How do heterogeneous R&D investments affect China's green productivity: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis

Currently, China's environmental pollution control investment and R&D investment have increased at a remarkable speed, exceeding the GDP growth rate. Against this background, determining the impact of different orientations of R&D investment on green total-factor productivity (GTFP) is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2022-06, Vol.825, p.154090-154090, Article 154090
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Shikuan, Cao, Yuequn, Feng, Chao, Guo, Ke, Zhang, Jinning
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 154090
container_issue
container_start_page 154090
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 825
creator Zhao, Shikuan
Cao, Yuequn
Feng, Chao
Guo, Ke
Zhang, Jinning
description Currently, China's environmental pollution control investment and R&D investment have increased at a remarkable speed, exceeding the GDP growth rate. Against this background, determining the impact of different orientations of R&D investment on green total-factor productivity (GTFP) is essential for overcoming the dual dilemma of resource depletion and environmental degradation. By applying the perpetual inventory method (PIM), meta-frontier DEA method and mediation effect test methods, this paper empirically tests the effects and mechanisms of environmentally induced R&D (ER&D) and traditional R&D (TR&D) on promoting GTFP during 2004–2019 in China at the provincial level. The results show that (1) ER&D investment has significantly promoted the growth of GTFP, while TR&D's promoting effects on GTFP are not significant; (2) ER&D promotes the growth of GTFP through the three channels of emission reduction, clean energy consumption, and green technology progress; and (3) from the perspective of regional heterogeneity, ER&D's promoting effects on GTFP in the eastern provinces are higher than the central and western provinces, and the promoting effects in the northern provinces are higher than in the southern provinces. From the perspective of pollution degree heterogeneity, ER&D's promotion of GTFP shows an inverted U-shaped characteristic as the pollution level increases. This means that, in the process of China's environmental governance, it is necessary to increase ER&D investment and guide green innovation to serve pollution control to achieve sustainable and high-quality economic development. [Display omitted] •Environmentally induced R&D (ER&D) investment and traditional R&D (TR&D) investment are distinguished by the “structure-behaviour-performance” model.•The capital stock of ER&D and TR&D is estimated using the perpetual inventory method.•The GTFP of provinces in China is measured by the meta-frontier DEA method and the direction-distance function.•The effect and mechanism of ER&D on promoting GTFP was empirically examined.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154090
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2633915613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969722011822</els_id><sourcerecordid>2633915613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-95bed7eb688c6050edeac09e6de1e536edcc85594a335834dffdaa9de5e3ecf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFPGzEQhS0EgkD7F8An2sum9nrttbmhtBQkpFaoPVuOPZt1lKyD7WyVf4_TUK5lLtZIb9543ofQFSVTSqj4spwm63PIMIzTmtT1lPKGKHKEJlS2qqKkFsdoQkgjKyVUe4bOU1qSUq2kp-iM8ZpKSdsJ6u_DH-wC7iFDDAsYIGwTfrr-iv0wQsprGHLCpuvAZjzr_WA-JbyIAAPexOC2NvvR590NfoLRJ5_9sMC5B_wzxGKI-90mlDb59AGddGaV4OPre4F-3337NbuvHn98f5jdPla2IU2uFJ-Da2EupLSCcAIOjCUKhAMKnAlw1krOVWMY45I1ruucMcoBBwa2Y-wCfT74lu89b8sFeu2ThdXK_D1N10LQkgvl5B1SxhTlgu5d24PUxpBShE5vol-buNOU6D0RvdRvRPSeiD4QKZOXr0u28zW4t7l_CIrg9iCAksroIe6NYLDgfCyhaxf8f5e8ALrXo4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2633915613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do heterogeneous R&amp;D investments affect China's green productivity: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhao, Shikuan ; Cao, Yuequn ; Feng, Chao ; Guo, Ke ; Zhang, Jinning</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shikuan ; Cao, Yuequn ; Feng, Chao ; Guo, Ke ; Zhang, Jinning</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Currently, China's environmental pollution control investment and R&D investment have increased at a remarkable speed, exceeding the GDP growth rate. Against this background, determining the impact of different orientations of R&D investment on green total-factor productivity (GTFP) is essential for overcoming the dual dilemma of resource depletion and environmental degradation. By applying the perpetual inventory method (PIM), meta-frontier DEA method and mediation effect test methods, this paper empirically tests the effects and mechanisms of environmentally induced R&D (ER&D) and traditional R&D (TR&D) on promoting GTFP during 2004–2019 in China at the provincial level. The results show that (1) ER&D investment has significantly promoted the growth of GTFP, while TR&D's promoting effects on GTFP are not significant; (2) ER&D promotes the growth of GTFP through the three channels of emission reduction, clean energy consumption, and green technology progress; and (3) from the perspective of regional heterogeneity, ER&D's promoting effects on GTFP in the eastern provinces are higher than the central and western provinces, and the promoting effects in the northern provinces are higher than in the southern provinces. From the perspective of pollution degree heterogeneity, ER&D's promotion of GTFP shows an inverted U-shaped characteristic as the pollution level increases. This means that, in the process of China's environmental governance, it is necessary to increase ER&D investment and guide green innovation to serve pollution control to achieve sustainable and high-quality economic development. [Display omitted] •Environmentally induced R&D (ER&D) investment and traditional R&D (TR&D) investment are distinguished by the “structure-behaviour-performance” model.•The capital stock of ER&D and TR&D is estimated using the perpetual inventory method.•The GTFP of provinces in China is measured by the meta-frontier DEA method and the direction-distance function.•The effect and mechanism of ER&D on promoting GTFP was empirically examined.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154090</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35218817</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>China ; clean energy ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Economic Development ; Efficiency ; environment ; environmental governance ; Environmental Policy ; Environmental regulation ; Green productivity ; Heterogeneous R&amp;D ; inventories ; pollution ; pollution control ; sustainable technology ; Transmission mechanism</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2022-06, Vol.825, p.154090-154090, Article 154090</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-95bed7eb688c6050edeac09e6de1e536edcc85594a335834dffdaa9de5e3ecf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-95bed7eb688c6050edeac09e6de1e536edcc85594a335834dffdaa9de5e3ecf33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154090$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35218817$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shikuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yuequn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jinning</creatorcontrib><title>How do heterogeneous R&amp;D investments affect China's green productivity: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Currently, China's environmental pollution control investment and R&D investment have increased at a remarkable speed, exceeding the GDP growth rate. Against this background, determining the impact of different orientations of R&D investment on green total-factor productivity (GTFP) is essential for overcoming the dual dilemma of resource depletion and environmental degradation. By applying the perpetual inventory method (PIM), meta-frontier DEA method and mediation effect test methods, this paper empirically tests the effects and mechanisms of environmentally induced R&D (ER&D) and traditional R&D (TR&D) on promoting GTFP during 2004–2019 in China at the provincial level. The results show that (1) ER&D investment has significantly promoted the growth of GTFP, while TR&D's promoting effects on GTFP are not significant; (2) ER&D promotes the growth of GTFP through the three channels of emission reduction, clean energy consumption, and green technology progress; and (3) from the perspective of regional heterogeneity, ER&D's promoting effects on GTFP in the eastern provinces are higher than the central and western provinces, and the promoting effects in the northern provinces are higher than in the southern provinces. From the perspective of pollution degree heterogeneity, ER&D's promotion of GTFP shows an inverted U-shaped characteristic as the pollution level increases. This means that, in the process of China's environmental governance, it is necessary to increase ER&D investment and guide green innovation to serve pollution control to achieve sustainable and high-quality economic development. [Display omitted] •Environmentally induced R&D (ER&D) investment and traditional R&D (TR&D) investment are distinguished by the “structure-behaviour-performance” model.•The capital stock of ER&D and TR&D is estimated using the perpetual inventory method.•The GTFP of provinces in China is measured by the meta-frontier DEA method and the direction-distance function.•The effect and mechanism of ER&D on promoting GTFP was empirically examined.]]></description><subject>China</subject><subject>clean energy</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>environment</subject><subject>environmental governance</subject><subject>Environmental Policy</subject><subject>Environmental regulation</subject><subject>Green productivity</subject><subject>Heterogeneous R&amp;D</subject><subject>inventories</subject><subject>pollution</subject><subject>pollution control</subject><subject>sustainable technology</subject><subject>Transmission mechanism</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFPGzEQhS0EgkD7F8An2sum9nrttbmhtBQkpFaoPVuOPZt1lKyD7WyVf4_TUK5lLtZIb9543ofQFSVTSqj4spwm63PIMIzTmtT1lPKGKHKEJlS2qqKkFsdoQkgjKyVUe4bOU1qSUq2kp-iM8ZpKSdsJ6u_DH-wC7iFDDAsYIGwTfrr-iv0wQsprGHLCpuvAZjzr_WA-JbyIAAPexOC2NvvR590NfoLRJ5_9sMC5B_wzxGKI-90mlDb59AGddGaV4OPre4F-3337NbuvHn98f5jdPla2IU2uFJ-Da2EupLSCcAIOjCUKhAMKnAlw1krOVWMY45I1ruucMcoBBwa2Y-wCfT74lu89b8sFeu2ThdXK_D1N10LQkgvl5B1SxhTlgu5d24PUxpBShE5vol-buNOU6D0RvdRvRPSeiD4QKZOXr0u28zW4t7l_CIrg9iCAksroIe6NYLDgfCyhaxf8f5e8ALrXo4k</recordid><startdate>20220615</startdate><enddate>20220615</enddate><creator>Zhao, Shikuan</creator><creator>Cao, Yuequn</creator><creator>Feng, Chao</creator><creator>Guo, Ke</creator><creator>Zhang, Jinning</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220615</creationdate><title>How do heterogeneous R&amp;D investments affect China's green productivity: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis</title><author>Zhao, Shikuan ; Cao, Yuequn ; Feng, Chao ; Guo, Ke ; Zhang, Jinning</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-95bed7eb688c6050edeac09e6de1e536edcc85594a335834dffdaa9de5e3ecf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>clean energy</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>environment</topic><topic>environmental governance</topic><topic>Environmental Policy</topic><topic>Environmental regulation</topic><topic>Green productivity</topic><topic>Heterogeneous R&amp;D</topic><topic>inventories</topic><topic>pollution</topic><topic>pollution control</topic><topic>sustainable technology</topic><topic>Transmission mechanism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shikuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yuequn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jinning</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Shikuan</au><au>Cao, Yuequn</au><au>Feng, Chao</au><au>Guo, Ke</au><au>Zhang, Jinning</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do heterogeneous R&amp;D investments affect China's green productivity: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2022-06-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>825</volume><spage>154090</spage><epage>154090</epage><pages>154090-154090</pages><artnum>154090</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Currently, China's environmental pollution control investment and R&D investment have increased at a remarkable speed, exceeding the GDP growth rate. Against this background, determining the impact of different orientations of R&D investment on green total-factor productivity (GTFP) is essential for overcoming the dual dilemma of resource depletion and environmental degradation. By applying the perpetual inventory method (PIM), meta-frontier DEA method and mediation effect test methods, this paper empirically tests the effects and mechanisms of environmentally induced R&D (ER&D) and traditional R&D (TR&D) on promoting GTFP during 2004–2019 in China at the provincial level. The results show that (1) ER&D investment has significantly promoted the growth of GTFP, while TR&D's promoting effects on GTFP are not significant; (2) ER&D promotes the growth of GTFP through the three channels of emission reduction, clean energy consumption, and green technology progress; and (3) from the perspective of regional heterogeneity, ER&D's promoting effects on GTFP in the eastern provinces are higher than the central and western provinces, and the promoting effects in the northern provinces are higher than in the southern provinces. From the perspective of pollution degree heterogeneity, ER&D's promotion of GTFP shows an inverted U-shaped characteristic as the pollution level increases. This means that, in the process of China's environmental governance, it is necessary to increase ER&D investment and guide green innovation to serve pollution control to achieve sustainable and high-quality economic development. [Display omitted] •Environmentally induced R&D (ER&D) investment and traditional R&D (TR&D) investment are distinguished by the “structure-behaviour-performance” model.•The capital stock of ER&D and TR&D is estimated using the perpetual inventory method.•The GTFP of provinces in China is measured by the meta-frontier DEA method and the direction-distance function.•The effect and mechanism of ER&D on promoting GTFP was empirically examined.]]></abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35218817</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154090</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2022-06, Vol.825, p.154090-154090, Article 154090
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2633915613
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects China
clean energy
Conservation of Natural Resources
Economic Development
Efficiency
environment
environmental governance
Environmental Policy
Environmental regulation
Green productivity
Heterogeneous R&D
inventories
pollution
pollution control
sustainable technology
Transmission mechanism
title How do heterogeneous R&D investments affect China's green productivity: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T23%3A41%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20heterogeneous%20R&D%20investments%20affect%20China's%20green%20productivity:%20Revisiting%20the%20Porter%20hypothesis&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Zhao,%20Shikuan&rft.date=2022-06-15&rft.volume=825&rft.spage=154090&rft.epage=154090&rft.pages=154090-154090&rft.artnum=154090&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2633915613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2633915613&rft_id=info:pmid/35218817&rft_els_id=S0048969722011822&rfr_iscdi=true