Contact allergy to and allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: A clinical review and update

This review aims to provide a clinically useful update regarding the role of formaldehyde (FA) and its five main releasers (FRs) quaternium‐15, diazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, and 2‐bromo‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol (bronopol) in contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contact dermatitis 2022-07, Vol.87 (1), p.20-27
Hauptverfasser: Goossens, An, Aerts, Olivier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Contact dermatitis
container_volume 87
creator Goossens, An
Aerts, Olivier
description This review aims to provide a clinically useful update regarding the role of formaldehyde (FA) and its five main releasers (FRs) quaternium‐15, diazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, and 2‐bromo‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol (bronopol) in contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis. These ubiquitous preservatives are still often present, and sometimes undeclared, in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, household detergents, and chemical (industrial) products. In Europe, the use of free FA and quaternium‐15 in cosmetics is forbidden and contact allergy rates have been found to be stable to decreasing. However, FA/FRs still readily provoke localized (eg, facial/hand), airborne, and generalized dermatitis, and may also complicate atopic and stasis dermatitis, or result in nummular dermatitis. Seborrheic‐, rosacea‐ and impetigo‐like dermatitis have recently been reported. For a correct diagnosis, FA 2% aq. (0.60 mg/cm2) should be used, and particularly the FRs bronopol 0.5% pet. and diazolidinyl urea 2% pet. should be patch tested separately in a baseline series. If sensitization to FA occurs, both FA and FRs should preferably be avoided, except perhaps for bronopol in case it tests negatively. If a patient reacts to one or more FRs (such as bronopol or diazolidinyl/imidazolidinyl urea), but not to FA, then the specific FR(s) should be avoided.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cod.14089
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2634847007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2634847007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-80cf7be6cbe63cda0240b724c6a52e8dda16547f627aeac7d01c4ffd2e72e7a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9LAzEQxYMoWqsHv4AseNHD6iS7m2y9lfoXBC96XtJkVlOym5rsWnrwuxvbKig4ZAhv8ptH4BFyROGcxrpQTp_THMrRFhlQDpBCkfFtMgAKRUpLke2R_RBmAJTnrNwle1nB2CijowH5mLi2k6pLpLXoX5ZJ5xLZ6o00KlGbd42-kZ3pTEhq75qkdlFbja9LjauNXwOPFmVAHy6TcaKsaY2SNk7fDS5WdD_XssMDslNLG_Bwcw_J88310-QufXi8vZ-MH1KVleUoLUHVYopcxc6UlsBymAqWKy4LhqXWkvIiFzVnQqJUQgNVeV1rhiIeCdmQnK5959699Ri6qjFBobWyRdeHivEsL3MBICJ68gedud638XeREkXkCs4idbamlHcheKyruTeN9MuKQvWVSRUzqVaZRPZ449hPG9Q_5HcIEbhYAwtjcfm_UzV5vFpbfgI0BZeH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675348562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contact allergy to and allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: A clinical review and update</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Goossens, An ; Aerts, Olivier</creator><creatorcontrib>Goossens, An ; Aerts, Olivier</creatorcontrib><description>This review aims to provide a clinically useful update regarding the role of formaldehyde (FA) and its five main releasers (FRs) quaternium‐15, diazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, and 2‐bromo‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol (bronopol) in contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis. These ubiquitous preservatives are still often present, and sometimes undeclared, in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, household detergents, and chemical (industrial) products. In Europe, the use of free FA and quaternium‐15 in cosmetics is forbidden and contact allergy rates have been found to be stable to decreasing. However, FA/FRs still readily provoke localized (eg, facial/hand), airborne, and generalized dermatitis, and may also complicate atopic and stasis dermatitis, or result in nummular dermatitis. Seborrheic‐, rosacea‐ and impetigo‐like dermatitis have recently been reported. For a correct diagnosis, FA 2% aq. (0.60 mg/cm2) should be used, and particularly the FRs bronopol 0.5% pet. and diazolidinyl urea 2% pet. should be patch tested separately in a baseline series. If sensitization to FA occurs, both FA and FRs should preferably be avoided, except perhaps for bronopol in case it tests negatively. If a patient reacts to one or more FRs (such as bronopol or diazolidinyl/imidazolidinyl urea), but not to FA, then the specific FR(s) should be avoided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cod.14089</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35229319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>allergic contact dermatitis ; Allergies ; Atopy ; bronopol ; Contact dermatitis ; Cosmetics ; Cosmetics - adverse effects ; Dermatitis ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology ; Detergents ; diazolidinyl urea ; DMDM hydantoin ; Eczema ; Formaldehyde ; Formaldehyde - adverse effects ; formaldehyde releasers ; Humans ; imidazolidinyl urea ; Impetigo ; Medical equipment ; Patch Tests - adverse effects ; Preservatives ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical ; quaternium‐15 ; Urea</subject><ispartof>Contact dermatitis, 2022-07, Vol.87 (1), p.20-27</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-80cf7be6cbe63cda0240b724c6a52e8dda16547f627aeac7d01c4ffd2e72e7a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-80cf7be6cbe63cda0240b724c6a52e8dda16547f627aeac7d01c4ffd2e72e7a03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9805-3439 ; 0000-0002-0076-2887</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcod.14089$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcod.14089$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35229319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goossens, An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aerts, Olivier</creatorcontrib><title>Contact allergy to and allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: A clinical review and update</title><title>Contact dermatitis</title><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><description>This review aims to provide a clinically useful update regarding the role of formaldehyde (FA) and its five main releasers (FRs) quaternium‐15, diazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, and 2‐bromo‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol (bronopol) in contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis. These ubiquitous preservatives are still often present, and sometimes undeclared, in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, household detergents, and chemical (industrial) products. In Europe, the use of free FA and quaternium‐15 in cosmetics is forbidden and contact allergy rates have been found to be stable to decreasing. However, FA/FRs still readily provoke localized (eg, facial/hand), airborne, and generalized dermatitis, and may also complicate atopic and stasis dermatitis, or result in nummular dermatitis. Seborrheic‐, rosacea‐ and impetigo‐like dermatitis have recently been reported. For a correct diagnosis, FA 2% aq. (0.60 mg/cm2) should be used, and particularly the FRs bronopol 0.5% pet. and diazolidinyl urea 2% pet. should be patch tested separately in a baseline series. If sensitization to FA occurs, both FA and FRs should preferably be avoided, except perhaps for bronopol in case it tests negatively. If a patient reacts to one or more FRs (such as bronopol or diazolidinyl/imidazolidinyl urea), but not to FA, then the specific FR(s) should be avoided.</description><subject>allergic contact dermatitis</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Atopy</subject><subject>bronopol</subject><subject>Contact dermatitis</subject><subject>Cosmetics</subject><subject>Cosmetics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology</subject><subject>Detergents</subject><subject>diazolidinyl urea</subject><subject>DMDM hydantoin</subject><subject>Eczema</subject><subject>Formaldehyde</subject><subject>Formaldehyde - adverse effects</subject><subject>formaldehyde releasers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>imidazolidinyl urea</subject><subject>Impetigo</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Patch Tests - adverse effects</subject><subject>Preservatives</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical</subject><subject>quaternium‐15</subject><subject>Urea</subject><issn>0105-1873</issn><issn>1600-0536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9LAzEQxYMoWqsHv4AseNHD6iS7m2y9lfoXBC96XtJkVlOym5rsWnrwuxvbKig4ZAhv8ptH4BFyROGcxrpQTp_THMrRFhlQDpBCkfFtMgAKRUpLke2R_RBmAJTnrNwle1nB2CijowH5mLi2k6pLpLXoX5ZJ5xLZ6o00KlGbd42-kZ3pTEhq75qkdlFbja9LjauNXwOPFmVAHy6TcaKsaY2SNk7fDS5WdD_XssMDslNLG_Bwcw_J88310-QufXi8vZ-MH1KVleUoLUHVYopcxc6UlsBymAqWKy4LhqXWkvIiFzVnQqJUQgNVeV1rhiIeCdmQnK5959699Ri6qjFBobWyRdeHivEsL3MBICJ68gedud638XeREkXkCs4idbamlHcheKyruTeN9MuKQvWVSRUzqVaZRPZ449hPG9Q_5HcIEbhYAwtjcfm_UzV5vFpbfgI0BZeH</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Goossens, An</creator><creator>Aerts, Olivier</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9805-3439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0076-2887</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Contact allergy to and allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: A clinical review and update</title><author>Goossens, An ; Aerts, Olivier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-80cf7be6cbe63cda0240b724c6a52e8dda16547f627aeac7d01c4ffd2e72e7a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>allergic contact dermatitis</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Atopy</topic><topic>bronopol</topic><topic>Contact dermatitis</topic><topic>Cosmetics</topic><topic>Cosmetics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology</topic><topic>Detergents</topic><topic>diazolidinyl urea</topic><topic>DMDM hydantoin</topic><topic>Eczema</topic><topic>Formaldehyde</topic><topic>Formaldehyde - adverse effects</topic><topic>formaldehyde releasers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>imidazolidinyl urea</topic><topic>Impetigo</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Patch Tests - adverse effects</topic><topic>Preservatives</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical</topic><topic>quaternium‐15</topic><topic>Urea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goossens, An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aerts, Olivier</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goossens, An</au><au>Aerts, Olivier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contact allergy to and allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: A clinical review and update</atitle><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>20-27</pages><issn>0105-1873</issn><eissn>1600-0536</eissn><abstract>This review aims to provide a clinically useful update regarding the role of formaldehyde (FA) and its five main releasers (FRs) quaternium‐15, diazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, and 2‐bromo‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol (bronopol) in contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis. These ubiquitous preservatives are still often present, and sometimes undeclared, in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, household detergents, and chemical (industrial) products. In Europe, the use of free FA and quaternium‐15 in cosmetics is forbidden and contact allergy rates have been found to be stable to decreasing. However, FA/FRs still readily provoke localized (eg, facial/hand), airborne, and generalized dermatitis, and may also complicate atopic and stasis dermatitis, or result in nummular dermatitis. Seborrheic‐, rosacea‐ and impetigo‐like dermatitis have recently been reported. For a correct diagnosis, FA 2% aq. (0.60 mg/cm2) should be used, and particularly the FRs bronopol 0.5% pet. and diazolidinyl urea 2% pet. should be patch tested separately in a baseline series. If sensitization to FA occurs, both FA and FRs should preferably be avoided, except perhaps for bronopol in case it tests negatively. If a patient reacts to one or more FRs (such as bronopol or diazolidinyl/imidazolidinyl urea), but not to FA, then the specific FR(s) should be avoided.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35229319</pmid><doi>10.1111/cod.14089</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9805-3439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0076-2887</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0105-1873
ispartof Contact dermatitis, 2022-07, Vol.87 (1), p.20-27
issn 0105-1873
1600-0536
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2634847007
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects allergic contact dermatitis
Allergies
Atopy
bronopol
Contact dermatitis
Cosmetics
Cosmetics - adverse effects
Dermatitis
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology
Detergents
diazolidinyl urea
DMDM hydantoin
Eczema
Formaldehyde
Formaldehyde - adverse effects
formaldehyde releasers
Humans
imidazolidinyl urea
Impetigo
Medical equipment
Patch Tests - adverse effects
Preservatives
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical
quaternium‐15
Urea
title Contact allergy to and allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: A clinical review and update
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T22%3A56%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contact%20allergy%20to%20and%20allergic%20contact%20dermatitis%20from%20formaldehyde%20and%20formaldehyde%20releasers:%20A%20clinical%20review%20and%20update&rft.jtitle=Contact%20dermatitis&rft.au=Goossens,%20An&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=20-27&rft.issn=0105-1873&rft.eissn=1600-0536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cod.14089&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2634847007%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675348562&rft_id=info:pmid/35229319&rfr_iscdi=true