Patterns of germline and somatic testing after universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: A clinical practice survey of active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer

Clinical guidelines recommend universal tumor screening (UTS) of colorectal and endometrial cancers for Lynch syndrome (LS). There are limited guidelines for how to integrate germline testing and somatic tumor testing after a mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumor is identified. We sought to charact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of genetic counseling 2022-08, Vol.31 (4), p.949-955
Hauptverfasser: Hodan, Rachel, Rodgers‐Fouche, Linda, Arora, Sanjeevani, Dominguez‐Valentin, Mev, Kanth, Priyanka, Katona, Bryson W., Mraz, Kathryn A., Roberts, Maegan E., Vilar, Eduardo, Soto‐Azghani, Cynthia M., Brand, Randall E, Esplin, Edward D., Perez, Kimberly
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 955
container_issue 4
container_start_page 949
container_title Journal of genetic counseling
container_volume 31
creator Hodan, Rachel
Rodgers‐Fouche, Linda
Arora, Sanjeevani
Dominguez‐Valentin, Mev
Kanth, Priyanka
Katona, Bryson W.
Mraz, Kathryn A.
Roberts, Maegan E.
Vilar, Eduardo
Soto‐Azghani, Cynthia M.
Brand, Randall E
Esplin, Edward D.
Perez, Kimberly
description Clinical guidelines recommend universal tumor screening (UTS) of colorectal and endometrial cancers for Lynch syndrome (LS). There are limited guidelines for how to integrate germline testing and somatic tumor testing after a mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumor is identified. We sought to characterize current practice patterns and barriers to preferred practice among clinical providers in high‐risk cancer programs. A clinical practice survey was sent to 423 active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer (CGA‐IGC) with a follow‐up survey sent to 103 clinician responders. The survey outlined clinical vignettes and asked respondents their preferred next test. The survey intended to assess: (1) the role of patient age and family history in risk assessment and (2) barriers to preferred genetic testing. Genetic test options included targeted germline testing based on dMMR expression, germline testing for LS, germline testing with a multigene cancer panel including LS, or paired tumor/germline testing including LS. In October 2020, 117 of 423 (28%) members completed the initial survey including 103 (88%) currently active clinicians. In April 2021, a follow‐up survey was sent to active clinicians, with 45 (44%) completing this second survey. After selecting their preferred next germline or paired tumor/germline tumor test based on the clinical vignette, 39% of respondents reported wanting to make a different choice for the initial genetic test without any testing barriers. The proportion of respondents choosing a different initial genetic test was dependent on the proband's age at diagnosis and specified family history. The reported barriers included patient's lack of insurance coverage, patient unable/unwilling to self‐pay for proposed testing, and inadequate tumor tissue. Responders reported insurance, financial constraints, and limited tumor tissue as influencing preferred genetic testing in high‐risk clinics, thus resulting in possible under‐diagnosis of LS and impacting potential surveillance and cascade testing of at‐risk relatives.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jgc4.1567
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2633899057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2633899057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-786fbfe60d8237be2c5bfba3616df23a83e0cc25ae1089351db961c5015795ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EomXhwAsgS1zgkNaO68ThtoroUrQSHOAcOc5kN6vYXmxnUR6Vt-mk23JA4uQ_8-mbsX-EvOXsijOWXx925uaKy6J8Ri65LEUmZFU9xz2TVVaWjF2QVzEeGGOVkvwluRAy50qW6pL8-a5TguAi9T3dQbDj4IBq19HorU6DoQliGtyO6h45OrnhBCHqkabJ-kCjCQBuqfd42s7O7GmcXRe8hU90TQ36BoP4MWiDOqBxCieYl3bLxQmoBduicrlJe6C1H0fd-qAfipvgp-NTaW0hoAxRR-_cHg8JOrrRMQU_uPOg2KrWzkB4TV70eozw5nFdkZ-3n3_UX7Ltt81dvd5mRihVZqUq-raHgnUqF2ULuZFt32pR8KLrc6GVAGZMLjVwpioheddWBTeS4UdXEoxYkQ9n7zH4XxPO0NghGsBHOPBTbPJCCFVVDHNZkff_oAc_BRx5oTCaEnMTSH08Uyb4GAP0zTEMVoe54axZ8m6WvJslb2TfPRqn1kL3l3wKGIHrM_B7GGH-v6n5uqlvHpT3pi-5WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2698573593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of germline and somatic testing after universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: A clinical practice survey of active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hodan, Rachel ; Rodgers‐Fouche, Linda ; Arora, Sanjeevani ; Dominguez‐Valentin, Mev ; Kanth, Priyanka ; Katona, Bryson W. ; Mraz, Kathryn A. ; Roberts, Maegan E. ; Vilar, Eduardo ; Soto‐Azghani, Cynthia M. ; Brand, Randall E ; Esplin, Edward D. ; Perez, Kimberly</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodan, Rachel ; Rodgers‐Fouche, Linda ; Arora, Sanjeevani ; Dominguez‐Valentin, Mev ; Kanth, Priyanka ; Katona, Bryson W. ; Mraz, Kathryn A. ; Roberts, Maegan E. ; Vilar, Eduardo ; Soto‐Azghani, Cynthia M. ; Brand, Randall E ; Esplin, Edward D. ; Perez, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical guidelines recommend universal tumor screening (UTS) of colorectal and endometrial cancers for Lynch syndrome (LS). There are limited guidelines for how to integrate germline testing and somatic tumor testing after a mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumor is identified. We sought to characterize current practice patterns and barriers to preferred practice among clinical providers in high‐risk cancer programs. A clinical practice survey was sent to 423 active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer (CGA‐IGC) with a follow‐up survey sent to 103 clinician responders. The survey outlined clinical vignettes and asked respondents their preferred next test. The survey intended to assess: (1) the role of patient age and family history in risk assessment and (2) barriers to preferred genetic testing. Genetic test options included targeted germline testing based on dMMR expression, germline testing for LS, germline testing with a multigene cancer panel including LS, or paired tumor/germline testing including LS. In October 2020, 117 of 423 (28%) members completed the initial survey including 103 (88%) currently active clinicians. In April 2021, a follow‐up survey was sent to active clinicians, with 45 (44%) completing this second survey. After selecting their preferred next germline or paired tumor/germline tumor test based on the clinical vignette, 39% of respondents reported wanting to make a different choice for the initial genetic test without any testing barriers. The proportion of respondents choosing a different initial genetic test was dependent on the proband's age at diagnosis and specified family history. The reported barriers included patient's lack of insurance coverage, patient unable/unwilling to self‐pay for proposed testing, and inadequate tumor tissue. Responders reported insurance, financial constraints, and limited tumor tissue as influencing preferred genetic testing in high‐risk clinics, thus resulting in possible under‐diagnosis of LS and impacting potential surveillance and cascade testing of at‐risk relatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-7700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1567</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35218578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Cancer ; Clinical medicine ; clinical practice barriers ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Collaboration ; Colorectal cancer ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic tests ; Endometrial cancer ; Endometrium ; Family medical history ; Gastrointestinal cancer ; genetic counseling ; Genetic disorders ; Genetic screening ; Genetic testing ; Insurance coverage ; Lynch syndrome ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical screening ; Mismatch repair ; Patients ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Relatives ; Respondents ; Risk assessment ; Surveillance ; Surveys ; Tumors ; universal tumor screening ; Vignettes</subject><ispartof>Journal of genetic counseling, 2022-08, Vol.31 (4), p.949-955</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-786fbfe60d8237be2c5bfba3616df23a83e0cc25ae1089351db961c5015795ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-786fbfe60d8237be2c5bfba3616df23a83e0cc25ae1089351db961c5015795ec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7856-0057 ; 0000-0001-8186-9119 ; 0000-0001-6404-3761 ; 0000-0002-5745-2994 ; 0000-0002-8273-589X ; 0000-0002-3956-5821 ; 0000-0001-9824-8159 ; 0000-0001-9303-1516 ; 0000-0001-9205-3756 ; 0000-0003-2887-4079 ; 0000-0002-0292-2557</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjgc4.1567$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjgc4.1567$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35218578$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodan, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers‐Fouche, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Sanjeevani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominguez‐Valentin, Mev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanth, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katona, Bryson W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mraz, Kathryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Maegan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilar, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto‐Azghani, Cynthia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Randall E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esplin, Edward D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of germline and somatic testing after universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: A clinical practice survey of active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer</title><title>Journal of genetic counseling</title><addtitle>J Genet Couns</addtitle><description>Clinical guidelines recommend universal tumor screening (UTS) of colorectal and endometrial cancers for Lynch syndrome (LS). There are limited guidelines for how to integrate germline testing and somatic tumor testing after a mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumor is identified. We sought to characterize current practice patterns and barriers to preferred practice among clinical providers in high‐risk cancer programs. A clinical practice survey was sent to 423 active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer (CGA‐IGC) with a follow‐up survey sent to 103 clinician responders. The survey outlined clinical vignettes and asked respondents their preferred next test. The survey intended to assess: (1) the role of patient age and family history in risk assessment and (2) barriers to preferred genetic testing. Genetic test options included targeted germline testing based on dMMR expression, germline testing for LS, germline testing with a multigene cancer panel including LS, or paired tumor/germline testing including LS. In October 2020, 117 of 423 (28%) members completed the initial survey including 103 (88%) currently active clinicians. In April 2021, a follow‐up survey was sent to active clinicians, with 45 (44%) completing this second survey. After selecting their preferred next germline or paired tumor/germline tumor test based on the clinical vignette, 39% of respondents reported wanting to make a different choice for the initial genetic test without any testing barriers. The proportion of respondents choosing a different initial genetic test was dependent on the proband's age at diagnosis and specified family history. The reported barriers included patient's lack of insurance coverage, patient unable/unwilling to self‐pay for proposed testing, and inadequate tumor tissue. Responders reported insurance, financial constraints, and limited tumor tissue as influencing preferred genetic testing in high‐risk clinics, thus resulting in possible under‐diagnosis of LS and impacting potential surveillance and cascade testing of at‐risk relatives.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>clinical practice barriers</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal cancer</subject><subject>genetic counseling</subject><subject>Genetic disorders</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Insurance coverage</subject><subject>Lynch syndrome</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Mismatch repair</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Relatives</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>universal tumor screening</subject><subject>Vignettes</subject><issn>1059-7700</issn><issn>1573-3599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EomXhwAsgS1zgkNaO68ThtoroUrQSHOAcOc5kN6vYXmxnUR6Vt-mk23JA4uQ_8-mbsX-EvOXsijOWXx925uaKy6J8Ri65LEUmZFU9xz2TVVaWjF2QVzEeGGOVkvwluRAy50qW6pL8-a5TguAi9T3dQbDj4IBq19HorU6DoQliGtyO6h45OrnhBCHqkabJ-kCjCQBuqfd42s7O7GmcXRe8hU90TQ36BoP4MWiDOqBxCieYl3bLxQmoBduicrlJe6C1H0fd-qAfipvgp-NTaW0hoAxRR-_cHg8JOrrRMQU_uPOg2KrWzkB4TV70eozw5nFdkZ-3n3_UX7Ltt81dvd5mRihVZqUq-raHgnUqF2ULuZFt32pR8KLrc6GVAGZMLjVwpioheddWBTeS4UdXEoxYkQ9n7zH4XxPO0NghGsBHOPBTbPJCCFVVDHNZkff_oAc_BRx5oTCaEnMTSH08Uyb4GAP0zTEMVoe54axZ8m6WvJslb2TfPRqn1kL3l3wKGIHrM_B7GGH-v6n5uqlvHpT3pi-5WA</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Hodan, Rachel</creator><creator>Rodgers‐Fouche, Linda</creator><creator>Arora, Sanjeevani</creator><creator>Dominguez‐Valentin, Mev</creator><creator>Kanth, Priyanka</creator><creator>Katona, Bryson W.</creator><creator>Mraz, Kathryn A.</creator><creator>Roberts, Maegan E.</creator><creator>Vilar, Eduardo</creator><creator>Soto‐Azghani, Cynthia M.</creator><creator>Brand, Randall E</creator><creator>Esplin, Edward D.</creator><creator>Perez, Kimberly</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-0057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-9119</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6404-3761</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5745-2994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8273-589X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-5821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9824-8159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9303-1516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9205-3756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-4079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-2557</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Patterns of germline and somatic testing after universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: A clinical practice survey of active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer</title><author>Hodan, Rachel ; Rodgers‐Fouche, Linda ; Arora, Sanjeevani ; Dominguez‐Valentin, Mev ; Kanth, Priyanka ; Katona, Bryson W. ; Mraz, Kathryn A. ; Roberts, Maegan E. ; Vilar, Eduardo ; Soto‐Azghani, Cynthia M. ; Brand, Randall E ; Esplin, Edward D. ; Perez, Kimberly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-786fbfe60d8237be2c5bfba3616df23a83e0cc25ae1089351db961c5015795ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>clinical practice barriers</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal cancer</topic><topic>genetic counseling</topic><topic>Genetic disorders</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Insurance coverage</topic><topic>Lynch syndrome</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Mismatch repair</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Relatives</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>universal tumor screening</topic><topic>Vignettes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodan, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers‐Fouche, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Sanjeevani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominguez‐Valentin, Mev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanth, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katona, Bryson W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mraz, Kathryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Maegan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilar, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto‐Azghani, Cynthia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Randall E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esplin, Edward D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of genetic counseling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodan, Rachel</au><au>Rodgers‐Fouche, Linda</au><au>Arora, Sanjeevani</au><au>Dominguez‐Valentin, Mev</au><au>Kanth, Priyanka</au><au>Katona, Bryson W.</au><au>Mraz, Kathryn A.</au><au>Roberts, Maegan E.</au><au>Vilar, Eduardo</au><au>Soto‐Azghani, Cynthia M.</au><au>Brand, Randall E</au><au>Esplin, Edward D.</au><au>Perez, Kimberly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of germline and somatic testing after universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: A clinical practice survey of active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of genetic counseling</jtitle><addtitle>J Genet Couns</addtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>949</spage><epage>955</epage><pages>949-955</pages><issn>1059-7700</issn><eissn>1573-3599</eissn><abstract>Clinical guidelines recommend universal tumor screening (UTS) of colorectal and endometrial cancers for Lynch syndrome (LS). There are limited guidelines for how to integrate germline testing and somatic tumor testing after a mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumor is identified. We sought to characterize current practice patterns and barriers to preferred practice among clinical providers in high‐risk cancer programs. A clinical practice survey was sent to 423 active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer (CGA‐IGC) with a follow‐up survey sent to 103 clinician responders. The survey outlined clinical vignettes and asked respondents their preferred next test. The survey intended to assess: (1) the role of patient age and family history in risk assessment and (2) barriers to preferred genetic testing. Genetic test options included targeted germline testing based on dMMR expression, germline testing for LS, germline testing with a multigene cancer panel including LS, or paired tumor/germline testing including LS. In October 2020, 117 of 423 (28%) members completed the initial survey including 103 (88%) currently active clinicians. In April 2021, a follow‐up survey was sent to active clinicians, with 45 (44%) completing this second survey. After selecting their preferred next germline or paired tumor/germline tumor test based on the clinical vignette, 39% of respondents reported wanting to make a different choice for the initial genetic test without any testing barriers. The proportion of respondents choosing a different initial genetic test was dependent on the proband's age at diagnosis and specified family history. The reported barriers included patient's lack of insurance coverage, patient unable/unwilling to self‐pay for proposed testing, and inadequate tumor tissue. Responders reported insurance, financial constraints, and limited tumor tissue as influencing preferred genetic testing in high‐risk clinics, thus resulting in possible under‐diagnosis of LS and impacting potential surveillance and cascade testing of at‐risk relatives.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35218578</pmid><doi>10.1002/jgc4.1567</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-0057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-9119</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6404-3761</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5745-2994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8273-589X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-5821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9824-8159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9303-1516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9205-3756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-4079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-2557</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-7700
ispartof Journal of genetic counseling, 2022-08, Vol.31 (4), p.949-955
issn 1059-7700
1573-3599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2633899057
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Barriers
Cancer
Clinical medicine
clinical practice barriers
Clinical practice guidelines
Collaboration
Colorectal cancer
Diagnosis
Diagnostic tests
Endometrial cancer
Endometrium
Family medical history
Gastrointestinal cancer
genetic counseling
Genetic disorders
Genetic screening
Genetic testing
Insurance coverage
Lynch syndrome
Medical diagnosis
Medical screening
Mismatch repair
Patients
Polls & surveys
Relatives
Respondents
Risk assessment
Surveillance
Surveys
Tumors
universal tumor screening
Vignettes
title Patterns of germline and somatic testing after universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: A clinical practice survey of active members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A12%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20germline%20and%20somatic%20testing%20after%20universal%20tumor%20screening%20for%20Lynch%20syndrome:%20A%20clinical%20practice%20survey%20of%20active%20members%20of%20the%20Collaborative%20Group%20of%20the%20Americas%20on%20Inherited%20Gastrointestinal%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20genetic%20counseling&rft.au=Hodan,%20Rachel&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=949&rft.epage=955&rft.pages=949-955&rft.issn=1059-7700&rft.eissn=1573-3599&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jgc4.1567&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2633899057%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2698573593&rft_id=info:pmid/35218578&rfr_iscdi=true