Comparison of Posterior and Lateral Surface Plating for Type B Weber Lateral Malleoli Fractures

Comparison of Posterior and Lateral Surface Plating for Type B Weber Lateral Malleoli Fractures

Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes, radiological outcomes, complication rates, and hardware removal between lateral and posterior surface plating in isolated type B Weber lateral malleolus fractures. Methods It was a retrospective study that compared the outcomes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot and ankle specialist 2024-04, Vol.17 (2), p.155-161
Hauptverfasser: Hegde, Atmananda, Shetty, Chethan, Joseph, Nitin, Mane, Prajwal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 161
container_issue 2
container_start_page 155
container_title Foot and ankle specialist
container_volume 17
creator Hegde, Atmananda
Shetty, Chethan
Joseph, Nitin
Mane, Prajwal
description Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes, radiological outcomes, complication rates, and hardware removal between lateral and posterior surface plating in isolated type B Weber lateral malleolus fractures. Methods It was a retrospective study that compared the outcomes of type B Weber lateral malleoli fractures treated by either lateral surface or posterior surface plating. Radiological and functional outcomes were assessed at regular intervals. The follow-up details and the complications and need for implant removal were collected from the hospital records. Results Our study included 60 patients (male-35 and female-25). The mean age was 41.7 ± 10.5 years. In all, 28 (46.7%) patients received lateral surface plating and 32 (53.3%) patients received posterior surface plating. The mean time gap between the injury and the surgery was significantly more among patients who underwent lateral plate insertion (P < .001). The mean operative time required for both the procedures was comparable, hence nonsignificant (P = .576). The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS) after 2 years of operation was significantly higher for posterior plate insertion (P = .014). The complication rates as well as the implant removal rates were higher in patients with lateral plating (P < .05). Conclusion Posterior surface plating can be considered as the procedure of choice for isolated type B Weber lateral malleolus fractures with respect to better functional outcome, lesser complications rates, and need for implant removal. Level of Evidence: Level III: Economic/decision
doi_str_mv 10.1177/19386400221079197
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2632149958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_19386400221079197</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2632149958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-7e4187bd95c2bd821c6d18a0a711b049d9c42a66ff86e20c4afc2b5e23c8a7d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EoqXwAViQR5aA7SR2PEJFAamIShQxRhfnUqVK4mInQ789rlq6IDHdn_e7J90j5JqzO86Vuuc6zmTCmBCcKc21OiHj3S5SMpanh34HjMiF92vGJJOJPCejOA1SEosxyae23YCrve2orejC-h5dbR2FrqRzCAM09GNwFRikiwb6ulvRKujL7QbpI_3CAt0RfIOmQdvUdObA9INDf0nOKmg8Xh3qhHzOnpbTl2j-_vw6fZhHRmjRRwoTnqmi1KkRRZkJbmTJM2CgOC9YokttEgFSVlUmUTCTQBXAFEVsMlAliyfkdu-7cfZ7QN_nbe0NNg10aAefCxkLnmidZgHle9Q4673DKt-4ugW3zTnLd7nmf3INNzcH-6FosTxe_AYZgLs94GGF-doOrgvv_uP4A2IMf74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632149958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Posterior and Lateral Surface Plating for Type B Weber Lateral Malleoli Fractures</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Hegde, Atmananda ; Shetty, Chethan ; Joseph, Nitin ; Mane, Prajwal</creator><creatorcontrib>Hegde, Atmananda ; Shetty, Chethan ; Joseph, Nitin ; Mane, Prajwal</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes, radiological outcomes, complication rates, and hardware removal between lateral and posterior surface plating in isolated type B Weber lateral malleolus fractures. Methods It was a retrospective study that compared the outcomes of type B Weber lateral malleoli fractures treated by either lateral surface or posterior surface plating. Radiological and functional outcomes were assessed at regular intervals. The follow-up details and the complications and need for implant removal were collected from the hospital records. Results Our study included 60 patients (male-35 and female-25). The mean age was 41.7 ± 10.5 years. In all, 28 (46.7%) patients received lateral surface plating and 32 (53.3%) patients received posterior surface plating. The mean time gap between the injury and the surgery was significantly more among patients who underwent lateral plate insertion (P &lt; .001). The mean operative time required for both the procedures was comparable, hence nonsignificant (P = .576). The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS) after 2 years of operation was significantly higher for posterior plate insertion (P = .014). The complication rates as well as the implant removal rates were higher in patients with lateral plating (P &lt; .05). Conclusion Posterior surface plating can be considered as the procedure of choice for isolated type B Weber lateral malleolus fractures with respect to better functional outcome, lesser complications rates, and need for implant removal. Level of Evidence: Level III: Economic/decision</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-6400</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-7636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/19386400221079197</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35193432</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Foot and ankle specialist, 2024-04, Vol.17 (2), p.155-161</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-7e4187bd95c2bd821c6d18a0a711b049d9c42a66ff86e20c4afc2b5e23c8a7d03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6893-4238 ; 0000-0002-6031-1607</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/19386400221079197$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19386400221079197$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35193432$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hegde, Atmananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Chethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Nitin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mane, Prajwal</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Posterior and Lateral Surface Plating for Type B Weber Lateral Malleoli Fractures</title><title>Foot and ankle specialist</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Spec</addtitle><description>Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes, radiological outcomes, complication rates, and hardware removal between lateral and posterior surface plating in isolated type B Weber lateral malleolus fractures. Methods It was a retrospective study that compared the outcomes of type B Weber lateral malleoli fractures treated by either lateral surface or posterior surface plating. Radiological and functional outcomes were assessed at regular intervals. The follow-up details and the complications and need for implant removal were collected from the hospital records. Results Our study included 60 patients (male-35 and female-25). The mean age was 41.7 ± 10.5 years. In all, 28 (46.7%) patients received lateral surface plating and 32 (53.3%) patients received posterior surface plating. The mean time gap between the injury and the surgery was significantly more among patients who underwent lateral plate insertion (P &lt; .001). The mean operative time required for both the procedures was comparable, hence nonsignificant (P = .576). The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS) after 2 years of operation was significantly higher for posterior plate insertion (P = .014). The complication rates as well as the implant removal rates were higher in patients with lateral plating (P &lt; .05). Conclusion Posterior surface plating can be considered as the procedure of choice for isolated type B Weber lateral malleolus fractures with respect to better functional outcome, lesser complications rates, and need for implant removal. Level of Evidence: Level III: Economic/decision</description><issn>1938-6400</issn><issn>1938-7636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EoqXwAViQR5aA7SR2PEJFAamIShQxRhfnUqVK4mInQ789rlq6IDHdn_e7J90j5JqzO86Vuuc6zmTCmBCcKc21OiHj3S5SMpanh34HjMiF92vGJJOJPCejOA1SEosxyae23YCrve2orejC-h5dbR2FrqRzCAM09GNwFRikiwb6ulvRKujL7QbpI_3CAt0RfIOmQdvUdObA9INDf0nOKmg8Xh3qhHzOnpbTl2j-_vw6fZhHRmjRRwoTnqmi1KkRRZkJbmTJM2CgOC9YokttEgFSVlUmUTCTQBXAFEVsMlAliyfkdu-7cfZ7QN_nbe0NNg10aAefCxkLnmidZgHle9Q4673DKt-4ugW3zTnLd7nmf3INNzcH-6FosTxe_AYZgLs94GGF-doOrgvv_uP4A2IMf74</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Hegde, Atmananda</creator><creator>Shetty, Chethan</creator><creator>Joseph, Nitin</creator><creator>Mane, Prajwal</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6893-4238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6031-1607</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Comparison of Posterior and Lateral Surface Plating for Type B Weber Lateral Malleoli Fractures</title><author>Hegde, Atmananda ; Shetty, Chethan ; Joseph, Nitin ; Mane, Prajwal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-7e4187bd95c2bd821c6d18a0a711b049d9c42a66ff86e20c4afc2b5e23c8a7d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hegde, Atmananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Chethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Nitin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mane, Prajwal</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot and ankle specialist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hegde, Atmananda</au><au>Shetty, Chethan</au><au>Joseph, Nitin</au><au>Mane, Prajwal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Posterior and Lateral Surface Plating for Type B Weber Lateral Malleoli Fractures</atitle><jtitle>Foot and ankle specialist</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Spec</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>155-161</pages><issn>1938-6400</issn><eissn>1938-7636</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes, radiological outcomes, complication rates, and hardware removal between lateral and posterior surface plating in isolated type B Weber lateral malleolus fractures. Methods It was a retrospective study that compared the outcomes of type B Weber lateral malleoli fractures treated by either lateral surface or posterior surface plating. Radiological and functional outcomes were assessed at regular intervals. The follow-up details and the complications and need for implant removal were collected from the hospital records. Results Our study included 60 patients (male-35 and female-25). The mean age was 41.7 ± 10.5 years. In all, 28 (46.7%) patients received lateral surface plating and 32 (53.3%) patients received posterior surface plating. The mean time gap between the injury and the surgery was significantly more among patients who underwent lateral plate insertion (P &lt; .001). The mean operative time required for both the procedures was comparable, hence nonsignificant (P = .576). The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS) after 2 years of operation was significantly higher for posterior plate insertion (P = .014). The complication rates as well as the implant removal rates were higher in patients with lateral plating (P &lt; .05). Conclusion Posterior surface plating can be considered as the procedure of choice for isolated type B Weber lateral malleolus fractures with respect to better functional outcome, lesser complications rates, and need for implant removal. Level of Evidence: Level III: Economic/decision</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>35193432</pmid><doi>10.1177/19386400221079197</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6893-4238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6031-1607</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1938-6400
ispartof Foot and ankle specialist, 2024-04, Vol.17 (2), p.155-161
issn 1938-6400
1938-7636
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2632149958
source SAGE Complete
title Comparison of Posterior and Lateral Surface Plating for Type B Weber Lateral Malleoli Fractures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A58%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Posterior%20and%20Lateral%20Surface%20Plating%20for%20Type%20B%20Weber%20Lateral%20Malleoli%20Fractures&rft.jtitle=Foot%20and%20ankle%20specialist&rft.au=Hegde,%20Atmananda&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=155-161&rft.issn=1938-6400&rft.eissn=1938-7636&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/19386400221079197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2632149958%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632149958&rft_id=info:pmid/35193432&rft_sage_id=10.1177_19386400221079197&rfr_iscdi=true