A comparison of FDDI asynchronous mode and DQDB queue arbitrated mode data transmission for metropolitan area network applications
The performance of the FDDI token ring and IEEE 802.6 DQDB protocols are compared using discrete event simulation models. A metropolitan area network (MAN) of 100 km and with 50 stations was modeled. A 100 Mbps channel is used for both networks with a traffic model with large (1 kbyte) low priority...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on communications 1994-02, Vol.42 (234), p.1758-1768 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1768 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 234 |
| container_start_page | 1758 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on communications |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Burr, W.E. Wakid, S. Xiaomei Qian Vaman, D. |
| description | The performance of the FDDI token ring and IEEE 802.6 DQDB protocols are compared using discrete event simulation models. A metropolitan area network (MAN) of 100 km and with 50 stations was modeled. A 100 Mbps channel is used for both networks with a traffic model with large (1 kbyte) low priority packets and smaller (100 byte) high priority packets. The delay and fairness characteristics of both networks are analyzed. The simulations show that FDDI has advantages in fairness and maximum capacity, while DQDB offers lower delay at all except very heavy loads and has a stronger priority mechanism.< > |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TCOMM.1994.582884 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26317481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>582884</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>28215159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-8d44cb081b45ab9009e92d3a06eb634bed94e3dbddc226a742905e54141bafc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFP3DAQha2KSl2gP6A9-YB6y9ZO7MQ-0l1okUCo0t6jiT1RDUkcbK8QV345XrLi2pNlz_ee5vkR8o2zNedM_9xt7u_u1lxrsZaqVEp8IisupSqYks0JWTGmWVE3jfpCTmN8YIwJVlUr8npJjR9nCC76ifqeXm-3NxTiy2T-BT_5faSjt0hhsnT7d_uLPu1xn6-hcylAQruMLSSg-WGKo4vRZaveBzpiCn72g0swZQkCnTA9-_BIYZ4HZyBlMp6Tzz0MEb8ezzOyu77abf4Ut_e_bzaXt4WpdJ0KZYUwHVO8ExI6nQOhLm0FrMaurkSHVgusbGetKcsaGlFqJlEKLngHvanOyI_Fdg4-h4ipzasaHAaYMMdsS1VyyaX-P1hXvBGKZ5AvoAk-xoB9Owc3QnhpOWsPrbTvrbSHVtqllay5OJpDNDD0-cuMix9CwZmqy8MO3xfMIeLH9OjxBq3Jl_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26317481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of FDDI asynchronous mode and DQDB queue arbitrated mode data transmission for metropolitan area network applications</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Burr, W.E. ; Wakid, S. ; Xiaomei Qian ; Vaman, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burr, W.E. ; Wakid, S. ; Xiaomei Qian ; Vaman, D.</creatorcontrib><description>The performance of the FDDI token ring and IEEE 802.6 DQDB protocols are compared using discrete event simulation models. A metropolitan area network (MAN) of 100 km and with 50 stations was modeled. A 100 Mbps channel is used for both networks with a traffic model with large (1 kbyte) low priority packets and smaller (100 byte) high priority packets. The delay and fairness characteristics of both networks are analyzed. The simulations show that FDDI has advantages in fairness and maximum capacity, while DQDB offers lower delay at all except very heavy loads and has a stronger priority mechanism.< ></description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6778</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0857</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.1994.582884</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IECMBT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Access methods and protocols, osi model ; Applied sciences ; Data communication ; Delay ; Exact sciences and technology ; FDDI ; Media Access Protocol ; Metropolitan area networks ; Network topology ; Optical fiber LAN ; Physical layer ; Telecommunication traffic ; Telecommunications ; Telecommunications and information theory ; Teleprocessing networks. Isdn ; Token networks</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on communications, 1994-02, Vol.42 (234), p.1758-1768</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-8d44cb081b45ab9009e92d3a06eb634bed94e3dbddc226a742905e54141bafc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-8d44cb081b45ab9009e92d3a06eb634bed94e3dbddc226a742905e54141bafc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/582884$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/582884$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4108629$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burr, W.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakid, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiaomei Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaman, D.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of FDDI asynchronous mode and DQDB queue arbitrated mode data transmission for metropolitan area network applications</title><title>IEEE transactions on communications</title><addtitle>TCOMM</addtitle><description>The performance of the FDDI token ring and IEEE 802.6 DQDB protocols are compared using discrete event simulation models. A metropolitan area network (MAN) of 100 km and with 50 stations was modeled. A 100 Mbps channel is used for both networks with a traffic model with large (1 kbyte) low priority packets and smaller (100 byte) high priority packets. The delay and fairness characteristics of both networks are analyzed. The simulations show that FDDI has advantages in fairness and maximum capacity, while DQDB offers lower delay at all except very heavy loads and has a stronger priority mechanism.< ></description><subject>Access methods and protocols, osi model</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Data communication</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FDDI</subject><subject>Media Access Protocol</subject><subject>Metropolitan area networks</subject><subject>Network topology</subject><subject>Optical fiber LAN</subject><subject>Physical layer</subject><subject>Telecommunication traffic</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications and information theory</subject><subject>Teleprocessing networks. Isdn</subject><subject>Token networks</subject><issn>0090-6778</issn><issn>1558-0857</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFP3DAQha2KSl2gP6A9-YB6y9ZO7MQ-0l1okUCo0t6jiT1RDUkcbK8QV345XrLi2pNlz_ee5vkR8o2zNedM_9xt7u_u1lxrsZaqVEp8IisupSqYks0JWTGmWVE3jfpCTmN8YIwJVlUr8npJjR9nCC76ifqeXm-3NxTiy2T-BT_5faSjt0hhsnT7d_uLPu1xn6-hcylAQruMLSSg-WGKo4vRZaveBzpiCn72g0swZQkCnTA9-_BIYZ4HZyBlMp6Tzz0MEb8ezzOyu77abf4Ut_e_bzaXt4WpdJ0KZYUwHVO8ExI6nQOhLm0FrMaurkSHVgusbGetKcsaGlFqJlEKLngHvanOyI_Fdg4-h4ipzasaHAaYMMdsS1VyyaX-P1hXvBGKZ5AvoAk-xoB9Owc3QnhpOWsPrbTvrbSHVtqllay5OJpDNDD0-cuMix9CwZmqy8MO3xfMIeLH9OjxBq3Jl_A</recordid><startdate>19940201</startdate><enddate>19940201</enddate><creator>Burr, W.E.</creator><creator>Wakid, S.</creator><creator>Xiaomei Qian</creator><creator>Vaman, D.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940201</creationdate><title>A comparison of FDDI asynchronous mode and DQDB queue arbitrated mode data transmission for metropolitan area network applications</title><author>Burr, W.E. ; Wakid, S. ; Xiaomei Qian ; Vaman, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-8d44cb081b45ab9009e92d3a06eb634bed94e3dbddc226a742905e54141bafc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Access methods and protocols, osi model</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Data communication</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FDDI</topic><topic>Media Access Protocol</topic><topic>Metropolitan area networks</topic><topic>Network topology</topic><topic>Optical fiber LAN</topic><topic>Physical layer</topic><topic>Telecommunication traffic</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications and information theory</topic><topic>Teleprocessing networks. Isdn</topic><topic>Token networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burr, W.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakid, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiaomei Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaman, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burr, W.E.</au><au>Wakid, S.</au><au>Xiaomei Qian</au><au>Vaman, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of FDDI asynchronous mode and DQDB queue arbitrated mode data transmission for metropolitan area network applications</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on communications</jtitle><stitle>TCOMM</stitle><date>1994-02-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>234</issue><spage>1758</spage><epage>1768</epage><pages>1758-1768</pages><issn>0090-6778</issn><eissn>1558-0857</eissn><coden>IECMBT</coden><abstract>The performance of the FDDI token ring and IEEE 802.6 DQDB protocols are compared using discrete event simulation models. A metropolitan area network (MAN) of 100 km and with 50 stations was modeled. A 100 Mbps channel is used for both networks with a traffic model with large (1 kbyte) low priority packets and smaller (100 byte) high priority packets. The delay and fairness characteristics of both networks are analyzed. The simulations show that FDDI has advantages in fairness and maximum capacity, while DQDB offers lower delay at all except very heavy loads and has a stronger priority mechanism.< ></abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TCOMM.1994.582884</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-6778 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on communications, 1994-02, Vol.42 (234), p.1758-1768 |
| issn | 0090-6778 1558-0857 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26317481 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Access methods and protocols, osi model Applied sciences Data communication Delay Exact sciences and technology FDDI Media Access Protocol Metropolitan area networks Network topology Optical fiber LAN Physical layer Telecommunication traffic Telecommunications Telecommunications and information theory Teleprocessing networks. Isdn Token networks |
| title | A comparison of FDDI asynchronous mode and DQDB queue arbitrated mode data transmission for metropolitan area network applications |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A27%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20FDDI%20asynchronous%20mode%20and%20DQDB%20queue%20arbitrated%20mode%20data%20transmission%20for%20metropolitan%20area%20network%20applications&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20communications&rft.au=Burr,%20W.E.&rft.date=1994-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=234&rft.spage=1758&rft.epage=1768&rft.pages=1758-1768&rft.issn=0090-6778&rft.eissn=1558-0857&rft.coden=IECMBT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TCOMM.1994.582884&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E28215159%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26317481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=582884&rfr_iscdi=true |