Da Vinci SP robotic approach to colorectal surgery: two specific indications and short-term results
Background Da Vinci® Single Port (dvSP) was recently developed. Its application in colorectal surgery is under investigation. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and feasibility of dvSP for intersphincteric (dvSP-ISR), right colectomy (dvSP-RC), and transverse colectomy (dvSP-TC). Surgic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Techniques in coloproctology 2022-06, Vol.26 (6), p.461-470 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 470 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 461 |
| container_title | Techniques in coloproctology |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Piozzi, G. N. Kim, J.-S. Choo, J. M. Shin, S. H. Kim, J. S. Lee, T.-H. Baek, S.-J. Kwak, J.-M. Kim, J. Kim, S. H. |
| description | Background
Da Vinci® Single Port (dvSP) was recently developed. Its application in colorectal surgery is under investigation. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and feasibility of dvSP for intersphincteric (dvSP-ISR), right colectomy (dvSP-RC), and transverse colectomy (dvSP-TC). Surgical indication and short-term results were analyzed.
Methods
All consecutive patients from a prospective database of patients who underwent dvSP-ISR, dvSP-RC, and dvSP-TC at Korea University Anam Hospital from November 2020 to December 2021, were analyzed. Perioperative, pathological, and oncological short-term outcomes were analyzed.
Results
A total of 7 dvSP-ISR, 5 dvSP-RC, and 1 dvSP-TC were performed. Median age was 56.0 (55.0–61.0) years for the dvSP-ISR and 54.0 (44.7–63.5) years for the dvSP-RC/TC. Median body mass index was 22.8 (17.1–24.8) kg/m
2
for the dvSP-ISR and 23.6 (20.8–26.9) kg/m
2
for the dvSP-RC/TC. All dvSP-ISR patients received neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy, including one patient with squamocellular carcinoma who was treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/mitomycin. All other patients, excluding one dvSP-RC patient with Crohn’s disease, had an adenocarcinoma. Median operation time was 280 (240–370) minutes for the dvSP-ISR and 220 (201–270) minutes for the dvSP-RC/TC. Estimated blood loss was insignificant. No intraoperative complications or conversions to multiport/open surgery was reported. Median post-operative stay was 7.0 (6.0–10.0) days for the dvSP-ISR and 5.0 (4.0–6.7) days for the dvSP-RC/TC. Quality of mesorectum was complete for six patients, and nearly complete for one. Median number of retrieved lymph nodes were 21 (17–25) for the dvSP-ISR and 28 (24–49) for the dvSP-RC/TC. Proximal and distal resection margins were tumor free. Four patients experienced post-operative complications not related to the platform which were: ileus, voiding dysfunction, infected pelvic hematoma, and wound infection. Median follow-up was 9 (6–11) months and 11 (7–17) months for the dvSP-ISR and dvSP-RC/TC, respectively. Two patients had systemic recurrence; all others were tumor free.
Conclusions
The dvSP platform is safe and feasible for intersphincteric resection with right lower quadrant access, and right/transverse colectomy with suprapubic access. Further studies are needed to evaluate benefit differences compared to multiport robotic platform. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10151-022-02597-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2630920816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630920816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7addba56fb9971fab7daf0a1b5713ab14ba7b0cd010c1605b693a4b458d6edbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1L5TAUhoM4-P0HXEiWbqo5TdO07kSdURBmYEZxF04-qpHe5pqkqP_e6FWXswgJ5HlfznkI2Qd2BIzJ4wQMBFSsrssRvaxe1sgWQN1VrBF36x9vXrWcy02yndIjYyClgA2yyQV0dS27LWLOkd76yXj69w-NQYfsDcXlMgY0DzQHasIYojMZR5rmeO_i6wnNz4GmpTN-KLCfrDeYfZgSxcnS9BBirrKLCxpdmsecdsmPAcfk9j7vHXLz8-Lf2WV1_fvX1dnpdWUa4LmSaK1G0Q667yUMqKXFgSFoIYGjhkaj1MxYBsxAy4Rue46NbkRnW2e14zvkcNVbpn-aXcpq4ZNx44iTC3NSdctZX7MO2oLWK9TEkFJ0g1pGv8D4qoCpd7lqJVcVuepDrnopoYPP_lkvnP2OfNksAF8BqXxNxZV6DHOcys7_q30DFW6HkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630920816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Da Vinci SP robotic approach to colorectal surgery: two specific indications and short-term results</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Piozzi, G. N. ; Kim, J.-S. ; Choo, J. M. ; Shin, S. H. ; Kim, J. S. ; Lee, T.-H. ; Baek, S.-J. ; Kwak, J.-M. ; Kim, J. ; Kim, S. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Piozzi, G. N. ; Kim, J.-S. ; Choo, J. M. ; Shin, S. H. ; Kim, J. S. ; Lee, T.-H. ; Baek, S.-J. ; Kwak, J.-M. ; Kim, J. ; Kim, S. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Da Vinci® Single Port (dvSP) was recently developed. Its application in colorectal surgery is under investigation. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and feasibility of dvSP for intersphincteric (dvSP-ISR), right colectomy (dvSP-RC), and transverse colectomy (dvSP-TC). Surgical indication and short-term results were analyzed.
Methods
All consecutive patients from a prospective database of patients who underwent dvSP-ISR, dvSP-RC, and dvSP-TC at Korea University Anam Hospital from November 2020 to December 2021, were analyzed. Perioperative, pathological, and oncological short-term outcomes were analyzed.
Results
A total of 7 dvSP-ISR, 5 dvSP-RC, and 1 dvSP-TC were performed. Median age was 56.0 (55.0–61.0) years for the dvSP-ISR and 54.0 (44.7–63.5) years for the dvSP-RC/TC. Median body mass index was 22.8 (17.1–24.8) kg/m
2
for the dvSP-ISR and 23.6 (20.8–26.9) kg/m
2
for the dvSP-RC/TC. All dvSP-ISR patients received neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy, including one patient with squamocellular carcinoma who was treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/mitomycin. All other patients, excluding one dvSP-RC patient with Crohn’s disease, had an adenocarcinoma. Median operation time was 280 (240–370) minutes for the dvSP-ISR and 220 (201–270) minutes for the dvSP-RC/TC. Estimated blood loss was insignificant. No intraoperative complications or conversions to multiport/open surgery was reported. Median post-operative stay was 7.0 (6.0–10.0) days for the dvSP-ISR and 5.0 (4.0–6.7) days for the dvSP-RC/TC. Quality of mesorectum was complete for six patients, and nearly complete for one. Median number of retrieved lymph nodes were 21 (17–25) for the dvSP-ISR and 28 (24–49) for the dvSP-RC/TC. Proximal and distal resection margins were tumor free. Four patients experienced post-operative complications not related to the platform which were: ileus, voiding dysfunction, infected pelvic hematoma, and wound infection. Median follow-up was 9 (6–11) months and 11 (7–17) months for the dvSP-ISR and dvSP-RC/TC, respectively. Two patients had systemic recurrence; all others were tumor free.
Conclusions
The dvSP platform is safe and feasible for intersphincteric resection with right lower quadrant access, and right/transverse colectomy with suprapubic access. Further studies are needed to evaluate benefit differences compared to multiport robotic platform.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1123-6337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1128-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02597-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35182278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Colectomy - methods ; Colorectal Surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Proctology ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotics ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Techniques in coloproctology, 2022-06, Vol.26 (6), p.461-470</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022</rights><rights>2022. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7addba56fb9971fab7daf0a1b5713ab14ba7b0cd010c1605b693a4b458d6edbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7addba56fb9971fab7daf0a1b5713ab14ba7b0cd010c1605b693a4b458d6edbe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6059-5064 ; 0000-0002-3185-8777 ; 0000-0001-6667-9202 ; 0000-0002-4700-3124 ; 0000-0001-6479-9673 ; 0000-0003-4676-9037 ; 0000-0002-4526-5147 ; 0000-0002-9700-9479 ; 0000-0003-0578-5209 ; 0000-0002-2181-4279</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10151-022-02597-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10151-022-02597-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piozzi, G. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, J.-S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choo, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, T.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, S.-J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, S. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Da Vinci SP robotic approach to colorectal surgery: two specific indications and short-term results</title><title>Techniques in coloproctology</title><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><description>Background
Da Vinci® Single Port (dvSP) was recently developed. Its application in colorectal surgery is under investigation. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and feasibility of dvSP for intersphincteric (dvSP-ISR), right colectomy (dvSP-RC), and transverse colectomy (dvSP-TC). Surgical indication and short-term results were analyzed.
Methods
All consecutive patients from a prospective database of patients who underwent dvSP-ISR, dvSP-RC, and dvSP-TC at Korea University Anam Hospital from November 2020 to December 2021, were analyzed. Perioperative, pathological, and oncological short-term outcomes were analyzed.
Results
A total of 7 dvSP-ISR, 5 dvSP-RC, and 1 dvSP-TC were performed. Median age was 56.0 (55.0–61.0) years for the dvSP-ISR and 54.0 (44.7–63.5) years for the dvSP-RC/TC. Median body mass index was 22.8 (17.1–24.8) kg/m
2
for the dvSP-ISR and 23.6 (20.8–26.9) kg/m
2
for the dvSP-RC/TC. All dvSP-ISR patients received neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy, including one patient with squamocellular carcinoma who was treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/mitomycin. All other patients, excluding one dvSP-RC patient with Crohn’s disease, had an adenocarcinoma. Median operation time was 280 (240–370) minutes for the dvSP-ISR and 220 (201–270) minutes for the dvSP-RC/TC. Estimated blood loss was insignificant. No intraoperative complications or conversions to multiport/open surgery was reported. Median post-operative stay was 7.0 (6.0–10.0) days for the dvSP-ISR and 5.0 (4.0–6.7) days for the dvSP-RC/TC. Quality of mesorectum was complete for six patients, and nearly complete for one. Median number of retrieved lymph nodes were 21 (17–25) for the dvSP-ISR and 28 (24–49) for the dvSP-RC/TC. Proximal and distal resection margins were tumor free. Four patients experienced post-operative complications not related to the platform which were: ileus, voiding dysfunction, infected pelvic hematoma, and wound infection. Median follow-up was 9 (6–11) months and 11 (7–17) months for the dvSP-ISR and dvSP-RC/TC, respectively. Two patients had systemic recurrence; all others were tumor free.
Conclusions
The dvSP platform is safe and feasible for intersphincteric resection with right lower quadrant access, and right/transverse colectomy with suprapubic access. Further studies are needed to evaluate benefit differences compared to multiport robotic platform.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1123-6337</issn><issn>1128-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1L5TAUhoM4-P0HXEiWbqo5TdO07kSdURBmYEZxF04-qpHe5pqkqP_e6FWXswgJ5HlfznkI2Qd2BIzJ4wQMBFSsrssRvaxe1sgWQN1VrBF36x9vXrWcy02yndIjYyClgA2yyQV0dS27LWLOkd76yXj69w-NQYfsDcXlMgY0DzQHasIYojMZR5rmeO_i6wnNz4GmpTN-KLCfrDeYfZgSxcnS9BBirrKLCxpdmsecdsmPAcfk9j7vHXLz8-Lf2WV1_fvX1dnpdWUa4LmSaK1G0Q667yUMqKXFgSFoIYGjhkaj1MxYBsxAy4Rue46NbkRnW2e14zvkcNVbpn-aXcpq4ZNx44iTC3NSdctZX7MO2oLWK9TEkFJ0g1pGv8D4qoCpd7lqJVcVuepDrnopoYPP_lkvnP2OfNksAF8BqXxNxZV6DHOcys7_q30DFW6HkQ</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Piozzi, G. N.</creator><creator>Kim, J.-S.</creator><creator>Choo, J. M.</creator><creator>Shin, S. H.</creator><creator>Kim, J. S.</creator><creator>Lee, T.-H.</creator><creator>Baek, S.-J.</creator><creator>Kwak, J.-M.</creator><creator>Kim, J.</creator><creator>Kim, S. H.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-5064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3185-8777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6667-9202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-3124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-9673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4676-9037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-5147</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9700-9479</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-5209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-4279</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Da Vinci SP robotic approach to colorectal surgery: two specific indications and short-term results</title><author>Piozzi, G. N. ; Kim, J.-S. ; Choo, J. M. ; Shin, S. H. ; Kim, J. S. ; Lee, T.-H. ; Baek, S.-J. ; Kwak, J.-M. ; Kim, J. ; Kim, S. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7addba56fb9971fab7daf0a1b5713ab14ba7b0cd010c1605b693a4b458d6edbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piozzi, G. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, J.-S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choo, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, T.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, S.-J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, S. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piozzi, G. N.</au><au>Kim, J.-S.</au><au>Choo, J. M.</au><au>Shin, S. H.</au><au>Kim, J. S.</au><au>Lee, T.-H.</au><au>Baek, S.-J.</au><au>Kwak, J.-M.</au><au>Kim, J.</au><au>Kim, S. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Da Vinci SP robotic approach to colorectal surgery: two specific indications and short-term results</atitle><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle><stitle>Tech Coloproctol</stitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>461</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>461-470</pages><issn>1123-6337</issn><eissn>1128-045X</eissn><abstract>Background
Da Vinci® Single Port (dvSP) was recently developed. Its application in colorectal surgery is under investigation. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and feasibility of dvSP for intersphincteric (dvSP-ISR), right colectomy (dvSP-RC), and transverse colectomy (dvSP-TC). Surgical indication and short-term results were analyzed.
Methods
All consecutive patients from a prospective database of patients who underwent dvSP-ISR, dvSP-RC, and dvSP-TC at Korea University Anam Hospital from November 2020 to December 2021, were analyzed. Perioperative, pathological, and oncological short-term outcomes were analyzed.
Results
A total of 7 dvSP-ISR, 5 dvSP-RC, and 1 dvSP-TC were performed. Median age was 56.0 (55.0–61.0) years for the dvSP-ISR and 54.0 (44.7–63.5) years for the dvSP-RC/TC. Median body mass index was 22.8 (17.1–24.8) kg/m
2
for the dvSP-ISR and 23.6 (20.8–26.9) kg/m
2
for the dvSP-RC/TC. All dvSP-ISR patients received neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy, including one patient with squamocellular carcinoma who was treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/mitomycin. All other patients, excluding one dvSP-RC patient with Crohn’s disease, had an adenocarcinoma. Median operation time was 280 (240–370) minutes for the dvSP-ISR and 220 (201–270) minutes for the dvSP-RC/TC. Estimated blood loss was insignificant. No intraoperative complications or conversions to multiport/open surgery was reported. Median post-operative stay was 7.0 (6.0–10.0) days for the dvSP-ISR and 5.0 (4.0–6.7) days for the dvSP-RC/TC. Quality of mesorectum was complete for six patients, and nearly complete for one. Median number of retrieved lymph nodes were 21 (17–25) for the dvSP-ISR and 28 (24–49) for the dvSP-RC/TC. Proximal and distal resection margins were tumor free. Four patients experienced post-operative complications not related to the platform which were: ileus, voiding dysfunction, infected pelvic hematoma, and wound infection. Median follow-up was 9 (6–11) months and 11 (7–17) months for the dvSP-ISR and dvSP-RC/TC, respectively. Two patients had systemic recurrence; all others were tumor free.
Conclusions
The dvSP platform is safe and feasible for intersphincteric resection with right lower quadrant access, and right/transverse colectomy with suprapubic access. Further studies are needed to evaluate benefit differences compared to multiport robotic platform.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35182278</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10151-022-02597-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-5064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3185-8777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6667-9202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-3124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-9673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4676-9037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-5147</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9700-9479</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-5209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-4279</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1123-6337 |
| ispartof | Techniques in coloproctology, 2022-06, Vol.26 (6), p.461-470 |
| issn | 1123-6337 1128-045X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2630920816 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Abdominal Surgery Adenocarcinoma - surgery Colectomy - methods Colorectal Surgery Gastroenterology Humans Laparoscopy - methods Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Original Article Proctology Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Robotics Surgery |
| title | Da Vinci SP robotic approach to colorectal surgery: two specific indications and short-term results |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A10%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Da%20Vinci%20SP%20robotic%20approach%20to%20colorectal%20surgery:%20two%20specific%20indications%20and%20short-term%20results&rft.jtitle=Techniques%20in%20coloproctology&rft.au=Piozzi,%20G.%20N.&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=461&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=461-470&rft.issn=1123-6337&rft.eissn=1128-045X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10151-022-02597-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2630920816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630920816&rft_id=info:pmid/35182278&rfr_iscdi=true |