Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking
The prevalence of redundancy in the world languages has long puzzled language researchers. It is especially surprising in light of the growing evidence on speakers' tendency to avoid redundant elements in production (omitting or reducing more predictable elements). Here, we propose that redunda...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition 2022-07, Vol.224, p.105055-105055, Article 105055 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 105055 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105055 |
container_title | Cognition |
container_volume | 224 |
creator | Tal, Shira Arnon, Inbal |
description | The prevalence of redundancy in the world languages has long puzzled language researchers. It is especially surprising in light of the growing evidence on speakers' tendency to avoid redundant elements in production (omitting or reducing more predictable elements). Here, we propose that redundancy can be functional for learning. In particular, we argue that redundant cues can facilitate learning, even when they make the language system more complicated. This prediction is further motivated by the Linguistic Niche Hypothesis (Lupyan & Dale, 2010), which suggests that morphological complexity can arise due to the advantage redundancy might confer for child learners. We test these hypotheses in an artificial language learning study with children and adults, where either word order alone or both word order and case marking serve as cues for thematic assignment in a novel construction. We predict, and find, that children learning the redundant language learn to produce it, and show better comprehension of the novel thematic assignment than children learning the non-redundant language, despite having to learn an additional morpheme. Children in both conditions were similarly accurate in producing the novel word order, suggesting redundancy might have a differential effect on comprehension and production. Adults did not show better learning in the redundant condition, most likely because they were at ceiling in both conditions. We discuss implications for theories of language learning and language change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2632808541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010027722000439</els_id><sourcerecordid>2632808541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-66d794e4a4fe138cdd8c1361a26de9af3cdccf86442803d19da1e3e644a24ef23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LRCEUhiWKmj7-Qglt2tzJr-vVdhF9EgRRazE9N5xmtPTeon-fw1SLNi3koDzvOZ4HoQNKppRQeTybuvQcwxBSnDLCWH1tSduuoQlVHW86xdU6mhBCSUNY122h7VJmhBDBOrWJtnhLtWy1nKCbe_Bj9Da6T-xsxE8QoQ8DnoPNMcTnE3z-HjxEB7jPaYE_Uva4HsjYRl8jBfDC5peK7qKN3s4L7H3XHfR4cf5wdtXc3l1en53eNk4INTRS-k4LEFb0QLly3itHuaSWSQ_a9tx553olhWCKcE-1txQ41LtlAnrGd9DRqu9rTm8jlMEsQnEwn9sIaSyGSV6TqhW0ood_0Fkac6y_q5SWSmsldaW6FeVyKiVDb15zqEt9GkrMUreZmV_dZqnbrHTX5P53__FpAf439-O3AqcrAKqQ9wDZFBeWNn3I4AbjU_h3yBc8_5SN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696899869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tal, Shira ; Arnon, Inbal</creator><creatorcontrib>Tal, Shira ; Arnon, Inbal</creatorcontrib><description>The prevalence of redundancy in the world languages has long puzzled language researchers. It is especially surprising in light of the growing evidence on speakers' tendency to avoid redundant elements in production (omitting or reducing more predictable elements). Here, we propose that redundancy can be functional for learning. In particular, we argue that redundant cues can facilitate learning, even when they make the language system more complicated. This prediction is further motivated by the Linguistic Niche Hypothesis (Lupyan & Dale, 2010), which suggests that morphological complexity can arise due to the advantage redundancy might confer for child learners. We test these hypotheses in an artificial language learning study with children and adults, where either word order alone or both word order and case marking serve as cues for thematic assignment in a novel construction. We predict, and find, that children learning the redundant language learn to produce it, and show better comprehension of the novel thematic assignment than children learning the non-redundant language, despite having to learn an additional morpheme. Children in both conditions were similarly accurate in producing the novel word order, suggesting redundancy might have a differential effect on comprehension and production. Adults did not show better learning in the redundant condition, most likely because they were at ceiling in both conditions. We discuss implications for theories of language learning and language change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35196596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Artificial language learning ; Artificial languages ; Case marking ; Child ; Children ; Comprehension ; Cues ; Humans ; Language ; Language acquisition ; Language change ; Language Development ; Learning ; Learning biases ; Linguistics ; Morphemes ; Morphological complexity ; Native language acquisition ; Natural language generation ; Redundancy ; Word order</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 2022-07, Vol.224, p.105055-105055, Article 105055</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-66d794e4a4fe138cdd8c1361a26de9af3cdccf86442803d19da1e3e644a24ef23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-66d794e4a4fe138cdd8c1361a26de9af3cdccf86442803d19da1e3e644a24ef23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027722000439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35196596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tal, Shira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnon, Inbal</creatorcontrib><title>Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>The prevalence of redundancy in the world languages has long puzzled language researchers. It is especially surprising in light of the growing evidence on speakers' tendency to avoid redundant elements in production (omitting or reducing more predictable elements). Here, we propose that redundancy can be functional for learning. In particular, we argue that redundant cues can facilitate learning, even when they make the language system more complicated. This prediction is further motivated by the Linguistic Niche Hypothesis (Lupyan & Dale, 2010), which suggests that morphological complexity can arise due to the advantage redundancy might confer for child learners. We test these hypotheses in an artificial language learning study with children and adults, where either word order alone or both word order and case marking serve as cues for thematic assignment in a novel construction. We predict, and find, that children learning the redundant language learn to produce it, and show better comprehension of the novel thematic assignment than children learning the non-redundant language, despite having to learn an additional morpheme. Children in both conditions were similarly accurate in producing the novel word order, suggesting redundancy might have a differential effect on comprehension and production. Adults did not show better learning in the redundant condition, most likely because they were at ceiling in both conditions. We discuss implications for theories of language learning and language change.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Artificial language learning</subject><subject>Artificial languages</subject><subject>Case marking</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Language change</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning biases</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Morphemes</subject><subject>Morphological complexity</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Natural language generation</subject><subject>Redundancy</subject><subject>Word order</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LRCEUhiWKmj7-Qglt2tzJr-vVdhF9EgRRazE9N5xmtPTeon-fw1SLNi3koDzvOZ4HoQNKppRQeTybuvQcwxBSnDLCWH1tSduuoQlVHW86xdU6mhBCSUNY122h7VJmhBDBOrWJtnhLtWy1nKCbe_Bj9Da6T-xsxE8QoQ8DnoPNMcTnE3z-HjxEB7jPaYE_Uva4HsjYRl8jBfDC5peK7qKN3s4L7H3XHfR4cf5wdtXc3l1en53eNk4INTRS-k4LEFb0QLly3itHuaSWSQ_a9tx553olhWCKcE-1txQ41LtlAnrGd9DRqu9rTm8jlMEsQnEwn9sIaSyGSV6TqhW0ood_0Fkac6y_q5SWSmsldaW6FeVyKiVDb15zqEt9GkrMUreZmV_dZqnbrHTX5P53__FpAf439-O3AqcrAKqQ9wDZFBeWNn3I4AbjU_h3yBc8_5SN</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Tal, Shira</creator><creator>Arnon, Inbal</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking</title><author>Tal, Shira ; Arnon, Inbal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-66d794e4a4fe138cdd8c1361a26de9af3cdccf86442803d19da1e3e644a24ef23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Artificial language learning</topic><topic>Artificial languages</topic><topic>Case marking</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Language change</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning biases</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Morphemes</topic><topic>Morphological complexity</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Natural language generation</topic><topic>Redundancy</topic><topic>Word order</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tal, Shira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnon, Inbal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tal, Shira</au><au>Arnon, Inbal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>224</volume><spage>105055</spage><epage>105055</epage><pages>105055-105055</pages><artnum>105055</artnum><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><abstract>The prevalence of redundancy in the world languages has long puzzled language researchers. It is especially surprising in light of the growing evidence on speakers' tendency to avoid redundant elements in production (omitting or reducing more predictable elements). Here, we propose that redundancy can be functional for learning. In particular, we argue that redundant cues can facilitate learning, even when they make the language system more complicated. This prediction is further motivated by the Linguistic Niche Hypothesis (Lupyan & Dale, 2010), which suggests that morphological complexity can arise due to the advantage redundancy might confer for child learners. We test these hypotheses in an artificial language learning study with children and adults, where either word order alone or both word order and case marking serve as cues for thematic assignment in a novel construction. We predict, and find, that children learning the redundant language learn to produce it, and show better comprehension of the novel thematic assignment than children learning the non-redundant language, despite having to learn an additional morpheme. Children in both conditions were similarly accurate in producing the novel word order, suggesting redundancy might have a differential effect on comprehension and production. Adults did not show better learning in the redundant condition, most likely because they were at ceiling in both conditions. We discuss implications for theories of language learning and language change.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35196596</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-0277 |
ispartof | Cognition, 2022-07, Vol.224, p.105055-105055, Article 105055 |
issn | 0010-0277 1873-7838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2632808541 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Artificial language learning Artificial languages Case marking Child Children Comprehension Cues Humans Language Language acquisition Language change Language Development Learning Learning biases Linguistics Morphemes Morphological complexity Native language acquisition Natural language generation Redundancy Word order |
title | Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T21%3A13%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Redundancy%20can%20benefit%20learning:%20Evidence%20from%20word%20order%20and%20case%20marking&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Tal,%20Shira&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=224&rft.spage=105055&rft.epage=105055&rft.pages=105055-105055&rft.artnum=105055&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2632808541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696899869&rft_id=info:pmid/35196596&rft_els_id=S0010027722000439&rfr_iscdi=true |