%20A%20stakeholder-driven%20model%20inter-comparison&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Nikas,%20Alexandros&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=793&rft.spage=148549&rft.epage=148549&rft.pages=148549-148549&rft.artnum=148549&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148549&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2545596393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545596393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0048969721036214&rfr_iscdi=true |