In Vitro Performance of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Several CAD/CAM Restorative Materials After Thermal Aging

To evaluate the microshear bond strength (mSBS) of 10 universal adhesive systems applied on five different CAD/CAM restorative materials, immediately and after thermal aging. Five CAD/CAM materials were selected: 1) feldspathic glass ceramic (FeCe); 2) pre-polymerized reinforced resin composite (ReR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Operative dentistry 2022-01, Vol.47 (1), p.107-120
Hauptverfasser: Alegría-Acevedo, L F, Gutiérrez, M F, Perdigão, J, Núñez, A, Méndez-Bauer, L, Dávila-Sanchez, A, Reis, A, Loguercio, A D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue 1
container_start_page 107
container_title Operative dentistry
container_volume 47
creator Alegría-Acevedo, L F
Gutiérrez, M F
Perdigão, J
Núñez, A
Méndez-Bauer, L
Dávila-Sanchez, A
Reis, A
Loguercio, A D
description To evaluate the microshear bond strength (mSBS) of 10 universal adhesive systems applied on five different CAD/CAM restorative materials, immediately and after thermal aging. Five CAD/CAM materials were selected: 1) feldspathic glass ceramic (FeCe); 2) pre-polymerized reinforced resin composite (ReRC); 3) leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (LeGC); 4) lithium disilicate (LiDi); and 5) yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide (ZiDi). For each material, 15 blocks were cut into four rectangular sections (6 × 6 × 6 mm; n=60 per group) and processed as recommended by the respective manufacturer. For each indirect material, the following adhesive systems were applied according to the respective manufacturer's instructions: 1) AdheSE Universal [ADU]; 2) All-Bond Universal [ABU]; 3) Ambar Universal [AMB]; 4) Clearfil Universal Bond [CFU]; 5) Futurabond U [FBU]; 6) One Coat 7 Universal [OCU]; 7) Peak Universal Bond [PUB]; 8) Prime&Bond Elect [PBE]; 9) Scotchbond Universal Adhesive [SBU]; 10) Xeno Select [XEN, negative control]. After the application of the adhesive system, cylinder-shaped transparent matrices were filled with a dual-curing resin cement (NX3) and light cured. Specimens were tested in shear mode at 1.0 mm/min (mSBS), after 24 hours and 10,000 thermal cycles (TC). All data were submitted to statistical analysis (α=0.05). For FeCe, there was no significant decrease in mean mSBS for AMB, FBU, and SBU after TC when compared at 24 hours. For ReRC, AMB and SBU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to CFU and XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For LiDi, FBU and OCU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to CFU and XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For LeGC, AMB and PUB showed higher mean mSBS when compared to XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For ZiDi, OCU and SBU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to XEN, after 24 hours and TC. In addition, PBE and XEN showed the lowest mean mSBS after TC with higher percentage of bond strength reduction. The mean mSBS among the different universal adhesives varied widely for each CAD/CAM material used. In addition, most universal adhesives underwent a statistically significant bond strength reduction after TC.
doi_str_mv 10.2341/20-203-L
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2634848147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2634848147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-191ac3fb91c6856d90ee94d45a7e4d2271cd22dad14a3a05e1c62a5f6754f2f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOwkAUhidGI4gmPoGZpZvKXHtZNgWVpEQj4LYZ2jNQ03Zwppjw9g4RdXMu-b_854LQLSUPjAs6ZiRghAf5GRpSKZOAxSE_R0PCQxpEERcDdOXcByFCCikv0YBLxsJI0iE6zDr8XvfW4Few2thWdSVgo_Gk1hosdD1edfUXWKcanFZbcL7Bi4ProXXYdHgBXvRalk7GWTrHb-B6Y1V_xOaqB1urxuFU-wovt-AHeJ9N3W2u0YX2Etyc8gitHqfL7DnIX55mWZoHJU3iPqAJVSXX64SWYSzDKiEAiaiEVBGIirGIlj5WqqJCcUUkeI4pqf15QjOd8BG6__HdWfO599sVbe1KaBrVgdm7goVcxCKmIvpHS2ucs6CLna1bZQ8FJcXx0QXzmfAi9-jdyXW_bqH6A38_y78Bbjh4Ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2634848147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vitro Performance of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Several CAD/CAM Restorative Materials After Thermal Aging</title><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Alegría-Acevedo, L F ; Gutiérrez, M F ; Perdigão, J ; Núñez, A ; Méndez-Bauer, L ; Dávila-Sanchez, A ; Reis, A ; Loguercio, A D</creator><creatorcontrib>Alegría-Acevedo, L F ; Gutiérrez, M F ; Perdigão, J ; Núñez, A ; Méndez-Bauer, L ; Dávila-Sanchez, A ; Reis, A ; Loguercio, A D</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the microshear bond strength (mSBS) of 10 universal adhesive systems applied on five different CAD/CAM restorative materials, immediately and after thermal aging. Five CAD/CAM materials were selected: 1) feldspathic glass ceramic (FeCe); 2) pre-polymerized reinforced resin composite (ReRC); 3) leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (LeGC); 4) lithium disilicate (LiDi); and 5) yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide (ZiDi). For each material, 15 blocks were cut into four rectangular sections (6 × 6 × 6 mm; n=60 per group) and processed as recommended by the respective manufacturer. For each indirect material, the following adhesive systems were applied according to the respective manufacturer's instructions: 1) AdheSE Universal [ADU]; 2) All-Bond Universal [ABU]; 3) Ambar Universal [AMB]; 4) Clearfil Universal Bond [CFU]; 5) Futurabond U [FBU]; 6) One Coat 7 Universal [OCU]; 7) Peak Universal Bond [PUB]; 8) Prime&amp;Bond Elect [PBE]; 9) Scotchbond Universal Adhesive [SBU]; 10) Xeno Select [XEN, negative control]. After the application of the adhesive system, cylinder-shaped transparent matrices were filled with a dual-curing resin cement (NX3) and light cured. Specimens were tested in shear mode at 1.0 mm/min (mSBS), after 24 hours and 10,000 thermal cycles (TC). All data were submitted to statistical analysis (α=0.05). For FeCe, there was no significant decrease in mean mSBS for AMB, FBU, and SBU after TC when compared at 24 hours. For ReRC, AMB and SBU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to CFU and XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For LiDi, FBU and OCU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to CFU and XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For LeGC, AMB and PUB showed higher mean mSBS when compared to XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For ZiDi, OCU and SBU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to XEN, after 24 hours and TC. In addition, PBE and XEN showed the lowest mean mSBS after TC with higher percentage of bond strength reduction. The mean mSBS among the different universal adhesives varied widely for each CAD/CAM material used. In addition, most universal adhesives underwent a statistically significant bond strength reduction after TC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-7734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2341/20-203-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35226751</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Operative dentistry, 2022-01, Vol.47 (1), p.107-120</ispartof><rights>Operative Dentistry, 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-191ac3fb91c6856d90ee94d45a7e4d2271cd22dad14a3a05e1c62a5f6754f2f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-191ac3fb91c6856d90ee94d45a7e4d2271cd22dad14a3a05e1c62a5f6754f2f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35226751$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alegría-Acevedo, L F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, M F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdigão, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Núñez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez-Bauer, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dávila-Sanchez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loguercio, A D</creatorcontrib><title>In Vitro Performance of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Several CAD/CAM Restorative Materials After Thermal Aging</title><title>Operative dentistry</title><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><description>To evaluate the microshear bond strength (mSBS) of 10 universal adhesive systems applied on five different CAD/CAM restorative materials, immediately and after thermal aging. Five CAD/CAM materials were selected: 1) feldspathic glass ceramic (FeCe); 2) pre-polymerized reinforced resin composite (ReRC); 3) leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (LeGC); 4) lithium disilicate (LiDi); and 5) yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide (ZiDi). For each material, 15 blocks were cut into four rectangular sections (6 × 6 × 6 mm; n=60 per group) and processed as recommended by the respective manufacturer. For each indirect material, the following adhesive systems were applied according to the respective manufacturer's instructions: 1) AdheSE Universal [ADU]; 2) All-Bond Universal [ABU]; 3) Ambar Universal [AMB]; 4) Clearfil Universal Bond [CFU]; 5) Futurabond U [FBU]; 6) One Coat 7 Universal [OCU]; 7) Peak Universal Bond [PUB]; 8) Prime&amp;Bond Elect [PBE]; 9) Scotchbond Universal Adhesive [SBU]; 10) Xeno Select [XEN, negative control]. After the application of the adhesive system, cylinder-shaped transparent matrices were filled with a dual-curing resin cement (NX3) and light cured. Specimens were tested in shear mode at 1.0 mm/min (mSBS), after 24 hours and 10,000 thermal cycles (TC). All data were submitted to statistical analysis (α=0.05). For FeCe, there was no significant decrease in mean mSBS for AMB, FBU, and SBU after TC when compared at 24 hours. For ReRC, AMB and SBU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to CFU and XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For LiDi, FBU and OCU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to CFU and XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For LeGC, AMB and PUB showed higher mean mSBS when compared to XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For ZiDi, OCU and SBU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to XEN, after 24 hours and TC. In addition, PBE and XEN showed the lowest mean mSBS after TC with higher percentage of bond strength reduction. The mean mSBS among the different universal adhesives varied widely for each CAD/CAM material used. In addition, most universal adhesives underwent a statistically significant bond strength reduction after TC.</description><issn>0361-7734</issn><issn>1559-2863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtOwkAUhidGI4gmPoGZpZvKXHtZNgWVpEQj4LYZ2jNQ03Zwppjw9g4RdXMu-b_854LQLSUPjAs6ZiRghAf5GRpSKZOAxSE_R0PCQxpEERcDdOXcByFCCikv0YBLxsJI0iE6zDr8XvfW4Few2thWdSVgo_Gk1hosdD1edfUXWKcanFZbcL7Bi4ProXXYdHgBXvRalk7GWTrHb-B6Y1V_xOaqB1urxuFU-wovt-AHeJ9N3W2u0YX2Etyc8gitHqfL7DnIX55mWZoHJU3iPqAJVSXX64SWYSzDKiEAiaiEVBGIirGIlj5WqqJCcUUkeI4pqf15QjOd8BG6__HdWfO599sVbe1KaBrVgdm7goVcxCKmIvpHS2ucs6CLna1bZQ8FJcXx0QXzmfAi9-jdyXW_bqH6A38_y78Bbjh4Ig</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Alegría-Acevedo, L F</creator><creator>Gutiérrez, M F</creator><creator>Perdigão, J</creator><creator>Núñez, A</creator><creator>Méndez-Bauer, L</creator><creator>Dávila-Sanchez, A</creator><creator>Reis, A</creator><creator>Loguercio, A D</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>In Vitro Performance of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Several CAD/CAM Restorative Materials After Thermal Aging</title><author>Alegría-Acevedo, L F ; Gutiérrez, M F ; Perdigão, J ; Núñez, A ; Méndez-Bauer, L ; Dávila-Sanchez, A ; Reis, A ; Loguercio, A D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-191ac3fb91c6856d90ee94d45a7e4d2271cd22dad14a3a05e1c62a5f6754f2f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alegría-Acevedo, L F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, M F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdigão, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Núñez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez-Bauer, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dávila-Sanchez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loguercio, A D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alegría-Acevedo, L F</au><au>Gutiérrez, M F</au><au>Perdigão, J</au><au>Núñez, A</au><au>Méndez-Bauer, L</au><au>Dávila-Sanchez, A</au><au>Reis, A</au><au>Loguercio, A D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vitro Performance of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Several CAD/CAM Restorative Materials After Thermal Aging</atitle><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>107-120</pages><issn>0361-7734</issn><eissn>1559-2863</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the microshear bond strength (mSBS) of 10 universal adhesive systems applied on five different CAD/CAM restorative materials, immediately and after thermal aging. Five CAD/CAM materials were selected: 1) feldspathic glass ceramic (FeCe); 2) pre-polymerized reinforced resin composite (ReRC); 3) leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (LeGC); 4) lithium disilicate (LiDi); and 5) yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide (ZiDi). For each material, 15 blocks were cut into four rectangular sections (6 × 6 × 6 mm; n=60 per group) and processed as recommended by the respective manufacturer. For each indirect material, the following adhesive systems were applied according to the respective manufacturer's instructions: 1) AdheSE Universal [ADU]; 2) All-Bond Universal [ABU]; 3) Ambar Universal [AMB]; 4) Clearfil Universal Bond [CFU]; 5) Futurabond U [FBU]; 6) One Coat 7 Universal [OCU]; 7) Peak Universal Bond [PUB]; 8) Prime&amp;Bond Elect [PBE]; 9) Scotchbond Universal Adhesive [SBU]; 10) Xeno Select [XEN, negative control]. After the application of the adhesive system, cylinder-shaped transparent matrices were filled with a dual-curing resin cement (NX3) and light cured. Specimens were tested in shear mode at 1.0 mm/min (mSBS), after 24 hours and 10,000 thermal cycles (TC). All data were submitted to statistical analysis (α=0.05). For FeCe, there was no significant decrease in mean mSBS for AMB, FBU, and SBU after TC when compared at 24 hours. For ReRC, AMB and SBU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to CFU and XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For LiDi, FBU and OCU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to CFU and XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For LeGC, AMB and PUB showed higher mean mSBS when compared to XEN, after 24 hours and TC. For ZiDi, OCU and SBU showed higher mean mSBS when compared to XEN, after 24 hours and TC. In addition, PBE and XEN showed the lowest mean mSBS after TC with higher percentage of bond strength reduction. The mean mSBS among the different universal adhesives varied widely for each CAD/CAM material used. In addition, most universal adhesives underwent a statistically significant bond strength reduction after TC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35226751</pmid><doi>10.2341/20-203-L</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-7734
ispartof Operative dentistry, 2022-01, Vol.47 (1), p.107-120
issn 0361-7734
1559-2863
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2634848147
source Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title In Vitro Performance of Different Universal Adhesive Systems on Several CAD/CAM Restorative Materials After Thermal Aging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A29%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vitro%20Performance%20of%20Different%20Universal%20Adhesive%20Systems%20on%20Several%20CAD/CAM%20Restorative%20Materials%20After%20Thermal%20Aging&rft.jtitle=Operative%20dentistry&rft.au=Alegr%C3%ADa-Acevedo,%20L%20F&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=107-120&rft.issn=0361-7734&rft.eissn=1559-2863&rft_id=info:doi/10.2341/20-203-L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2634848147%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2634848147&rft_id=info:pmid/35226751&rfr_iscdi=true