Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking

The prevalence of redundancy in the world languages has long puzzled language researchers. It is especially surprising in light of the growing evidence on speakers' tendency to avoid redundant elements in production (omitting or reducing more predictable elements). Here, we propose that redunda...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cognition 2022-07, Vol.224, p.105055-105055, Article 105055
Hauptverfasser: Tal, Shira, Arnon, Inbal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105055
container_issue
container_start_page 105055
container_title Cognition
container_volume 224
creator Tal, Shira
Arnon, Inbal
description The prevalence of redundancy in the world languages has long puzzled language researchers. It is especially surprising in light of the growing evidence on speakers' tendency to avoid redundant elements in production (omitting or reducing more predictable elements). Here, we propose that redundancy can be functional for learning. In particular, we argue that redundant cues can facilitate learning, even when they make the language system more complicated. This prediction is further motivated by the Linguistic Niche Hypothesis (Lupyan & Dale, 2010), which suggests that morphological complexity can arise due to the advantage redundancy might confer for child learners. We test these hypotheses in an artificial language learning study with children and adults, where either word order alone or both word order and case marking serve as cues for thematic assignment in a novel construction. We predict, and find, that children learning the redundant language learn to produce it, and show better comprehension of the novel thematic assignment than children learning the non-redundant language, despite having to learn an additional morpheme. Children in both conditions were similarly accurate in producing the novel word order, suggesting redundancy might have a differential effect on comprehension and production. Adults did not show better learning in the redundant condition, most likely because they were at ceiling in both conditions. We discuss implications for theories of language learning and language change.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2632808541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010027722000439</els_id><sourcerecordid>2632808541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-66d794e4a4fe138cdd8c1361a26de9af3cdccf86442803d19da1e3e644a24ef23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LRCEUhiWKmj7-Qglt2tzJr-vVdhF9EgRRazE9N5xmtPTeon-fw1SLNi3koDzvOZ4HoQNKppRQeTybuvQcwxBSnDLCWH1tSduuoQlVHW86xdU6mhBCSUNY122h7VJmhBDBOrWJtnhLtWy1nKCbe_Bj9Da6T-xsxE8QoQ8DnoPNMcTnE3z-HjxEB7jPaYE_Uva4HsjYRl8jBfDC5peK7qKN3s4L7H3XHfR4cf5wdtXc3l1en53eNk4INTRS-k4LEFb0QLly3itHuaSWSQ_a9tx553olhWCKcE-1txQ41LtlAnrGd9DRqu9rTm8jlMEsQnEwn9sIaSyGSV6TqhW0ood_0Fkac6y_q5SWSmsldaW6FeVyKiVDb15zqEt9GkrMUreZmV_dZqnbrHTX5P53__FpAf439-O3AqcrAKqQ9wDZFBeWNn3I4AbjU_h3yBc8_5SN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696899869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tal, Shira ; Arnon, Inbal</creator><creatorcontrib>Tal, Shira ; Arnon, Inbal</creatorcontrib><description>The prevalence of redundancy in the world languages has long puzzled language researchers. It is especially surprising in light of the growing evidence on speakers' tendency to avoid redundant elements in production (omitting or reducing more predictable elements). Here, we propose that redundancy can be functional for learning. In particular, we argue that redundant cues can facilitate learning, even when they make the language system more complicated. This prediction is further motivated by the Linguistic Niche Hypothesis (Lupyan &amp; Dale, 2010), which suggests that morphological complexity can arise due to the advantage redundancy might confer for child learners. We test these hypotheses in an artificial language learning study with children and adults, where either word order alone or both word order and case marking serve as cues for thematic assignment in a novel construction. We predict, and find, that children learning the redundant language learn to produce it, and show better comprehension of the novel thematic assignment than children learning the non-redundant language, despite having to learn an additional morpheme. Children in both conditions were similarly accurate in producing the novel word order, suggesting redundancy might have a differential effect on comprehension and production. Adults did not show better learning in the redundant condition, most likely because they were at ceiling in both conditions. We discuss implications for theories of language learning and language change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35196596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Artificial language learning ; Artificial languages ; Case marking ; Child ; Children ; Comprehension ; Cues ; Humans ; Language ; Language acquisition ; Language change ; Language Development ; Learning ; Learning biases ; Linguistics ; Morphemes ; Morphological complexity ; Native language acquisition ; Natural language generation ; Redundancy ; Word order</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 2022-07, Vol.224, p.105055-105055, Article 105055</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-66d794e4a4fe138cdd8c1361a26de9af3cdccf86442803d19da1e3e644a24ef23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-66d794e4a4fe138cdd8c1361a26de9af3cdccf86442803d19da1e3e644a24ef23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027722000439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35196596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tal, Shira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnon, Inbal</creatorcontrib><title>Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>The prevalence of redundancy in the world languages has long puzzled language researchers. It is especially surprising in light of the growing evidence on speakers' tendency to avoid redundant elements in production (omitting or reducing more predictable elements). Here, we propose that redundancy can be functional for learning. In particular, we argue that redundant cues can facilitate learning, even when they make the language system more complicated. This prediction is further motivated by the Linguistic Niche Hypothesis (Lupyan &amp; Dale, 2010), which suggests that morphological complexity can arise due to the advantage redundancy might confer for child learners. We test these hypotheses in an artificial language learning study with children and adults, where either word order alone or both word order and case marking serve as cues for thematic assignment in a novel construction. We predict, and find, that children learning the redundant language learn to produce it, and show better comprehension of the novel thematic assignment than children learning the non-redundant language, despite having to learn an additional morpheme. Children in both conditions were similarly accurate in producing the novel word order, suggesting redundancy might have a differential effect on comprehension and production. Adults did not show better learning in the redundant condition, most likely because they were at ceiling in both conditions. We discuss implications for theories of language learning and language change.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Artificial language learning</subject><subject>Artificial languages</subject><subject>Case marking</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Language change</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning biases</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Morphemes</subject><subject>Morphological complexity</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Natural language generation</subject><subject>Redundancy</subject><subject>Word order</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LRCEUhiWKmj7-Qglt2tzJr-vVdhF9EgRRazE9N5xmtPTeon-fw1SLNi3koDzvOZ4HoQNKppRQeTybuvQcwxBSnDLCWH1tSduuoQlVHW86xdU6mhBCSUNY122h7VJmhBDBOrWJtnhLtWy1nKCbe_Bj9Da6T-xsxE8QoQ8DnoPNMcTnE3z-HjxEB7jPaYE_Uva4HsjYRl8jBfDC5peK7qKN3s4L7H3XHfR4cf5wdtXc3l1en53eNk4INTRS-k4LEFb0QLly3itHuaSWSQ_a9tx553olhWCKcE-1txQ41LtlAnrGd9DRqu9rTm8jlMEsQnEwn9sIaSyGSV6TqhW0ood_0Fkac6y_q5SWSmsldaW6FeVyKiVDb15zqEt9GkrMUreZmV_dZqnbrHTX5P53__FpAf439-O3AqcrAKqQ9wDZFBeWNn3I4AbjU_h3yBc8_5SN</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Tal, Shira</creator><creator>Arnon, Inbal</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking</title><author>Tal, Shira ; Arnon, Inbal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-66d794e4a4fe138cdd8c1361a26de9af3cdccf86442803d19da1e3e644a24ef23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Artificial language learning</topic><topic>Artificial languages</topic><topic>Case marking</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Language change</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning biases</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Morphemes</topic><topic>Morphological complexity</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Natural language generation</topic><topic>Redundancy</topic><topic>Word order</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tal, Shira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnon, Inbal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tal, Shira</au><au>Arnon, Inbal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>224</volume><spage>105055</spage><epage>105055</epage><pages>105055-105055</pages><artnum>105055</artnum><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><abstract>The prevalence of redundancy in the world languages has long puzzled language researchers. It is especially surprising in light of the growing evidence on speakers' tendency to avoid redundant elements in production (omitting or reducing more predictable elements). Here, we propose that redundancy can be functional for learning. In particular, we argue that redundant cues can facilitate learning, even when they make the language system more complicated. This prediction is further motivated by the Linguistic Niche Hypothesis (Lupyan &amp; Dale, 2010), which suggests that morphological complexity can arise due to the advantage redundancy might confer for child learners. We test these hypotheses in an artificial language learning study with children and adults, where either word order alone or both word order and case marking serve as cues for thematic assignment in a novel construction. We predict, and find, that children learning the redundant language learn to produce it, and show better comprehension of the novel thematic assignment than children learning the non-redundant language, despite having to learn an additional morpheme. Children in both conditions were similarly accurate in producing the novel word order, suggesting redundancy might have a differential effect on comprehension and production. Adults did not show better learning in the redundant condition, most likely because they were at ceiling in both conditions. We discuss implications for theories of language learning and language change.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35196596</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-0277
ispartof Cognition, 2022-07, Vol.224, p.105055-105055, Article 105055
issn 0010-0277
1873-7838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2632808541
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Artificial language learning
Artificial languages
Case marking
Child
Children
Comprehension
Cues
Humans
Language
Language acquisition
Language change
Language Development
Learning
Learning biases
Linguistics
Morphemes
Morphological complexity
Native language acquisition
Natural language generation
Redundancy
Word order
title Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T21%3A13%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Redundancy%20can%20benefit%20learning:%20Evidence%20from%20word%20order%20and%20case%20marking&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Tal,%20Shira&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=224&rft.spage=105055&rft.epage=105055&rft.pages=105055-105055&rft.artnum=105055&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2632808541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696899869&rft_id=info:pmid/35196596&rft_els_id=S0010027722000439&rfr_iscdi=true