Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison

Recent calls to do climate policy research with, rather than for, stakeholders have been answered in non-modelling science. Notwithstanding progress in modelling literature, however, very little of the scenario space traces back to what stakeholders are ultimately concerned about. With a suite of el...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2021-11, Vol.793, p.148549-148549, Article 148549
Hauptverfasser: Nikas, Alexandros, Elia, Alessia, Boitier, Baptiste, Koasidis, Konstantinos, Doukas, Haris, Cassetti, Gabriele, Anger-Kraavi, Annela, Bui, Ha, Campagnolo, Lorenza, De Miglio, Rocco, Delpiazzo, Elisa, Fougeyrollas, Arnaud, Gambhir, Ajay, Gargiulo, Maurizio, Giarola, Sara, Grant, Neil, Hawkes, Adam, Herbst, Andrea, Köberle, Alexandre C., Kolpakov, Andrey, Le Mouël, Pierre, McWilliams, Ben, Mittal, Shivika, Moreno, Jorge, Neuner, Felix, Perdana, Sigit, Peters, Glen P., Plötz, Patrick, Rogelj, Joeri, Sognnæs, Ida, Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan, Vielle, Marc, Zachmann, Georg, Zagamé, Paul, Chiodi, Alessandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 148549
container_issue
container_start_page 148549
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 793
creator Nikas, Alexandros
Elia, Alessia
Boitier, Baptiste
Koasidis, Konstantinos
Doukas, Haris
Cassetti, Gabriele
Anger-Kraavi, Annela
Bui, Ha
Campagnolo, Lorenza
De Miglio, Rocco
Delpiazzo, Elisa
Fougeyrollas, Arnaud
Gambhir, Ajay
Gargiulo, Maurizio
Giarola, Sara
Grant, Neil
Hawkes, Adam
Herbst, Andrea
Köberle, Alexandre C.
Kolpakov, Andrey
Le Mouël, Pierre
McWilliams, Ben
Mittal, Shivika
Moreno, Jorge
Neuner, Felix
Perdana, Sigit
Peters, Glen P.
Plötz, Patrick
Rogelj, Joeri
Sognnæs, Ida
Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan
Vielle, Marc
Zachmann, Georg
Zagamé, Paul
Chiodi, Alessandro
description Recent calls to do climate policy research with, rather than for, stakeholders have been answered in non-modelling science. Notwithstanding progress in modelling literature, however, very little of the scenario space traces back to what stakeholders are ultimately concerned about. With a suite of eleven integrated assessment, energy system and sectoral models, we carry out a model inter-comparison for the EU, the scenario logic and research questions of which have been formulated based on stakeholders' concerns. The output of this process is a scenario framework exploring where the region is headed rather than how to achieve its goals, extrapolating its current policy efforts into the future. We find that Europe is currently on track to overperforming its pre-2020 40% target yet far from its newest ambition of 55% emissions cuts by 2030, as well as looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 emissions range in 2050. Aside from the importance of transport electrification, deployment levels of carbon capture and storage are found intertwined with deeper emissions cuts and with hydrogen diffusion, with most hydrogen produced post-2040 being blue. Finally, the multi-model exercise has highlighted benefits from deeper decarbonisation in terms of energy security and jobs, and moderate to high renewables-dominated investment needs. [Display omitted] •We define the scenario logic & scope of a model inter-comparison with stakeholders.•We explore the EU's energy future, if its current policy is projected in the long run.•The diverse modelling ensemble employed includes seven global and four regional models.•Far from its new 2030 goal the EU is looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 2050 emissions range.•We further assess CCS, hydrogen, transport electrification, energy security, and jobs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148549
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2636468872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969721036214</els_id><sourcerecordid>2545596393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-600c283d7a932561f757d43c11d2deadeabe3d890972ce650a695b357eeb8f6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLQzEQhYMoWB-_wSzd3JrHzWslRXyB4EZxGdJkrk29valJWvDfe2vFrbMZGL5zmJmD0AUlU0qovFpOi481VRi2U0YYndJWi9YcoAnVyjSUMHmIJoS0ujHSqGN0UsqSjKU0naDwtoAMOBZcF4BvX_ECXICA3-MWBhxrwX6TMwwV-z6uXAW8Tn30X9d4hkt1H7BIfYDchPwjWKUAPY5DHUc-rdYux5KGM3TUub7A-W8_Ra93ty83D83T8_3jzeyp8S0ntZGEeKZ5UM5wJiTtlFCh5Z7SwMJuLTcHHrQhRjEPUhAnjZhzoQDmupMdP0WXe991Tp8bKNWuYvHQ926AtCmWSS5bqbVi_6OiFcJIbviIqj3qcyolQ2fXeXxF_rKU2F0Edmn_IrC7COw-glE52ythPHobIe84GDyEmMFXG1L81-MbNMWUww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545596393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nikas, Alexandros ; Elia, Alessia ; Boitier, Baptiste ; Koasidis, Konstantinos ; Doukas, Haris ; Cassetti, Gabriele ; Anger-Kraavi, Annela ; Bui, Ha ; Campagnolo, Lorenza ; De Miglio, Rocco ; Delpiazzo, Elisa ; Fougeyrollas, Arnaud ; Gambhir, Ajay ; Gargiulo, Maurizio ; Giarola, Sara ; Grant, Neil ; Hawkes, Adam ; Herbst, Andrea ; Köberle, Alexandre C. ; Kolpakov, Andrey ; Le Mouël, Pierre ; McWilliams, Ben ; Mittal, Shivika ; Moreno, Jorge ; Neuner, Felix ; Perdana, Sigit ; Peters, Glen P. ; Plötz, Patrick ; Rogelj, Joeri ; Sognnæs, Ida ; Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan ; Vielle, Marc ; Zachmann, Georg ; Zagamé, Paul ; Chiodi, Alessandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Nikas, Alexandros ; Elia, Alessia ; Boitier, Baptiste ; Koasidis, Konstantinos ; Doukas, Haris ; Cassetti, Gabriele ; Anger-Kraavi, Annela ; Bui, Ha ; Campagnolo, Lorenza ; De Miglio, Rocco ; Delpiazzo, Elisa ; Fougeyrollas, Arnaud ; Gambhir, Ajay ; Gargiulo, Maurizio ; Giarola, Sara ; Grant, Neil ; Hawkes, Adam ; Herbst, Andrea ; Köberle, Alexandre C. ; Kolpakov, Andrey ; Le Mouël, Pierre ; McWilliams, Ben ; Mittal, Shivika ; Moreno, Jorge ; Neuner, Felix ; Perdana, Sigit ; Peters, Glen P. ; Plötz, Patrick ; Rogelj, Joeri ; Sognnæs, Ida ; Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan ; Vielle, Marc ; Zachmann, Georg ; Zagamé, Paul ; Chiodi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><description>Recent calls to do climate policy research with, rather than for, stakeholders have been answered in non-modelling science. Notwithstanding progress in modelling literature, however, very little of the scenario space traces back to what stakeholders are ultimately concerned about. With a suite of eleven integrated assessment, energy system and sectoral models, we carry out a model inter-comparison for the EU, the scenario logic and research questions of which have been formulated based on stakeholders' concerns. The output of this process is a scenario framework exploring where the region is headed rather than how to achieve its goals, extrapolating its current policy efforts into the future. We find that Europe is currently on track to overperforming its pre-2020 40% target yet far from its newest ambition of 55% emissions cuts by 2030, as well as looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 emissions range in 2050. Aside from the importance of transport electrification, deployment levels of carbon capture and storage are found intertwined with deeper emissions cuts and with hydrogen diffusion, with most hydrogen produced post-2040 being blue. Finally, the multi-model exercise has highlighted benefits from deeper decarbonisation in terms of energy security and jobs, and moderate to high renewables-dominated investment needs. [Display omitted] •We define the scenario logic &amp; scope of a model inter-comparison with stakeholders.•We explore the EU's energy future, if its current policy is projected in the long run.•The diverse modelling ensemble employed includes seven global and four regional models.•Far from its new 2030 goal the EU is looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 2050 emissions range.•We further assess CCS, hydrogen, transport electrification, energy security, and jobs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148549</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>carbon sequestration ; Climate policy ; energy ; Energy system models ; environment ; environmental policy ; Europe ; exercise ; hydrogen ; Integrated assessment models ; Model inter-comparison ; Stakeholder engagement ; stakeholders</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2021-11, Vol.793, p.148549-148549, Article 148549</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-600c283d7a932561f757d43c11d2deadeabe3d890972ce650a695b357eeb8f6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-600c283d7a932561f757d43c11d2deadeabe3d890972ce650a695b357eeb8f6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148549$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nikas, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elia, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boitier, Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koasidis, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doukas, Haris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassetti, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anger-Kraavi, Annela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campagnolo, Lorenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Miglio, Rocco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delpiazzo, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fougeyrollas, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gambhir, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gargiulo, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giarola, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbst, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köberle, Alexandre C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolpakov, Andrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Mouël, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Shivika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuner, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdana, Sigit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Glen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plötz, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogelj, Joeri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sognnæs, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vielle, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zachmann, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagamé, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiodi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><title>Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><description>Recent calls to do climate policy research with, rather than for, stakeholders have been answered in non-modelling science. Notwithstanding progress in modelling literature, however, very little of the scenario space traces back to what stakeholders are ultimately concerned about. With a suite of eleven integrated assessment, energy system and sectoral models, we carry out a model inter-comparison for the EU, the scenario logic and research questions of which have been formulated based on stakeholders' concerns. The output of this process is a scenario framework exploring where the region is headed rather than how to achieve its goals, extrapolating its current policy efforts into the future. We find that Europe is currently on track to overperforming its pre-2020 40% target yet far from its newest ambition of 55% emissions cuts by 2030, as well as looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 emissions range in 2050. Aside from the importance of transport electrification, deployment levels of carbon capture and storage are found intertwined with deeper emissions cuts and with hydrogen diffusion, with most hydrogen produced post-2040 being blue. Finally, the multi-model exercise has highlighted benefits from deeper decarbonisation in terms of energy security and jobs, and moderate to high renewables-dominated investment needs. [Display omitted] •We define the scenario logic &amp; scope of a model inter-comparison with stakeholders.•We explore the EU's energy future, if its current policy is projected in the long run.•The diverse modelling ensemble employed includes seven global and four regional models.•Far from its new 2030 goal the EU is looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 2050 emissions range.•We further assess CCS, hydrogen, transport electrification, energy security, and jobs.</description><subject>carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy system models</subject><subject>environment</subject><subject>environmental policy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>exercise</subject><subject>hydrogen</subject><subject>Integrated assessment models</subject><subject>Model inter-comparison</subject><subject>Stakeholder engagement</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtLQzEQhYMoWB-_wSzd3JrHzWslRXyB4EZxGdJkrk29valJWvDfe2vFrbMZGL5zmJmD0AUlU0qovFpOi481VRi2U0YYndJWi9YcoAnVyjSUMHmIJoS0ujHSqGN0UsqSjKU0naDwtoAMOBZcF4BvX_ECXICA3-MWBhxrwX6TMwwV-z6uXAW8Tn30X9d4hkt1H7BIfYDchPwjWKUAPY5DHUc-rdYux5KGM3TUub7A-W8_Ra93ty83D83T8_3jzeyp8S0ntZGEeKZ5UM5wJiTtlFCh5Z7SwMJuLTcHHrQhRjEPUhAnjZhzoQDmupMdP0WXe991Tp8bKNWuYvHQ926AtCmWSS5bqbVi_6OiFcJIbviIqj3qcyolQ2fXeXxF_rKU2F0Edmn_IrC7COw-glE52ythPHobIe84GDyEmMFXG1L81-MbNMWUww</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Nikas, Alexandros</creator><creator>Elia, Alessia</creator><creator>Boitier, Baptiste</creator><creator>Koasidis, Konstantinos</creator><creator>Doukas, Haris</creator><creator>Cassetti, Gabriele</creator><creator>Anger-Kraavi, Annela</creator><creator>Bui, Ha</creator><creator>Campagnolo, Lorenza</creator><creator>De Miglio, Rocco</creator><creator>Delpiazzo, Elisa</creator><creator>Fougeyrollas, Arnaud</creator><creator>Gambhir, Ajay</creator><creator>Gargiulo, Maurizio</creator><creator>Giarola, Sara</creator><creator>Grant, Neil</creator><creator>Hawkes, Adam</creator><creator>Herbst, Andrea</creator><creator>Köberle, Alexandre C.</creator><creator>Kolpakov, Andrey</creator><creator>Le Mouël, Pierre</creator><creator>McWilliams, Ben</creator><creator>Mittal, Shivika</creator><creator>Moreno, Jorge</creator><creator>Neuner, Felix</creator><creator>Perdana, Sigit</creator><creator>Peters, Glen P.</creator><creator>Plötz, Patrick</creator><creator>Rogelj, Joeri</creator><creator>Sognnæs, Ida</creator><creator>Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan</creator><creator>Vielle, Marc</creator><creator>Zachmann, Georg</creator><creator>Zagamé, Paul</creator><creator>Chiodi, Alessandro</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison</title><author>Nikas, Alexandros ; Elia, Alessia ; Boitier, Baptiste ; Koasidis, Konstantinos ; Doukas, Haris ; Cassetti, Gabriele ; Anger-Kraavi, Annela ; Bui, Ha ; Campagnolo, Lorenza ; De Miglio, Rocco ; Delpiazzo, Elisa ; Fougeyrollas, Arnaud ; Gambhir, Ajay ; Gargiulo, Maurizio ; Giarola, Sara ; Grant, Neil ; Hawkes, Adam ; Herbst, Andrea ; Köberle, Alexandre C. ; Kolpakov, Andrey ; Le Mouël, Pierre ; McWilliams, Ben ; Mittal, Shivika ; Moreno, Jorge ; Neuner, Felix ; Perdana, Sigit ; Peters, Glen P. ; Plötz, Patrick ; Rogelj, Joeri ; Sognnæs, Ida ; Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan ; Vielle, Marc ; Zachmann, Georg ; Zagamé, Paul ; Chiodi, Alessandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-600c283d7a932561f757d43c11d2deadeabe3d890972ce650a695b357eeb8f6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy system models</topic><topic>environment</topic><topic>environmental policy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>exercise</topic><topic>hydrogen</topic><topic>Integrated assessment models</topic><topic>Model inter-comparison</topic><topic>Stakeholder engagement</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nikas, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elia, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boitier, Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koasidis, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doukas, Haris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassetti, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anger-Kraavi, Annela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campagnolo, Lorenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Miglio, Rocco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delpiazzo, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fougeyrollas, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gambhir, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gargiulo, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giarola, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbst, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köberle, Alexandre C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolpakov, Andrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Mouël, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Shivika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuner, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdana, Sigit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Glen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plötz, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogelj, Joeri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sognnæs, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vielle, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zachmann, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagamé, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiodi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nikas, Alexandros</au><au>Elia, Alessia</au><au>Boitier, Baptiste</au><au>Koasidis, Konstantinos</au><au>Doukas, Haris</au><au>Cassetti, Gabriele</au><au>Anger-Kraavi, Annela</au><au>Bui, Ha</au><au>Campagnolo, Lorenza</au><au>De Miglio, Rocco</au><au>Delpiazzo, Elisa</au><au>Fougeyrollas, Arnaud</au><au>Gambhir, Ajay</au><au>Gargiulo, Maurizio</au><au>Giarola, Sara</au><au>Grant, Neil</au><au>Hawkes, Adam</au><au>Herbst, Andrea</au><au>Köberle, Alexandre C.</au><au>Kolpakov, Andrey</au><au>Le Mouël, Pierre</au><au>McWilliams, Ben</au><au>Mittal, Shivika</au><au>Moreno, Jorge</au><au>Neuner, Felix</au><au>Perdana, Sigit</au><au>Peters, Glen P.</au><au>Plötz, Patrick</au><au>Rogelj, Joeri</au><au>Sognnæs, Ida</au><au>Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan</au><au>Vielle, Marc</au><au>Zachmann, Georg</au><au>Zagamé, Paul</au><au>Chiodi, Alessandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>793</volume><spage>148549</spage><epage>148549</epage><pages>148549-148549</pages><artnum>148549</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Recent calls to do climate policy research with, rather than for, stakeholders have been answered in non-modelling science. Notwithstanding progress in modelling literature, however, very little of the scenario space traces back to what stakeholders are ultimately concerned about. With a suite of eleven integrated assessment, energy system and sectoral models, we carry out a model inter-comparison for the EU, the scenario logic and research questions of which have been formulated based on stakeholders' concerns. The output of this process is a scenario framework exploring where the region is headed rather than how to achieve its goals, extrapolating its current policy efforts into the future. We find that Europe is currently on track to overperforming its pre-2020 40% target yet far from its newest ambition of 55% emissions cuts by 2030, as well as looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 emissions range in 2050. Aside from the importance of transport electrification, deployment levels of carbon capture and storage are found intertwined with deeper emissions cuts and with hydrogen diffusion, with most hydrogen produced post-2040 being blue. Finally, the multi-model exercise has highlighted benefits from deeper decarbonisation in terms of energy security and jobs, and moderate to high renewables-dominated investment needs. [Display omitted] •We define the scenario logic &amp; scope of a model inter-comparison with stakeholders.•We explore the EU's energy future, if its current policy is projected in the long run.•The diverse modelling ensemble employed includes seven global and four regional models.•Far from its new 2030 goal the EU is looking at a 1.0–2.35 GtCO2 2050 emissions range.•We further assess CCS, hydrogen, transport electrification, energy security, and jobs.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148549</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2021-11, Vol.793, p.148549-148549, Article 148549
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2636468872
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects carbon sequestration
Climate policy
energy
Energy system models
environment
environmental policy
Europe
exercise
hydrogen
Integrated assessment models
Model inter-comparison
Stakeholder engagement
stakeholders
title Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A22%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Where%20is%20the%20EU%20headed%20given%20its%20current%20climate%20policy?%20A%20stakeholder-driven%20model%20inter-comparison&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Nikas,%20Alexandros&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=793&rft.spage=148549&rft.epage=148549&rft.pages=148549-148549&rft.artnum=148549&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148549&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2545596393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545596393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0048969721036214&rfr_iscdi=true