Lung cancer screening use and implications of varying eligibility criteria by race and ethnicity: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data
Background In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) expanded the eligibility criteria for low‐dose computed tomographic lung cancer screening (LCS) to reduce racial disparities that resulted from the 2013 USPSTF criteria. The annual LCS rate has risen slowly since the 2013 USPSTF scre...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2022-05, Vol.128 (9), p.1812-1819 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1819 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1812 |
| container_title | Cancer |
| container_volume | 128 |
| creator | Williams, Randi M. Li, Tengfei Luta, George Wang, Min Qi Adams‐Campbell, Lucile Meza, Rafael Tammemägi, Martin C. Taylor, Kathryn L. |
| description | Background
In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) expanded the eligibility criteria for low‐dose computed tomographic lung cancer screening (LCS) to reduce racial disparities that resulted from the 2013 USPSTF criteria. The annual LCS rate has risen slowly since the 2013 USPSTF screening recommendations. Using the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), this study 1) describes LCS use in 2019, 2) compares the percent eligible for LCS using the 2013 versus 2021 USPSTF criteria, and 3) determines the percent eligible using the more detailed PLCOm2012Race3L risk‐prediction model.
Methods
The analysis included 41,544 individuals with a smoking history from states participating in the BRFSS LCS module who were ≥50 years old.
Results
Using the 2013 USPSTF criteria, 20.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.0‐22.4) of eligible individuals underwent LCS in 2019. The 2013 USPSTF criteria was compared to the 2021 USPSTF criteria, and the overall proportion eligible increased from 21.0% (95% CI, 20.2‐21.8) to 34.7% (95 CI, 33.8‐35.6). Applying the 2021 criteria, the proportion eligible by race was 35.8% (95% CI, 34.8‐36.7) among Whites, 28.5% (95% CI, 25.2‐31.9) among Blacks, and 18.0% (95% CI, 12.4‐23.7) among Hispanics. Using the 1.0% 6‐year threshold that is comparable to the 2021 USPSTF criteria, the PLCOm2012Race3L model selected more individuals overall and by race.
Conclusions
Using data from 20 states and using multiple imputation, higher LCS rates have been reported compared to prior BRFSS data. The 2021 expanded criteria will result in a greater number of screen‐eligible individuals. However, risk‐based screening that uses additional risk factors may be more inclusive overall and across subgroups.
Lay Summary
In 2013, lung cancer screening (lung screening) was recommended for high risk individuals.
The annual rate of lung screening has risen slowly, particularly among Black individuals.
In part, this racial disparity resulted in expanded 2021 criteria.
Survey data was used to: 1) describe the number of people screened in 2019, 2) compare the percent eligible for lung screening using the 2013 versus 2021 guidelines, and 3) determine the percent eligible using more detailed criteria.
Lung screening rates increased in 2019, and the 2021 criteria will result in more individuals eligible for screening.
Using additional criteria may identify more individuals eligible for lung screening.
Compared to prior data, lung cancer screening |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.34098 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2632805043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2648965603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-f8193cb7452e81c5394975dfd0d9aeccbf8d5e3854cf26d5f3203f616fb109b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhq0K1C6ll_4AZIkLQkrxR5y1e2tXFJBWILUgcYucybh1m4-tnSzKH-H34pDCgQOn0cw8885oXkJOOTvjjIl30EE4kzkz-oCsODPrjPFcPCMrxpjOVC6_H5EXMd6ndC2UPCRHUgnGC85W5Od27G4p2A4w0AgBsfOpMEaktqupb3eNBzv4vou0d3RvwzT3sfG3vvKNHyYKwQ8YvKXVRIOFZRCHu85Dap_TtMrQS7yze98H29BrHx_olYWhD_RmDHv0TTPvpzdTHLCltR3sS_Lc2SbiyVM8Jt-u3n_dfMy2Xz582lxsM5BG6sxpbiRU61wJ1ByUNLlZq9rVrDYWASqna4VSqxycKGrlpGDSFbxwVfpTJeQxebPo7kL_OGIcytZHwPkg7MdYikIKzRTLZUJf_4Pe92Po0nWJyrUpVMFm6u1CQehjDOjKXfBt-lrJWTm7Vc5ulb_dSvCrJ8mxarH-i_6xJwF8AX74Bqf_SJWbz5vrRfQXp-igsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2648965603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lung cancer screening use and implications of varying eligibility criteria by race and ethnicity: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Williams, Randi M. ; Li, Tengfei ; Luta, George ; Wang, Min Qi ; Adams‐Campbell, Lucile ; Meza, Rafael ; Tammemägi, Martin C. ; Taylor, Kathryn L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Williams, Randi M. ; Li, Tengfei ; Luta, George ; Wang, Min Qi ; Adams‐Campbell, Lucile ; Meza, Rafael ; Tammemägi, Martin C. ; Taylor, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) expanded the eligibility criteria for low‐dose computed tomographic lung cancer screening (LCS) to reduce racial disparities that resulted from the 2013 USPSTF criteria. The annual LCS rate has risen slowly since the 2013 USPSTF screening recommendations. Using the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), this study 1) describes LCS use in 2019, 2) compares the percent eligible for LCS using the 2013 versus 2021 USPSTF criteria, and 3) determines the percent eligible using the more detailed PLCOm2012Race3L risk‐prediction model.
Methods
The analysis included 41,544 individuals with a smoking history from states participating in the BRFSS LCS module who were ≥50 years old.
Results
Using the 2013 USPSTF criteria, 20.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.0‐22.4) of eligible individuals underwent LCS in 2019. The 2013 USPSTF criteria was compared to the 2021 USPSTF criteria, and the overall proportion eligible increased from 21.0% (95% CI, 20.2‐21.8) to 34.7% (95 CI, 33.8‐35.6). Applying the 2021 criteria, the proportion eligible by race was 35.8% (95% CI, 34.8‐36.7) among Whites, 28.5% (95% CI, 25.2‐31.9) among Blacks, and 18.0% (95% CI, 12.4‐23.7) among Hispanics. Using the 1.0% 6‐year threshold that is comparable to the 2021 USPSTF criteria, the PLCOm2012Race3L model selected more individuals overall and by race.
Conclusions
Using data from 20 states and using multiple imputation, higher LCS rates have been reported compared to prior BRFSS data. The 2021 expanded criteria will result in a greater number of screen‐eligible individuals. However, risk‐based screening that uses additional risk factors may be more inclusive overall and across subgroups.
Lay Summary
In 2013, lung cancer screening (lung screening) was recommended for high risk individuals.
The annual rate of lung screening has risen slowly, particularly among Black individuals.
In part, this racial disparity resulted in expanded 2021 criteria.
Survey data was used to: 1) describe the number of people screened in 2019, 2) compare the percent eligible for lung screening using the 2013 versus 2021 guidelines, and 3) determine the percent eligible using more detailed criteria.
Lung screening rates increased in 2019, and the 2021 criteria will result in more individuals eligible for screening.
Using additional criteria may identify more individuals eligible for lung screening.
Compared to prior data, lung cancer screening rates increased in 2019, and the 2021 expanded criteria will result in a greater number of eligible individuals. Risk‐based screening that uses additional risk factors may be more inclusive across racial subgroups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34098</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35201610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System ; Cancer screening ; Computed tomography ; Confidence intervals ; Criteria ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Ethnicity ; Humans ; low dose computed tomography ; Lung cancer ; lung cancer screening ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Lung Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Mass Screening ; Medical screening ; Middle Aged ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Oncology ; PLCOm2012 risk prediction model ; Prediction models ; Race ; race disparities ; Race factors ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Risk taking ; Subgroups ; Surveillance ; United States - epidemiology ; US Preventive Services Task Force ; White People</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2022-05, Vol.128 (9), p.1812-1819</ispartof><rights>2022 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2022 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-f8193cb7452e81c5394975dfd0d9aeccbf8d5e3854cf26d5f3203f616fb109b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-f8193cb7452e81c5394975dfd0d9aeccbf8d5e3854cf26d5f3203f616fb109b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5026-1773 ; 0000-0002-3444-3884 ; 0000-0001-7351-0413 ; 0000-0002-4035-7632 ; 0000-0002-4989-5058 ; 0000-0003-0837-9281 ; 0000-0002-1076-5037</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.34098$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.34098$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35201610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williams, Randi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luta, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Min Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams‐Campbell, Lucile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meza, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tammemägi, Martin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><title>Lung cancer screening use and implications of varying eligibility criteria by race and ethnicity: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background
In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) expanded the eligibility criteria for low‐dose computed tomographic lung cancer screening (LCS) to reduce racial disparities that resulted from the 2013 USPSTF criteria. The annual LCS rate has risen slowly since the 2013 USPSTF screening recommendations. Using the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), this study 1) describes LCS use in 2019, 2) compares the percent eligible for LCS using the 2013 versus 2021 USPSTF criteria, and 3) determines the percent eligible using the more detailed PLCOm2012Race3L risk‐prediction model.
Methods
The analysis included 41,544 individuals with a smoking history from states participating in the BRFSS LCS module who were ≥50 years old.
Results
Using the 2013 USPSTF criteria, 20.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.0‐22.4) of eligible individuals underwent LCS in 2019. The 2013 USPSTF criteria was compared to the 2021 USPSTF criteria, and the overall proportion eligible increased from 21.0% (95% CI, 20.2‐21.8) to 34.7% (95 CI, 33.8‐35.6). Applying the 2021 criteria, the proportion eligible by race was 35.8% (95% CI, 34.8‐36.7) among Whites, 28.5% (95% CI, 25.2‐31.9) among Blacks, and 18.0% (95% CI, 12.4‐23.7) among Hispanics. Using the 1.0% 6‐year threshold that is comparable to the 2021 USPSTF criteria, the PLCOm2012Race3L model selected more individuals overall and by race.
Conclusions
Using data from 20 states and using multiple imputation, higher LCS rates have been reported compared to prior BRFSS data. The 2021 expanded criteria will result in a greater number of screen‐eligible individuals. However, risk‐based screening that uses additional risk factors may be more inclusive overall and across subgroups.
Lay Summary
In 2013, lung cancer screening (lung screening) was recommended for high risk individuals.
The annual rate of lung screening has risen slowly, particularly among Black individuals.
In part, this racial disparity resulted in expanded 2021 criteria.
Survey data was used to: 1) describe the number of people screened in 2019, 2) compare the percent eligible for lung screening using the 2013 versus 2021 guidelines, and 3) determine the percent eligible using more detailed criteria.
Lung screening rates increased in 2019, and the 2021 criteria will result in more individuals eligible for screening.
Using additional criteria may identify more individuals eligible for lung screening.
Compared to prior data, lung cancer screening rates increased in 2019, and the 2021 expanded criteria will result in a greater number of eligible individuals. Risk‐based screening that uses additional risk factors may be more inclusive across racial subgroups.</description><subject>Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>low dose computed tomography</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>lung cancer screening</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>PLCOm2012 risk prediction model</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>race disparities</subject><subject>Race factors</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>US Preventive Services Task Force</subject><subject>White People</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhq0K1C6ll_4AZIkLQkrxR5y1e2tXFJBWILUgcYucybh1m4-tnSzKH-H34pDCgQOn0cw8885oXkJOOTvjjIl30EE4kzkz-oCsODPrjPFcPCMrxpjOVC6_H5EXMd6ndC2UPCRHUgnGC85W5Od27G4p2A4w0AgBsfOpMEaktqupb3eNBzv4vou0d3RvwzT3sfG3vvKNHyYKwQ8YvKXVRIOFZRCHu85Dap_TtMrQS7yze98H29BrHx_olYWhD_RmDHv0TTPvpzdTHLCltR3sS_Lc2SbiyVM8Jt-u3n_dfMy2Xz582lxsM5BG6sxpbiRU61wJ1ByUNLlZq9rVrDYWASqna4VSqxycKGrlpGDSFbxwVfpTJeQxebPo7kL_OGIcytZHwPkg7MdYikIKzRTLZUJf_4Pe92Po0nWJyrUpVMFm6u1CQehjDOjKXfBt-lrJWTm7Vc5ulb_dSvCrJ8mxarH-i_6xJwF8AX74Bqf_SJWbz5vrRfQXp-igsg</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Williams, Randi M.</creator><creator>Li, Tengfei</creator><creator>Luta, George</creator><creator>Wang, Min Qi</creator><creator>Adams‐Campbell, Lucile</creator><creator>Meza, Rafael</creator><creator>Tammemägi, Martin C.</creator><creator>Taylor, Kathryn L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-1773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3444-3884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7351-0413</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-7632</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4989-5058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-9281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1076-5037</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Lung cancer screening use and implications of varying eligibility criteria by race and ethnicity: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data</title><author>Williams, Randi M. ; Li, Tengfei ; Luta, George ; Wang, Min Qi ; Adams‐Campbell, Lucile ; Meza, Rafael ; Tammemägi, Martin C. ; Taylor, Kathryn L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-f8193cb7452e81c5394975dfd0d9aeccbf8d5e3854cf26d5f3203f616fb109b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>low dose computed tomography</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>lung cancer screening</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>PLCOm2012 risk prediction model</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>race disparities</topic><topic>Race factors</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>US Preventive Services Task Force</topic><topic>White People</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williams, Randi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luta, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Min Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams‐Campbell, Lucile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meza, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tammemägi, Martin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williams, Randi M.</au><au>Li, Tengfei</au><au>Luta, George</au><au>Wang, Min Qi</au><au>Adams‐Campbell, Lucile</au><au>Meza, Rafael</au><au>Tammemägi, Martin C.</au><au>Taylor, Kathryn L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lung cancer screening use and implications of varying eligibility criteria by race and ethnicity: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1812</spage><epage>1819</epage><pages>1812-1819</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background
In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) expanded the eligibility criteria for low‐dose computed tomographic lung cancer screening (LCS) to reduce racial disparities that resulted from the 2013 USPSTF criteria. The annual LCS rate has risen slowly since the 2013 USPSTF screening recommendations. Using the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), this study 1) describes LCS use in 2019, 2) compares the percent eligible for LCS using the 2013 versus 2021 USPSTF criteria, and 3) determines the percent eligible using the more detailed PLCOm2012Race3L risk‐prediction model.
Methods
The analysis included 41,544 individuals with a smoking history from states participating in the BRFSS LCS module who were ≥50 years old.
Results
Using the 2013 USPSTF criteria, 20.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.0‐22.4) of eligible individuals underwent LCS in 2019. The 2013 USPSTF criteria was compared to the 2021 USPSTF criteria, and the overall proportion eligible increased from 21.0% (95% CI, 20.2‐21.8) to 34.7% (95 CI, 33.8‐35.6). Applying the 2021 criteria, the proportion eligible by race was 35.8% (95% CI, 34.8‐36.7) among Whites, 28.5% (95% CI, 25.2‐31.9) among Blacks, and 18.0% (95% CI, 12.4‐23.7) among Hispanics. Using the 1.0% 6‐year threshold that is comparable to the 2021 USPSTF criteria, the PLCOm2012Race3L model selected more individuals overall and by race.
Conclusions
Using data from 20 states and using multiple imputation, higher LCS rates have been reported compared to prior BRFSS data. The 2021 expanded criteria will result in a greater number of screen‐eligible individuals. However, risk‐based screening that uses additional risk factors may be more inclusive overall and across subgroups.
Lay Summary
In 2013, lung cancer screening (lung screening) was recommended for high risk individuals.
The annual rate of lung screening has risen slowly, particularly among Black individuals.
In part, this racial disparity resulted in expanded 2021 criteria.
Survey data was used to: 1) describe the number of people screened in 2019, 2) compare the percent eligible for lung screening using the 2013 versus 2021 guidelines, and 3) determine the percent eligible using more detailed criteria.
Lung screening rates increased in 2019, and the 2021 criteria will result in more individuals eligible for screening.
Using additional criteria may identify more individuals eligible for lung screening.
Compared to prior data, lung cancer screening rates increased in 2019, and the 2021 expanded criteria will result in a greater number of eligible individuals. Risk‐based screening that uses additional risk factors may be more inclusive across racial subgroups.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35201610</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.34098</doi><tpages>0</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-1773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3444-3884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7351-0413</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-7632</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4989-5058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-9281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1076-5037</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
| ispartof | Cancer, 2022-05, Vol.128 (9), p.1812-1819 |
| issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2632805043 |
| source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Cancer screening Computed tomography Confidence intervals Criteria Early Detection of Cancer - methods Ethnicity Humans low dose computed tomography Lung cancer lung cancer screening Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology Lung Neoplasms - prevention & control Mass Screening Medical screening Middle Aged Minority & ethnic groups Oncology PLCOm2012 risk prediction model Prediction models Race race disparities Race factors Risk analysis Risk factors Risk taking Subgroups Surveillance United States - epidemiology US Preventive Services Task Force White People |
| title | Lung cancer screening use and implications of varying eligibility criteria by race and ethnicity: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A42%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lung%20cancer%20screening%20use%20and%20implications%20of%20varying%20eligibility%20criteria%20by%20race%20and%20ethnicity:%202019%20Behavioral%20Risk%20Factor%20Surveillance%20System%20data&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Williams,%20Randi%20M.&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1812&rft.epage=1819&rft.pages=1812-1819&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.34098&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2648965603%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2648965603&rft_id=info:pmid/35201610&rfr_iscdi=true |