Correlation between pelvic floor ultrasound parameters and vaginal pressures in nulliparous women: a subanalysis of the SUM-AN study

Introduction and hypothesis Pelvic floor ultrasound is used as a validated technique for measuring levator ani dimensions. Vaginal manometry has been used in the past as a method to assess levator ani muscle (LAM) strength. Whether the combination of both methods can contribute to our understanding...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Urogynecology Journal 2022-06, Vol.33 (6), p.1481-1487
Hauptverfasser: Alshiek, Jonia, Wei, Qi, Shobeiri, S. Abbas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1487
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1481
container_title International Urogynecology Journal
container_volume 33
creator Alshiek, Jonia
Wei, Qi
Shobeiri, S. Abbas
description Introduction and hypothesis Pelvic floor ultrasound is used as a validated technique for measuring levator ani dimensions. Vaginal manometry has been used in the past as a method to assess levator ani muscle (LAM) strength. Whether the combination of both methods can contribute to our understanding of pelvic floor pathophysiology has not yet been described. We hypothesized that as female pelvic floor muscular hiatus increases, the vaginal pressure and strength decrease. Methods We recruited 20 asymptomatic nulliparous women ages 18–85 years. Minimal levator hiatus (MLH) area, anteroposterior/left-right (AP/LR) diameter ratio, the distance between levator plate and the pubic symphysis (LP-PS) while at rest and squeeze were measured using endovaginal ultrasound (US). Vaginal pressure at rest, squeeze (Kegel) and Valsalva were measured using 3D manometry. Logistic and linear regression analysis was performed to assess correlations. Results MLH area was negatively correlated with the sum of all the squeeze pressures produced on the four walls of the vagina ( p  = 0.049, R 2  = 0.197). There was also a borderline negative correlation between MLH and the sum of rest pressures ( p  = 0.09, R 2  = 0.15). AP/LR ratio was negatively correlated with the sum of squeeze pressures ( p  = 0.056, R 2  = 0.197). LP-PS distances, both while at rest and during squeeze, were negatively correlated with the vaginal squeeze pressure ( p  = 0.046, R 2  = 0.21; p  = 0.011, R 2  = 0.31, respectively). LP-V distance, both at rest and during squeeze, was negatively correlated with the sum of squeeze pressures on four vaginal walls ( p  = 0.02, R 2  = 0.25; p  = 0.005, R 2  = 0.36, respectively). Conclusions Stronger levator ani muscles, smaller MLH area and a more oval shape of pelvic floor hiatus as assessed by pelvic floor ultrasound are associated with higher squeeze vaginal pressures as assessed by 3D manometry.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00192-022-05117-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2634850825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2634850825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-104557bf7e60dd826340d14c9de3d34a64519a030a269422493ddf02693a68e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1vFDEQhi0EIpfAH6BAlmhoFsZf-0EXnSAgBVKE1JZvPRs28tqLvU50fX44Xi6AlILCY43m8WtbDyGvGLxjAM37BMA6XgEvSzHWVOoJ2TApRCWAi6dkA51oKiFrfkSOU7oBAAkKnpMjobgA2fINud-GGNGZZQye7nC5Q_R0Rnc79nRwIUSa3RJNCtlbOptoJlwwJmpKe2uuR28cnSOmlEuho6c-OzcWMORE78KE_gM1NOWdKeQ-jYmGgS4_kF5efa1Ov9G0ZLt_QZ4NxiV8-bCfkKtPH79vP1fnF2dftqfnVS94vVQMpFLNbmiwBmtbXgsJlsm-syiskKaWinUGBBhed5Jz2QlrByiNMHWLSpyQt4fcOYafGdOipzH16JzxWN6r18RWQctX9M0j9CbkWP6wUk3LBOO8KxQ_UH0MKUUc9BzHycS9ZqBXR_rgSBdH-rcjvUa_fojOuwnt3yN_pBRAHIBURv4a47-7_xP7C0aYnLY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678131229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation between pelvic floor ultrasound parameters and vaginal pressures in nulliparous women: a subanalysis of the SUM-AN study</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Alshiek, Jonia ; Wei, Qi ; Shobeiri, S. Abbas</creator><creatorcontrib>Alshiek, Jonia ; Wei, Qi ; Shobeiri, S. Abbas</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and hypothesis Pelvic floor ultrasound is used as a validated technique for measuring levator ani dimensions. Vaginal manometry has been used in the past as a method to assess levator ani muscle (LAM) strength. Whether the combination of both methods can contribute to our understanding of pelvic floor pathophysiology has not yet been described. We hypothesized that as female pelvic floor muscular hiatus increases, the vaginal pressure and strength decrease. Methods We recruited 20 asymptomatic nulliparous women ages 18–85 years. Minimal levator hiatus (MLH) area, anteroposterior/left-right (AP/LR) diameter ratio, the distance between levator plate and the pubic symphysis (LP-PS) while at rest and squeeze were measured using endovaginal ultrasound (US). Vaginal pressure at rest, squeeze (Kegel) and Valsalva were measured using 3D manometry. Logistic and linear regression analysis was performed to assess correlations. Results MLH area was negatively correlated with the sum of all the squeeze pressures produced on the four walls of the vagina ( p  = 0.049, R 2  = 0.197). There was also a borderline negative correlation between MLH and the sum of rest pressures ( p  = 0.09, R 2  = 0.15). AP/LR ratio was negatively correlated with the sum of squeeze pressures ( p  = 0.056, R 2  = 0.197). LP-PS distances, both while at rest and during squeeze, were negatively correlated with the vaginal squeeze pressure ( p  = 0.046, R 2  = 0.21; p  = 0.011, R 2  = 0.31, respectively). LP-V distance, both at rest and during squeeze, was negatively correlated with the sum of squeeze pressures on four vaginal walls ( p  = 0.02, R 2  = 0.25; p  = 0.005, R 2  = 0.36, respectively). Conclusions Stronger levator ani muscles, smaller MLH area and a more oval shape of pelvic floor hiatus as assessed by pelvic floor ultrasound are associated with higher squeeze vaginal pressures as assessed by 3D manometry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-3462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05117-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35230482</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Gynecology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Article ; Pelvis ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Urology ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>International Urogynecology Journal, 2022-06, Vol.33 (6), p.1481-1487</ispartof><rights>The International Urogynecological Association 2022</rights><rights>2022. The International Urogynecological Association.</rights><rights>The International Urogynecological Association 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-104557bf7e60dd826340d14c9de3d34a64519a030a269422493ddf02693a68e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5505-7544</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00192-022-05117-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00192-022-05117-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35230482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alshiek, Jonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shobeiri, S. Abbas</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation between pelvic floor ultrasound parameters and vaginal pressures in nulliparous women: a subanalysis of the SUM-AN study</title><title>International Urogynecology Journal</title><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><description>Introduction and hypothesis Pelvic floor ultrasound is used as a validated technique for measuring levator ani dimensions. Vaginal manometry has been used in the past as a method to assess levator ani muscle (LAM) strength. Whether the combination of both methods can contribute to our understanding of pelvic floor pathophysiology has not yet been described. We hypothesized that as female pelvic floor muscular hiatus increases, the vaginal pressure and strength decrease. Methods We recruited 20 asymptomatic nulliparous women ages 18–85 years. Minimal levator hiatus (MLH) area, anteroposterior/left-right (AP/LR) diameter ratio, the distance between levator plate and the pubic symphysis (LP-PS) while at rest and squeeze were measured using endovaginal ultrasound (US). Vaginal pressure at rest, squeeze (Kegel) and Valsalva were measured using 3D manometry. Logistic and linear regression analysis was performed to assess correlations. Results MLH area was negatively correlated with the sum of all the squeeze pressures produced on the four walls of the vagina ( p  = 0.049, R 2  = 0.197). There was also a borderline negative correlation between MLH and the sum of rest pressures ( p  = 0.09, R 2  = 0.15). AP/LR ratio was negatively correlated with the sum of squeeze pressures ( p  = 0.056, R 2  = 0.197). LP-PS distances, both while at rest and during squeeze, were negatively correlated with the vaginal squeeze pressure ( p  = 0.046, R 2  = 0.21; p  = 0.011, R 2  = 0.31, respectively). LP-V distance, both at rest and during squeeze, was negatively correlated with the sum of squeeze pressures on four vaginal walls ( p  = 0.02, R 2  = 0.25; p  = 0.005, R 2  = 0.36, respectively). Conclusions Stronger levator ani muscles, smaller MLH area and a more oval shape of pelvic floor hiatus as assessed by pelvic floor ultrasound are associated with higher squeeze vaginal pressures as assessed by 3D manometry.</description><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>0937-3462</issn><issn>1433-3023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT1vFDEQhi0EIpfAH6BAlmhoFsZf-0EXnSAgBVKE1JZvPRs28tqLvU50fX44Xi6AlILCY43m8WtbDyGvGLxjAM37BMA6XgEvSzHWVOoJ2TApRCWAi6dkA51oKiFrfkSOU7oBAAkKnpMjobgA2fINud-GGNGZZQye7nC5Q_R0Rnc79nRwIUSa3RJNCtlbOptoJlwwJmpKe2uuR28cnSOmlEuho6c-OzcWMORE78KE_gM1NOWdKeQ-jYmGgS4_kF5efa1Ov9G0ZLt_QZ4NxiV8-bCfkKtPH79vP1fnF2dftqfnVS94vVQMpFLNbmiwBmtbXgsJlsm-syiskKaWinUGBBhed5Jz2QlrByiNMHWLSpyQt4fcOYafGdOipzH16JzxWN6r18RWQctX9M0j9CbkWP6wUk3LBOO8KxQ_UH0MKUUc9BzHycS9ZqBXR_rgSBdH-rcjvUa_fojOuwnt3yN_pBRAHIBURv4a47-7_xP7C0aYnLY</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Alshiek, Jonia</creator><creator>Wei, Qi</creator><creator>Shobeiri, S. Abbas</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5505-7544</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Correlation between pelvic floor ultrasound parameters and vaginal pressures in nulliparous women: a subanalysis of the SUM-AN study</title><author>Alshiek, Jonia ; Wei, Qi ; Shobeiri, S. Abbas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-104557bf7e60dd826340d14c9de3d34a64519a030a269422493ddf02693a68e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alshiek, Jonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shobeiri, S. Abbas</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alshiek, Jonia</au><au>Wei, Qi</au><au>Shobeiri, S. Abbas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation between pelvic floor ultrasound parameters and vaginal pressures in nulliparous women: a subanalysis of the SUM-AN study</atitle><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle><stitle>Int Urogynecol J</stitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1481</spage><epage>1487</epage><pages>1481-1487</pages><issn>0937-3462</issn><eissn>1433-3023</eissn><abstract>Introduction and hypothesis Pelvic floor ultrasound is used as a validated technique for measuring levator ani dimensions. Vaginal manometry has been used in the past as a method to assess levator ani muscle (LAM) strength. Whether the combination of both methods can contribute to our understanding of pelvic floor pathophysiology has not yet been described. We hypothesized that as female pelvic floor muscular hiatus increases, the vaginal pressure and strength decrease. Methods We recruited 20 asymptomatic nulliparous women ages 18–85 years. Minimal levator hiatus (MLH) area, anteroposterior/left-right (AP/LR) diameter ratio, the distance between levator plate and the pubic symphysis (LP-PS) while at rest and squeeze were measured using endovaginal ultrasound (US). Vaginal pressure at rest, squeeze (Kegel) and Valsalva were measured using 3D manometry. Logistic and linear regression analysis was performed to assess correlations. Results MLH area was negatively correlated with the sum of all the squeeze pressures produced on the four walls of the vagina ( p  = 0.049, R 2  = 0.197). There was also a borderline negative correlation between MLH and the sum of rest pressures ( p  = 0.09, R 2  = 0.15). AP/LR ratio was negatively correlated with the sum of squeeze pressures ( p  = 0.056, R 2  = 0.197). LP-PS distances, both while at rest and during squeeze, were negatively correlated with the vaginal squeeze pressure ( p  = 0.046, R 2  = 0.21; p  = 0.011, R 2  = 0.31, respectively). LP-V distance, both at rest and during squeeze, was negatively correlated with the sum of squeeze pressures on four vaginal walls ( p  = 0.02, R 2  = 0.25; p  = 0.005, R 2  = 0.36, respectively). Conclusions Stronger levator ani muscles, smaller MLH area and a more oval shape of pelvic floor hiatus as assessed by pelvic floor ultrasound are associated with higher squeeze vaginal pressures as assessed by 3D manometry.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35230482</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00192-022-05117-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5505-7544</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-3462
ispartof International Urogynecology Journal, 2022-06, Vol.33 (6), p.1481-1487
issn 0937-3462
1433-3023
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2634850825
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Gynecology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article
Pelvis
Ultrasonic imaging
Urology
Vagina
title Correlation between pelvic floor ultrasound parameters and vaginal pressures in nulliparous women: a subanalysis of the SUM-AN study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T21%3A17%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20between%20pelvic%20floor%20ultrasound%20parameters%20and%20vaginal%20pressures%20in%20nulliparous%20women:%20a%20subanalysis%20of%20the%20SUM-AN%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20Urogynecology%20Journal&rft.au=Alshiek,%20Jonia&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1481&rft.epage=1487&rft.pages=1481-1487&rft.issn=0937-3462&rft.eissn=1433-3023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00192-022-05117-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2634850825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678131229&rft_id=info:pmid/35230482&rfr_iscdi=true